The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

what will have to occur excite you about next season?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • what will have to occur excite you about next season?

    Yes it's a big lull but after considering what we have to look forward to I could be excited if the following were to occur.

    1. JOB is gone. A no-brainer but not the entire reason for the team's poor performance. It doesn't matter who replaces him for the next year or two as the team restocks with new draftees.

    2. Hans is healthy. I believe he can be a very exciting and important player for the pacers for many years to come. At least 10 points and 10 rebounds per as a starter or off the bench but clearly a major asset.

    3. Some consistent minutes from Foster and his leadership. Probably one of the two players who are capable leaders.

    4. Trading Rush. Sorry but after 18 years of Reggie watching Brandon's reluctance to shoot is just hard to stomach. A SG should shoot. I like his defense but Dhantay can defend as well and neither one is a starter. Trade him before everyone else realizes he is like Mo Petersen. Start Dun at SG.

    5. Give AJ a real shot at the point when he recovers.

    6. Convince Granger that he needs to improve his defensive game. He needs to play within an offensive-defensive system and does not need to put up just points-see point #1.

  • #2
    Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

    Healthy Hansbrough would be great, Jim leaving would be welcome, a trade for a player or two closer to Danny's talent would be good. Trading Murphy would be very nice.


    • #3
      Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

      I'd like to see Jim get replaced but in the end it probably won't make a big difference for this season. Might as well save the money and put up with it for one more year.

      I think the best options for the Pacers to improve are through the draft. They are unlikely to get a superstar but there are several players who can come in and help the Pacers out. So for me i'd like to see the Pacers have at least 2 picks in the first round, maybe 3 depending on who is available. I don't know if excite is the right word but I would be extremely happy if the Pacers were picking more than once in the first round of this years draft.

      This won't be known until the season starts but I am anxious to see how Roy Hibbert and AJ Price have improved. I'd add Rush to the list but I don't think he is in the future plans of the Pacers. I was really impressed with AJ based on where he was picked. It'd be nice to see Tyler healthy.


      • #4
        Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

        I'd like to see Hansbrough healthy but even if he is, just how much playing time will he get with our current coach?

        The draft is a wash. Other than Wall I don't see anyone that could really take this team to the next level in 10-11.

        We'd have to replace coach or make some bold trades to get me excited about the coming year.

        11-12 is a whole different story.
        Last edited by Jose Slaughter; 06-13-2010, 07:30 PM.


        • #5
          Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

          To excite me this season?? Get rid of O'Brien and I'd be excited--we could win just 30 games again this next season and I'd still be happy as long as Jim was gone as anybody else besides him in this world would realize to not play 2 PGs at once and not to play a wing player in the post all game long (among with other horrible-looking lineups and gameplans).


          • #6
            Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

            Originally posted by ChristianDudley View Post
            To excite me this season?? Get rid of O'Brien and I'd be excited--we could win just 30 games again this next season and I'd still be happy as long as Jim was gone as anybody else besides him in this world would realize to not play 2 PGs at once and not to play a wing player in the post all game long (among with other horrible-looking lineups and gameplans).
            I'll add in addition to this that I would rather lose games and not be laughed at than to lose and be laughed at because of our awful-looking lineups O'Brien puts out there [2 undersized PG's at once, Murphy at center, Murphy playing all game long while missing everything he puts up and playing 0 defense, etc].


            • #7
              Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

              Don't pick 10th. Move it with whatever for multiple picks, the 2, or a significant vet contributor, preferably at PG. I don't care if they are the long-term solution or not, Parker, Felton, Maynor, Collison. Any of those would be welcome compared to what we had to suffer through last year. And, true, Earl Watson played solid ball the latter part of the season as the starter. I say this assuming he won't back, but even if he is.
              I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

              -Emiliano Zapata


              • #8
                Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                I'll get excited about the Pacers when the first game starts!


                • #9
                  Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                  Well obviously removing O'Brien would increase my excitement immensly.

                  However knowing that is not going to happen about the only thing I can think that would make me even slightly excited would be to move Murphy and not let Foster play more than 10 min. a game.

                  We need to accept the fact that this next season we are not going to be great and therefor we, once again, need to see what McRoberts, Hansbrough & Hibbert can do.

                  Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13


                  • #10
                    Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                    My Top 10!

                    1) -A productive draft (picks/ trades, or both).
                    2) -A Healthy Hansbrough.
                    3) -Aquiring a new PG (Collison, Sessions,.?.)
                    4) -Danny committed to leading, playing great D every nite!
                    5) -Consistent min's/ opportunity for McBob!
                    6) -Rush having a breakout year, playing w/ confidence consistently fron day 1.
                    7) -Moving Murph (by the deadline, if not sooner) for very good value!
                    8) -Moving TJ for anything of value.
                    9) -Replacing JO'B w/ a coach & (& staff) w/ winners + recruitors for '11.
                    10) -Seeing everyone happy w/ a new CIB deal, hearing they are here to stay!
                    "Larry Bird: You are Officially On the Clock! (3/24/08)"
                    (Watching You Like A Hawk!)


                    • #11
                      Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                      Just get rid of this coach and a lot of other things would start to fall into place. Well, also they need to hire a talented coach to replace this bozo. I guarantee Granger and Rush would improve under a better coach.

                      I'm hoping Hans is OK next season. I'm fine if he performs like a rookie because he basically is one. He didn't get much of a chance to play last year, and he was never at 100% when he did. I also want to see Price recover. That guy has been through a lot of serious injuries.

                      I'd be pumped if we were able to snag Udoh. I really hope we don't end up with yet another jumpshooter instead. I want someone who can play defense inside to help Hibbert.


                      • #12
                        Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                        Just bring on board a player with promise!


                        • #13
                          Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                          Getting rid of O'Brien is the only thing that would excite me about next season. All other moves (good trades, draft, Tyler's health, etc.) will excite me about the future. But until O'Brien is gone, those other things will be partially/fully wasted.


                          • #14
                            Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                            Getting rid of OB seems to be #1 on most people's list. I don't think that will happen next year, but we can dream. My list:

                            1. Of course gettugn rid of OB.
                            2. Either drafting or trading for someone who is young with a lot of potential. Not drafting someone who is NBA ready and is already at their ceiling.
                            3. If we are stuck with OB, making him play the young guys more. Let McBob and Hansbrough (if healthy) play the majority of the minutes at the PF spot. Give Rush and Price consistent minutes.
                            4. Get a new PG who is young and has potential to pair with Price.


                            • #15
                              Re: what will have to occur excite you about next season?

                              I would say trading #10, but I think that's such a given now I can't say it makes me excited. Maybe who we get with it will.

                              Of course, like everyone I bet, that excitement is tempered by Jimmy. Somebody like Turner (won't happen) would obviously get me excited. Somebody like Collison (who I still like), not so much. He'd still be playing in this crappy *** system.

                              I'm really starting to believe that I won't be excited until next summer, just in time for the lockout to start.
                              Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!