The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Game #74 Pacers vs Celtics

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Game #74 Pacers vs Celtics

    Revenge game? After OT loss at home?

    Friday, March 24 at 7:00 PM ET at TD Garden

    Game Preview

    If the first two games were any indication, the regular season finale between the Indiana Pacers and Boston Celtics could prove another classic. But this time around, with just nine games left on the schedule, a win could mean a little more for either team.

    The Pacers (33-40) will make stop No. 3 of their four-game road trip on Friday when they take on the Celtics (50-23) at TD Garden.

    As of Wednesday night, the Pacers were 1.5 games back of 10th place in the Eastern Conference standings. Seeds one through six will automatically make the playoffs while seven through 10 advance to the Play-In.

    The Chicago Bulls (34-47) were in 10th on Wednesday, while spots nine through six were occupied by the Toronto Raptors (35-38), Atlanta Hawks (36-36), Miami Heat (39-34) and Brooklyn Nets (39-33). Out of those teams, the Pacers will just play just one of them – the Hawks this Saturday – before the regular season ends.

    Boston enter the game with the second-best record in the East, trailing the Milwaukee Bucks (52-20), but are just a half game ahead of the Philadelphia 76ers (49-23).

    PLAYOFF PICTURE: Track the Latest Standings, Remaining Schedules, and More >>

    If Indiana beats Boston, it will be the first season series won by the Pacers over the Celtics since the 2013-2014 campaign.

    The teams are 1-1 thus far, with both teams winning on the road. The Pacers won 117-112 on Dec. 21 but Celtics took an overtime win, 142-138, on Feb. 23.

    Indiana comes into the matchup off an impressive, season-sweeping win over the Raptors.

    Rookies Andrew Nembhard and Bennedict Mathurin, who are both from Canada, shined in the win. Nembhard scored 25 points to go along with 10 assists – including making the game-clinching 3-pointers in the 35 seconds – and Mathurin scored 15 points in his second game back from injury.

    The Pacers shot 55.8 percent from the field while holding the Raptors to 43.8 percent overall and 20.6 percent from 3-point range. Six Pacers players scored in double figures.

    Nembhard, the 31st overall pick in the 2022 draft, has been superb in the last six games with All-Star point guard Tyrese Haliburton out with a sprained ankle, averaging 17.9 points, 6.3 assists and 2.2 rebounds per game. The rookie has scored at least 22 points in four of his last five games.

    Haliburton and Chris Duarte are both questionable heading into the game against Boston.

    Despite going 5-5 over their last 10 games, Boston has been among the best teams in the league all season. The Celtics started the season 21-5 before going into the All-Star break with a record of 42-17.

    Boston is led by the familiar star tandem of Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown. This season, the two have each scored 30 points or more in the same game nine times, which is the most by any duo over the last 30 years outside Kobe Bryant and Shaquille O’Neal (10 in 2000-2001, 12 in 2002-2003).

    Tatum is averaging 30.1 points per game on 45.9 percent shooting, 8.9 rebounds and 4.7 assists while Brown is putting up 26.7 points on 49.2 percent shooting, 6.9 rebounds and 3.4 assists this season.

    Boston also boasts the reigning Defensive Player of the Year in Marcus Smart as well as Pacer point guard Malcolm Brogdon, who is considered one of the leading contenders for this year’s Sixth Man of the Year award.

    The Celtics come into their game against Indiana with a Tuesday road win over the Sacramento Kings (43-29). Tatum scored 36 points in the game and Brown had 27.

    In both games between the Pacers and Celtics this season, at least one player has scored more than 40 points while a player on the opposite team has dropped 30-plus points. In game one, a Pacers win, Haliburton scored 33 points and Tatum had 41. The second game saw Pacers center Myles Turner drop 40 and Tatum register 31.

    After taking on the Celtics, the Pacers will conclude their four-game road trip at the Hawks on Saturday.

