Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 8
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 template Next
  • #1

    NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

    I was looking back through some old TV ratings articles, and uncovered this blog. Had me going for a second. But I think the point is made rather well. Also interesting to read the readers comments



    http://sportsmediawatch.blogspot.com...#disqus_thread

    By Paul Paulsen

    The NBA is full of thugs, and here's the rap sheet to prove it
    The Gilbert Arenas situation has made it clear as day: the NBA has a problem.

    The league is "full of thugs," to quote Forbes editor Michael K. Ozanian. San Francisco Examiner writer Bob Frantz recently wrote that the NBA's "overly ink-stained players look like a bunch of gang-bangers playing in the recreation yard at Pelican Bay," following that up by saying that Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittendon had validated his opinion. Frantz: "A league filled with guys that look like thugs is bound to be filled with guys that act like thugs" (sfexaminer.com, 1/4/10).

    And they're absolutely right. Just take a look at the league's rap sheet.

    An NBA player was just released from prison after being involved in a murder-for-hire plot involving his agent. There's an NBA player currently serving a 14 year prison sentence for attempted murder, and another player serving a sentence for conspiring to murder his pregnant girlfriend.

    There are fights in NBA games on an almost nightly basis -- including one during the league's outdoor game earlier this season, its showcase event. Several years ago, an NBA player grabbed an elderly assistant coach by the head and shoved him to the ground during a melee in the Conference Finals. Five years ago, an NBA player threw a chair into the stands and broke a woman's nose -- just months after another player suckerpunched an opponent, breaking his neck.

    NBA players are unquestionably prone to violence. One player demonstrated to ESPN's Outside the Lines how he would handle someone who would attempt to mug him. "If someone's right here, ... and he's like, 'give me your wallet,' and he's got a knife. I'm like, alright man, let me grab my wallet," he grabbed his gun and laughed, "there it is. Now, he's got a chance to turn tail, or he's getting it. Better leave. If you think you can get me with that knife before I squeeze off three rounds with this, you'll be gravely mistaken." If that does not epitomize thug life, I don't know what does.

    An NBA player was arrested for domestic battery last year -- less than a year after his brother, a fellow NBA player, was sued for allegedly beating his pregnant girlfriend. The star of the NBA's championship team was sued for alleged sexual assault over the summer.

    And let's not forget the NBA player that murdered his teammate back in 2003.

    The fact is, the NBA has a problem. The league is filled with vile, criminal thugs. No other league deals with the kind of criminal activity that the NBA does. Not the NHL, not Major League Baseball -- and certainly not college basketball, where the players are uncorrupted by the money in the pros. Even the NFL has more upstanding citizens than the ...

    Hold on a moment.

    I'm receiving word that the aforementioned murder-for-hire plot involved NHL player Mike Danton. And that the person serving a 14-year prison sentence for attempted murder is former MLB player -- and member of the '03 World Champion Marlins -- Ugueth Urbina. And the person in jail for the murder of his pregnant girlfriend is the NFL's Rae Carruth.

    Also, I've been informed that the NBA has not had a brawl since 2006. To the best of my understanding, those nightly brawls I referenced earlier took place in the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball. Again, I apologize -- but who could blame me? It's not like you hear about fights in those leagues.

    Furthermore, the outdoor game fight took place during the NHL's Winter Classic, the player who shoved the elderly assistant to the ground was MLB player Pedro Martinez, the player who threw a chair in the stands was MLB player Frank Francisco, and the player who broke an opponent's neck during a fight was the NHL's Todd Bertuzzi.

    The Outside the Lines quote was made by MLB player Luke Scott, and the brothers involved in separate domestic violence incidents were MLB's Brian and Marcus Giles. And, apparently, the superstar sued for alleged sexual assault was the star of the Super Bowl champion Steelers, Ben Roethlisberger.

    Finally, it has come to my attention that the player who murdered his teammate in '03 was Baylor college basketball player Carlton Dotson.

    Huh. Boy, it's a good thing none of those other sports have image problems. Or those incidents would really have stuck.

    Okay, so the other leagues have their issues. But those are isolated incidents. Why judge Major League Baseball just because an elderly man was thrown to the ground and had to be taken away by stretcher, or just because a woman had a her nose crushed by a folding chair?

    And besides, that doesn't change the fact that the NBA is filled with unrepentant, preening, arrogant thugs. Just look at Jayson Williams, who killed his limo driver and continues to get into legal trouble. Sure, he hasn't played in the NBA in a decade, and he was retired when said incident took place, but he is still representative of the league as a whole. You know, the same way Jim Leyritz (arrested on DUI manslaughter after the death of a woman in '07, and then arrested in '09 on domestic battery charges) is representative of Major League Baseball.

