Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

    Because of my loyalty to Indy, it's easy for me to join in with all the criticisms of Detroit. The worse Detroit is the better it makes Indy look, I must subconsciously think. Other than Chicago, Naptown is the last city in the midwest that is spoken about positively by the general public. We probably all partake in a little joy at Detroit's never ending suffering.

    Note - It's Detroit, the Midwest, the central division.. It's very close to home which is why I thought we could all talk about it. =)

    Anyways, I loved this column by Rembert. Really hope Detroit pulls it together.


    http://www.grantland.com/blog/hollyw...t-vs-everybody

    An interesting exchange takes place when you tell people you're headed to Detroit.

    While it's never the same response verbatim, it usually revolves around three general themes: "Be careful," "Why?" and "Take pictures." These would be reasonable if I were, say, headed to a zoo. When discussing a city that people still call home, they're more than a little off-putting.

    Detroit was one of the first places I knew I wanted to visit when this trip's route began to take shape. I've studied cities and their planning (or the lack thereof) since college and always knew this was a place I sorely needed to see. But if you were to ask me five years ago, 10 months ago, or even a week ago why my presence in Detroit was imperative, I'm not sure I'd have a good reason.

    Truth be told, it was mostly voyeuristic.

    The same way we're fixated by car crashes, we're mystified by struggle. And blight. And right now, there's no city mired in more struggle than Detroit.

    On the whole, I don't think this country wants Detroit to make it. It sounds maniacal, but I truly believe that. We've made our peace with this still-great city firmly existing in the land of "once-great." This has been especially true since news of bankruptcy threw the city's woes on the front page of every major publication. These pieces were specific on the details of Detroit's dire economic situation, but they were operating from a distance. Highlighting the very real flaws, leaving no room for the imagination to assume positivity. They rarely acknowledged the chance of a bounce-back.

    And because of this, due to the brainwash that happens when you read too much about the city, you begin to assume the worst. As you approach the city limits, you envision buildings have crumbled, cars have been overturned, the homeless outnumber the sheltered, and things are but a few steps away from martial law.

    I fell victim to this line of thought only two minutes after making it downtown.

    Having not even made it to my hotel, I felt as if I'd entered a Third World city.

    "Be careful" and "Take pictures" were suddenly on high alert. As was the "Why?," as in "Why did I come here again?" Cities are my foremost sociological love, but this was unlike anything I'd seen before. Perhaps everything I was reading was correct. Maybe there was no hope for this place.

    Finally, I pulled in to my hotel to check in, moderately rattled, and the woman at the desk gave me a heads-up.

    "Don't be startled if you hear explosions," she said with a big smile on her face.

    I don't know the look I gave her, because I can't see my face, but I'm certain it wasn't a big smile. Staring at her, without words, I stood still for a second. But there was no follow-up, no second sentence. She just went back to work.

    Standing in the lobby, now on minute eight of Detroit, I sat down. Where was I? What was this place? And why did no one else seem taken aback by overturned subway cars and future explosions? Walking to the elevator, I overheard a conversation between two other employees during their break:

    Employee 1: Did you see Mark Wahlberg the other day?
    Employee 2: No, he was here?
    Employee 1: Yes, I saw him. I wonder how long he'll be in town for Transformers 4. I bet it's gonna be good.
    There are moments in your life when irrational fear or prejudice or judgmental nature backslap you in the face and all you can do is apologize.

    I'm sorry, Detroit. I got caught up.

    Now that I understood the previous 10 minutes of my stay in Detroit, thrilled that I could finally approach the city free of biases, I set out to learn. Not to explain, or philosophize, or pitch solutions, or make pretentious generalizations about its citizens and doomsaying conjecture about its future. Just to experience it.

    The Heidelberg Project

    My Thursday morning in downtown Detroit had already proven that there was life in the city. Less than half a mile from my hotel, I truly embraced the beef between neighboring hot dog sellers Lafayette Coney Island and American Coney Island, watched more than 30 people picket outside the Theodore Levin United States Courthouse over pensions, and walked through Lafayette Greens, a half-acre garden on city land used to grow food, house vendors, and teach classes.

