Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Your impressions of Shawne Williams

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

    Originally posted by Jermaniac View Post
    Granger is going to be 24 next year, Shawne 21, If I'm correct I dont feel like looking.

    When Shawne is 24 he will for damn sure be better then ol stand behind the 3point line and wave my hands Danny.

    What a disappointing season by the golden boy. Most of you didnt want ANY SF because Danny is so great and Danny needed to be the #2. The guy is not ready to be a #2 and I said it before the season. All the games when JO was hurt, Granger would still be doing the same thing he was doing when JO was playing. And that is not being aggressive, he has all the ability to score 20 ppg, he is just scared.

    While Shawne on the other hand looks like he is a world class ice skater when he is moving on the floor. He is also the best shooter on this team.

    Did you tune out the last month? Danny has been going to the basket a LOT lately. Rick confirmed they had been on him about it.
    The VERY nice thing is how WELL he finishes! VERY GOOD around the basket, with EITHER hand.
    He impressed me 100% more in the past 2 weeks than he did most of the season.
    You should have payed attention.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

      Originally posted by Bball View Post
      I have a feeling the reason many of us seem to think Williams has more going for him than Granger (as far as potential and where he's at now) is simply because Granger got more minutes and we got to see the growing pains and the flaws. Williams, OTOH, got more limited minutes and we didn't really get a full picture.

      It's the same thing will college players staying in college instead of declaring for the draft. If you're going to be a top pick you risk tarnishing that by giving the scouts a fuller picture. The more they know and see the more they can dwell on the negatives.

      -Bball
      BINGO. It's the old "back up quarterback" syndrom. Everybody LOVES the backup, because he looks good in mop up duty and hasn't played enough minutes to dissect his weaknesses.
      Danny is much further along than most of you think, (and me too until lately).
      He IS developing the "second tier" of abilities now. They've scouted him and learned how to guard him and now HE"S adapting.\
      That's what stars and stars in the making do. I like Shawne A LOT. But he's not gone through a whole bunch of steps that Danny has. WHEN he's done that, and STILL looks better, then you'll have something.
      Not before.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

        Originally posted by Kstat View Post
        I'm astounded so many people think Shawne is going to be better than Granger. Granger sure as hell has shown a lot more.
        agreed. Shawne has shown a nice jumper and offense in general. He's NEVER rebounded like Danny did as a rookie. Nor blocked shots. NOR GUARDED THE OPPOSITIONS BEST PLAYER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! While STILL being the 2nd option!

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

          Originally posted by Jermaniac View Post
          Granger is going to be 24 next year, Shawne 21, If I'm correct I dont feel like looking.

          When Shawne is 24 he will for damn sure be better then ol stand behind the 3point line and wave my hands Danny.

          What a disappointing season by the golden boy. Most of you didnt want ANY SF because Danny is so great and Danny needed to be the #2. The guy is not ready to be a #2 and I said it before the season. All the games when JO was hurt, Granger would still be doing the same thing he was doing when JO was playing. And that is not being aggressive, he has all the ability to score 20 ppg, he is just scared.

          While Shawne on the other hand looks like he is a world class ice skater when he is moving on the floor. He is also the best shooter on this team.
          I totally disagree with your post, except for the bolded part. Granger should be a 3rd option, JO the 2nd (he certainly isn't a clear cut 1st, he proved that this season) and we currently don't have a 1st option on offense right now.

          I hope we trade JO for a high scoring SG and insert Shawne as our 2nd option.
          Maceo Baston's #1 fan on Pacers Digest!

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

            Originally posted by Eindar View Post
            When looking at Granger vs. Williams, the margin is razor thin. Williams looks very smooth out there, and seems to have a better basketball IQ. Granger, from what I've seen is better defensively, and will continue to be. Granger also appears to be the better athlete between the two of them.

            Here's the rub. Both have shown tremendous improvement in their time playing, which is usually the deciding factor when you're trying to figure out who the better player is. Last year Granger improved his shot, and during the season, you saw him start being more aggressive. Williams literally went from a guy who didn't look like he belonged in the NBA during the Fan Jam to a guy who I feel can be an All-Star at some point.

            If you held a gun to my head and made me choose, I'd keep Williams due to his age. The "best" solution would be to have Williams beef up a little bit to become a 3/4 and play the Al Harrington role as 6th man playing both positions. If we can land Mark Iavaroni, that's what I'd want. I do not want Granger or Williams trying to play SG, however. If it becomes a situation where both need to start at SF, then trade whichever one will land you more value and never look back.
            They're both 6'9" or +. They make perfect bookend forwards. Combined with Ike and Dunleavy I'm happy with our forwards for the next decade.
            Of course we'll have to trade at least 1 of them to get the guards we desperately need.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
              Thank you.