    The Pacers/Pistons brawl is perhaps the best example of the NBA's rampant thuggery. Players going into the stands to fight with fans is unprecedented in the history of sports. Except for the time Bruins players went into the stands at Madison Square Garden. And the time Dodgers players went into the stands at Wrigley Field. But Pacers/Pistons was different. After all, as Mike Breen said, Ron Artest had a "scary look in his eyes." Mike Milbury was just having fun out there.

    The NBA's gun problem is another good example. Devin Harris estimated that 75% of NBA players own guns. Take a look at the list of NBA players involved in gun incidents in recent years: Jayson Williams, Sebastian Telfair, Arenas, Crittendon, Delonte West, Stephen Jackson, DeShawn Stevenson and Chris Mills. That's 9 whole players -- enough to fill an injury-decimated team -- and those are just the 9 we know about. It could be 25 or 50 of them for all we know.

    If 75% of the NBA owns guns, and the NBA has 400 players, then we're talking about 300 pistol-packing NBA thugs. Now, sure, 9 (or even 50) out of 300 is a fairly small fraction -- and one that would seem to indicate that the vast majority of NBA gun owners are responsible with their weapons. But just the fact that they have those weapons is a bad thing. After all, gun ownership is illegal in the United States. (ed. note, apparently, the right to bear arms is guaranteed in the Constitution. Who knew?)

    And guns aside, everyone knows that NBA players frequently get in trouble with the law. Remember that book by Jeff Benedict, "Out of Bounds: Inside the NBA's Culture of Rape, Violence, and Crime," where he found that 40% of NBA players have a police record involving a serious crime? Sure, his sample size was limited to 177 of the NBA's 417 non-foreign born players -- less than half. And sure, the book did not "disclose a detailed listing of his data" (New York Times, 6/15/04). And sure, as NBA Commissioner David Stern noted, the book lumped together those who were accused of crimes and those who were convicted (ed. note, apparently, there is indeed a difference between being accused of a crime and being convicted of one.)

    But who cares? 40 percent of NBA players! Rape, Violence and Crime! That's all you need to know. And sure, I could do an investigation into cable news, use Bill O'Reilly and Kiran Chetry as my sample size, and say that 50% of cable news hosts have been accused of sexual harassment. But that doesn't matter. It sounds true, doesn't it? It reinforces our preconceived notions.

    It doesn't matter what's true. It doesn't matter what goes on in other sports. It doesn't matter that for every Javaris Crittendon, there's Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and countless others. It doesn't matter that the majority of NBA players are more than likely law abiding citizens.

    The league has an image problem. It has an image problem not because of what actually takes place, but because of what observers have convinced themselves takes place. It has an image problem because every incident becomes part of a trend. It has an image problem because the league's first player-related scandal in three years has also resulted in its only mentions on cable news shows in three years.

    With that in mind, I, for one, will join my sportswriting colleagues -- from Terrence Moore and Michael K. Ozanian to Gary Thorne and Jason Whitlock before them -- in continuing to judge the league and its players based on stereotypes and innuendo. The NBA is full of thugs, and I think I speak for those aforementioned individuals when I say there's nothing you can say to make me think otherwise.

    Published by Paulsen at 1:48 PM

    Labels: NBA

    Add New Comment
    You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.



    Subscribe to all comments by email

    Share on Share this comment on...Configure options...Post as Guest
    Showing 27 comments
    Sort by Popular nowBest RatingNewest firstOldest first Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
    dbrown1225 2 months ago

    Every sport has players that get in trouble in some regard.

    The fact that you wrote an article to prove that the NBA is full of thugs might say as much about you as it does the league.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Jason Clinkscales 2 months ago in reply to dbrown1225

    He's being sarcastic. EXTREMELY sarcastic. Believe me when I say that there are few bloggers and media reporters who respect and defend the NBA as he does. Just go through the archives.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    dbrown1225 2 months ago in reply to Jason Clinkscales

    My comment should be deleted. I didn't read the article as thoroughly as I should have.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Jason Clinkscales 2 months ago in reply to dbrown1225

    Stuff happens. Yet, how you felt is how all fans feel about the league when unknowledgeable hacks in the mainstream denigrate it as such.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    AvEryBadApPLe 3 months ago

    Maybe, just maybe, professional athletes shouldn't be considered role models. I find it rather amusing that folks want to cry about these recent turn of events with these so called "star" athletes. They're definitely not perfect and as screwed up in the head as the next person. It's quite possible that there will be another one cutting up only weeks, maybe days from now.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Jen Nguyen 3 months ago

    Excellent article!
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    someone 3 months ago

