Why is it that the first thing that came to my mind when I read that they call the offense "quick" was when Bilbo Baggins called the ring his precious and Gandalf said "it's been called that before"?
As to today's article, no offense to the writer, but honestly couldn't they have just copy and pasted this from almost any article from the last three years when the team is trying to figure out why they are in a losing streak? Every year it's the exact same d@mn thing. We aren't moving on offense, we don't pass the ball, we aren't cutting, blah, blah, blah.
Sorry I could buy this in year one, even to an extent in year two but for God's sake most of these guys have played this before. Yes Collison is new, but that shouldn't matter as every single point guard for the past four years has been new, other than T.J. and since he is playing almost as much as Collison then should that even matter.
Is it possible that maybe just maybe the offense is flawed?
I mean are they purposley just forgetting to move? Are they refusing to move? Or is it that defenses have cut off the lanes and thus forcing people outside the route that the want to take and thus causing a chain reaction of everybody having to try and react to what everybody else is doing?
They need to simplify this and give themselves a set of play that they can run when they need to. Yes they can still run the "quick" (btw Isaiah was a visionary obviously) on occasion, nothing wrong with shaking things up. But sometimes being unpredictable becomes predictable.
Anyway here is today's puzzlement.
http://www.indystar.com/article/2010...se-stuck-place
Written by
Jeff Rabjohns Filed Under
Sports
The frustration is mounting for the Indiana Pacers.
And it isn't just the losses. It's the loss of offense.
It was clear watching the body language of leading scorer Danny Granger. After some of his teammates had showered and dressed following Wednesday's 104-90 road loss to the Washington Wizards, the Pacers' leading scorer was still in his uniform, sitting in a padded chair in front of his locker, his feet in an ice bucket.
"We're not cutting with a purpose. We're not moving with a purpose, and then next thing you know, six seconds on the shot clock and we have to hoist up a shot," he said. "Too many of our possessions end that way, and we've got to figure it out or it's going to be a long season for us."
Heading into today's game against revamped Washington (8-22), the Pacers (13-17) have lost seven of their past nine games. In those nine games, they've scored 90 points or fewer six times.
The Pacers started 11-10 and in those 21 games, they scored 90 or fewer just three times.
"We've got to move," shooting guard Brandon Rush said. "We're settling too much for running plays rather than running our quick stuff that we were earlier in the year. The whole thing is to keep everyone moving as one. Even when we dump in down to Roy (Hibbert), we have to keep moving."
The Pacers' offense runs through the 7-2 Hibbert in the post and Granger on the wing.
Hibbert, the Pacers' second-leading scorer at 13.5 points per game, has been held to single digits six times in December.
Granger is averaging 21.1 points but has been far from consistent. This month, he has had six games of 15 or fewer points.
"The way our offense works, it has to move as a unit. Everyone has really got to be in tune to what we're trying to accomplish on this possession or that possession, and right now we're not doing it. It's very frustrating," Granger said. "I've been in this offense for three years, and I've scored well in it over the past three or four years. This year is just straight not the same, and we've got to figure it out."
When coach Jim O'Brien took over before the 2007-08 season, the team was in transition. With the acquisition of players such as Mike Dunleavy to join Granger on the wing and the more recent drafting of Hibbert, O'Brien's idea was to move from a team that ran half-court sets to one that ran a passing game.
"We felt we had to invent something that would be difficult to guard, that would give our guys the best chance," O'Brien said. "It takes great conditioning. It takes an understanding that you've got to move, figure out where you're going to move and what you're doing in that movement.
"You also have to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of your teammates, who to screen for, who to avoid, and your own strengths and weaknesses."
The starting lineup the Pacers have used about half the season -- Darren Collison, Rush, Granger, Josh McRoberts and Hibbert -- is the second-youngest in the league, so youth is another factor.
Collison also is in his first year with the team.
Running their passing game, which the Pacers refer to as their "quick" offense, O'Brien said the team scores on 50 percent of its possessions. It was successful earlier in the year, leading to road wins over LeBron James and Miami and Kobe Bryant and the defending champion Lakers.
"I'd prefer not to make any calls," O'Brien said of set plays. "I'd rather just run our passing game, but we have not shown the persistence to run and move and get into (it) on a regular basis, and we need to do that."