    On the surface, the Heidelberg Project is a two-block outdoor art installation. Many of the homes have been purchased by the project and its creator, Tyree Guyton, but scattered among the decorated homes are houses with residents who continue to live there normally, separate from the project.

    I spent an hour in the district. It's both beautiful and sad, a shining parallel with the city's current status. The beauty comes from the fact that something like this can exist, even through partial demolitions directed by two former mayors — that it can cover such a large surface area and offer such an amazing artistic vision. With that said, the project began, and still exists, as a form of political protest over the deterioration of Guyton's Detroit neighborhood.

    Asking one of the Project's employees how the surrounding area responded and respected the houses, as well as the art strewn throughout the grass, he said that for the most part things went untouched. "Everything was going great until recently, when someone burned down one of the houses."

    I asked him if it was an accident and he quickly responded, "Oh, no, it was arson."

    He told me about his background in the "traditional" art world, and why he left it for something more meaningful like the Heidelberg Project. "It was just filled with hipsters who would come into the city because they treated everything like ruin porn."

    That phrase, "ruin porn," stuck with me, because it was a phrase I knew I'd read before.

    “At first, you’re really flattered by it, like, ‘Whoa, these professional guys are interested in what I have to say and show them.’ But you get worn down trying to show them all the different sides of the city, then watching them go back and write the same story as everyone else. The photographers are the worst. Basically the only thing they’re interested in shooting is ruin porn.” —Vice, 2009.
    This, too, was said in reference to Detroit. Pulling this up on my phone and reading it after finishing our conversation, I looked out into the neighborhood. Three teenage girls were getting their picture taken in front of the burned-down house, Charlie's Angels–style.

    Kendrick Lamar at the Fillmore Detroit

    I'd never been to Detroit, and there's no real tie between the rapper and the city unless the L.A.–Kendrick–Dr. Dre–Eminem–Detroit plotline means something to someone. So I was very curious to see how this show played out. This was only intensified upon learning it was a 21-and-over show, meaning the gaggle of teenage fanboys that can make any crowd hyperactive would be at a minimum, with the exception of some successful fake IDs.

    Even before the set started, however, just feeling the buzz in the room, I knew it would be one to remember. Because on that night in that venue, everyone was excited, almost feeling privileged, to see Kendrick Lamar, rap star. And for once, the throng of rap concertgoers that mouth the words to themselves and refuse to show any joy and happiness were nowhere to be found.

    The lyrics were shouted back at Kendrick for the duration of the concert. For an hour, it felt like everything that occurred outside the doors of the Fillmore didn't matter. The horrible things being said about this city failed to penetrate.

    For an hour, it was just Kendrick giving everyone in attendance a release. And even though all rappers have shtick that can make any crowd feel special, scripted or not, he made Detroit feel like the center of the universe for a moment.

    Belle Isle Park

    Detroit has a park and it is called Belle Isle Park and it is larger than Central Park. By more than 150 acres.

    But virtually no one was there.

    Yes, there was a tennis lesson place, as well as a man blasting music and smoking a cigar in a lawn chair, five men playing handball, a father giving his son a basketball lesson, the lifeguard guarding zero lives, and a few scattered family reunion barbecues, but all of these activities could have taken place in a large cul-de-sac.

    This was a 982-acre park. It was startling to see that much space, and these public services, go unused.

    The instinct is to say "go to waste." But that's not exactly accurate. Because they were being used, just extremely sparingly.

    When things aren't crowded and lines don't exist, it often seems as if they're not meeting their full potential. There's no one arguing that Belle Isle Park is operating at maximum efficiency, but there is something pleasant and calming about a place — a public one — where you can have the space and freedom to do whatever you want.

    Just like Heidelberg, it was beautiful and sad. The freedom to roam at your own pace, at your own volume, in as much space as you desired is something those in densely populated areas can only dream about. But at the same time, a wonder like Belle Isle Park should not be so desolate. Never.