    You are an idiot so just because a basketball player has a gun he's a thug, "One player demonstrated to ESPN's Outside the Lines how he would handle someone who would attempt to mug him. "If someone's right here, ... and he's like, 'give me your wallet,' and he's got a knife. I'm like, alright man, let me grab my wallet," he grabbed his gun and laughed, "there it is. Now, he's got a chance to turn tail, or he's getting it. Better leave. If you think you can get me with that knife before I squeeze off three rounds with this, you'll be gravely mistaken." If that does not epitomize thug life, I don't know what does.", how does protecting yourself make you a thug, thats like saying eating meat to survive makes you a barbarian. Some comments say this is a great post but it is a ridiculous one.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    James 3 months ago in reply to someone

    I think someone missed the entire point of the article. Have you, by any chance, ever heard of the term 'sarcasm?'

    Interesting note by someone earlier. The Knicks and Heat used to have epic brawls in the late 90s, and it was never considered a bad thing. Why the sudden shift?
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Colby 3 months ago

    Thank you for writing this. Too bad the jokers in mainstream media are too blind and/or racist to write something like this so that this myth can be dispelled
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Andrew 3 months ago

    As someone from a completely white america background who has gone to undergrad and law school at small jesuit colleges and had to listen about how football and college basketball are better than nba basketball because "they care more" and "aren't a bunch of thugs" I loooooooved reading this article. For whatever reason, people act goofy when it comes to the nba (cough *RACE* cough). Pretty bitter, very funny, and very engaging writing. Thanks for the read.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    sitruc 3 months ago

    Great article.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    oxymor0n 3 months ago

    good job writing this article! i'm not in the US so i dont know the extent of the problem over there, but it's always heartwarming to see some1 stand up against the stupid stereotypes of the media, esp. when it's about the game i love =)
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Era 3 months ago

    Well, sad to think about it, but could it be, that the NBA has an image problem because the NBA has a higher percentage of black players than every other major US sports league?
    I myself am not black but I wonder if there could be a connection between the false notion that most NBA players are thugs and the fact, that most NBA players are black...
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    borymvp 3 months ago in reply to Era

    hmmm interesting. does speaking AAVE(African American Vernacular English) make people more prone to think your a thug? I know for a fact it makes people think your less intelligent so it's not really a stretch. Plus, black american culture has those thuggish connotations to the pearly whites. As someone from Oregon I can tell you first hand race is how it works. We are white as sin and I remember how ironic it was when Sheed and Damon were "Jail Blazers" because they smies. When a black guy does it he's coked pot when Portland is just about at the top of the list of stoner citriminal , when white people partake they're just progressive.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    RyanMcD29 3 months ago

    Very good read, just wanted to make some extra points and a few disagreements here and there.

    I do agree that the NBA's troubles are over magnified and everything. A few bad seeds are ruining it for everyone it seems. There's no doubt that some of the things people get antsy over are downright hysterical (see: the Knicks-Nuggets brawl. Geez that was nothing to be getting up in arms about at all).

    I do have to disagree to the extent of some of the incidents listed and how other leagues get a free pass. The media extensively covered the Bertuzzi incident as much as they did the Pacers-Pistons brawl, as they did a few years previously with the McSorely incident. The Mike Milbury in the stands incident was way back in either the late 70s or 80s so comparing the media reaction back then is apples to oranges these days with ESPN having 24 hour coverage, and I'm sure if that happened today there would be a ton of negative feelings towards the NHL. Also the Pistons/Pacers brawl really was the start of a lot of negative reaction to anything negative in the NBA. I mean I don't think you saw much outrage or debates over the Knicks-Heat brawls back in 98 and 99 as you did with the previously mentioned overreaction of the Knicks-Nuggets brawl and it probably got as much coverage as an NHL or MLB brawl did. Onto one other point, I think the MLB has done more damage to its image than the NBA has with its steroid mess, and I think the media and the public has agreed. A ESPN Sportsnation poll shows an overwhelming majority feels that performance enhancing drugs are more detrimental to a sport than guns. Plus I think the sports media has gone on more of a crusade on the "MLB players on steroids" angle than the "NBA players are thugs" one, granted it's a much more widespread problem.

