Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

    QUICK THOUGHTS ON THE FANTASY MESS IN INDIANA

    Roy Hibbert – Got off to a good start but finished with seven points, seven rebounds and a block in just 16 minutes. On one play, Hibbert dove to the rim wide open on a pick-and-roll but took a tentative lay-up instead of dunking it as the defense closed in. Then he missed a relatively easy tip-in. Pretty much sums up how lost he is at the moment. I think he'll eventually get it going again, but I can't blame you if you want to cut him.

    Jeff Foster – Had six points, 18 rebounds and a block off the bench, but keep in mind that he's basically nothing more than a one-dimensional rebounder.

    T.J. Ford – Had been better lately, but was awful on Wednesday (zero points, one assist in 20 minutes). Meanwhile, backup Earl Watson had 15 points in 28 minutes. This is a PG situation I'm very happy to avoid.

    Dahntay Jones – Started, had 16 points, and looks like a safe play at least until Mike Dunleavy gets up to speed.

    Mike Dunleavy – Had six points in 20 minutes and should remain on fantasy benches as long as he's on a minutes limit.

    Brandon Rush – Only got into the game in the fourth quarter after Dunleavy had maxed out his playing time. In other words, he's not worth owning right now outside of deep leagues.

    http://www.rotoworld.com/content/fea...eid=34259&pg=2
    Ya Think Ya Used Enough Dynamite there Butch...

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

      Originally posted by Brad8888 View Post
      Small sample size, early in the season, but after losing Dahntay

      Denver 2008-09 Offensive Rating -- 110.4
      Denver 2009-10 Offensive Rating -- 114.0 = 3.6 improvement

      Denver 2008-09 Defensive Rating -- 106.8
      Denver 2009-10 Defensive Rating -- 106.1 = 0.7 improvement

      Net improvement for Denver this year = +4.3 points per 100 possessions.

      Hmmm...
      They brought in Afflalo, whose rep was also that of defensive player with little offense. I'm sure his addition plays a role as well as whatever the rest of them are doing.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

        Bulls weigh trade options for Thomas

        http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/news;_yl...yhoo&type=lgns

        By Adrian Wojnarowski, Yahoo! Sports 10 hours, 24 minutes ago

        So far, NBA general managers are still passing judgment on their own teams, evaluating needs and slowly, surely feeling out the market. The February trade deadline is more than two months away, but conversations are beginning to gather momentum.


        For starters, multiple league executives believe the Chicago Bulls’ shopping of forward Tyrus Thomas could result with him moving sooner than later. As Thomas has rehabbed a broken forearm, the Bulls have had discussions with several teams, but perhaps none as serious as the ongoing dialogue general manager Gar Forman has had with New York Knicks president Donnie Walsh.


        Several sources believe the Bulls are agreeable to a package of Thomas and Jerome James for Knicks forward Al Harrington. Thus far, Walsh has resisted parting with Harrington, but discussions are still active and the teams have explored different combinations in recent days that would ultimately deliver Thomas to the Knicks.


        “Nothing is imminent, but both sides would like to figure out a way to do this,” one league executive briefed on the talks told Yahoo! Sports.


        The Bulls believe Harrington’s ability to score coupled with a $10.2 million expiring contract make this a worthy exchange. Knicks coach Mike D’Antoni has long been fond of Thomas, a 6-foot-9 forward whose nimbleness and athleticism makes him an intriguing fit for New York.


        Thomas, 23, was the fourth pick in the 2006 NBA draft, and started to fulfill his promise with 10.9 points and 6.4 rebounds last season. Nevertheless, Chicago believes it has a worthy power forward successor on the cheap in rookie Taj Gibson, and jettisoning Thomas would also eliminate his approximate $13 million cap hold for the Bulls next summer.


        Thomas’ agent, Brian Elfus, tried to negotiate a contract extension with Chicago, but talks never pushed past perfunctory.

        Here are other teams that front-office officials, coaches and agent say are active in talks.


        Portland: Since Travis Outlaw has been lost for four to five months with foot surgery, GM Kevin Pritchard has been working the phones for an athletic forward as a replacement.

