Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

    Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
    Lance broke more plays than any Pacer player since Jalen Rose. Is that a bad thing? maybe, maybe not. I mean Michael Jordan used to break the triangle all the time, same with Kobe. Is it a good thing when they do it and a bad thing when lance does it? Depends on the situation. The question I think should be asked is what gets Lance in trouble. What pisses his teammates off? Breaking plays is pone of those things.

    Does seem like he is not given as much freedom with the Hornets as he had here last season. in the long run that might be good for Lance.
    It's hard to say, he had the freedom last night and it was working for him. Then with about two minutes left he demanded the ball and went straight to the cup head down and fell. A play later fumbled a pass to Al Jefferson. Costly turnovers in the last possessions of a close game. A few times coming up court he would wave off Kemba and Kemba would stand there like "no I'm the point" and then Lance would give it to him.

    But all in all Lance had a good game. Will Lance help the Hornets be better than they were last year? I'll just go on record saying no. It's just too obvious that Lance wants to dominate the ball and gets visibly frustrated when he doesn't get the rock.
    Last edited by freddielewis14; 11-03-2014, 08:44 AM.

    Comment


    • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      Lance broke more plays than any Pacer player since Jalen Rose. Is that a bad thing? maybe, maybe not. I mean Michael Jordan used to break the triangle all the time, same with Kobe. Is it a good thing when they do it and a bad thing when lance does it? Depends on the situation. The question I think should be asked is what gets Lance in trouble. What pisses his teammates off? Breaking plays is pone of those things.

      Does seem like he is not given as much freedom with the Hornets as he had here last season. in the long run that might be good for Lance.
      I agree with this approach with Lance. You can argue all you want that Lance needs freedom to impact the game but as often as not the results of this are a net negative. A guy that shows flashes of great play and stupidity that nullifies it. IMO Lance needs micro managed, really all young immature players need direction and coaching. Vogel is a great coach for some players but I don't think he was the best coach for Lance. How Lance responds to this is yet to be seen but I think the approach being taken is the right one for him.
      Why do teams tank? Ask a Spurs fan.

      Comment


      • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

        Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
        We can be having a discussion about Derek Fisher and how much the Knicks are going to the triangle now and next thing ya know...

        What purpose does this rediculous little tidbit provide.

        Comment


        • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

          Originally posted by doctor-h View Post
          What purpose does this rediculous little tidbit provide.
          It's hilarious?
          Time for a new sig.

          Comment


          • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

            http://www.charlotteobserver.com/201...l#.VFec8_nF-hM

            “I went with the team that was playing the best,” a testy Clifford said in his postgame news conference, several times pounding the table with his right hand for emphasis. “I’m going to coach to win.”


            Clifford said of Stephenson: “He just didn’t play very well. Look, he’s trying to find his rhythm. But we’ve got to be organized.”

            “He just didn’t play very well. I coach to win. I went with the team that played the best. The guys that know what they’re doing out there and played the best are the guys that played. The guys that continue to play like that will be the guys that play.”

            But Clifford obviously isn’t happy with his team freelancing its way through a lot of offensive possessions. Stephenson – while not all of the problem – is a big part of that.
            Clifford took pains to praise guard Gary Neal for being “smart,” “organized” and “great” during his news conference. It was Neal (10 points) who took Stephenson’s place for almost all of the fourth quarter.

            Said Clifford: “What I saw in the fourth quarter was smart, inside-out basketball ... Fundamentally sound ... Before that it was laissez-faire, random basketball, which – against a team like (Memphis) – you got no shot.”

            Stephenson made one of his six shot attempts on the night – a layup in the third quarter. He still hasn’t scored in the first half this season.
            Immediately after making that layup, he went one on one on the next possession and missed a 19-foot stepback jumper.


            “We’re learning each other,” Stephenson said of he and his teammates. “We’re trying to figure out each other and I’m learning the offense at the same time. So I’m just trying to get comfortable and learn the offense so I can get comfortable shots.”

            Comment


            • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

              Lance was much better last night, but he and Kemba still are not sharing the ball well. This is on both of them. They don't when to run and when to slow it down. Clifford needs to get this figured out as the head coach.


              Comment


              • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

                I can see both sides of the Lance argument, but I do know one thing.