    The other thing the NBA has going against it in a way is the number of players in the league are much smaller than their counterparts, which makes things become way more out of proportion than they seem when it comes to bad seeds. The NBA has around 15 players per team whereas the NHL has 25, MLB 27-40 depending on the year, and the NFL over 50 (the numbers are more than likely incorrect but are in the ballpark). That in part makes critics more likely to blast the NBA in a situation than the other leagues, though that doesn't make it any more right to do so. Which leads to my next point; is it me, or does the NFL get a free pass on everything? I mean, baseball players get blasted for steroids, basketball players get blasted for off the court issues. But the thing is, why doesn't the NFL get put under the microscope like their counterparts do when they have the same, if not more rampart, problems? For instance, don't tell me that the NFL didn't have a steroid problem. I don't think it's fair that the other big 3 leagues are always put on watch whenever a incident happens but the NFL more or less it's brushed aside, or at least talked about less than the others. Hell, even college football, where the public majority is blaming the QB who was sent into a locked room by himself as punishment for getting injured rather than the coach who ordered him to do so. I think there's too many double-standards going on with the sport of football in general. Now don't get me wrong, I still love football as much as anyone, but it is kind of alarming to see all these double-standards.

    All in all I think this does a good job of explaining that the NBA isn't the only one with their problems and that some of it has been completely overblown. You have a really good future as a columnist and I think this as well as your decade in reviews have proved it.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Joel Yinger 3 months ago

    Good article. You are a very good writer, and these types of articles are interesting to read. Just a quick correction, Bertuzzi did not break Moore's neck in a fight. It was a sucker punch from behind.

    It seems to me that the league that has the most off court/field/ice problems is the NFL.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    InsideHoops.com 3 months ago

    Fun article. Might want to add some sort of "don't stop here; read on!" towards the top, because people have a short attention span and may stop reading after one or two paragraphs
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    James 3 months ago

    Fantastic write up.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Michael 3 months ago

    I gotta give you this: in trying to play the "but what about THEM" game, you've been very unintentionally funny in your use of context. I half-expected you to include the ump who was hit with a baseball bat in the early 1900s.

    Doesn't do much for SMW's credibility when you have to play so much defense for the NBA...
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Paulsen 3 months ago in reply to Michael

    Considering that the 1998 Latrell Sprewell incident is still talked about, I see nothing wrong in bringing up these incidents from the other major sports -- all of which have taken place since 2000.

    You are free to have your opinion.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Josh 3 months ago

    This is probably the best argumentative story that I have ever read in my life.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    johann bestowrous 3 months ago

    astonishingly sane article
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    llbplayball 3 months ago

    I believe you are confused about Pedro Martinez and blaming him for Manny Ramirez throwing the Red Sox assistant to the clubhouse floor in a dispute over free tickets Ramirez wanted. Pedro did throw a charging gerbil (and Yankee bench coach) named Don Zimmer to the ground during a melee in the midst of and ALCS game in 2003.

    But the most arrests in Las Vegas for a single non-New Year's Eve is owned by the NBA's showcase All Star Game held in Sin City a few years back. Thus dampening the citizen's enthusiasm in trying to gain a franchise for Vegas. That's all I need to know about the NBA's impact on society.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Unnamed Guest 3 months ago in reply to llbplayball

    And who had the highest-profile arrest during that All-Star game? Pacman Jones. Damn. The NBA's thuggery is so rampant it even gets players in OTHER SPORTS arrested. Whoa!
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Paulsen 3 months ago in reply to llbplayball

    I was actually referring to the Martinez/Zimmer incident.

    On a separate note, how many NBA players were arrested during the 2007 All-Star Weekend?
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Paulsen 3 months ago in reply to Paulsen

    One more thing. I find it interesting that you exclude New Year's Eve from your argument on the NBA's deleterious effects on society.

    New Year's Eve 2007: 130 arrests made in a 12-hour period. NBA All-Star Weekend: 81 arrests made every 24-hours (or just over 40 arrests in each 12-hour period). There were 302,000 people in Las Vegas for NBA All-Star Weekend and 300,000 for New Year's Eve.

    http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Feb...
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    D. 3 months ago

    This is one of the best posts I've ever read. Very well put, Paulsen. I 200% agree.

    No doubt the Arenas situation is sad and embarrassing, but those ones who should be blamed are Arenas and Crittenton. Not the entire league. Like I said several times, for every player who gets in trouble you have countless players who never got in trouble before. If people don't think so it's because they don't pay enough attention to the NBA. As soon as they see someone getting in trouble they end up trashing the entire league.

    It's sad that the media mentions only those few ones who get in trouble and mostly ignore those players who behave themselves. Most NBA players have charity foundations and built hospitals (Mutombo), learning centers, donate money to needy people, visit homeless shelters. McGrady visited Darfur to educate himself about the crisis there and decided to start a foundation to build schools there. Or how about the NBA's Basketball Without Borders program to help friendship, education for young people from all over the world and bring them together through the game of basketball (for instance, they were able to bring together Israeli and Palestinian kids). Or NBA players organizing an exhibition game to help raise money for Hurricane Katrina's victims? Or the NBA itself having what was called the largest community effort in pro sports history during the '08 all-star weekend in New Orleans.

