The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

First six hours of the free agent period is now in the books, some quick thoughts

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by docpaul View Post

    That last year or two of his contract is going to leave a mark on the Jazz. The guy is 30.

    Three year deal with a team option? OK. But heís going to regress in a year or two. Love Bogie, donít love the deal.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    Thatís a reasonable take, but I tend to think his game will age well. Plus he has less mileage on him than his age would suggest considering he didnít come to the NBA until he was like 25.


    • #47
      Originally posted by CableKC View Post
      So, same old same old?
      OK, who do you want to bench so we can tank for the 6th pick for the Bucks?

      A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
      Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...


      • #48
        Originally posted by Gremz View Post
        I don't mind us keeping Doug. He has a specific skill and a decent enough BB IQ. Hopefully after a full season here he'll be able to put both to use,
        No Doug's gotta go. He doesn't defend well at all, and on the offensive end he just doesn't do enough. We need to move him and Leaf and open up more space. We could then add Marcus Morris or Danny Green. Then use the room exception for a Trey Lyles or extend an offer sheet to Kelly Oubre Jr. Also here's an idea. If we open up the extra cap space and combined that with what we have now? That's around $16 mil in cap space. How about offering Boogie Cousins a two year deal? If not him, then Willy Cauley Stein or Nerlens Noel?


        • #49
          Originally posted by GizzyStardust View Post
          One thing that I haven't seen discussed much is the prospect of team chemistry next year. We've had such an amazing culture here (which I know some would say is overrated in the NBA) and losing Thad (especially), DC, CoJo, and even Bogie to an extent really removes a large part of that equation as well as their veteran leadership. I know Vic is, by all accounts, a big part of that as well, but he will still be out for a while. Probably fair to say that Domas and Myles are important contributors to the chemistry as well. Will just certainly be a different dynamic in that locker room and on the court next year.
          I agree about the chemistry. I really hate that we didn't sign Bogie. Loved to watch him play. I also feel we'll miss Collison. That being said I was surprised by the moves we've made this summer. Being the eternal optimist I think the season will go this way, First third of the season about .500. I expect it to pick up the 2nd third with us moving into a playoff position. By the middle of February or perhaps March, Vic should be back into the swing of things and we should move up to 4th or 5th. I fully expect to do well in the playoffs. As always time will tell.


          • #50
            It really is nice to see the board in unison on these moves. It's weird.


            • #51
              Doug ainít going nowhere folks deal with it. Iíd bet my house that most people in the organization, particularly in analytics, think much more highly of Doug than most here do. Theyíre not about to give him away.


              • #52
                Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                It really is nice to see the board in unison on these moves. It's weird.
                Some reason Vnz hates the Lamb move. 50% ainít bad for him though lol


                • #53
                  Originally posted by BobbyMac View Post
                  I also feel we'll miss Collison.
                  somebody good at special fx should like trick him one night like: "This is God....Sign with the Pacers, 3 years, league min"


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post
                    Doug ainít going nowhere folks deal with it. Iíd bet my house that most people in the organization, particularly in analytics, think much more highly of Doug than most here do. Theyíre not about to give him away.
                    That makes no sense. You move him and Leaf and you open up enough space to sign Marcus Morris, Danny Green or Kelly Oubre.


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by BillS View Post

                      OK, who do you want to bench so we can tank for the 6th pick for the Bucks?
                      I apologize. I should have green fonted my post. I should have been less "tongue in check" in my response. I am one of the few here in PD that recognizes that "tanking" and the approach that the Pacers have taken to "Win at all costs" is what this Front Office's MO. So, I'm Ok with the "Same old Same Old".
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post

                        Some reason Vnz hates the Lamb move. 50% ainít bad for him though lol
                        Don't hate it but don't love it either, I'm always afraid of players that had career years on s*** teams specially in Charlotte where somebody needed to score at some point.

                        And I for sure don't like it if the plan is for him to replace Bogdanovic, now Warren could be that guy but then again that is another guy (who I loved in Phoenix and was an steal) that was playing in a bad team as well.

                        I'm optimistic and cautious at the same time as I still think they need to make a couple of moves
                        @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Grimp View Post

                          That makes no sense. You move him and Leaf and you open up enough space to sign Marcus Morris, Danny Green or Kelly Oubre.
                          Ainít happening man. I would bet a boatload of cash on it. Theyíre going to see what these guys can do.


                          • #58
                            People who are evaluating changes in the East think that Pacers improved the most. I agree with that. Raptors already think that Pacers could be the biggest problem for them, but better they worry about themselves. Aging core and Kawhi is still not under contract with them.
                            For the past two seasons Pacers biggest problem was that they were not stacked. If some of Myles, Domas, Dipo was out - glaring problems everywhere. Not the case now.
                            Myself, I look at the Boston, they look good. Kemba is a bad, bad guy and now he has plenty of talent around him plus a very good coach. Still, regular season is long. If Pacers will start hot right from the gate, play eye pleasing game (I think they will) - chatter around the league will start. That should make life a little easier. For three seasons half of the fouls called on Domas were bs. Now, a starter on a very good team, with some impressive numbers - I hope he will get more respect from the refs. Raptors traded JV for Gasol and the refs let Marc to get away with a lot of stuff while JV would be immediately in foul problems with the same stuff.
                            I know, biggest concern is Dipo's knee. But after all his injuries maybe he will change his style a bit? There is no need to be a super hero and die under opponents basket for the glory of 2 points. When MJ came back to play basketball again, he lost some of his athleticism. But he developed deadly fade-away jumper.
                            It's so cool for me now. In the East I'm all in on Pacers, while in the West JV got a new life with Grizzlies. Last season, before Dipo's injury, I was in the difficult spot. Basketball culture wise I was on the Pacers side, but wanted JV to get a ring with Toronto. Now it's simple. I want Pacers to kick arse to EVERYBODY, and Memphis - miraculously make post-season in the West meat-grinder.
                            12-12-2018, 09:20 PM

