Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Tbird analysis, 2022 NBA draft profile #7: Jeremy Sochan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tbird analysis, 2022 NBA draft profile #7: Jeremy Sochan


    8 days away from draft night 2022, a night I know we are all looking forward to. Today on a hazy Indiana evening we take an in-depth look at Baylor wing Jeremy Sochan. In previous editions of this year’s draft profiles, we have taken stock of the talents of Keegan Murray, Johnny Davis, Dyson Daniels, Bennedict Mathurin, A.J. Griffin, and Jaden Ivey. All of those draft profiles can be found elsewhere on Pacersdigest. As always, please feel free to share these pieces with friends and fellow Pacers fan whom you think would enjoy them.


    Jeremy Juliesz Sochan was born on 5/20/2003, which makes him one of the youngest players in this year's draft, having just turned 19 less than a month ago as I write this. His mother Aneta had come to America for college and to play basketball from her native Poland, eventually landing at a small college in the Oklahoma Panhandle. There she met Jeremy’s father Ryan, a fellow basketball player at the tiny school in Guymon Oklahoma. Aneta eventually graduated and moved to England, playing professional basketball in Europe. While neither of Jeremy’s parents played at the highest levels of basketball, both of them did have good careers for various teams in the European basketball stage. Settling primarily in Milton Keynes Great Britain with his mother and step-father, Jeremy and his siblings grew up multi-sport athletes, playing soccer, rugby, and basketball. Jeremy Sochan was quite a soccer goalkeeper at a young age, but eventually followed his parents path and chose basketball as his primary sport.


    Living in Great Britain but a Polish citizen, Sochan took advantage of his Polish citizenship and has been able to participate in high level basketball at a young age, traveling all over Europe for the Polish squads, and even making their Polish National Team in Eurobasket competition as a 17 year old. Sochan has truly been a world traveler with basketball, even with an Indiana connection: he spent his junior year in high school playing for LaPorte La Lumiere Prep, one of the top high school basketball programs in the country. The same school incidentally where Jaden Ivey graduated from. Sochan left his senior year of high school to go play for the Polish national team program, then played one year of high level college basketball for Baylor University, one of the top teams in America. Sochan lost his father as a middle schooler, when Ryan Williams was killed in a car accident. That tragedy no doubt has shaped his personality and drive, and he is on the verge of fulfilling the dream his father had for him.


    From the Oklahoma Panhandle, to the Queen’s England, to Northern Indiana, to all across Eastern Europe, then to Waco Texas, it has truly been a basketball odyssey for Jeremy Sochan. His next stop: the bright lights and biggest basketball stage in the world: The NBA.


    —-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Let’s get the basics out of the way first: Sochan measures in at a reported 6’9”, with a weight of 230lbs. International team measurements from Poland had his wingspan listed at 7’0”, but we didn’t get actual measurements at the NBA combine. I am positive the Pacers have those by now, even if they aren’t public knowledge. Sochan clearly has the prerequisite size to be a big NBA wing, a need almost all 30 NBA teams are desperately searching for.


    Coming off the bench but playing big minutes for one of the best teams in the country last year for Scott Drew’s Baylor Bears, Sochan’s box score numbers don’t jump off the page. Sochan for the year averaged 9.2ppg, 6.4rpg, and 1.8 apg. Shooting numbers weren’t great either for the young Baylor wing, ending the season shooting just 29.6% from 3 point range, and just 58.9% from the foul line. Yet despite that, Sochan impacted winning for Baylor, and it is his energy, youth, athletic traits, and intangibles, along with flashes of brilliance on both ends of the floor, that have Sochan solidly in lottery discussion. Let’s put his really extraordinary skill set under the microscope down below.


    —------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    In Sochan’s case, I am going to start with his defense first.


    I am going to make a bold statement here: for a player of his age, Jeremy Sochan has some of the best defensive habits, traits, and abilities I have seen in a long time for a perimeter defender.


