The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Indiana University Athletics Thread 2017-2018

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by LuckSwagger View Post

    This kind of game is exactly what Crean would have done. That's why it's so disappointing. I really thought we were beyond stuff like this happening anymore.

    At any rate, I'm starting to seriously lose interest in IU basketball. I'm tired of rebuilds and tired of games like this. I'll probably watch a few more games this season, but it's no longer must-see TV for me. Just tired of this program and its 20+ years of drama.
    This is why Crean should've been sent packing sooner... It just delayed the inevitable (firing, rebuild, down year...).

    Of course, it was a trap game for IU and they fell right into it. They were fat and happy after beating ND. Probably, a little spent mentally and physically. Ft Wayne came to play their NBA Finals Game 7 as the underdog. They couldn't 'lose'.... Lose on the scoreboard and it's "Oh well, they got 'em last year and of course they lost the revenge game AT IU!"
    Win on the scoreboard and it's "These guys weren't picked to finish first in their conference?" "The Mastadon coach had a brilliant game plan" "Greatest win in school history!"

    As soon as Ft Wayne figured out they could play with IU their energy just doubled, and IU was already behind the 8 ball and making turnovers and feeding the Mastadon fire.

    Oh well.... This season is going to be like this. The turnovers will be key, as will IU's 3 point shooting and FT's. If the 3's aren't falling, then they CANNOT be missing FT's. Davis is bad enough but Morgan cannot be missing.
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.


    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

    -John Wooden


    • This is a team that needs in between coaching, practice, rest, and prep time between games. I think we can start looking at the schedule and finding competitive games and likely losses just by looking at the schedule more than the opponent.

      They will need to be prepared, practiced, and rested. They will need to play with energy and hustle. They can't afford to be mentally drained, nor physically drained. In a normal Thurs-Sat BT schedule, look for a competitive Thurs game, and a likely Saturday loss.
      Maybe that will change as the season goes on... but I just don't think the talent is there to change that.
      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.


      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

      -John Wooden


      • Disappointing after the ND win, but I have low expectations. I don't think there's much chance this team is consistently competitive - and I don't mean B1G contenders competitive - until more of Archie's recruits are in. Crean's leftovers are not that talented and they've got a lot of bad habits to unlearn. We'll get some games like Duke & ND when we can play with optimal effort and execution based on the magnitude of the opponent, but those will be coupled with these types of miserable misfires. This group is not there talent-wise or mentals-wise.
        I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

        -Emiliano Zapata


        • Originally posted by cdash View Post

          Yeah, I am too. We're a mid-tier B1G program at this point. It is what it is.
          It's a program with a colorful ambiance, passionate large fanbase, and rich ancient history........that produces an incredibly mediocre and dull modern product until consistently proven otherwise (hopefully Archie can do it when his guys come in).


          • I kind of have to agree that this is just who we are as a program now.


            • By my count, this performance against a decimated Wisconsin team is the fourth legitimately embarrassing performance by IU this season.


              • Man, it's brutal. Davis is just awful. The team is just awful.
                I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                -Emiliano Zapata


                • Originally posted by D-BONE View Post
                  Man, it's brutal. Davis is just awful. The team is just awful.
                  Zero effort, zero heart. I wasn't expecting much out of this team, but the effort in some of these games is inexcusable. C- on the first 15 games of the Archie Miller era.


                  • I too had low expectations, but I did think they would play like they care. I could not have imagined a more disinterested, dispassionate performance than what we've seen so far. Clearly they can summon up intensity - ND, Duke - for example. Is this the holdovers, Archie, or simply the radical disconnect between Archie and Crean's approaches?
                    I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                    -Emiliano Zapata


                    • Wonder what the buyout for Archie's contract is. ha ha


                      • We'll see what happens when Archie gets his own players, but this is the third time we've hit the reset button since canning Davis 12 years ago. I'll believe it when I see it. We hire coaches who say all the right cliche Indiana basketball things at the introductory press conference, but then reality hits. I have zero expectations for a program that has been nothing but a mediocre disappointment for almost 25 years, which is virtually my entire memorable life.

                        The Colts gave us elite excitement for a long time with a championship. The Pacers have been one of the more successful franchises of the last 25 years with numerous deep playoff runs. But IU has just been such an overall disappointment for the last quarter century. A bunch of mediocrity and falling short of expectations, with one random deep tournament run in 2002.

                        As D-Bone says, the effort against Duke and ND shows that the ability is there. They just don't care when they're playing lesser opponents.
                        Last edited by Sollozzo; 01-03-2018, 11:58 AM.


                        • #1 Indiana's guards are crap. Decision making is poor and can't shoot.
                          #2 Hartman overall has been a disappointment. I don't have an answer for why that is.
                          #3 I'm sure Archie arrived in Indiana and focused on defense and discipline. Possibly that sucked all of the joy out of the game for players that came to IU to play for the exact opposite of that under Crean.
                          #4 Indiana's depth must be crap because Archie doesn't seem to have much incentive to use the bench... But he could be rewarding the older players for sticking with him and the program. Possibly he made promises to them that he now regrets.
                          #5 Durham hit a rookie wall awfully quickly after a nice start.

                          I do think the team is trying... they're just not getting it. The losses have taken their toll mentally on the team and instead of making them more determined they've had the opposite effect. They need a consistent shooter, and two would be even better. Instead, they've got none. Hartman and Johnson should easily be those shooters. And anyone that Crean recruited should be able to shoot 3's since that is all he cared about anyway. The only answer I have is that Archie focused on defense with players not used to playing defense, and between that focus and players having to spend mental and physical effort on the defensive side of the court, they just lost their mojo. Definitely lost their RoJo.....

                          But the good news is, it appears a player problem, not a system problem. It's just players going from one system to the next and not handling it well and Crean's poor recruiting and declining results coming home to roost. Losing to Wisc at Wisc is nothing new for IU.
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.


                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

                          -John Wooden


                          • Meh, the Fort Wayne game officially put me in "next year" mode with this bunch. Didn't even bother with last night's game.


                            • DeRon Davis out indefinitely with lower leg injury...
                              Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.


                              "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, thatís teamwork."

                              -John Wooden


                              • Originally posted by Bball View Post
                                DeRon Davis out indefinitely with lower leg injury...
                                No big loss. He's been mostly ****, and this is already well past the point of being a throwaway season.