    Projected Starters

    Pacers: G - Andrew Nembhard, G - Buddy Hield, F - Bennedict Mathurin, F - Aaron Nesmith, C - Myles Turner

    Celtics: G - Marcus Smart, G - Derrick White, F - Jayson Tatum, F - Jaylen Brown, C - Al Horford

    Injury Report

    Pacers: Chris Duarte - questionable (sore left ankle), Tyrese Haliburton - questionable (sprained right ankle), Kendall Brown - out (right tibia stress fracture)

    Celtics: Jaylen Brown - available (facial fracture/face mask), Payton Pritchard - doubtful (left heel pain), Danilo Gallinari - out (left knee ACL repair)

    Last Meeting

    Feb. 23, 2023:In the first game following the All-Star break, the fans at Gainbridge FIeldhouse were treated to an offensive showcase.

    Unfortunately for the supporters of the Blue & Gold, the Pacers came out on the wrong side of a 142-138 overtime loss to the then-first place Celtics.

    The teams were tied at 138 in overtime before Tatum hit a pair of free throws and then tipped-in a basket off the glass with 10 seconds remaining to help secure the win.

    In all, there were 17 lead changes in the game.

    Tatum scored 31 points while pulling down 12 rebounds to lead the Celtics, Brown added 30 points and 11 rebounds and Brogdon had 24 points off the bench. Turner led all scorers by matching his career-high of 40 points (13-for-15 FG), Haliburton collected 22 points and 14 assists and Mathurin came off the bench and scored 19 points.

    Overall, the Pacers finished one 3-pointer shy of tying the franchise record for shots made from deep in a game by going 22-for-39.

    Indiana outshot Boston 52 percent to 51 percent and made four more 3-pointers than the visitors. However, the Celtics won the rebounding margin 50-37 and points in the paint difference 60-44.

    • Boston owns the all-time regular season series over Indiana 105-83, including a 65-28 record at home.
    • Indiana has a record of 5-8 on the first legs of back-to-backs this season.
    • Nembhard moved into third place for most assists by a Pacers rookie in a season on Wednesday, passing Sidney Lowe (269, 1983-1984). Nembhard currently has 272 assists and trails just Chuck Person (295, 1986-1987) and Jamaal Tinsley (647, 2001-2002) in the Pacers rookie record book.
    • Mathurin, who played most of the season off the bench, has started the last two games for the Pacers since returning from an ankle injury.

    Broadcast Information (TV and Radio Listings >>)

    TV: Bally Sports Indiana - Chris Denari (play-by-play), Quinn Buckner (analyst), Jeremiah Johnson (sideline reporter/host)

    Radio: 93.5/107.5 The Fan - Mark Boyle (play-by-play), Eddie Gill (analyst), Pat Boylan (studio host)


    After a four-game road trip, the Pacers will return to Gainbridge Fieldhouse to host Luka Doncic and the Dallas Mavericks on Monday, March 27 at 7:00 PM ET. Find Tickets >>


  • #2
    And clown Pacers are bringing Hali back
    @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


    • #3
      Man has this season flown by. Only 9 games left in the regular season. The next 2 games could determine which direction the Pacers are headed. I can say I have enjoyed this season way more than the last 3.


      • #4
        Buddy’s out of the starting lineup


        • #5
          Not a single player hitting the offensive board


          • #6
            Benn must have butterfingers


            • #7
              Lmao this game is comical


              • #8
                If Tyrese starts getting calls he is going to be a monster.


                • #9
                  Turner needs Haliburton
                  "We've got to be very clear about this. We don't want our players hanging around with murderers," said Larry Bird, Pacers president.


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by rock747 View Post
                    Turner needs Haliburton
                    The whole team needs him lol


                    • #11
                      Hali is warming up


                      • #12
                        Reminder to our Celtics fanboys in PD that this team ain’t going anywhere
                        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


                        • #13
                          Also Horford is super washed and shouldn’t be getting playing time.
                          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


                          • #14
                            Missed free throws are going to cost them the game.


                            • #15
                              Myles and TJ combining for 25 points on 80% from the field