    And let's not forget to mention my favorite team, the Pistons, other than being one of the best organizations when it comes to help the community, even organize a telethon marathon each year to raise money for needy people before, during and after games.

    And on and on and on.

    Obviously the mainstream media rarely mentions those events and they only mention negative stuff leading people to believe every single NBA player is an animal ready to kill people, at least according to some (ok, many) idiots.

    I'm not saying the NBA is perfect and doesn't have troublemakers, I'm saying that it's unfair trashing the entire league based on the actions of a few idiots. Just because some players don't know how to behave themselves doesn't mean every NBA player is like them.

    Again, great post, Paulsen.
    FlagLikeReplyReply
    Reactions
    tinyroads 3 months ago

    From twitter via BackType

    Just got this from a friend. I know it's weeks old, but...NBA=thugs? http://bit.ly/5L63I5

    Shey, Jamaican of FF 3 months ago

    From friendfeed via BackType

    "The league has an image problem. It has an image problem not because of what actually takes place, but because of what observers have convinced themselves takes place. It has an image problem because every incident becomes part of a trend. It has an image problem because the league's first player-related scandal in three years has also resulted in its only mentions on cable news shows in three years."

    Matt Hilton 3 months ago

    From friendfeed via BackType

    I'd check it out Rod if I were you.

    Andrew C 3 months ago

    From friendfeed via BackType

    Yeah, it's one of those pieces with a surprise twist.

    Matt Hilton 3 months ago

    From friendfeed via UberVU

    I'd check it out Rod if I were you.

    Andrew C 3 months ago

    From friendfeed via UberVU

    Yeah, it's one of those pieces with a surprise twist.

    StephonJohnson8 3 months ago

    From twitter via BackType

    RT @asportsscribe SARCASM ALERT RT @paulsen_smw The NBA is full of thugs. And here's the rap sheet to prove it. http://tinyurl.com/yh6rpn3

    asportsscribe 3 months ago

    From twitter via BackType

    SARCASM ALERT RT @paulsen_smw The NBA is full of thugs. And here's the rap sheet to prove it. http://tinyurl.com/yh6rpn3

    phulcrum 3 months ago

    From twitter via BackType

    Great read about thugs in the NBA. Just trust me, read the whole thing. It's very entertaining. http://bit.ly/8OgT5y

    BullBearSock 3 months ago

    From twitter via BackType

    RT @ShamSports: going well until the DWill mention: http://sportsmediawatch.blogspot.com...heres-rap.html

    Show more reactions
    Loading comments...
    Problem loading comments?
    The NBA is full of thugs, and here's the rap sheet to prove it
    The Gilbert Arenas situation has made it clear as day: the NBA has a problem.

    The league is "full of thugs," to quote Forbes editor Michael K. Ozanian. San Francisco Examiner writer Bob Frantz recently wrote that the NBA's "overly ink-stained players look like a bunch of gang-bangers playing in the recreation yard at Pelican Bay," following that up by saying that Arenas and teammate Javaris Crittendon had validated his opinion. Frantz: "A league filled with guys that look like thugs is bound to be filled with guys that act like thugs" (sfexaminer.com, 1/4/10).

    And they're absolutely right. Just take a look at the league's rap sheet.

    An NBA player was just released from prison after being involved in a murder-for-hire plot involving his agent. There's an NBA player currently serving a 14 year prison sentence for attempted murder, and another player serving a sentence for conspiring to murder his pregnant girlfriend.

    There are fights in NBA games on an almost nightly basis -- including one during the league's outdoor game earlier this season, its showcase event. Several years ago, an NBA player grabbed an elderly assistant coach by the head and shoved him to the ground during a melee in the Conference Finals. Five years ago, an NBA player threw a chair into the stands and broke a woman's nose -- just months after another player suckerpunched an opponent, breaking his neck.

    NBA players are unquestionably prone to violence. One player demonstrated to ESPN's Outside the Lines how he would handle someone who would attempt to mug him. "If someone's right here, ... and he's like, 'give me your wallet,' and he's got a knife. I'm like, alright man, let me grab my wallet," he grabbed his gun and laughed, "there it is. Now, he's got a chance to turn tail, or he's getting it. Better leave. If you think you can get me with that knife before I squeeze off three rounds with this, you'll be gravely mistaken." If that does not epitomize thug life, I don't know what does.

    An NBA player was arrested for domestic battery last year -- less than a year after his brother, a fellow NBA player, was sued for allegedly beating his pregnant girlfriend. The star of the NBA's championship team was sued for alleged sexual assault over the summer.

