Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

George Floyd Protests and Riots

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by dal9 View Post

    uh, normal people would still hate him, and you clowns would still love him?
    Don't think I need to answer that since he didn't do it. Some liberal-azz comic did it. Biden is just as bad. Yet they get passes because they support handing out the goodies...

    Comment


    • Well, where's the vitriol for Eddie Murphy doing his 'white guy' act ?? Ditto for Dave Chappelle ?? (both hilarious skits BTW . . . . it IS comedy after all).

      Comment


      • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

        Imagine if Trump did that. smh...
        He probably has if someone could find the image. The minstrel type. Central Park 5. Housing discrimination. Right in his wheel house.
        I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

        -Emiliano Zapata

        Comment


        • Waiting for the good apples to come out of the hole at some point.


          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

          Comment


          • Originally posted by D-BONE View Post

            He probably has if someone could find the image. The minstrel type. Central Park 5. Housing discrimination. Right in his wheel house.
            Trump is the definition of a narcissist. More than anything he wants people to fawn over him, praise him, tell him he's great, essentially worship him. He may well be the anti-Christ with all that pride and zero humility. So if you think I'm a fan, you're wrong.

            Yet I think you are confusing the fact he's a supremacist with that having anything to do with race. He thinks he's above everyone else, but he's an equal opportunity supremacist. He also says exactly what's on his mind. He's not hiding the ball from anyone, which is why his supporters like him.

            Edit: I think it may well be the combination of him being a nationalist and a narcissist that get people confused about what he really is.
            Last edited by BlueNGold; 06-25-2020, 11:48 AM.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

              Trump is the definition of a narcissist. More than anything he wants people to fawn over him, praise him, tell him he's great, essentially worship him. He may well be the anti-Christ with all that pride and zero humility. So if you think I'm a fan, you're wrong.

              Yet I think you are confusing the fact he's a supremacist with that having anything to do with race. He thinks he's above everyone else, but he's an equal opportunity supremacist. He also says exactly what's on his mind. He's not hiding the ball from anyone, which is why his supporters like him.

              Edit: I think it may well be the combination of him being a nationalist and a narcissist that get people confused about what he really is.
              You are completely right about him being a narcissist and a nationalist. Being an "equal opportunity supremacist" leaves plenty of room to be racist and sexist too.

              To your point about his narcissism and how the media or his critics treat/react to him, can you imagine if Trump ever came out and apologized for any of his insulting racial comments/actions? Or any of his insensitive/inaccurate comments? Kimmel, Fallon, and others are recognizing, apologizing and promising not to continue a practice that is quickly becoming socially unacceptable.

              Obviously, his narcissism won't allow it, but I don't think that excuses him for taking the heat for the wide ranging implications of his offensive remarks.
              I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

              -Emiliano Zapata

              Comment


              • Originally posted by D-BONE View Post
                Originally posted by VNZLA

                You are completely right about him being a narcissist and a nationalist. Being an "equal opportunity supremacist" leaves plenty of room to be racist and sexist too.

                To your point about his narcissism and how the media or his critics treat/react to him, can you imagine if Trump ever came out and apologized for any of his insulting racial comments/actions? Or any of his insensitive/inaccurate comments? Kimmel, Fallon, and others are recognizing, apologizing and promising not to continue a practice that is quickly becoming socially unacceptable.

                Obviously, his narcissism won't allow it, but I don't think that excuses him for taking the heat for the wide ranging implications of his offensive remarks.
                It would help if the good apples (or more of the good apples) voiced their condemnation of this and promoted their support and commitment to legitimate reform. How about a NASCAR-style show of support/unity for the black officers in that department? Value perhaps more symbolic, but would make a good start.
                I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                -Emiliano Zapata

                Comment


                • Originally posted by vapacersfan View Post

                  To be fair it was not only blackface

                  https://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...-comic-podcast
                  Damn, I mean what the hell. Was he just trying to see how much he could get away with?

                  Making your own Snoop Dog holiday rap song and using the N-word throughout is pretty far off the ledge. I mean that is crazy even for a comedian.

                  Imitating George Wallace, and Carl Malone, Oprah, eh whatever I think celebrities are fair game no matter if you are black or white, as long as you are not overtly bringing their race to the punch line.


                  Another Interesting story from the past week was one of these WHITE social media stars made a video of her self singing a rap song and she used the N-word as the lyrics go, and everyone blew up at her. She had to apologize, the bachelorette franchise got rid of her. Canceled....

                  If music is art, shouldn't these rap artists insist that their work be enjoyed as they intended it to be?

                  Where is the common sense? If you can't get the context of singing along with your favorite rap tune vs. using the word in a conversation or directing it at somebody? These are very different things.

                  I'm not saying that anyone wants to use the word....but we shouldn't be destroyed for singing along with a popular rap song. It's non-sense.


                  You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by D-BONE View Post

                    It would help if the good apples (or more of the good apples) voiced their condemnation of this and promoted their support and commitment to legitimate reform. How about a NASCAR-style show of support/unity for the black officers in that department? Value perhaps more symbolic, but would make a good start.
                    This probably happens less than it should because this entire month of June has been a monologue, not a dialogue. It's been about "teaching" people who supposedly didn't understand whatever. Well, people understand more than you might think. We just disagree.

                    I mean, they are talking about changing the National Anthem over all of this. Fact is, I don't want it changed. All people are doing is demonizing.

                    Really, the last month or so has been confirming. I have thought for at least 20 years that liberals hated America. I think what we are seeing right now is everyone coming out of the closet letting you know exactly what they think....and I was right the entire time.