    As a one on one defender, he is outstanding. Among the many things that stand out are his extremely quick feet (his soccer background really shows up here to me), his balance, his ability to slide, use the cross step, wall up drivers, stop on a dime and immediately contest a jump shot, and he has the length to affect all sorts of shots. If the number one priority for a team is to find an “Alpha” type scorer, bucket getter, and shot creator, then among the priorities after that have to be finding someone who can defend the opponent’s top dog. Sochan will do what almost no other 19 yr old rookie can do at this level, and that is be a top shelf defender right from jump street. For Indiana, if we had him, he immediately takes the opponent’s best offensive player as his assignment, where I project that in time he will more than hold his own.


    Sochan is long on the ball, but he isn’t super duper long. But his length plays up because he keeps his hands above his elbows, closes out high, and does these things consistently. He is super fast laterally in a slide, because his athletic technique is almost perfect in this regard.


    Sochan is very very switchable, and can be a plus defender against all NBA wings and probably some of the more limited 5 men in the league. If the Pacers have a team vision of having a top 5 defense (which I believe they should be aiming for eventually), then Sochan can be a building block to start that process. Know this: when I say “switchable”, I don’t mean it just in the athletic size/strength way, I mean he is switchable because he has extremely good awareness of offensive concepts, seems to innately understand what the offense is trying to do, sees things before they happen from a defensive perspective, understands complex NBA defensive concepts already, and seems to be on tape an outstanding communicator for his teammates.


    If the ballscreen is the biggest NBA offensive weapon, then to win you have to be able to defend it. Sochan excels here too, and at all 3 levels: the point of attack defender, the screen defender, or in help, Sochan is plus plus. You wouldn’t want him to be your backline defender too often, as I don’t think he is quite vertically athletic enough to be a premium rim protector, but in every other role, in every other defensive coverage, Sochan will not need any coaching up in these areas.


    Some players do put up bigger stats in steals and blocks than Sochan does, but don’t be fooled by that. What Sochan rarely does is gamble, and he therefore keeps the team's defensive structure in place. He understands how to win a possession defensively. Still, 2.0 “Stocks” per game is nothing to sneeze at. However, let me give some more defensive numbers to salivate over: In ISO situations, teams rarely tried on Sochan, but when they did they shot 6/22 this season. All year long, teams shot 19/84 against Baylor when Sochan was the nearest defender, and teams shot 13.4% worse from mid range (as defined by Synergy), when Sochan was on the floor vs off. Take these numbers for what they are worth, but I do find significance in them, as it verifies what my eyes told me.


    As a help defender, Sochan gives you everything you’d want except premier rim protection. He is there in the right place, but lacks the last level of extreme jumping ability to block a bunch of shots at the rim. So while I think he can be a small ball 5 occasionally in certain matchups, I don’t really want to have to go that way with him. In fact, I actually like playing big at times with Sochan playing with ideally 2 players bigger than he is, and definitely playing with at least 1. I love Sochan playing on the court with a size advantage, especially on the defensive end. How often you can do this with him is of course context dependent, and depends on who the other players with him are.


    Smooth body mover, really active high hands, extremely twitchy feet, great technique, top shelf awareness and intelligence, with a high motor. A potential defensive stopper who excels contesting shots, 1 on 1 dribble defender, and in all aspects of the screen/roll defensive schemes you’d want to play. He can “ice”, he can switch, he can hedge hard and recover, he can quarterback your defense away from the play. Sochan will be a difference maker, a potential multiple time all NBA defensive team guy I believe, and in worst case will be way above average defensively for years to come.


    —------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Sochan will be a major plus defensively I believe, but what can he do on offense?


    Let’s talk about his shot form first, since I tend to do that in all of these breakdowns. Sochan clearly has disturbing numbers from an analytical perspective, and the tape tells you why when you really examine it closely. I wish I could tell you how many slow motion jump shots I’ve watched him take the last few months!


