Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

    Originally posted by spazzxb View Post
    ...My priorities for this season?

    Culture change:check
    young talented core: check
    flexibility for bird to finish constructing this team without being in a position of weakness: check
    players working together and growing together: check
    Players that play hard: check
    hungry players: check
    time for players to develop: WIP


    I want Bird to do exactly what he has been doing; being patient and makeing smart moves. My Top priority this season is to keep Morway and Bird. I also Want to win as many games as we can and do the very best we can while the team continues to evolve.. I don't think the youngans need spectators in order to grow.
    I've stated similar priorities for the season that include many of yours, although your wording regarding "flexibility" is much better. You bring up a very good point regarding Bird and Morway... I also believe that continuity would be helpful for the next couple of drafts.

    I believe the rumored trade, although I do not believe for a moment that it is an actual rumor, reduces the flexibility that Bird and Morway would have by cutting into the cap space that the Pacers will have without returning a valuable piece to the puzzle.

    There is nothing exciting about Redick. Take him, leave him. Do we really care one way or the other? Is he not a piece whose all-around abilities could be found in several other cheaper possibilities? I believe we drafted George with the intent of filling the role that Redick would have for us... at least initially... long-term it was hoped that George would eventually start.

    So, if we are going to look at SGs at all, why mess around with considering a reserve for 7.5M? Since we have Rush and George already, would it not be wiser to try to find a bonafide starting SG that we could sign for 10-10.5M instead? For 3M more than Redick, I would personally rather have a starter... if we are going to look at SGs at all.

    For the present season, the trade would seem to create more of an imbalance than currently exists by removing reducing the frontcourt to Hibbert, SJones, Hansbrough and McRoberts. I believe the trade would result in a large increase in Posey being used in the PF role. With Foster now apparently healthy and perhaps playing more minutes, a further result of trading Foster for Redick might also be a slight decrease in total rebounds.

    Comment


    • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

      Originally posted by Peck View Post
      I have some bad news for some of you, great news for others.

      Jeff Foster is not an option in trade talks. Jeff will only be traded because either he asks for it, which he has already made it perfectly clear early this year he does NOT want to leave or if he is part of some blockbuster trade that allows whatever team he is traded to to buy him out and then return to the club (like Big Z last season).

      Right now the club believes & rightfully so that Jeff is one of the most popular members of our club & they are also into the legacy thing now that he has been here so long.

      Jeff will not be traded in a player for player trade.

      I'm not saying this is what I think should be, I'm just saying that this is what I totally believe.

      My thought is that like all players if we can get something better than by all means, however like Reggie longevity equals success and in Jeff's case I think he can still offer something to the club in both a teaching older brother type role or even in spot min. on the floor.
      Jeff stated he wanted to retire a pacer and that wish will be honored this season. But it also means he will likely not be given a new contract for next season.

      Comment


      • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

        Originally posted by Peck View Post
        I have some bad news for some of you, great news for others.

        Jeff Foster is not an option in trade talks...
        Yes... totally agree. I believe Bird is just as loyal as Donnie ever was, especially to a player that has been with the team for so long and that he actually coached.

        I think to a lesser degree, this same factor might also play into Dunleavy being retained. Certainly Dunleavy has not spent his entire career with the Pacers, but he has been a knowledgeable, loyal player and is in a position where his continued service is desired by his present coach. Bird was known as a smart player; I could see where a player like Dunleavy who is considered to be "headsy" would be appreciated greatly by Bird. I believe that whether Dunleavy is retained will come down entirely to dollars and whether he is willing to allow himself to be slotted into a salary range desired by Bird.

        Comment


        • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

          Reddick might not be such a bad idea if we can include some other players.

          Since this years free agent pool is so bad, we could let this contract (and Posey's) expire after next season if we wanted to and have a lot of flexibility. (I assume it's 100% unguaranteed, I don't know for sure.)


          As Peck said, it's highly unlikely that we trade Foster, but I feel Posey has taken up part of the leadership role which might make Bird and Morway more willing to consider it.

          We could trade trade Foster & D.Jones for J.J, Ryan Anderson (to spread the floor) and Daniel Orton, including Gortat's trade exception to make the trade work. Only concern is staying under the tax by Feb.

          Reddick won't see a lot of playing time with Gilbert, Richardson and Jameer and they still have Quentin Richardson. They could use a bit of defense as well.

          Ryan Anderson has barely played this season and is behind Malik Allen on the Magic's depth chart. Last year I thought he did quite well and still is young and on a cheap deal.

          D. Jones is just sitting on the active list anyway, and will be making near 3mil next few years as well. It partly offsets the logjam at SG.

          Orton is just a nice project who is just having a horrible NBA experience so far. He has just had knee surgery and will be out for a while anyway. This year he just shouldn't see any playing time for a decent playoff team.

          In two years, if Paul George (or Lance for all we know) is ready to take on a major role than we can either trade/cut J.J. quite easily.

          I agree with other posters that we still don't really know what to expect with Foster. Will he be able to stay away from back trouble if he played more minutes/games? Would the Magic be interested in having a back-up center who they cannot yet trust to stay healthy?

          And besides, another former Duke player, a stretch forward and a talent with knee trouble. It all sounds a bit familiar somehow...

