Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

    Definitely not Sam Mitchell. He's a poor mans Rick Carlisle. The reason Toronto had a successful season is their overall talent level, not Sam Mitchells coaching.

    Ivaroni does interest me though. A great coaching pedigree.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

      Originally posted by Sh4d3 View Post
      I don't know much about Iavaroni, but I don't want Sam Mitchell.

      So, I'd go with Beefaroni by default.
      Thats exactly how I feel.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

        Marc Iavaroni

        I like the way that the Suns play, and would love to see Danny, Shawne and Ike in such a system.
        PACER FAN ON STRIKE!!!-The moment the Pacers fire Larry Bird I will cheer for them again.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

          Originally posted by DrBadd01 View Post
          Marc Iavaroni

          I like the way that the Suns play, and would love to see Danny, Shawne and Ike in such a system.
          Does Iavaroni have anything to do with the way the offense is run?

          I thought that it was mostly cuz of D'antoni?

          I'm not sure if we get Iavaroni that we would even come close to running an offense like that.....we don't have the players to make that work.
          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

            Iavaroni runs the defense and he doesn't run the offense - and from the book I've read on the Suns it doesn't appear he really does anything with the offense

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

              Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
              Iavaroni runs the defense and he doesn't run the offense - and from the book I've read on the Suns it doesn't appear he really does anything with the offense
              I'm also reading the book and it has made me more interested in Iavaroni. He loves defense but he also believes in a strong offense. I doubt he will coach a half-court, grind out the clock type of team. He has many sides though, after being and learning under many great head coaches.

              Now Sam Mitchell, I don't know why but I have never been impressed by him. Yes he does get in players faces, hold them responsible, and calls them out (which we need in a coach) but I just have a bad feeling about him.

              With that said...the Pacers need to hire Iavaroni.
              I think KP is a Captain Planet fan. He believes that the collective will of five decent starters can outweigh the power of top-level talent. Too bad Herb won't cut the check for their Planeteer rings.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                Originally posted by indyman37 View Post
                Now Sam Mitchell, I don't know why but I have never been impressed by him. Yes he does get in players faces, hold them responsible, and calls them out (which we need in a coach) but I just have a bad feeling about him.
                I get the sense the Mitchell is pulling a "Jerome James" on the league. Jerome James played like cr@p duing his years in Seattle....he has one really good Playoff series against the Kings during a Contract year.....and then fools some GM into giving him a huge contract and then fades into obscurity. IMHO...Mitchell leads a lottery team for 2 seasons...a new GM comes in.....his roster is significantly improved.....they win...and he gets DCOY. In the end....I just feel that he isn't really as good of a coach as some people think he is and ( in the end ) convinces some poor GM to give him a huge paycheck.

                I like that he's a disciplinarian type coach...but that doesn't always works with players.

                Besides...if we trade JONeal and go young...I'm not sure if I would want him as a coach.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                  Question: if you were a hot coaching prospect and had your choice of open jobs this summer: Bobcats, Pacers, Sonics, Kings - am I missing one? The Raptors job might open up as could the Heat job.

                  I'm not sure which job is the best.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                    UB - I'd put Pacers at the bottom of that list.

                    Pretending that I'm a hot coaching candidate, after seeing what happened to Carlisle season after season, I wouldn't touch the Pacers job with a 100 foot pole.
                    “Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.” - Winston Churchill

                    “If you can't be a good example, then you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning.” - Catherine Aird

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                      Sam Mitchell is a "meh" pick to me. I like some things I read about him, but I'm worried that he's Rick Jr. for the WRONG reasons.

                      Ivaroni intrigues me a lot more, though he could easily flop. Considering we're clearly not in contender mode, I'd rather swing for the fences with Marc.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                        Ivaroni intrigues me BUT IF JO is staying I might lean toward Mitchell. I'm afraid we need an established voice to A: be firm in assigning a role for JO (and the whole team) and B: At 8 games into the season (and new system) be able to say "STFU" and take no prisoners. I'm not sure Ivaroni could do that because I'm afraid he'd still be trying to find his footing and I just don't know if he could hold firm if it came to that.

                        Would there be some self-doubt creep in if the franchise player came screaming into the office? What about if it was a grizzled vet like Armstrong?

                        Would management even get behind him if things weren't going overly smooth? Even Cletus had some questions about Coach Norman Dale but he was able to give the coach the benefit of the doubt. Oh wait... that was a movie

                        -Bball
                        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                        ------

                        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                        -John Wooden

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                          Question: if you were a hot coaching prospect and had your choice of open jobs this summer: Bobcats, Pacers, Sonics, Kings - am I missing one? The Raptors job might open up as could the Heat job.

                          I'm not sure which job is the best.
                          memphis should be added.

                          i might actually rank them the way you've got them listed and stick memphis over the pacers...

                          look i think the pacers are a mess but you can't tell me you'd rather be in seattle because while they have the requisite 2 stars (one annual allstar and one contender) and some decent role players (collison, ridenour/watson, wilkens) they're going to be moving and fighting the city and if their target destination is vegas then the league as well... the kings who are in more of a mess than the pacers are. they have martin and maybe some hope for garcia but they're in worse shape.

                          i think you rank the bobcats #1 because there isn't a lot of expectation there - they've never been good so you couldn't really do worse. and they've got a ton of young talent that would be fun to coach (okafor, may, felton, morrison, hermann and wallace if he stays). there is a gap to #2 (the grizzlies) they were hurt by pau's injury and coaching instability. the ownership is a mess but you're gonna have a high pick, you've got pau, hakim, miller and gay returning. plus they're only a year removed from the playoffs. then there is another significant gap when you get to the pacers. you've got a bunch of players with potenial (granger, diogu, quis maybe people outside of pacer fans look at shawne that way too) but you do have tinsley and the uncertainty of JO. the pacers also, while it was a horrifically difficult team to coach didn't run him out of town the way SAC did adelman and musselman. and as i mentioned seattle as an organization is in a mess. i think you've got 3,4,5 that are close and a large gap between 1 and 2 and 3, but you still have to rank the pacers there.

                          if toronto falls in there they obviously go to the top of the list. the magic? behind the bobcats but ahead of the pacers probably below memphis too cos they have dwight but who knows what else.
                          This is the darkest timeline.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                            Sam's got some crazy in him which like in a woman both attracts and repels me. The season wouldn't be dull with Sam.
                            "They could turn out to be only innocent mathematicians, I suppose," muttered Woevre's section officer, de Decker.

                            "'Only.'" Woevre was amused. "Someday you'll explain to me how that's possible. Seeing that, on the face of it, all mathematics leads, doesn't it, sooner or later, to some kind of human suffering."

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                              I'd have to go with Mitchell & for one reason only.

                              Bird is gonna fire the next coach after 3 years anyway. If Iavaroni comes in & as Uncle Buck hopes, "becomes the next great NBA coach", he's gonna be gone in 3 years. Since I doubt we will have dug ourselves out of our current mess in that time, we'll still be rebuilding & need another coach.

                              Bring in Mitchell for 2 years & an option for a 3rd.

                              Bird can re-stock the roster with the players he wants over the next 2 years.

                              Fire Mitchell & then try to find the next great NBA coach.

                              If Bird would allow a young coach to come in & maybe coach for 4 or 5 years, then by all means, go for Iavaroni.

                              But you know that's not gonna happen.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Do you want Sam Mitchell or Marc Iavaroni - and why

                                I don't know that at all. Rick was here for 4 years, and I bet if we'd done better this year he would be back for a 5th.

                                I think people are taking Bird's "rule of thumb" about the shelf-life of a coach and running with it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X