        That isn’t much of a surprise, but this is: In conversations with Portland’s front office and coaching staffs, several league officials believe Andre Miller could soon be available. As a free-agent signee over the summer, Miller can’t be traded until Dec. 15.


        After missing out on several preferred free agents, Pritchard settled for Miller and signed him to a three-year, $21 million contract, the first two years of which are guaranteed. Yet, Blazers coaches have privately insisted to confidants throughout the league that Miller isn’t working out, and the belief is that Pritchard is testing the market on Miller’s worth. Portland could stay with Steve Blake or use Miller to bring back another playmaker.


        Sources say that Brandon Roy clearly prefers playing with Blake over Miller, and that’s an issue that Pritchard must contend with.


        Houston: The Rockets continue to offer Tracy McGrady in a trade, but that will be a difficult proposition considering he’s the highest-paid player in the league ($23.2 million) and no one has seen him play in nine months. Houston seems willing to take back a longer-term contract for McGrady, but most executives believe his high salary makes it hard to put together a package.

        Rockets GM Daryl Morey and coach Rick Adelman don’t want McGrady back with the team, and have insisted that he isn’t physically ready to return to the lineup. McGrady would love a trade, but knows he must start playing again for it to be possible.


        Philadelphia: Sixers GM Ed Stefanski is desperate to unload forward Elton Brand and the $66 million owed over the remaining four years of his crippling contract, sources say, but that will be incredibly difficult. Even with several teams, including Golden State and Charlotte, desperate for low-post scorers and rebounders, no one believes Brand, who makes $14.8 million this season, has enough left to merit taking on that contract.


        Before Monta Ellis started on his scoring tear, Philly had hope that his issues with Golden State might inspire the Warriors to take a chance on Brand, but that isn’t happening. Sacramento had some interest in center Samuel Dalembert, another contract Philly wants to shed, but couldn’t work out a three-way deal with Boston.


        Los Angeles Lakers: With a league high payroll of $91 million, the Lakers are looking again to shed salary off their bench, and GM Mitch Kupchak has told teams to take its pick of reserve players – except for Lamar Odom, of course – to relieve the team of some salary.


        That idea worked out last season, when losing the salary of Vladimir Radmanovic to Charlotte unearthed the valuable Shannon Brown for the Lakers.

        --------------

        I've always coveted Andre Miller, but I haven't seen him play this year and I know he's getting older. Anyone know how he's looked?
        Last edited by Speed; 12-04-2009, 08:39 AM.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

          Originally posted by Hicks View Post
          They brought in Afflalo, whose rep was also that of defensive player with little offense. I'm sure his addition plays a role as well as whatever the rest of them are doing.
          League-wide, Defensive Ratings are down by 1.6 pts/100, from 108.3 to 106.7, and they've been climbing relatively steadily. Denver is actually pacing behind the rest of the league defensively.

          Offensively, Carmelo is simply on a completely different plane this season, and that probably explains the bulk of it.

          However, Dahntay was basically an 18-minute per game role player on last year's Nuggets. His departure does not have a huge impact, one way or the other.

          That he's been one of, if not the top performer on the Pacers this year simply underscores both the talent deficiency on this team, and how poorly it has been playing.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

            Houston seems willing to take back a longer-term contract for McGrady, but most executives believe his high salary makes it hard to put together a package.

            --------------

            I've always coveted Andre Miller, but I haven't seen him play this year and I know he's getting older. Anyone know how he's looked?
            I can't comment on Miller's play this season, but I'm more excited by the Houston-McGrady comment. Murphy, Ford & Foster for McGrady & Chuck Hayes, for example, would be a beautiful financial colonoscopy ... and if TMac gets healthy, it may well improve our team this season. (Heck, while I'm fantasizing, imagine if he'd re-sign with us for a modest amount after this season. I'll bet his wing presence would help Hibby's game.)


            "He’s no shrinking violet when it comes to that kind of stuff."