              I can see how someone might think Williams will be better than Granger eventually, but right now Granger is much much better. As Granger learned after the trade there is a huge difference being the 7th or 8th man coming off the bench and being the second best player on the entire team and playing 40 minutes. Before anyone suggests that Williams is better than Granger - let's see how Williams can handle playing 40 minutes every game.

              Comparing Granger last season to Williams this season, Granger's defense is much better, Williams shooting is better
              Rebounding - Granger much better, though he needs to stay focused on it.
              Shot blocking - Danny was a semi-force for a while last year, when he was in the paint more. Hoping he's back in there next year.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                Originally posted by 3rdStrike View Post
                First point, in man-defense Granger is better, yeah. But in terms of defensive awareness Williams is already ahead, as far as positioning and so forth. Second point, I can't agree with at all. Williams is (easily) the better athlete, from what I've seen. DG's main weakness is his slow feet and weak dribble, two things that haven't shown up as flaws for Williams (yet).
                Danny hasn't looked slow blowing past his defender to the hoop lately.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                  Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                  (it's worse with autographs, I just can't risk those anymore...all get traded).
                  Anyway that you can track down Tinsley or Murphy during the offseason to get their autograph?
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                    Originally posted by Mal View Post
                    I think labeling Williams as better than Granger is premature. Let's see how they look in a year.
                    Here's where I see it - away from the ball. Shawne almost constantly seeks out the gaps, the spaces that open up on either end, filling them offensively to keep the defense honest or covering them to prevent a pass or dribble drive.

                    One on one Danny is better at both ends right now, which is where I mention offensive moves that Danny has, despite the limited handles.

                    DD is right about Danny freezing into the hands-up, I'm open at 3pt arc on the weakside of a defensive trap/double team. That crap doesn't help because the ball can't reach you in those situations. Watching Shawne in similar situations he would come into the void left by the defense and attack it, making himself more available to get the ball and do something with it closer to the rim.

                    BTW, per48 Shawne OUTREBOUNDED Granger this year (7.2 to 6.6) and was virtually the same on assists (2 to 1.9). Danny was better in steals and blocks, but again that goes with my point that one on one Danny is the stronger defender. He's shown pretty strong instincts for shot blocks and his one on one defense actually is the closest thing to Pippen he has shown so far.

                    Last year Granger was a 10.5 rp48 guy, but let's be fair here, he was playing in the 4 with JO out and even Pollard/Foster sitting half the time. He was one of the biggest players on the team and even Harrison had a higher rp48 last year in his 67 games.

                    I think the rebounding level you saw this year at the primarly SF spot was more on track for where his game is at. HOWEVER, between the 2 of them I'd put DG at the PF sooner than Shawne because he is better in the post.


                    Honestly to me it's amazing how close the 2 of them are in overall ability. They each have some strengths, but the Pacers effectively drafted Danny 2 years in a row, both making the pick a steal IMO. Next year might be too soon, but years 4/3 should be very exciting I think.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                      Okay... question to all of you that have been discussing the 1-3-3-4-5 rotation while playing Dunleavy/Granger/Shawne at the SG spot.

                      Should we continue with what we were doing....go big and play 2 SFs at the SG/SF rotation ( while adding Marquis to the mix )?

                      - As in Marquis/Granger/Shawne/Dunleavy share a combined 96 minutes of playing time at the SG/SF rotation ( hence not acquiring a new Starting or backup SG ) with Marquis ( possibly ) playing some backup PG minutes.

                      or

                      Should we go back to a more traditional SG / SF rotation where we acquire a legit SG ( either a starting or backup one ) and we have our remaining SFs play only at the SF position?

                      - As in starting Marquis starting ( or backing up ) whatever SG that we acquire while having a standard SF rotation of Granger/Dunleavy/Shawne ( pick 2 since 1 of them will likely be traded ).

                      I'm guessing that if we try to acquire a legit SG....either backup of starting quality......it will mean that one of the SFs minutes will likely diminish. My main concern is how to figure out a way to get Shawne some legit minutes to continue his development.
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                        I'm not overly impressed with Shawne. I think he needs to bulk up, and I don't think his game is especially versatile. I'm not convinced he can put the ball on the floor, for example.