    Building from the ground up, Sochan’s base is fine. I like his feet angle (I am not a Dave Love “10 toes at the target guy”, I like the 10 o’clock or so style), but I do wish he’d get just a slightly wider base. Not much different, but just a smidge wider. Overall though, Sochan’s shooting woes are not from his legs or body, but there are with his hand positions, both his shooting hand and guide hand. In a way, it is amazing he makes as many as he does, holding the ball like he does. Try watching it in slow motion if you care to: it’s bad right now. His guide hand is too far in front of the ball, and his right hand is at this weird angle with his thumb higher than the rest of his hand. From this position, he basically has to have extremely good touch and aim to make the ball go in as much as it does. He sort of adjusts the ball as he goes up, because I assume he knows it isn’t right, and ends up trying to compensate in other ways to try and shoot the ball straight. Sometimes it all counter balances each other and it goes in. But other times it can lead to bad misses.


    The good news, all that is very very fixable! Change his hand placements, groove that into place, maybe give him some instruction on how to get the seams correct on the basketball (he takes more shots with the seams all out of whack than any good player I’ve ever seen). I am totally guessing now, but I wonder if he learned to shoot that way as a youth by watching his mom play, as occasionally women with smaller hands will have those same shot form tendencies. It seems like something he taught himself, that no one has bothered to fix yet.


    Fix his jump shot, take him from a high 20’s% 3 point shooter to somebody who shoots 38%-40% from deep (I believe that is possible, though I am not sure I’d bet my life on it), and then Sochan becomes a truly dangerous 2 way weapon, because he does have some other intriguing offensive skills.


    Those skills are plentiful, and they become unlocked if he can make outside shots and bend the defense to his liking. Sochan has a great shot fake for instance, that worked way more often in college than it should have. That becomes a major weapon if his jumper comes along. Next, Sochan has an intriguing mid range/off the dribble game. He can spin dribble, he can elevate at odd angles, and off the bounce his shot form already looks better than when off the catch. He has good footwork, great vision, and shows some versatility on offense that comes in handy for a coach…he can be a swiss army knife offensively for you.


    Driving to the rim, Sochan loves contact, and actually had a higher rate of drawing fouls than the other elite players at the top of the draft at his position, Paulo Banchero and Jabari Smith. Fixing his short form to make teams pay for fouling him is a big key to his future. Sochan can score with either hand and has extremely good touch, finishing a very percentage of shots in the restricted area despite not having unbelievable athleticism. Making tough leaners and scoring off balance around the rim through bumps is a big skill, and Sochan has it. But his drive game won’t matter all that much if he can’t fix his jumper. So that becomes the swing skill.


    Sochan helps you in all sorts of other ways offensively. He is a really good cutter, and excels in the dunker’s spot as a cutter or receiver of lobs. I think he has major potential as a post player, not as a scorer but if a team lets him post up and then runs “split actions” with him having the basketball. I like him both as the roll man on a ballscreen on short rolls, as I think he can be a playmaker with the ball in his hands in the middle of the floor. And, if he can develop his jumper, he’d be I think a major weapon as pick and roll attacker, putting weaker defenders in harm’s way and using his outstanding vision to pick apart the defense. Sochan can excel in the DHO game I think, eventually receiving the hand off but for now being the initiator of that action, and occasionally faking that and keeping it as we see really smart players do, like Draymond Green does from time to time.


    I also think he can play at the elbows in NBA “corner” actions, as a point forward occasionally in designed half court sets, and I project eventually he will be able to be a floor spacer in the deep corners and even as a ballscreen pick and pop guy. Add to that his ability to bring the ball up after a defensive rebound, his talent at making the “hit ahead” and long outlet passes I love so much, and I think there is the potential here for a player with an offensive game that is above average, a player who brings a ton to the table when his team has the ball, albeit in a complimentary type role. His versatility offensively can be a major help to a winning team, as it makes him able to play at a high level with a variety of different teammates in lots of different schemes.


    What his ultimate potential offensively is, depends on how likely you project his jump shot to be fixed, and how much space he can create for you. I think we know that Sochan will be good at taking advantage of whatever space he is given with his playmaking and handles, but if he becomes a guy who can snipe open shots and create space for himself and others, then the sky’s the limit for him.