          Comment


          • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

            Originally posted by CableKC View Post
            I agree on Foster.

            IMHO....I think that Foster is only going to improve and get back into "game-shape". ...if we don't get the type of offers that are blowing Bird away....we'll keep him for the inevitable playoff push.
            We will need him during the season and during the playoffs. I don't trust Hibbert to stay out of foul trouble against decent opponents. At least not yet.

            Comment


            • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

              I see absolutely no reason for the Pacers to do this trade. All it does is give us a younger version of Dunleavy at a position that we already have a better player in Rush and a player with much higher potential in George. To top it off we would be trading away Foster who plays a position with very little depth.

              Comment


              • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                Orlando's greatest need is for a starting 4 and back up center. Our greatest need is for a starting 4 and possibly a back up center. I'm really not sold on the back up center need for this team though if Foster is healthy and I think he is. We're set at the sg position for now and hopefully for the future with Paul George and Rush. Why would we want to bring in yet another back up shooting guard? I might see it if an all star quality 2 came along but I wouldn't tie up more salary for another backup 2. Unless a trade for an real difference maker comes along that Bird just can't say no to, then I think Foster will be with us, and he should be.
                This trade would make no sense to me. We need to find a trade that brings in another big man, not a trade that sends one out.
                Why do teams tank? Ask a Spurs fan.

                Comment


                • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                  Why make a trade to make a strong team even stronger in Orlando, especially in your own conference? Pass

                  "I've got an idea--an idea so smart that my head would explode if I even began to know what I'm talking about." - Peter Griffin

                  Comment


                  • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                    Originally posted by joeyd View Post
                    We will need him during the season and during the playoffs. I don't trust Hibbert to stay out of foul trouble against decent opponents. At least not yet.
                    That's why I think that Bird will only move him for the right price.
                    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                    Comment


                    • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                      Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                      One more thing....this is pure 'spitballin' on the part of the Writer. My guess is that he pointed out the obvious.....the Magic now have a huge platoon of Wing Players and they need to thin out the herd while looking for more depth in their non-existent Frontcourt. He essentially threw out a listing of Big Men that had expiring Contracts.

                      IMHO.....the only trade scenario that I can come up with is to wait until the trade deadline and figure out some 3-team Trade with the Magic where the Pacers send out Foster and Dunleavy ( or TJ ) and get back JRich. Dunleavy would then be sent to some 3rd Team while that 3rd Team sends back another Player to the Magic. JRich is the only Player that makes any sense for the Pacers in the short term.
                      If that is possible thats pretty good. J Rich turns 30 in less than a month. I would like that deal but don't see the Magic just taking that for him, he would probably command a 1st as well.

                      Comment


                      • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                        The only reasons why I do not want to consider Reddick is because he's not Starting material.
                        Jason Terry has made his living being a 6th man. Redick can put up points the same and will continue developing his game and growing as a player.

                        Comment


                        • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                          Originally posted by Hibbert View Post
                          Jason Terry has made his living being a 6th man. Redick can put up points the same and will continue developing his game and growing as a player.
                          But we have BRush..who is better..and Paul George..who has potential. And if we really want someone like Redick..why not resign Dun to a cheaper contract..

                          Comment


                          • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                            Originally posted by BlueNGold View Post
                            The bottom line is that Redick will be a backup even on the Pacers. A backup is not worth that amount of money. Also, I don't think we have a worse contract on the roster simply due to the length. Dude will compete for minutes with George...who will be much, much better before JJ's contract is over, Rush who is already much, much better simply because he blows JJ off the earth on D, and Granger...who of course is on a different planet as well.

                            Seriously, what do you do next year when George, Rush and Granger are all obviously much better players? While he can shoot arguably better than even those three who are very good themselves, he is not even remotely as good defensively.

                            This really is Redickulous.
                            How do you figure PG will be better or even pan out? Dude has yet to show anybody anything and cant even crack this teams weak @$$ rotation, thats not saying much. Sure he has the potential but what does that do unless he turns himself into that player he can be. JJ is a better defender than Mike, hands down.

                            Comment


                            • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                              Originally posted by speakout4 View Post
                              Sometimes I wonder also. The guy scores 9 ppg, does not start, and has been in the league 4 years. Assists and rebounds are not impressive and he is small for a SG.

                              Obviously you see something the rest of us can't or we see something you can't. Lots of guys are 25,26 so i don't know why that matters.

                              It's not between Dun and Redick. We have the potential to do better than both. As for Dun he will be cheaper than Redick. Exactly when did Redick become this awesome player? Kapono is also automatic from deep.

                              We need to think large. We don't need to denigrate Redick to suggest that he isn't the answer. He's just ok.
                              Hey, your guy Mikey starts and only scores 12 points a game playing more than 6 minutes more a game. He's just ok. You can think large all you want but you can only do what is realistic.

                              Comment


                              • Re: JJ Redick for Jeff Foster trade rumor

                                Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                                But we have BRush..who is better..and Paul George..who has potential. And if we really want someone like Redick..why not resign Dun to a cheaper contract..
                                Because Dun is getting old and has never done anything in the NBA, anywhere he has played.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X