Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

    http://www.indystar.com/story/sports...fame/71836916/

    Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame
    Dana Hunsinger Benbow, dana.benbow@indystar.com 12:07 p.m. EDT September 7, 2015
    Southport product is the first Indianapolis-born player to be enshrined

    The black-and-white photo bleeds sadness.

    It's right there in his eyes. The darkness. It's in his tensed-up jaw. The grief.

    It's in the skinny limbs that poke out from his No. 6 Indiana All-Star uniform.

    When a teenage kid is heartbroken, he doesn't eat much. And Louie Dampier, 6-0, 165 pounds, was heartbroken.

    The photo, half a century old, still tells a story of a teenage orphan, a basketball superstar, who by 18 had lost his mother and his father.

    And it tells a story of why Dampier may be the only man to ever play the game of basketball who, deep down within his soul, secretly hoped he would never get into the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame.

    The Hall of Fame means being in the spotlight. And Dampier – who will be the first Indianapolis-born player enshrined Friday into a hallowed place every athlete dreams of – despises the spotlight.

    Dampier is a self-proclaimed and well-known introvert.

    "The happiest that Louie is is when he's out riding his lawnmower and doesn't have to talk to anybody," said Dan Issel, who played on the ABA's Kentucky Colonels with Dampier for five years and was his roommate when the team traveled. "He's pretty much of an introvert. Not only does he not like the spotlight, he does everything possible to stay out it."

    ****

    It wasn't always that way.

    Two years before the photo was taken, Dampier was an outgoing, 16-year-old, happy-go-lucky kid attending Southport High School. He was the hometown hero at a time when basketball stars at Indiana high schools were icons.

    He loved socializing with friends, being a jokester.

    Then one day, sitting in class – he doesn't remember whether it was math or English or history because everything in life suddenly became a blur – Dampier was called out.

    His sister was there. She had unexpected and devastating news. His mother was dead. She had died in the hospital recovering from surgery. Dampier thinks it was a hysterectomy, though now, as a 70-year-old man, he's not exactly sure.

    To be honest, he didn't need to know. His mom, a woman he was intensely close to, was gone.

    "After my mom, of course, I was demoralized," Dampier said from his La Grange, Ky., home this week. "I can't explain exactly, the sadness and loss. I still can't explain it."

    He can explain what those feelings did. They took him over. They altered him deep within.

    "I used to be very outgoing, but it changed when my mom died," he said. "I became introverted and it changed my personality quite a bit."

    On the court, it didn't show. Dampier, known as Little Louie because of his frail build, averaged 24 points a game his senior year and led Southport to both county and sectional titles. Dampier set a sectional scoring record, 40 points in one game, and a tourney record, 114 points.

    "He was very humble, unassuming," said Billy Shepherd, who played at Carmel High School and Butler University before reaching the ABA for three seasons. He looked up to Dampier, his basketball career running five years behind Dampier's. "That doesn't mean he wasn't confident when he played."

    But as the crowd cheered at those high school games for a player they thought had it all, Dampier looked up into the bleachers and longed to see his mom.

    Basketball had been their thing.

    ***

    Dampier and his mom were about as close as a mother and son could be. His father, a milk man, was rarely home.

    "He was not really interested," Dampier said. "I don't know that he wasn't interested. He worked a lot. He had his own milk route."

    His mother carried the load of raising Louie and his four older siblings. And Dampier was the baby – by a long shot. His three sisters were older than him by 11, 12 and 13 years; his brother older by 9.

    "My mom had season tickets for me and her and she took me to all the home basketball games (at Southport) and some of the away games when I was little," Dampier said.

    His mom went to watch the three older sisters, who were cheerleaders. Dampier was there, even at 4 or 5 years old, to watch basketball.

    "That's where I started admiring players when I watched the guys play varsity," he said. "Those were my first heroes. That's what my dream was then, to play high school ball."

    So years later, having made it to the high school court, being that hero to other young kids, the emptiness was overwhelming.