                I am mesmerized by that GIF! Make me stop watching it! It's hilarious and I'm not sure why.

                Comment


                • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

                  People calling me bitter ex for giving Lance some criticism yet it sparks 4 pages of debate from people rushing to Lance's defense while I don't even post about it for 2 days? If I am the bitter ex then I guess some of you are just the obsessive ex who can't take his picture off the wall.


                  The problem isn't giving Lance credit or giving Lance criticism, it's the emotional responses Lance seems to generate especially from those who seem to think people are hating on him.

                  The biggest problem I see is that Clifford doens't have any idea how to use Kemba and Lance together. They both need the ball and the coach is failing. The other issue is that Al Jefferson is a big man who needs the ball. Al is an alright pick and pop guy, but he's best in post iso situations. Chalotte is a team still of mismatched parts. That is NOT Lance's fault, but it is also why I questioned if the Hornets were the best place for him when he made his decision this summer. The Hornets have now also committed themselves in a big way to Kemba.

                  Lance is in a tough spot because he's not only the "new guy" but his set of skills also make him an easy target to pick on when things don't go well. This happened all the time on PD which also bred the tribe of Lance defenders. But being the new guy on Charlotte is a double whammy. I watched most of the Hornets-Knicks game last night and my opinion is that a trio of Kemba, Lance and Al is not going to work long term and that's not the fault of the 3 individual players, but rather the fault of team management for trying to run a squad with 3 guys who need the ball so badly. I saw Lance relegated to standing in the corner so much last night that it was almost sad to see. Also, in the first half of the game, Clifford was forcing Lance to give the ball to Kemba after every defensive rebound. I think this is absolute insanity, but then I see people who are supposedly Lance supporters criticizing Frank while giving Clifford dap? So far Clifford is failing with Lance, I don't think Lance is failing with Clifford. Lance is who he is and Charlotte should have known that when they signed him, not to mention that from a winning standpoint Lance is the most accomplished player on the Hornets roster. Lance is being forced to defer to Kemba even in the open court, this is going to fail. If Clifford does not change it quickly, Lance will be the one who pays the price because he is the easy one to blame.

                  I want Lance to succeed. That has been my point from day one. I just don't think Charlotte is the place that will happen, at least not with this roster makeup and the blossoming play of MKG puts Lance in an even odder spot in that lineup. I'm not bitter at all, I'm just disappointed that Lance has put himself in a position where I think unfortunately he will end up an easy scape goat if things fail.

                  Lance's arrival in Charlotte reminds me a bit of Stephen Jackson's arrival to the mid 2000's Pacers. Not the same thing definitely because Jackson had the brawl, the strip clubs, etc, but just in terms of pure basketball dynamics I think they both don't really make sense for the rosters they stepped into. Jackson took a lot of blame for the Pacers failings on the basketball court when in reality some of the more established Pacers were much more guilty of the failings on the actual floor. Lance I think could be a similar situation if Clifford doesn't adjust as a coach.

                  Lance needed to land somewhere that needed a ballhandler and an attacker. Indiana is a much more appropriate place for that even with Paul George honestly. Instead he landed on a team that needed a shooter and a defender, and with Gary Neal and the emergence of Michael Kidd Gilchrist, I'm just not sure where Lance fits, because the Hornets are not going to pick Lance over Kemba to run the team or be assertive. It's really just my opinion, but I just wanted to clarify that I am not hating on Lance individually at all. I enjoy watching the guy play, I just don't think he's in the right spot for his game.


                  Comment


                  • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

                    Originally posted by doctor-h View Post
                    What purpose does this rediculous little tidbit provide.
                    If you can't laugh at that then you are way too uptight over this.


                    Comment


                    • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

                      Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                      Hes been getting killed defensively all game first by Shumpert and now by Melo. He did have a pretty nice 3rd qtr driving to the basket.

                      He seems reluctant to shoot an outside jumper for some reason
                      Lance is an attacker, a ball handler, and a scorer. those are his three best attributes. Clifford was forced to put him on Melo when MKG got hurt, not really Lance's fault there. Lance's rep for defense is a product of 2 things, playing next to Paul George and Roy, and his ability to occasionally be physical with Lebron (admittedly a nice trait, but it doesn't work against everyone). Overall, Lance is an average defender really in 1 on 1 situations and a below average defender when defending off the basketball. However, he's an open court beast and a guy who is actually pretty good in the PnR, something Clifford isn't really letting him do yet. The 3rd quarter against the KNicks was the first time all season they gave Lance any freedom on offense which I think is a mistake, but not surprising since that team is clearly committed come hell or high water to Kemba Walker.