    Hart Plaza Amphitheater

    A sign is affixed atop the amphitheater that sits inside downtown Detroit's Hart Plaza advertising four things: restrooms, an ethnic gallery, food booths, and a police substation.

    Walking around the space midday, I found that none of these entities appeared to still be in use.

    While the plaza was bustling, especially as I neared the waterfront, there were only two people in the spacious underbelly of the amphitheater: me and a man who seemed to be sleeping down there.

    We acknowledged one another and he gave me what I took as a head-nod of approval to roam around.

    Still unsure of whether this space was always uninhabited, or perhaps only recently, the increasingly strong stench of stale urine made it feel as if barren was the norm.

    This was a place that once mattered. I was sure of it.

    Walking around, I constantly felt as if I was trespassing. But I also knew that I was the only one who seemed to care about that space at that very moment. Continuing to poke my head in different corners of the space, to continuously find rooms that appeared untouched for some time, until I'd traversed every nook, I walked out.

    Again, at the street level, a different world existed. The sounds of children laughing, people having lunch on stoops, tourists taking pictures of the water. One random, seemingly abandoned structure existed on the street level, however, that didn't fit with everything else.

    Unsure of what it was, I approached. The windows were reflective and dirty, and it certainly wasn't something commonly in use.

    I couldn't see inside, but it did provide a nice backdrop of the skyline. Just taking a stab at it, I removed my phone from its case and put the camera flush against the rusty window.

    Unreal. Or was it? I didn't know at that point. It was troubling, I knew that. Seeing that something appeared to be written on the wall of this room that hadn't been tended to in months, or perhaps years, I put my camera against the second window:

    I jumped back almost expecting to see a dead body. After searching for good among the troubled for two days in Detroit, this was the first encounter that was purely despicable. Not only that this was written, but that it was allowed to remain.

    I left Hart Plaza. Discouraged.

    Three days in Detroit is perhaps only enough time to make a declarative statement on a Coney hot dog choice. (Lafayette.) Nothing else.

    As I drove out of town, I left knowing I'd be back. Soon. This place had taken hold of me, as had the people, those seemingly stuck in Detroit and the contingent that have voluntarily chosen to see this tough stretch through.

    But I'm tired of taking pictures and simply experiencing. Now I want to help.

  • #2
    Edit: Probably best to delete thread
    Last edited by Psyren; 08-06-2013, 05:09 PM.
    Stop quoting people I have on ignore!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

      Nothing productive is going to come out of this thread. No one is even interested in having a productive discussion. I have no interest in the flow of unabashed hate and ignorance that comes from a city of Detroit-related thread here.

      Originally posted by Psyren View Post
      My honest opinion, and I don't mean this to offend anyone, is just that most people don't want to help rebuild one of the worst cities in America only to watch it fail again. It's a wasted effort.
      Whoops. Too late.

      On the other hand, it was a nice article.

      This belongs in Market square anyway.
      Last edited by Kstat; 08-06-2013, 04:27 PM.

      It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

      Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
      Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
      NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

        Originally posted by mattie View Post
        We probably all partake in a little joy at Detroit's never ending suffering.
        Pistons? Sure. Detroit? C'mon dude. That's a pretty gross statement.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

          "Ruin Porn". Heh, that's interesting phrasing.

          Admittedly I know a couple of photographers who fall all over themselves to shoot "ruin porn". One of them has recently done up Cleveland, Detroit, Pittsburgh and Columbus all in the last four months. Interestingly enough, if this guy wasn't shooting boarded up homes, he was shooting trash on the side of the road next to a cornfield. I didn't consider it artful, to me, it was just perpetuating Midwestern stereotypes.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

            I probably spend as much time in Detroit as any regular poster on this board (to my knowledge), and while I can't say I'm an overwhelming fan of the city, I am certainly not rooting for it's demise. If there is any truth to the statement that people take "joy" in Detroit's suffering or that there are portions of the population that don't want to see it propped up, it's probably more due to "they dug their grave, let them lie in it" line of thinking. There's also a certain amount of hostility reserved by those who follow the politics of it all that the auto industry (which they read as: Detroit) was bailed out by the government from their years of mismanagement and poor products. How true all of that is, I'm not going to speculate.