    But at least his dad was there. After his mom died, he started coming to Dampier's games. The two became closer.

    He and his dad would babysit Dampier's nieces and nephews, his dad's grandchildren, together a couple nights a week while his brother and sisters were out playing in bowling leagues.

    They started connecting. Dampier was filling the void left by his mother. But it didn't last long.

    When Dampier was 18, a second devastating blow came. His dad died of stomach cancer.

    Any happiness or joy of carefree youth was gone for Dampier. He turned inward and never came back out.

    ***

    Don't be mistaken. Dampier isn't rude or aloof.

    He's humble, modest and shy. And sweet. He sheepishly apologizes, in his acquired Kentucky drawl, for not returning phone calls from the media, admitting it's just not his cup of tea.

    People who knew him back in Southport, teammates who played with him at the University of Kentucky and with the Colonels say Dampier would give anyone the shirt off his back.

    "It couldn't happen to a better human being," said Darel Carrier, of Dampier's Hall of Fame induction. Carrier played with Dampier on the Colonels.

    And it couldn't happen to a better basketball player.

    Dampier was one of the greatest to play in the ABA. He was one of only a handful of men to play all nine years of the league's existence. He spent his entire ABA career with the Colonels, finishing as the league's all-time leader in points (13,726), assists (4,044), games (728), 3-pointers (794) and minutes (27,770).
    University of Kentucky's Louie Dampier is seen, 1966. (AP Photo) Uncredited, ASSOCIATED PRESS

    "One hundred percent, he is the ABA player that comes to mind when you think of the Hall of Fame," said Scott Tarter, a co-founder of Dropping Dimes Foundation, an Indianapolis-based non-profit that helps struggling former ABA players. "He also is one that comes to mind when you think of ABA players that should have gone in the Hall of Fame a long time ago."

    Dampier, who capped his career playing three years for the NBA's San Antonio Spurs after the ABA dissolved, said he's heard that from people time and again.

    He never cared to push the matter.

    "It's something you might start thinking about because other people started talking to me about it, saying, 'It's your turn. You should be in,' " he said. "Not that I always agreed with them. But it sure is an honor."

    And now, Dampier is about to take the good – that Hall of Fame honor – with the bad. All that attention.

    ***

    The flurry of a Hall of Fame enshrinement in Springfield, Mass., this weekend includes three days of fanfare beginning Thursday, sprinkled with photo opportunities, scheduled appearances, required time with the media and a speech.

    A speech from Dampier. Surely, he's dreading that.

    "It's not so much that," he said. "It's everything else we have to do. We're committed to doing so many other things, press conferences, interviews. Giving a short speech might be some relief."

    Relief because Dampier is in control of that. The 11 inductees get five minutes to talk. The woman running the ceremony asked everybody to send a copy of their speeches to her, Dampier said.

    "Except me," he said, laughing, "because she knew mine wouldn't be too long."

    He estimates his speech, which he's had written for months, will last about three minutes. Issel isn't buying that.

    "I'm sure he will take a minute and a half," Issel said. "And that will be it."

    Issel may be right. After all, he knows Dampier better than anyone, except Dampier's wife of 32 years, Judy; his two children, Danielle and Nick; and stepson, Rob, who will all be at the enshrinement.

    Dampier picked Issel to be his Hall of Fame presenter.

    "Let me tell you something, I consider Louie the best friend I have," he said. "And sometimes he doesn't call me back."

    That doesn't hurt Issel's feelings. He knows exactly who Dampier is. The two met when Dampier was a senior, Issel a freshman, at the University of Kentucky playing for Adolph Rupp.

    Under Rupp, Dampier, Tommy Kron and Pat Riley led the Wildcats to the 1966 NCAA championship game, where they lost to Texas Western College (now the University of Texas at El Paso). The game is famous: Texas Western was the first team with an all-black starting lineup to win an NCAA title.

    When he graduated from Kentucky in 1967, Dampier had scored 1,575 points, the third-most in school history at the time.