    And, just turning 19, with the skills he already possesses, I think I’d bet on the kid being successful and reaching his maximum potential. But if you take him, you better be a franchise who sees his versatility as an asset, and who can coach him up on his particular shooting flaw. This is where you have to know your own strengths and weaknesses as a staff and as a franchise.


    —--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    I try very hard to stick with the tape, and with the research, when I break down prospects for Pacersdigest. Obviously I don’t have access to medical stuff, deep background checks, nor do I get to meet the players in person. I try and stick with the stuff I can see and verify with my own 2 eyes.


    But, let’s talk about some intangibles Sochan possesses.


    This is a kid who has traveled the globe, on his own, playing basketball against grown men. This is a kid who seems to have a “charisma”, a charm, a worldliness, and awareness and comfort with himself that you usually don’t see out of a teenager. He plays and acts with an emotional intelligence on the floor, a guy who cares about team success more than individual accolades. He dives on the floor, pats people on the back, points to his bench, cheers loudly when he is not in the game. Sochan might not be the greatest individual “alpha” scorer we’d like to have, but he does have an “alpha” type personality style it seems to me. I think he walks in on day one and becomes every little kid in Indiana’s favorite Pacer. I think there is a reason why his teams always seem to win. Jeremy Sochan strikes me as a “podium” guy, the guy who leads your team with his personality, curious nature, charisma and intellect, along with the example he sets on the floor.


    While I normally don’t dive into such things, I am intrigued a bit by who his agent is in Jim Tanner. Tanner has among his clients Ja Morant, Jarrett Allen, and Grant Hill. Also 2 other players with ties to Indianapolis, Indy native Desmond Bane and the very Pacers/Fever connected Tamika Catchings. Take that for what it is worth as well.


    —----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    So, what do we have in total with Jeremy Sochan?


    I believe we have a defensive anchor, a stopper, a young kid who has both a very high floor and a pretty damn high ceiling as well if he hits it. A kid who has a dynamic personality, a connector, a kid who does whatever it takes to win. He does everything above average in basketball except shoot catch and shoot, and I believe his particular issues with his slower release and hand placement are among the easiest to fix in coaching. I love his drive, his athletic traits, his personality, and his young age. Add to that that he plays the very most valuable position in basketball as a switchable wing who can do multiple things for you, and I believe Sochan is being vastly underrated in this draft.


    I am betting on his upside, and I am betting on the kid. I believe Sochan can be a catalyst for others to become their best selves, and for the Pacers to establish what used to be a winning culture here that has been lost these past few years.


    I want him. I’d take him at 6 if I had to if I were running the Pacers and if he were available, if nothing else because he is a more rare commodity than other players in our range. Jeremy Sochan is my guy. With a franchise hungry for talent and starved for culture, Sochan I project can give us both.


    —-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    That is not to say that I don’t understand the concept of “value”. I absolutely do. And if Indiana does indeed have the inside knowledge that they can move down a bit and still acquire Sochan while acquiring another asset, I am all for it. If the Pacers indeed end up with 2 lottery or near lottery selections, I would definitely be hoping that one of them is Sochan.


    If the Pacers do indeed take him at #6, they’ll be howling all over this site and in the local media. So be it. Remember this though: when the season gets here, IT DOESN’T MATTER WHERE YOU PICK THEM, IT ONLY MATTERS HOW THEY PLAY. Keep that in mind if I actually get my way on who we pick for the first time in many, many years.


    Will Indiana in fact pick Sochan at 6? I doubt it, as this front office and I have rarely seen eye to eye on scouting players. I think Indiana is more likely to pick someone else at #6, and then try and acquire Sochan later….which I’d be thrilled with too.