    And let's not forget the NBA player that murdered his teammate back in 2003.

    The fact is, the NBA has a problem. The league is filled with vile, criminal thugs. No other league deals with the kind of criminal activity that the NBA does. Not the NHL, not Major League Baseball -- and certainly not college basketball, where the players are uncorrupted by the money in the pros. Even the NFL has more upstanding citizens than the ...

    Hold on a moment.

    I'm receiving word that the aforementioned murder-for-hire plot involved NHL player Mike Danton. And that the person serving a 14-year prison sentence for attempted murder is former MLB player -- and member of the '03 World Champion Marlins -- Ugueth Urbina. And the person in jail for the murder of his pregnant girlfriend is the NFL's Rae Carruth.

    Also, I've been informed that the NBA has not had a brawl since 2006. To the best of my understanding, those nightly brawls I referenced earlier took place in the National Hockey League and Major League Baseball. Again, I apologize -- but who could blame me? It's not like you hear about fights in those leagues.

    Furthermore, the outdoor game fight took place during the NHL's Winter Classic, the player who shoved the elderly assistant to the ground was MLB player Pedro Martinez, the player who threw a chair in the stands was MLB player Frank Francisco, and the player who broke an opponent's neck during a fight was the NHL's Todd Bertuzzi.

    The Outside the Lines quote was made by MLB player Luke Scott, and the brothers involved in separate domestic violence incidents were MLB's Brian and Marcus Giles. And, apparently, the superstar sued for alleged sexual assault was the star of the Super Bowl champion Steelers, Ben Roethlisberger.

    Finally, it has come to my attention that the player who murdered his teammate in '03 was Baylor college basketball player Carlton Dotson.

    Huh. Boy, it's a good thing none of those other sports have image problems. Or those incidents would really have stuck.

    Okay, so the other leagues have their issues. But those are isolated incidents. Why judge Major League Baseball just because an elderly man was thrown to the ground and had to be taken away by stretcher, or just because a woman had a her nose crushed by a folding chair?

    And besides, that doesn't change the fact that the NBA is filled with unrepentant, preening, arrogant thugs. Just look at Jayson Williams, who killed his limo driver and continues to get into legal trouble. Sure, he hasn't played in the NBA in a decade, and he was retired when said incident took place, but he is still representative of the league as a whole. You know, the same way Jim Leyritz (arrested on DUI manslaughter after the death of a woman in '07, and then arrested in '09 on domestic battery charges) is representative of Major League Baseball.

    The Pacers/Pistons brawl is perhaps the best example of the NBA's rampant thuggery. Players going into the stands to fight with fans is unprecedented in the history of sports. Except for the time Bruins players went into the stands at Madison Square Garden. And the time Dodgers players went into the stands at Wrigley Field. But Pacers/Pistons was different. After all, as Mike Breen said, Ron Artest had a "scary look in his eyes." Mike Milbury was just having fun out there.

    The NBA's gun problem is another good example. Devin Harris estimated that 75% of NBA players own guns. Take a look at the list of NBA players involved in gun incidents in recent years: Jayson Williams, Sebastian Telfair, Arenas, Crittendon, Delonte West, Stephen Jackson, DeShawn Stevenson and Chris Mills. That's 9 whole players -- enough to fill an injury-decimated team -- and those are just the 9 we know about. It could be 25 or 50 of them for all we know.

    If 75% of the NBA owns guns, and the NBA has 400 players, then we're talking about 300 pistol-packing NBA thugs. Now, sure, 9 (or even 50) out of 300 is a fairly small fraction -- and one that would seem to indicate that the vast majority of NBA gun owners are responsible with their weapons. But just the fact that they have those weapons is a bad thing. After all, gun ownership is illegal in the United States. (ed. note, apparently, the right to bear arms is guaranteed in the Constitution. Who knew?)

    And guns aside, everyone knows that NBA players frequently get in trouble with the law. Remember that book by Jeff Benedict, "Out of Bounds: Inside the NBA's Culture of Rape, Violence, and Crime," where he found that 40% of NBA players have a police record involving a serious crime? Sure, his sample size was limited to 177 of the NBA's 417 non-foreign born players -- less than half. And sure, the book did not "disclose a detailed listing of his data" (New York Times, 6/15/04). And sure, as NBA Commissioner David Stern noted, the book lumped together those who were accused of crimes and those who were convicted (ed. note, apparently, there is indeed a difference between being accused of a crime and being convicted of one.)

    But who cares? 40 percent of NBA players! Rape, Violence and Crime! That's all you need to know. And sure, I could do an investigation into cable news, use Bill O'Reilly and Kiran Chetry as my sample size, and say that 50% of cable news hosts have been accused of sexual harassment. But that doesn't matter. It sounds true, doesn't it? It reinforces our preconceived notions.