                        But I'll say this - he was the only guy who even tried to run the floor during the first half of the Atlanta game, so he gets credit for having more professional pride than these other bozos. Ike was also playing hard but wasn't running the floor like Shawne was.

                        I'd trade him for legit backcourt help in a heartbeat. And I think the reality is that either Williams or Granger will need to be traded (we're stuck with Dunleavy, but he's an okay "system" player, even if he's obnoxiously overpaid.)

                        Williams is, however, miles and miles ahead of rAwful Marshall.
                        Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                        Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                        Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                        Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                        And life itself, rushing over me
                        Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                        Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                          I like them both and look forward to watching them develop together.....




                          Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                          Once the summer is set and he's back in camp for certain he's gonna be the first jersey I've bought in about 10 years. I'm risking my jinx with him (it's worse with autographs, I just can't risk those anymore...all get traded).
                          My plan is for #2 son to sport a #4 jersey next season to replace his #32 (#3 the 2nd time, which replaced his Euro #3). My daughter has a #33 that replaced #1. Eldest son wears #'s 11 and 7.

                          Look for a blockbuster deal involving all jerseys mentioned.......
                          PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                            Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                            DD is right about Danny freezing into the hands-up, I'm open at 3pt arc on the weakside of a defensive trap/double team. That crap doesn't help because the ball can't reach you in those situations. Watching Shawne in similar situations he would come into the void left by the defense and attack it, making himself more available to get the ball and do something with it closer to the rim.

                            BTW, per48 Shawne OUTREBOUNDED Granger this year (7.2 to 6.6) and was virtually the same on assists (2 to 1.9). Danny was better in steals and blocks, but again that goes with my point that one on one Danny is the stronger defender. He's shown pretty strong instincts for shot blocks and his one on one defense actually is the closest thing to Pippen he has shown so far.
                            .
                            I haven't noticed those things, you are observant.

                            Shawne USUALLY plays mop up minutes against reserves.
                            Danny plays against starters ALL the time, guards the opponents best shooter AND has had to play outside all year. Kind of hard to get offensive rebounds when you're 23' away.
                            No way can you compare 48 minute figures for a starter vs a bench player.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                              Here's a question for the unabashing and reasonable Granger fans..


                              What exactly makes GRANGER better than WILLIAMS? I guess I'm curious to what people think. I know people think Shawne hasn't proved himself, but what is Granger proving so well that, without giving Shawne a fair look, ranks Granger as the better of the two?

                              How about tangibles? Name a category you think Granger holds the edge in:

                              Shooting
                              Dribbling
                              Passing
                              Post Game
                              Running
                              One-on-one defense
                              Team defense
                              Team offense
                              Rebouding
                              Hustle

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Your impressions of Shawne Williams

                                Originally posted by maragin View Post
                                It's kind of tough to really gauge a rookie that doesn't see a ton of playing time. Often enough, a rookie gets lots of playing time on a bad team.

                                And yes he did get more PT as we regressed into a bad team.

                                NBA.com listed the top 30 rookies, and Shawne wasn't on the list.

                                Brandon Roy
                                Rudy Gay
                                Andrea Bargnani
                                Paul Millsap
                                LaMarcus Aldridge
                                Jorge Garbajosa
                                Craig Smith
                                Randy Foye
                                Rajon Rondo
                                Adam Morrison
                                Tyrus Thomas
                                Renaldo Balkman
                                Sheldon Williams
                                Marcus Williams
                                Walter Herrmann
                                Sergio Rodriguez
                                Tarence Kinsey
                                Mickael Gelabale
                                Jordan Farmar
                                Daniel Gibson
                                Kelenna Azubuike
                                Josh Boone
                                Ronnie Brewer
                                Rodney Carney
                                Mardy Collins
                                Yakhouba Diawara
                                Ersan Ilyasova
                                Alexander Johnson
                                J.J. Redick
                                Thabo Sefolosha

                                I think that with some playing time he would have cracked the top 20. I too wondered about our logjam at the 3. I'd look for him to get quality backup minutes next year, maybe as the 7th or 8th off the bench. If we make some large moves, including moving Granger, that obviously changes.

                                By next year, I hope we could look at the sophs and say that he's in the top 20 of his class. If we can say top 10, I'll consider him another draft steal.
                                Tyrus Thomas would be in my top 10.

                                Shawne seems like he's willing to learn and man when he shoots that 3 --

                                you know it's going in.
                                http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YMltKsoDwe8&NR=1
                                press pause on the second slow-mo replay around 0:12 mark

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X