Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

    Originally posted by Kstat View Post
    "offensive gold"= two guys.

    He's arguably the top defensive forward in the NBA. You're not paying him to carry you offensively.

    Did you seriously think the max talk was coming from his stellar averages of 12 and 8?
    They're more than just those two offensively. It's just that those two guys are elite shooters/scorers.

    Barnes, Lee, Bogut, Barbosa, Speights, Iggy, Livingston are all plus offensive players in some way (shooting, slashing, finishing). When coupled with two elite shooters/scorers in Curry and Thompson at the pace they play, then you've got offensive gold.

    I think that Green is an extremely valuable piece to what they do. I just doubt he could duplicate that same value to any other team. You don't pay max money to defensive role players that come from outside of your team IMO. Would he fit on the Pistons? Sure. But he wouldn't make them that much better to be worth the max (even if it's the rookie max or whatever)

    You're also overstating his defense if you think it's Artest level. He may be a physical and long defender like Artest, but Green isn't Artest. Artest was probably the best wing defender in the league of his era, and the best since Pippen.

    Comment


    • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

      Originally posted by Since86 View Post
      They've had similiar defensive ratings for the past three years. Green went from playing 14mpg, to 21mpg, to 31mpg all while GS' defensive ratings have stayed pretty consistent. I don't think Green is the player stirring the defensive drink.


      Here's their NBA ranking by defensive efficiency

      2012 (year before the drafted Green): 27th
      2013: 15th (Green 15 mpg)
      2014: 4th (Green 21 mpg)
      2015: 1st (Green 31 mpg)

      Yeah, there's basically been no change at all.

      Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post

      You're also overstating his defense if you think it's Artest level. He may be a physical and long defender like Artest, but Green isn't Artest. Artest was probably the best wing defender in the league of his era, and the best since Pippen.
      He certainly was. And Green is becoming that guy for this decade. He's a legit DPOY candidate in year 3. And he could actually win it.
      Last edited by Kstat; 04-21-2015, 12:52 PM.

      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

      Comment


      • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

        Originally posted by Since86 View Post
        They've had similiar defensive ratings for the past three years. Green went from playing 14mpg, to 21mpg, to 31mpg all while GS' defensive ratings have stayed pretty consistent. I don't think Green is the player stirring the defensive drink.

        We've been hearing about GS defensive prowless for longer than this season.
        Thompson was always a good defender. I think that Bogut and Iguodala have been difference makers for them as well. Another unsung hero defensively is Barnes. I haven't looked at the stats, but looking at the game, he's an athletic plus defender who utilizes his length well.

        Comment


        • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

          Originally posted by Kstat View Post
          And Green is becoming that guy for this decade. He's a legit DPOY candidate in year 3.
          Idk that Draymond is a better defender than Paul George. Against smaller 4's? Yes. But positions 1-3, I'm not thinking so.

          Edit: I hate that I'm coming off as a Green hater, because I love his game. I have since he was a spartan.

          Comment


          • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

            per Zach Lowe:

            Defensive Player of the Year

            1. Draymond Green
            2. Kawhi Leonard
            3. Andrew Bogut

            Leonard has been the league’s best defender, a pouncing terror who prevents the shots you want, disrupts the shots for which you settle, and steals the ball from anyone who tries one too many dribbles within his general vicinity. He is a *******ed menace to society. He can lock down at least three positions, and the Spurs defense has collapsed with Leonard on the bench. But durability matters, and Leonard has appeared in 15 fewer games and logged about 475 fewer minutes than Green.

            That’s enough to swing it to Golden State’s position-less security guard — a cinder block with long arms, quick hands, an unbreakable grip, and an advanced understanding of the floor. Green’s ability to thwart bigger players in the post4 has allowed the Warriors to play smaller and spread the floor with shooting; Kerr has even dared to play heavy minutes with Green at center, and the Dubs defense is just as stingy when Green plays without Bogut, per NBA.com.

            He’s also the key that unlocks Golden State’s ability to switch. Having like-size perimeter players is handy, but there is a limit to how many actions you can switch if you don’t have at least one big guy capable of leaping onto a smaller player during a standard pick-and-roll. Without Green, the whole scheme collapses.

            There is a mechanical nature to defense for most teams. One guy rotates over there, the second guy sees that and, after a slight pause, he rotates to the next spot on the chain. It’s jagged, with small breaks — a video that’s buffering.

            The Warriors defense is fluid. That second rotation starts almost in concert with the first, so that everyone moves in sync. No one is holding still, waiting to figure out the next step in the dance. Green is always early to the right spot, snuffing out drives, darting into passing lanes, and providing exactly the right level of help without losing track of his own guy. What Green and Bogut do in the paint is a freaking ballet — switching assignments on the fly in tight confines, smothering layups, waiting until just the right moment to commit to shooters, and anticipating when those shooters really want to pass.

            Bogut has been Leonard-level brilliant, but in 429 fewer minutes — and about 900 fewer than Green, the equivalent of almost 19 full games. Opponents have shot just 40.9 percent on shots near the rim with Bogut nearby, the third-lowest mark in the league, trailing only Rudy Gobert — one of the final cuts (along with Davis) on this ballot — and Serge Ibaka.

            Gobert is a destroyer at the rim, but he doesn’t have enough experience to match Bogut’s intellect as an all-around deterrent. Watch Bogut when he’s guarding a non-shooting big standing around the elbow. Bogut will ignore him and shift to something more productive: doubling a post-up threat to deny an entry pass, bumping a cutter, or sticking one of his giant mitts into a passing lane. Those little things wall off a team’s first and second options, drain the shot clock, and stack the odds bit by bit against an opponent getting off a good shot.

