Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

    I like Luck, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't prefer RG3. I know I'm probably alone on that island though.


    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

      Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
      I like Luck, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't prefer RG3. I know I'm probably alone on that island though.
      Its OK your young and naive.. We forgive you.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

        Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
        I like Luck, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't prefer RG3. I know I'm probably alone on that island though.
        You are not alone but it might not help your ego to know that you are in my company........

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

          Originally posted by Shade View Post
          What makes Minnesota (3-13), Cleveland (4-12), and Buffalo (6-10) better than the Colts this season?

          We also split with the Texans last season.
          Those teams worked to get better. The Colts jetisoned most of their best players and are trying to replace them with draft picks and other teams junk. Wanna make a bet we don't split with the
          Texans this year? Want to add that we won't split with the
          Titans either? How about that we lose two to Jacksonville and go 0-6 in the South. We will be that bad...........

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

            These "best players" that were jettisoned weren't exactly world beaters last year.

            I'd take this upcoming team over last year's team any day of the week. Luck is a major upgrade over Painter/Orlovsky and I'm sure Colts fans can understand the importance of a good QB.

            btw: where is the option to ignore posters? i'm not seeing it.
            Last edited by Swingman; 04-20-2012, 06:26 PM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

              click user CP
              then under settings and options
              click edit ignore list
              The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                There is no expectation that we will be even decent this year but there is an expectation that in three years we will be much more competitive. Some of the guys cut just haven't been productive for several years-Brackett, Clark, and Bullitt. The one i don't really understand is Addai who could be used as a short yardage receiver in our depleted core. Leaving the RB job to Brown makes me nervous. I'm convinced that if Garcon had resigned Reggie would also be gone. We have no experienced impact player on offense and we will now place our 2 defensive ends in a scheme they have never played before. This is another example of a new coach bringing in a new scheme that doesn't fit existing personnel.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                  Originally posted by OlBlu View Post
                  Those teams worked to get better. The Colts jetisoned most of their best players and are trying to replace them with draft picks and other teams junk. Wanna make a bet we don't split with the
                  Texans this year? Want to add that we won't split with the
                  Titans either? How about that we lose two to Jacksonville and go 0-6 in the South. We will be that bad...........
                  Come on, you can't be serious. You do realize there's this thing called a salary cap, right? And that the Colts had ****ed theirs up bad towards the end of Polian's term, correct?

                  So you do realize there was a *reason* why they cut those players lose, correct? Because they were older.... injury-prone... and expensive. And they were in cap hell.

                  They had to "trim" the bad contracts. It's called business. I understand from a sentimentality aspect that it's not fun seeing your old pros take leave... but it has to happen. You cannot have every player you ever take on retiring in that uniform.

                  The Colts are doing exactly what they have to do to fix this situation.

                  But... they also have new coaches in place, new players via free agency, a new defensive system, and yes, some big-time draft picks. Namely, Andrew Luck.

                  And there should be expected some rough patches as this team comes together and it may take most of the season. We likely won't hit 10 wins... we likely won't make the playoffs... but just watching the transactions we've made, I would be comfortable believing that we'll have a better season this year than last year.

                  Either way, the success RG3 has with his team has nothing to do with the Colts. The 'Skins are further ahead in their process (because they've been in a state of rebuilding for about 20 years)... so of course they have more team around RG3. That doesn't make RG3 a better quarterback than Andrew Luck! It makes him a quarterback of a team that is better.

                  So don't be fooled when RG3 comes out and has a better rookie year than Luck (if it even happens, I wouldn't bet against Luck). Considering the teams around them, RG3 *should* have a better season. If he doesn't, then you got some explainin' to do, lol...
                  Last edited by Kid Minneapolis; 04-20-2012, 09:49 PM.
                  There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                    Why do you people even respond to him?
                    Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                      I dont understand why ppl keep saying RG3 is gonna be out of the pocket all the time. Apparently NO ONE watches football. Luck was out of the pocket last year more than RG3 was on pass plays
                      STARBURY

                      08 and Beyond

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                        Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                        I like Luck, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't prefer RG3. I know I'm probably alone on that island though.
                        I love RG3 and think he will be terrific. But I'm not sure how you can not pick Luck with the #1 pick. He just seems so damn ready. He really does seem to be the next Peyton Manning.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                          Originally posted by Kid Minneapolis View Post
                          Come on, you can't be serious. You do realize there's this thing called a salary cap, right? And that the Colts had ****ed theirs up bad towards the end of Polian's term, correct?

                          So you do realize there was a *reason* why they cut those players lose, correct? Because they were older.... injury-prone... and expensive. And they were in cap hell.

                          They had to "trim" the bad contracts. It's called business. I understand from a sentimentality aspect that it's not fun seeing your old pros take leave... but it has to happen. You cannot have every player you ever take on retiring in that uniform.

                          The Colts are doing exactly what they have to do to fix this situation.

                          But... they also have new coaches in place, new players via free agency, a new defensive system, and yes, some big-time draft picks. Namely, Andrew Luck.

                          And there should be expected some rough patches as this team comes together and it may take most of the season. We likely won't hit 10 wins... we likely won't make the playoffs... but just watching the transactions we've made, I would be comfortable believing that we'll have a better season this year than last year.

                          Either way, the success RG3 has with his team has nothing to do with the Colts. The 'Skins are further ahead in their process (because they've been in a state of rebuilding for about 20 years)... so of course they have more team around RG3. That doesn't make RG3 a better quarterback than Andrew Luck! It makes him a quarterback of a team that is better.

                          So don't be fooled when RG3 comes out and has a better rookie year than Luck (if it even happens, I wouldn't bet against Luck). Considering the teams around them, RG3 *should* have a better season. If he doesn't, then you got some explainin' to do, lol...

                          I agree with you and I think all of that is what I was saying. That does not mean that the Colts are better than they were last year, they are not and won't be for a long time......

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                            won't be as good as last years team for a long time? You do realize last years team stunk and went 2-14 right?

                            I can't imagine you actually believe what you're saying. It would take a monumental collapse to not surpass 2-14 this year, let alone for a "long time".

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                              Originally posted by Swingman View Post
                              won't be as good as last years team for a long time? You do realize last years team stunk and went 2-14 right?

                              I can't imagine you actually believe what you're saying. It would take a monumental collapse to not surpass 2-14 this year, let alone for a "long time".
                              I certainly expect that Luck can win 2-3 games if he is as advertised a difference maker. In the offseason between years 1 and 2 the coaches knew that Peyton was going to make it all turn around. Is Luck another Peyton? I'm optimistically looking for 6 wins this year.
                              Last edited by speakout4; 04-21-2012, 11:15 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Colts inform Luck he'll be No. 1 pick

                                The team hasn't played yet, i won't judge them as a team, but it's shaping up to be a good force, and that excites me.


                                @Coupe460

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X