                            Myles Turner during Vic's postgame interview: "Tell you what the East is in trouble now boy"



                            • #59
                              Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post

                              Ainít happening man. I would bet a boatload of cash on it. Theyíre going to see what these guys can do.
                              I think the FO saw what McDermott could do last season, and they aren't that impressed. I think they'd move him with so many better options out there.


                              • #60
                                - Like the Brogdon move, surprised me. Everyone who freaked out when we loaded up on 2nd round picks --- that was why we grabbed them.
                                - Like the Lamb move, gives us a Dipo replacement until he's back, and then becomes a great bench option, he's really improved the last few years, he was clutch as hell last year, good player.
                                - I feel like the Warren move sorta forced their hand on Bojan. We basically traded Warren for Bojan. I think ultimately it'll pay off for us, but I think in the immediate-term we get set back slightly at that position. Warren younger and more athletic, but not as polished offensively as Bojan. Dan will get him to play some defense, especially if he could get Bojan to do so.
                                - Pacers are under-rated as usual, even by their own fans. They won 48 games last year and largely outplayed most of the "contenders" in the East even without their star player --- got rid of their older players and replaced them with some good young talent. Quietly I think Indy made savvy moves that made them remarkably younger, more attractive assets, and still remained a top 4 team for next year with plenty of cap flexibility. Was funny watching everyone jump off a cliff on here for the past few weeks.
                                - Everyone loving the Jazz, I'm sorta meh on it. I think they went for it this year, and I think they'll be a really good team this year, but I'm not sure it's enough to go all the way. Conley and Bogey, good players, expensive, and bound to decline sooner than later. Feel like they loaded up on the present and it just isn't quite good enough to get it done. They basically got better this year by getting quite a bit more expensive and older, and it's just a bit of a gamble.
                                - Everyone praising the Nets, again, I'm sorta meh on it. We all saw what Kyrie did to Boston, wasn't pretty. Durant is the same kinda weird/moody guy as Irving, and he's out at least a year, and likely won't be the same player when he does return. Same with Jordan, past his prime, and only getting older. I just don't see how that is all gonna work.
                                - Sixers... I like the JRich get.... Horford has been a rock for years.... good player..... but again, like Utah and Nets, he's making $27mill/year, and he's 33 years old. And I'm just not a massive Tobias Harris guy. Dude is making $30mill/year. Man, that is alot of money tied up in those two guys. They'll be a load this year, but I'm just not a massive fan of the decisions they make on the whole, I don't know how they got where they are. They've made some huge roster changes in the last year alone.
                                - Warriors... how do they do it? Although that move may not work like a lot of people think it may. But we'll see. Talking about flipping Russell, which makes sense.
                                - Freakin' Knicks. Why do we let them be a franchise.
                                - Bucks --- not entirely sure why they threw so much at Middleton, and then kept Lopez over Brogdon. Honestly not a huge fan of what they did. But they'll be a massive force because of Giannis, so whatever.
                                - Celtics --- loved what they did this off-season. They got rid of Kyrie the splinter; lost a bit of older bloat in Horford; grabbed a great guy and player in Kemba; picked up Romeo who I think is going to be a stud; and generally just sorta shored up the over-talented mess that they were last year. They seem to have a more focused roster now.
                                - Someone said if the Lakers don't land Kawhi, they F'd up, and I'm like, "Uh, they still have LeBron and AD, they'll be alright", lol...
                                - Heat - eh, incomplete. Butler is an enigma, but he looks right in a Heat uni.

                                Roster looks like:
                                1 - Brogdon/Holiday
                                2 - Dipo/Lamb/Sumner
                                3 - Warren/Buckets/Johnson
                                4 - Sabo/Leaf/Johnson
                                5 - Turner/Goga

                                I'm on-board. I think it all looks like a fun, competitive, athletic roster. Most are super young and so we'll be seeing some guys grow up, even Turner/Sabo. Our oldest guys are literally Dipo, Buckets, and Lamb, all 27. So this is officially Dipo's team now, he's the leader, whereas in the past folks would state that Thad or Collison rallied the troops, it's Dipo now.

                                Even intrigued by the 2nd team. A line-up of Holiday, Lamb, Buckets, Leaf, and Goga will have it's growing pains, but I think they'll be fun to watch. I do expect Sumner's minutes will trail off considerably when Dipo returns.
                                Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 07-01-2019, 01:56 PM.
                                There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.