            Other annual candidates took a half-step back because of injuries (Joakim Noah) or the need to expend more energy on offense (the always outstanding Marc Gasol).

            It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

            Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
            Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
            NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

            Comment


            • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

              Originally posted by Kstat View Post


              Here's their NBA ranking by defensive efficiency

              2012 (year before the drafted Green): 27th
              2013: 15th (Green 15 mpg)
              2014: 4th (Green 21 mpg)
              2015: 1st (Green 31 mpg)

              Yeah, there's basically been no change at all
              And how about a little more context of those?
              2013 OppPPG: 100.3 OppFG%: 43.9
              2014 OppPPG: 99.5 OppFG%: 43.6
              2015 OppPPG: 99.9 OppFG%: 42.8

              So there is 0.8pts and 1.1% ddifferential in three seasons.
              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

              Comment


              • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                Idk that Draymond is a better defender than Paul George. Against smaller 4's? Yes. But positions 1-3, I'm not thinking so.
                That's fine because that was never the debate. Green is a guy that can guard the 3, 4 and occasional 5.

                It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                Comment


                • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                  Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                  "offensive gold"= two guys.

                  He's arguably the top defensive forward in the NBA. You're not paying him to carry you offensively.

                  Did you seriously think the max talk was coming from his stellar averages of 12 and 8?
                  When Roy put up 11/7 and received the max everyone on here and nationally cried out about how overpayed he was despite being the anchor on defense. You think this would be different for Green?

                  Comment


                  • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                    Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                    And how about a little more context of those?
                    2013 OppPPG: 100.3 OppFG%: 43.9
                    2014 OppPPG: 99.5 OppFG%: 43.6
                    2015 OppPPG: 99.9 OppFG%: 42.8

                    So there is 0.8pts and 1.1% ddifferential in three seasons.
                    Sorry chief, but you're the one taking numbers out of context. That's what defensive rating is for. It calculates stops per-possesion instead of PPG (which can be dictated by pace) and FG% (which is useless if you aren't getting rebounds).

                    GSW's defensive rating went from 15th to 1st in two years. You're free to explain how that's possible even though FG% and opponent ppg remained relatively constant.

                    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                    Comment


                    • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                      Originally posted by joew8302 View Post
                      When Roy put up 11/7 and received the max everyone on here and nationally cried out about how overpayed he was despite being the anchor on defense. You think this would be different for Green?
                      Yes, mainly because the league is getting smaller and faster, which is basically what Draymond's game. He's a bit more useful than Roy offensively as well because he can stretch the floor as a PF.

                      FYI, Hibbert's contract really doesn't bother me. If he maxed out again with the increased cap? Sure, but that won't happen.
                      Last edited by Kstat; 04-21-2015, 01:12 PM.

                      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                      Comment


                      • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                        That's an easy answer, teams are scoring more and shooting better the last few seasons lol.
                        "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

                        ----------------- Reggie Miller

                        Comment


                        • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                          Originally posted by Since86 View Post
                          They've had similiar defensive ratings for the past three years. Green went from playing 14mpg, to 21mpg, to 31mpg all while GS' defensive ratings have stayed pretty consistent. I don't think Green is the player stirring the defensive drink.

                          We've been hearing about GS defensive prowless for longer than this season.
                          I don't recall where I heard or read it.....but Kerr has said that Green is the defensive spark that gets the whole Team going on the defensive end. Sure, you have Iggy and Klay doing a good job on the perimeter.....but Green is the guy that is always asked to guards the opposing Team's best scoring offensive Forward.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                            Originally posted by Cactus Jax View Post
                            That's an easy answer, teams are scoring more and shooting better the last few seasons lol.
                            We have a winner.

                            While everyone else's defensive rating has gone up each year since 2012, Golden State's keeps decreasing.

                            I'm pretty sure they're the only team out of 30 that can say that.

                            The Warriors are 14.2 points better with Green on the floor than without him. Other than Curry (Thompson is third), that's the best plus/minus on a team that went 67-15 and had comparable numbers to the 1996 bulls.
                            Last edited by Kstat; 04-21-2015, 01:21 PM.

                            It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                            Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                            Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                            NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                            Comment


                            • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                              Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                              Sorry chief, but you're the one taking numbers out of context. That's what defensive rating is for. It calculates stops per-possesion instead of PPG (which can be dictated by pace) and FG% (which is useless if you aren't getting rebounds).

                              GSW's defensive rating went from 15th to 1st in two years. You're free to explain how that's possible even though FG% and opponent ppg remained relatively constant.
                              You're right, opponent points per game and opponent field goal% when talking about a teams defense, is taking numbers out of context. You've got me.

                              Show me the errors of my ways, and explain what context those numbers have merit in, since it isn't defense.

                              There's more than one tell all stat when talking team defense. Most want to use all numbers available, not limit them to the ones that prove a point correct.
                              Last edited by Since86; 04-21-2015, 01:39 PM.
                              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

                              Comment


                              • Re: The 11th Annual NBA Random Thoughts Thread 2014-2015: Bowties Are Cool

                                Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                                Josh Smith has nothing to do with Draymond Green.

                                And I keep trying to say, we aren't going to get him. The Warriors would match any deal in a hot second. He's their 3rd best player and they just won 67 games. But he's absolutely worth $16 million a year for what he brings.

                                He's a legit stretch 4 that can also handle the ball and defend either forward position at an elite level. You won't find players that versatile on the cheap.
                                I'm just not sure that he's a max player. He deserves a high deal, but to give him max money is a little questionable.
                                Smothered Chicken!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X