    Issel said Dampier was one of the few seniors who would give a freshman, not allowed in those days to play, the time of day. That meant something to Issel – and paved the way for a ready-made friendship when they played for the Colonels.

    As roommates traveling with the team, though, there was no rowdiness or socializing. Dampier didn't like to go out. So, the two became addicted to the soap opera "Days of Our Lives."

    They would sit in the hotel room, watch the show and order food in, usually cheeseburgers and fries.

    "We were the kings of room service," Issel said. "We very seldom went out. We would stay in our rooms and watch TV. We weren't very social."

    ***

    Dampier was lucky to play basketball when he did. He came before the days of nightly telecasts. The ABA wasn't on TV. Most fans listened to games on the radio.

    He came before the days when players had media swarming the locker rooms asking them questions.

    He came before the days of social media and a 24-hour news cycle.

    If all that had existed in Dampier's heyday, he would have been accosted. He was a superstar.

    He had a lightning-fast release on his shot.

    "Dampier would kill you with that shot," Carrier said. "Both of us could hit the 3-pointer from anywhere on the court once we crossed the midcourt line."

    Together, Dampier and Carrier formed what has been called the most explosive backcourt duo ever to play in the ABA. They each averaged at least 20 points per game.

    "We really complemented each other," Carrier said, "because you could try to guard him and then leave me open or you could try and guard me and leave him open. People were amazed by us."

    ***

    A basketball superstar. That's what Dampier always wanted to be, ever since those days as a little boy watching the Southport High School team with his mom.

    And he became one.

    He did it by battling through grief that most people watching him on the court never knew.

    And as he takes the stage to be inducted this weekend, the photos may show him smiling.

    But that doesn't mean Dampier has forgotten, that he won't be thinking of his mom, and why he made it to the Hall of Fame.

    Follow Dana Benbow on Twitter: @DanaBenbow.
    Another great player a lot of you guys probably never saw play.
    BillS

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

    Dampier and Carrier used to give the Pacers headaches. Well, they gave the entire ABA headaches.

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

      I never saw him play, but after hearing of his accomplishments I can't help but think how noteworthy he would have been if social media had been around.

      Social media has truly transformed sports.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

        I remember watching him, and gotta give him and those Colonels their due.

        That was a very tough team, and that 4-1 thumping they put on us in the
        '75 ABA finals was hard to swallow.

        Dampier and his teammates were most definitely some of the greatest
        players of that era, ABA, or NBA. It is still a travesty to this day the
        Colonels weren't included when the leagues merged.

        Congrats though to Dampier; his HOF induction is well deserved.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

          I'm a Southport graduate, and my brothers played both basketball and baseball with Lou for years. So, I grew up seeing him in the old Babe Ruth league. He was just as good at baseball as basketball, but eventually specialized in just basketball.

          It was a lot of fun attending all those games at the huge Southport field house, which held over 7000 fans. If you didn't arrive by halftime of the reserve game, you would either risk not getting a very good seat, or depending on the opponent (like Washington or Columbus), no seat at all.

          When it comes to shooters and shooters with range, Southport's Dampier, and later even Jim Krivacs, are two of a short list of players I've ever seen that can be compared in the same breath with Rick Mount.

          My brothers have always said that something changed in Lou after his parents were gone, but I never saw it any time I saw him with others. He was always quiet, but was very cordial to anyone around him.

          In earlier years, on the baseball field, he was probably the only player who did not treat all of the younger siblings like tag-a-longs. He would talk with us and play catch with us until it was time for the team to begin warming up.

          So, I guess that's the Lou I remember. A fierce competitor and sportsman on the field/court, and a very good person outside of sports as well.

          It's sad to read that his life is other than what I might have imagined it.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: Indystar: Louie Dampier's devastating road to Basketball Hall of Fame

            Thanks for posting this. As a kid I never wanted to like him because he played for the Colonels and had played college ball at Kentucky. Then you would watch him play and think damn he is good.

            Comment

            Previous template Next
            Working...
            X