            - Rick Carlisle on how Kevin Pritchard responds to needed roster changes.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

              Originally posted by DrFife View Post
              I can't comment on Miller's play this season, but I'm more excited by the Houston-McGrady comment. Murphy, Ford & Foster for McGrady & Chuck Hayes, for example, would be a beautiful financial colonoscopy ... and if TMac gets healthy, it may well improve our team this season. (Heck, while I'm fantasizing, imagine if he'd re-sign with us for a modest amount after this season. I'll bet his wing presence would help Hibby's game.)
              We're not gonna bamboozle Houston on any type of deal with T-Mac. My guess would be that they'd want some players that they could actually use and not just our pupu platter.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                If TPTB want to trade Murph or TJ or both, they could find someone to trade with. I think the real question is, do they really want to? I have lost confidence in the way they (Jim and Bird) assess talent. They seem to think these guys are much more valuable than they really are. At least Jim does for certain.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                  I'm watching this Bulls/Cavaliers game on ESPN right now. Man, Chicago has a really crappy offense. I know Gordon is kind of a chucker, but they miss him badly. They need someone who can make an outside shot consistently.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                    Wow, Kobe at the buzzer, damn that was a good 4th quarter... I'd almost forgotten what it was like to watch a really good game of two great teams.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                      did donnie walsh just pin the blame for missing on jennings on his scouting department?

                      http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...cks/index.html

                      Brandon Jennings could have helped the Knicks, as president Donnie Walsh realized last July while watching the 6-foot-1 rookie attack the Las Vegas Summer League.

                      Walsh tried to turn the episode into one of those "teachable moments." "When I saw him play in Vegas, I did go to our scouts and I told them, 'Look, if you knew he was that good you should have come to me every day in my office and said, 'You've got to look at this guy,'" said Walsh. "I said, 'I listened to you. You said, 'He's good,' but that was about it."

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                        Originally posted by wintermute View Post
                        did donnie walsh just pin the blame for missing on jennings on his scouting department?

                        http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200...cks/index.html
                        Depends on the context of the conversation. If he was relating that story just to rationalize why they passed on Jennings, then yes.

                        If, on the other hand, the scouting staff gave an equivocating report, then used it as a CYA when they saw that they'd actually missed, then no. "I told you so" is of no real value to anyone that's worth a damn. If the scouting staff "knew" that Jennings was the real deal, then Walsh is right, and they should have fought for that pick.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                          Originally posted by cdash View Post
                          I'm watching this Bulls/Cavaliers game on ESPN right now. Man, Chicago has a really crappy offense. I know Gordon is kind of a chucker, but they miss him badly. They need someone who can make an outside shot consistently.
                          I'm not even going to mention his name. But his name starts with a T and ends with a roy Murphy.
                          "I keep wondering the same thing. Last week they had the 4th worst record in the league, had an 11.9 percent chance of winning the lottery and were in line to land a franchise type player like Derrick Favors or DeMarcus Cousins. This week? They have a 1.7 percent chance of winning the lottery, have the 8th worst record and are in line to draft Cole Aldrich or Greg Monroe. Way to go Jim O'Brien. Rest Danny Granger the rest of the season (if it isn't too late) and give Josh McRoberts lots of minutes. That ought to do it." - Chad Ford on winning meaningless games

                          Way to go Jim, you may have just put our franchise back another 4+ years.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                            Jonas Jerebko with another double-double. Hard to not appreciate his play, even if he has limited offensive ability. His motor never stops running.

                            It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                            Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                            Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                            NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                              Originally posted by Burtrem Redneck View Post
                              Wow, Kobe at the buzzer, damn that was a good 4th quarter... I'd almost forgotten what it was like to watch a really good game of two great teams.
                              He's going to be the GOAT when it's all said and done.
                              "I keep wondering the same thing. Last week they had the 4th worst record in the league, had an 11.9 percent chance of winning the lottery and were in line to land a franchise type player like Derrick Favors or DeMarcus Cousins. This week? They have a 1.7 percent chance of winning the lottery, have the 8th worst record and are in line to draft Cole Aldrich or Greg Monroe. Way to go Jim O'Brien. Rest Danny Granger the rest of the season (if it isn't too late) and give Josh McRoberts lots of minutes. That ought to do it." - Chad Ford on winning meaningless games

                              Way to go Jim, you may have just put our franchise back another 4+ years.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: 09-10 NBA Random Thoughts part VI: Return of the Jedi (again)

                                he needs to earn a few more championships and MVPs before he can make that claim. Clock's ticking.

                                It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

                                Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
                                Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
                                NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X