    —------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Sochan is going in the lottery, I’d bet big money on that. If Indiana passes, the advantage of Sochan is that he fits with every single team in the league, as his skill set is so extremely valuable. But to me he fits the most obviously with the coach in the league who I think would value him over almost anyone else, and that is with the New York Knicks at pick #11. It isn’t much but I do have some intelligence coming with that one, so if you and I can trust my source, I think the Knicks are his absolute floor. I could be wrong though, and if so then Sochan would be a great pick for teams like Oklahoma City or Atlanta, with the Hawks being a strong candidate to move with someone to come up and get him. I expect, if he doesn’t end up with us, that Sochan is destined for New York City or Atlanta here in 8 days.


    —--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Who are his comparable players?


    I can tell you that I had a real hard time trying to get a modern day NBA player with the comparable skills and personality combination that I believe Sochan possesses.


    It was easier using past players. It is easy to see the defensive chops, the funky personality, the antagonizing of opponents, and combine that with the changing hair styles and come up with the former Ron Artest. And yes, the playing styles are somewhat similar.


    Other players he resembles: Nic Batum….but Sochan will score more than him. There are some definite Dennis Rodman vibes to Sochan, but he has way more offensive utility than Rodman. There is some prime Boris Diaw to his game, but Sochan is more athletic than him.


    The old school player I think fits the best is Luol Deng, who in his prime was a 15-18 point scorer, bigger, high-level defensive wing, high character/leader of a strong era of Chicago Bulls basketball.


    Modern day comparables are tough to come by. Sochan is a unicorn….which is kind of the point. He has more offensive potential and size than guys like P.J. Tucker, or Jae Crowder, or players of that ilk. Those guys are winning players and any team would love having them, but guys like that are his floor I think. He has some physical attributes like Aaron Gordon with a much different personality.


    In the end of the day, forced to choose a comparable just so we can compare these comparables later, I’ll go with a mix of 2 players for this one:


    NBA comparable: O.G. Anunoby, with Draymond Green’s personality and charisma.


    The Pacers missed on O.G. Anunoby a few years ago, we’ve litigated that mistake many times starting with the night they made their ill-fated choice. They can make up for it in 8 days by figuring out a way to obtain Jeremy Sochan, either at #6 or in another subsequent move.


    As always, the above is just my opinion. In this case, I am aware that I am higher on Jeremy Sochan than almost everyone in the universe, and that’s ok. I just believe that if we are to go toe to toe with premier NBA scorers like Jimmy Butler, or Jayson Tatum, others of similar ilk, then we need to find a way to stop them. We need to reestablish a culture of who we are and what we are about as a franchise, and I believe Sochan can be the catalyst to help start that process with his toughness, emotional intelligence, grit, and fire. All things in short supply in recent seasons at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.


    I’ll have several more draft pieces coming over the weekend and before draft day, including one really under the radar player that I think is oozing big time potential, thoughts on some other contenders at #6 and if we acquire another pick near the top half of the draft (spoiler alert: I believe we will indeed do that), thoughts on some 2nd round potential guys I like at #31, comparing the comparables, my Pacers-centric big board, maybe a mock draft, and more!


    For now, let the discussion begin about one of the most interesting and unique players in this year's draft, a player I covet, Jeremy Sochan.


    Tbird




  • #2
    How about Derrick McKey as a comparison?
    "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

    Comment


    • #3
      He is like Boris Diaw? sign me TF up
      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

      Comment


      • #4
        This team's dying for some leadership. If he's that guy, we need to find a way to get him. Have they rescheduled the visit yet?

        Comment


        • #5
          By far my favorite player who will be available at six, and he’s my favorite by a wide margin.


          His game is different than Derrick McKey’s, but his impact and importance to winning reminds me exactly of McKey. Derrick had elite hands and could stop guys on the perimeter. Jeremy defends with his feet and with his brain. He’s the highest IQ defender to enter the draft since at least 2015, IMO. And like Derrick, he’s crafty near the basket on offense.

          On defense I’d have him in the same exact role that Cleveland has Mobley in; a disruptor and stopper at the top of the key to start.

          On offense I think he’d excel at the elbow as a facilitator, where Sabonis was successful but for different reasons. I envision him playing very well in a two man game with Haliburton, and being able to create something down low for an athletic big such as Jackson.