    It doesn't matter what's true. It doesn't matter what goes on in other sports. It doesn't matter that for every Javaris Crittendon, there's Chris Paul, Deron Williams, and countless others. It doesn't matter that the majority of NBA players are more than likely law abiding citizens.

    The league has an image problem. It has an image problem not because of what actually takes place, but because of what observers have convinced themselves takes place. It has an image problem because every incident becomes part of a trend. It has an image problem because the league's first player-related scandal in three years has also resulted in its only mentions on cable news shows in three years.

    With that in mind, I, for one, will join my sportswriting colleagues -- from Terrence Moore and Michael K. Ozanian to Gary Thorne and Jason Whitlock before them -- in continuing to judge the league and its players based on stereotypes and innuendo. The NBA is full of thugs, and I think I speak for those aforementioned individuals when I say there's nothing you can say to make me think otherwise.
    blog comments powered by Disqus
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

    I blame you, Buck. Just you.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

    Comment

    • #3
      Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

      a
      Last edited by sweabs; 08-07-2010, 05:53 PM.

      Comment

      • #4
        Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

        The players, Stern, and the media.

        The players for perpetuating the stereotype with acting like fools off the court and sometimes on it.

        Stern for putting out a less than stellar product to begin with and being fixated on individual stars rather than teams. Not to mention stuff that happens now wouldn't have warranted a foul let alone a suspension back then. See the NFL has more arrests than the NBA but they put out a good product that people still want to watch despite it.

        The media for their slanted coverage. An NBA brawl= Thugs, a brawl in the MLB= That's just showing spirit and a great rivalry.

        Comment

        • #5
          Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

          Does football have this image, because it's just as bad?
          Baseball?? Rap music no, criminal charges...probably.

          Heck..even golf has problems.

          The truth is that give men a ton of money and power, and they'll act like dofuses. From your CEO to your NBA player..they become arrogant, and think they can do what they want.

          The NBA though, is too black to get a pass from the country. Rap music isn't more demeaning or disgusting than any other type of music, it's just black. Their image is a problem because being black is a problem. Look at Ben vs. Kobe in terms of the way the media treated them. Or hell, Ben vs. Tiger. It's hard to admit but we're still, as a country, very racist (although we hide it better) And that's where the league's problem is.

          Comment

          • #6
            Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

            Originally posted by Sookie View Post
            Does football have this image, because it's just as bad?
            Baseball?? Rap music no, criminal charges...probably.

            Heck..even golf has problems.

            The truth is that give men a ton of money and power, and they'll act like dofuses. From your CEO to your NBA player..they become arrogant, and think they can do what they want.

            The NBA though, is too black to get a pass from the country. Rap music isn't more demeaning or disgusting than any other type of music, it's just black. Their image is a problem because being black is a problem. Look at Ben vs. Kobe in terms of the way the media treated them. Or hell, Ben vs. Tiger. It's hard to admit but we're still, as a country, very racist (although we hide it better) And that's where the league's problem is.
            Way to ruin a discussion there.... Sookie

            Comment

            • #7
              Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

              I think the fact is that the general public does two things:

              1) first they think the NBA is full of thugs, so whenever they hear something regarding an NBA player they not only believe it out of hand, but they assign blame to the NBA in general. They do not do that with the other professional sports leagues.

              2) oops, I forgot my other point. Forget what it is, but it is better than my first one.


              I hear it all the time from family and friends and it just isn't about the Pacers it is about the NBA in general. They think the NBA is a thug league, how do I know they think this, they tell me. When I say what about the NFL they are just as bad if not worse, they just look at me like I have a screw loose.

              Comment

              • #8
                Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post

                Way to ruin a discussion there.... Sookie
                Why do people run from the race discussion?

                If you want to discuss the NBA's image "problems" and "thug" culture you have to talk about race, or the discussion is shallow. Sorry.
                Last edited by Sookie; 04-27-2010, 03:03 PM.

                Comment

                • #9
                  Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                  Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                  I think the fact is that the general public does two things:

                  1) first they think the NBA is full of thugs, so whenever they hear something regarding an NBA player they not only believe it out of hand, but they assign blame to the NBA in general. They do not do that with the other professional sports leagues.

                  2) oops, I forgot my other point. Forget what it is, but it is better than my first one.


                  I hear it all the time from family and friends and it just isn't about the Pacers it is about the NBA in general. They think the NBA is a thug league, how do I know they think this, they tell me. When I say what about the NFL they are just as bad if not worse, they just look at me like I have a screw loose.
                  True but the media and the public will give you a pass if you are fun to watch. The NBA to a lot of people is just not fun to watch.