                    With that said, here's Obama's pastor of 20 years cursing America. None of this should now be surprising to anyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix-AMYos0Js



                    Last edited by BlueNGold; 06-25-2020, 06:48 PM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

                      This probably happens less than it should because this entire month of June has been a monologue, not a dialogue. It's been about "teaching" people who supposedly didn't understand whatever. Well, people understand more than you might think. We just disagree.

                      I mean, they are talking about changing the National Anthem over all of this. Fact is, I don't want it changed. All people are doing is demonizing.

                      Really, the last month or so has been confirming. I have thought for at least 20 years that liberals hated America. I think what we are seeing right now is everyone coming out of the closet letting you know exactly what they think....and I was right the entire time.

                      With that said, here's Obama's pastor of 20 years cursing America. None of this should now be surprising to anyone: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ix-AMYos0Js


                      I doubt the SSB gets replaced as the anthem, but time will tell. I think the demands are upping the ante because nobody at the top is leading on the issue, just ignoring/deflecting/denying/politicking. The president needs to at least be showing some willingness to listen/understand/empathize with the cause. Announcing planning or a blueprint for some type of national dialogue on the issue would be a start. At least admitting that the criminal justice system/law enforcement needs reform would be another. How about announcing a task force to research and plan for the construction of monuments honoring black, brown, indigenous politicians, abolitionists, inventors, historical figures, etc? There's just nothing positive coming out of DC in response to the issue.

                      Meanwhile, congress looks like it will end up playing partisan politics and bog down on reform or end up with some watered down BS. So, either the movement/sentiment will eventually lose steam. Or it will respond with more and more seemingly extreme demands. Not unlike with COVID, it looks like it will be up to the states and localities. But the movement/sentiment itself is quite strong.

                      It's hard to feel your voice is ignored for an entire month. BIPoC and their causes understand how that feels. They've spent centuries in that position. Maybe if we (as a country/government) had taken these causes more seriously before, it wouldn't be as conflictive now. It's ironic that the SSB wasn't replaced as the anthem and statues of Jesus and George Washington toppled under the leadership of, Obama. Yet all hell's coincidentally broken loose under Trump, even if not representative of moderate conservatives, elected and supported primarily by conservatives.
                      Last edited by D-BONE; 06-25-2020, 09:53 PM.
                      I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                      -Emiliano Zapata

                      Comment


                      • Trump on Fox tonight stating that cities like Chicago and Detroit are worse than Afghanistan, Guatemala, and Honduras. Not only does he insult other countries, he insults his own cities. Who's anti-American?

                        I could swear somebody on here told me the poor here lived way better than in the underdeveloped world.
                        I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                        -Emiliano Zapata

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by D-BONE View Post
                          Trump on Fox tonight stating that cities like Chicago and Detroit are worse than Afghanistan, Guatemala, and Honduras. Not only does he insult other countries, he insults his own cities. Who's anti-American?

                          I could swear somebody on here told me the poor here lived way better than in the underdeveloped world.
                          The poor do live better here than the 3rd world. They at least have a chance to better their lives and are supported by the government until they do that.

                          But when he said those cities are worse, what was he talking about? If he was talking about homicides, it's true that the murder rate in Detroit is much higher than Guatemala and Afghanistan. It's about the same as Honduras. The murder rate in Chicago is a bit worse than Guatemala and much worse than Afghanistan.

                          So, on par, yes those cities are worse in terms of murder.

                          BTW, it's not that Afghanistan is really that dangerous. You are far more likely to be killed in Indy. It's that they harbored international terrorists so we had to be there playing wack a mole.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post

                            The poor do live better here than the 3rd world. They at least have a chance to better their lives and are supported by the government until they do that.

                            But when he said those cities are worse, what was he talking about? If he was talking about homicides, it's true that the murder rate in Detroit is much higher than Guatemala and Afghanistan. It's about the same as Honduras. The murder rate in Chicago is a bit worse than Guatemala and much worse than Afghanistan.

                            So, on par, yes those cities are worse in terms of murder.

                            BTW, it's not that Afghanistan is really that dangerous. You are far more likely to be killed in Indy. It's that they harbored international terrorists so we had to be there playing wack a mole.
                            And we spent all that money chasing terrorists in a country safer than Indy and there's still no stability there. And I thought Trump was reeling in all that nation building. But we were there under Obama and we're still there under Trump. I mean an anti-American, liberal Obama wouldn't have even gone after Bin Laden, no?

                            And a pro-American president wouldn't throw our major cities under the bus like that. Who's anti-American now? The narcissist in chief (as diagnosed by you)? Can't he think of something better to do but to insult us and three other (I'm sure he'd term "shithole" countries) at the same time? That's probably a Lincoln statue's worth of bluster there.

                            You state you don't like him. So Biden it is then, right? There is a second chance. Hillary was a trash compactor of a candidate but she wouldn't have had people calling for the SSB to be replaced. Same as the allegedly Muslim, Kenyan Obama - surprisingly not widespread unrest.
                            Last edited by D-BONE; 06-26-2020, 12:21 AM.
                            I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                            -Emiliano Zapata

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                              The poor do live better here than the 3rd world. They at least have a chance to better their lives and are supported by the government until they do that.
                              Out of curiosity, how many 3rd world countries have you lived in?


                              BTW, it's not that Afghanistan is really that dangerous. You are far more likely to be killed in Indy. It's that they harbored international terrorists so we had to be there playing wack a mole.
                              Have you ever served in the Middle East or Afghanistan specifically?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X