            Detroit has some good things going for it, and since they feel this "us against the world" thing that is being touched on here, they are a proud group of people. The city will recover, and it will be better for it. Will it ever be what it once was? I rather doubt it, but as someone who frequents the city, it's not that bad. It has it's shadowy parts like any other major city, and theirs may be a little more prominently displayed, but the city will regroup.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

              Originally posted by mattie
              Because of my loyalty to Indy, it's easy for me to join in with all the criticisms of Detroit. The worse Detroit is the better it makes Indy look, I must subconsciously think. Other than Chicago, Naptown is the last city in the midwest that is spoken about positively by the general public. We probably all partake in a little joy at Detroit's never ending suffering.
              For mattie: Nothing like an American rooting against one of America's oldest great cities, and the home of millions of fellow Americans, to collapse into ruin. In your remarkable history of posting stupidity, I don't think anything compares to this.

              This thread is an embarrassment.
              Last edited by Mackey_Rose; 08-07-2013, 08:38 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                Being a citizen of the USA and a former resident of Michigan, I find this post by the OP to be highly inflammatory, asinine and out of line. Rooting for the demise of a city and its people? Seriously Clark?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                  Why would anyone take joy in a city collapsing?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                    I wouldn't have found this article if it wasn't for the thread... so there's that.

                    Man, the author is a fantastic storyteller. The bait-and-switch at the start of the article had me laughing out loud. It was a very fair, balanced article that was thought provoking to me at least.

                    I for one hope that Detroit emerges from all of their current misfortune and returns as a giant.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                      Some food for thought...

                      Study Ranks America's Most Liberal and Conservative Cities | American City & County

                      The most liberal city in America? Detroit, Michigan (followed closely behind by our very own Gary, Indiana, a true beacon of beauty).

                      The most conservative city in America?



                      Provo, Utah, a city with low crime, high income, and old fashioned family values and human decency.

                      So, while I don't enjoy cities being ruined, and livelihoods being destroyed, Detroit can be looked at as a lesson as to what poison politics can do to an economy and culture. Smart people learn from lessons. Unfortunately, after looking at the last presidential election, we can safely say that slightly more than half of the voting public would never be confused for smart people (no offense intended).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                        Originally posted by Kstat View Post
                        I have no interest in the flow of unabashed hate and ignorance that comes from a city of Detroit-related thread here.
                        Just because you don't like the truth doesn't make it wrong or hateful, it just means you'd rather be happy in your own little bubble world than face cold, hard reality. As they say, ignorance is bliss.

                        Stay blissful, my friend.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                          Yeah I knew this thread would probably not be a good idea when I moved it last night, I just don't see anywhere for this to go but down from here. It's to bad because there would/could be a good discussion about how cities function and what they need/want to provide.

                          I don't know maybe I'll give it one more chance and see if we can't re-direct the conversation.

                          Does anyone, without going into a liberal/conservative monologue, have a real understanding of how Detroit got to where it is?


                          Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                            Originally posted by Peck View Post
                            Does anyone, without going into a liberal/conservative monologue, have a real understanding of how Detroit got to where it is?
                            Government corruption, rise of the Japanese auto industry, NAFTA in general......
                            "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                            "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: For Kstat: Detroit vs Everybody

                              Originally posted by GrangeRusHibbert View Post
                              Some food for thought...

                              Study Ranks America's Most Liberal and Conservative Cities | American City & County

                              The most liberal city in America? Detroit, Michigan (followed closely behind by our very own Gary, Indiana, a true beacon of beauty).

                              The most conservative city in America?



                              Provo, Utah, a city with low crime, high income, and old fashioned family values and human decency.

                              So, while I don't enjoy cities being ruined, and livelihoods being destroyed, Detroit can be looked at as a lesson as to what poison politics can do to an economy and culture. Smart people learn from lessons. Unfortunately, after looking at the last presidential election, we can safely say that slightly more than half of the voting public would never be confused for smart people (no offense intended).
                              You always have to bring up politics in nearly every Market Square thread, don't you.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X