                  You know you have a problem when the NFL draft gets higher ratings than your playoffs.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                    Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                    Why do people run from the race discussion?

                    If you want to discuss the NBA's image "problems" and "thug" culture you have to talk about race, or the discussion is shallow. Sorry.
                    Sookie, I agree with you 110% This conversation is worthless without dealing with the elephant in the room and that is RACE. I believe this conversation is worthy of sticking around as long as it is moderated properly.
                    ...Still "flying casual"
                    @roaminggnome74

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                      Originally posted by Gamble1 View Post
                      True but the media and the public will give you a pass if you are fun to watch. The NBA to a lot of people is just not fun to watch.

                      You know you have a problem when the NFL draft gets higher ratings than your playoffs.
                      That is true. But then why don't they just say they like football better than basketball. College football gets much higher ratings than college basketball, as does the NFL gets much higher ratings than the NBA. But a lot of people will claim to not watch the NBA because it is a thug league and yet they watch the NFL. So obviously the reason they don't watch has nothing to do with whether they are thugs or not, they just like football better

                      The NFL draft has gotten higher ratings than the NBA playoffs for at least 10 years, so that is nothing new. The NFL average Sunday night ratings are higher than NBA Finals ratings, and higher than 8 of the last 10 NCAA basketball final game ratings.

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                        Originally posted by Roaming Gnome View Post
                        Sookie, I agree with you 110% This conversation is worthless without dealing with the elephant in the room and that is RACE. I believe this conversation is worthy of sticking around as long as it is moderated properly.
                        Here I think comparing the NBA with the NFL is in order. I don't know the %'s in each league. But I think the NBA is around 90% black and the NFL is around 65-70% black, and if you take away the kickers and QB's (granted a lot of image of the NFL is based upon the QB's) they are pretty close. Why doesn't the race issue in the NFL cut like it does in the NBA.

                        I can think of two reasons why it doesnt
                        1) people just like football more
                        2) the media coverage focuses on the thuggish behavior of NBA players and it sticks to all NBA players, where as thuggish behavior in the NFL only sticks to the individual players, not the league as a whole

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                          Here I think comparing the NBA with the NFL is in order. I don't know the %'s in each league. But I think the NBA is around 90% black and the NFL is around 65-70% black, and if you take away the kickers and QB's (granted a lot of image of the NFL is based upon the QB's) they are pretty close. Why doesn't the race issue in the NFL cut like it does in the NBA.

                          I can think of two reasons why it doesnt
                          1) people just like football more
                          2) the media coverage focuses on the thuggish behavior of NBA players and it sticks to all NBA players, where as thuggish behavior in the NFL only sticks to the individual players, not the league as a whole
                          I think there are a few reasons

                          As you said, the most popular, marketed, and seen as "most valuable" player in the NFL is the QB, who has a tendency to be white.

                          Who are the most famous football players, Payton Manning and Tom Brady. ..who are not only white, but very wholesome looking.

                          I also think appearance plays a big part in it. Unless you are heavily marketed, people can't really watch a football game and know what you look like. You see a uniform that comletely covers the body, and a helmet.

                          So people tune into basketball, see the cornrows the tattoos ect..associate that with the NBA's image problem..and that's that. Why do you think Stern has done things such as making a dress code and such for NBA players? For the most part, NBA players are much more visible when playing their game.
                          Last edited by Sookie; 04-27-2010, 04:01 PM.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                            Here I think comparing the NBA with the NFL is in order. I don't know the %'s in each league. But I think the NBA is around 90% black and the NFL is around 65-70% black, and if you take away the kickers and QB's (granted a lot of image of the NFL is based upon the QB's) they are pretty close. Why doesn't the race issue in the NFL cut like it does in the NBA.

                            I can think of two reasons why it doesnt
                            1) people just like football more
                            2) the media coverage focuses on the thuggish behavior of NBA players and it sticks to all NBA players, where as thuggish behavior in the NFL only sticks to the individual players, not the league as a whole
                            Like the Basketball fan said. Stern promoted the individual over the team and in football its the team over the individual. Honestly I think people respect team mentality more.

                            Originally posted by Sookie View Post
                            I also think appearnace plays a big part in it. Unless you are heavily marketed, people can't really watch a football game and know what you look like.
                            Totally agree. When you don't have an image its hard to have a problem with it.
                            Last edited by Gamble1; 04-27-2010, 03:32 PM.

                            Comment

                            • #15
                              Re: NBA Image problem - what or who do you blame?

                              a
                              Last edited by sweabs; 08-07-2010, 05:54 PM.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 template Next
                              Working...
                              X