          I see the same impact as McKey, and I see Boris Dias with elite defense. He is the perfect, ideal defender for the modern NBA; a guy who can prevent offensive rhythms with his style and understanding of the game. He plays like he knows what the other team is running better than they do.

          In a draft without a clear cut #1, this is the next type of player to draft. With a better shot, he is the prototype. Please please please please please pick him, Pacers.
          Last edited by imawhat; 06-15-2022, 10:11 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
            How about Derrick McKey as a comparison?
            That defense with some offense and leadership skills…wow
            {o,o}
            |)__)
            -"-"-

            Comment


            • #7
              I think many on here really like Sochan. If the Pacers got some offense and defense out of this draft
              that would be great. Mathurin and Sochan or Ivey and Sochan would be home runs
              {o,o}
              |)__)
              -"-"-

              Comment


              • #8
                This guy was not even on my radar during the college season, but since we’ve gotten into draft season, he jumped out to me right away. The size, hair, and incredible defensive abilities immediately made me think Draymond and Rodman, though he’s not exactly like either. I’m fully on board with bringing him to Indy. I hadn’t considered him at 6 because he’s mostly projected closer to 10. But if he’s here after draft night, I don’t think I’ll be upset if we use 6 or make a deal to get him a few picks later.

                He’s obviously not the offensive player that casuals will be excited about, but he’ll be integral to winning and fan favorite for YEARS. Since the prevailing opinion is that this draft lacks the top-end generational talent, but has a plethora of high quality starters and role players, you’re really just picking your favorite. I say, assuming Ivey is gone at 6, let’s snag Daniels, and then swing a deal to get Sochan around 10. I think you’d have amazing defense, high IQ, and incredible team basketball with those two and Haliburton.
                It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Hummm initially I considered him at 6… as there was no talk of him I thought he might drop, perfectly fine with me! I was hoping we could trade up and get Mathurin and Sochan.

                  I think they are the two most passionate guys on offense and defense in this draft, and that’s something the Pacers miss in the biggest way! We need a culture shock and if these two were to come here I definitely think we would be in a great position for the future.

                  If we make that happen, I’ll forgive the front office for all the dumb things they have done recently!
                  Why so SERIOUS

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Incredible write-up, as always. Have the Pacers brought him in for a workout yet?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I thought his comparison was going to be Kawhi Leonard. I don’t see the Pacers selecting him at 6 but a trade down or extra pick is realistic. I see some Kirilenko in him.
                      Last edited by eldubious; 06-16-2022, 01:14 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by owl View Post
                        I think many on here really like Sochan. If the Pacers got some offense and defense out of this draft
                        that would be great. Mathurin and Sochan or Ivey and Sochan would be home runs
                        Agree with this.
                        Heck I will be happy if we come out of this draft with 2 defensive stud (Sochan and Davis). On defense we can put Davis as primary, Duarte / Haliburton at the wings and sochan/ Jackson as the 4/5.

                        so much we can do defensively...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by 712Jefferson View Post
                          Incredible write-up, as always. Have the Pacers brought him in for a workout yet?
                          Yep, he was in the same group as Dyson Daniels. June 10th.
                          Pacers fan since April 9th 2004 - New Jersey 80 Indiana 90.
                          Been to 42 Pacers games since November 2017.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Coincidence that the one British player happens to be comparable to the two other recent ones... Luol Deng and OG Anunoby?
                            Pacers fan since April 9th 2004 - New Jersey 80 Indiana 90.
                            Been to 42 Pacers games since November 2017.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              A lot of guys in this draft I'd be pleased to get. Few I wouldn't. Seems like a prime opportunity to acquire an extra pick or two and draft multiples. Of course, if this many on PD are pro-Sochan, that almost certainly means TPTB won't be. Sadly. Hope it doesn't work out that way for once.
                              I'd rather die standing up than live on my knees.

                              -Emiliano Zapata

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X