As to today's article, no offense to the writer, but honestly couldn't they have just copy and pasted this from almost any article from the last three years when the team is trying to figure out why they are in a losing streak? Every year it's the exact same d@mn thing. We aren't moving on offense, we don't pass the ball, we aren't cutting, blah, blah, blah.
Sorry I could buy this in year one, even to an extent in year two but for God's sake most of these guys have played this before. Yes Collison is new, but that shouldn't matter as every single point guard for the past four years has been new, other than T.J. and since he is playing almost as much as Collison then should that even matter.
Is it possible that maybe just maybe the offense is flawed?
I mean are they purposley just forgetting to move? Are they refusing to move? Or is it that defenses have cut off the lanes and thus forcing people outside the route that the want to take and thus causing a chain reaction of everybody having to try and react to what everybody else is doing?
They need to simplify this and give themselves a set of play that they can run when they need to. Yes they can still run the "quick" (btw Isaiah was a visionary obviously) on occasion, nothing wrong with shaking things up. But sometimes being unpredictable becomes predictable.
Anyway here is today's puzzlement.
http://www.indystar.com/article/2010...se-stuck-place
Written by
Jeff Rabjohns Filed Under
Sports
The frustration is mounting for the Indiana Pacers.
And it isn't just the losses. It's the loss of offense.
It was clear watching the body language of leading scorer Danny Granger. After some of his teammates had showered and dressed following Wednesday's 104-90 road loss to the Washington Wizards, the Pacers' leading scorer was still in his uniform, sitting in a padded chair in front of his locker, his feet in an ice bucket.
"We're not cutting with a purpose. We're not moving with a purpose, and then next thing you know, six seconds on the shot clock and we have to hoist up a shot," he said. "Too many of our possessions end that way, and we've got to figure it out or it's going to be a long season for us."
Heading into today's game against revamped Washington (8-22), the Pacers (13-17) have lost seven of their past nine games. In those nine games, they've scored 90 points or fewer six times.
The Pacers started 11-10 and in those 21 games, they scored 90 or fewer just three times.
"We've got to move," shooting guard Brandon Rush said. "We're settling too much for running plays rather than running our quick stuff that we were earlier in the year. The whole thing is to keep everyone moving as one. Even when we dump in down to Roy (Hibbert), we have to keep moving."
The Pacers' offense runs through the 7-2 Hibbert in the post and Granger on the wing.
Hibbert, the Pacers' second-leading scorer at 13.5 points per game, has been held to single digits six times in December.
Granger is averaging 21.1 points but has been far from consistent. This month, he has had six games of 15 or fewer points.
"The way our offense works, it has to move as a unit. Everyone has really got to be in tune to what we're trying to accomplish on this possession or that possession, and right now we're not doing it. It's very frustrating," Granger said. "I've been in this offense for three years, and I've scored well in it over the past three or four years. This year is just straight not the same, and we've got to figure it out."
When coach Jim O'Brien took over before the 2007-08 season, the team was in transition. With the acquisition of players such as Mike Dunleavy to join Granger on the wing and the more recent drafting of Hibbert, O'Brien's idea was to move from a team that ran half-court sets to one that ran a passing game.
"We felt we had to invent something that would be difficult to guard, that would give our guys the best chance," O'Brien said. "It takes great conditioning. It takes an understanding that you've got to move, figure out where you're going to move and what you're doing in that movement.
"You also have to recognize the strengths and weaknesses of your teammates, who to screen for, who to avoid, and your own strengths and weaknesses."
The starting lineup the Pacers have used about half the season -- Darren Collison, Rush, Granger, Josh McRoberts and Hibbert -- is the second-youngest in the league, so youth is another factor.
Collison also is in his first year with the team.
Running their passing game, which the Pacers refer to as their "quick" offense, O'Brien said the team scores on 50 percent of its possessions. It was successful earlier in the year, leading to road wins over LeBron James and Miami and Kobe Bryant and the defending champion Lakers.
"I'd prefer not to make any calls," O'Brien said of set plays. "I'd rather just run our passing game, but we have not shown the persistence to run and move and get into (it) on a regular basis, and we need to do that."
Comment