                      Comment


                      • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

                        Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                        If you can't laugh at that then you are way too uptight over this.
                        I would laugh if it was funny but it is in no way funny. It is just another cheap shot at Lance done by a Lance hater. Also your comment about the Lance supporters not letting it go is really comical coming from you. You have made up quotes and twisted words to try to justify your point of view. In that game last night Charlotte only started playing well when they finally put Lance in a position to do what Lance can do. It will take time for Lance to adjust to his role on that team and it will take time for the coach to figure out the best way to use him. If you want us to stop talking about this stop taking cheap shots. I would be more worried about how bad the Pacers are right now. If you can't see their limitations and the lack of interest from the fans then you are not being realistic. There were plenty of seats Friday in the lower bowl and that was with a good team with several Indiana ties coming in here. This franchise cannot afford to lose fan support after they just spent many years trying to get it back. I don't think the fans trust this franchise much anymore. Lance was a fan favorite, excited the fan base and will be missed by many of us so just deal with it.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

                          Originally posted by doctor-h View Post
                          I would laugh if it was funny but it is in no way funny. It is just another cheap shot at Lance done by a Lance hater. Also your comment about the Lance supporters not letting it go is really comical coming from you. You have made up quotes and twisted words to try to justify your point of view. In that game last night Charlotte only started playing well when they finally put Lance in a position to do what Lance can do. It will take time for Lance to adjust to his role on that team and it will take time for the coach to figure out the best way to use him. If you want us to stop talking about this stop taking cheap shots. I would be more worried about how bad the Pacers are right now. If you can't see their limitations and the lack of interest from the fans then you are not being realistic. There were plenty of seats Friday in the lower bowl and that was with a good team with several Indiana ties coming in here. This franchise cannot afford to lose fan support after they just spent many years trying to get it back. I don't think the fans trust this franchise much anymore. Lance was a fan favorite, excited the fan base and will be missed by many of us so just deal with it.
                          I'M a Lance hater. ME? The guy who said it was a monumental mistake letting him go and it's going to haunt us? Time to update your spreadsheet I guess.

                          Yeah. Lighten up man. It's sports. Sports are supposed to be fun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

                            Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                            Hes been getting killed defensively all game first by Shumpert and now by Melo. He did have a pretty nice 3rd qtr driving to the basket.

                            He seems reluctant to shoot an outside jumper for some reason
                            Actually if you paid attention Lance started playing well in the second quarter when he continually found the open man and had 5 of his six assists. Shumpert had a good start but he is capable of that. I find it interesting that here in Indiana some complain Lance is a ball stopper. The biggest ball stopper on the Pacers was Hill. Continually dribbling the shot clock down to nothing. You complain about Lance's defense when Hill has been torched by every good quick point guard in the league. I will say Hill is a decent defender off the ball but that is about it. Can't stay in front of his man but you defend him.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Trouble in paradise for Lance

                              Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
                              I'M a Lance hater. ME? The guy who said it was a monumental mistake letting him go and it's going to haunt us? Time to update your spreadsheet I guess.

                              Yeah. Lighten up man. It's sports. Sports are supposed to be fun.
                              Please enlighten me the meaning behind it and why it is funny. I just don't get it at all.

                              Comment


                              • Re: All things Lance Stephenson thread for the next year or so

                                Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                                Lance needed to land somewhere that needed a ballhandler and an attacker. Indiana is a much more appropriate place for that even with Paul George honestly. Instead he landed on a team that needed a shooter and a defender, and with Gary Neal and the emergence of Michael Kidd Gilchrist, I'm just not sure where Lance fits, because the Hornets are not going to pick Lance over Kemba to run the team or be assertive. It's really just my opinion, but I just wanted to clarify that I am not hating on Lance individually at all. I enjoy watching the guy play, I just don't think he's in the right spot for his game.
                                What team is a good fit for Lance I wonder? I ideally see Lance as a third/fourth option on a good team.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X