Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

    Under no circumstances do I consider extending Lamar Odom's deal just to get him to be happy about coming here. I dont blame Odom for saying that however, its just good business sense on his part. It enables him to have some possible leverage in a situation where in reality he really shouldn't have any. It's always possible that Indy would agree to extend him, though doubtful, but if you are Odom you dont find out for sure unless you at least ask.

    There are lots of scenarios and teams that do make sense for Odom, some of which have been bandied about on this thread and in the "spinning off Odom" thread in the trade forum. Some reasonable destinations for Odom include Boston (Ratliff, West, #5 pick perhaps), Charlotte (Brevin Knight and a sign/trade with Gerald Wallace), Dallas (Jason Terry, picks and filler), LA Clippers (Maggette/Quinton Ross and filler) Denver (Jr Smith plus either Nene or Camby), Houston (Battier and filler?) Seattle (Chris Wilcox maybe?), maybe even a 3 way deal with Detroit and New York (Odom to Detroit, Wallace to New York, Crawford and others to Indiana). I particularly like the last possibility, and may have to research that some more and see what makes sense.

    My main point is, Odom being unhappy about being traded here is somewhat understandable, and doesn't make him a bad guy at all. We all also have to understand that players all talk to one another, and bringing the "tougher and more intense" Jim O'Brien may not be popular with all players in the league. It also goes without saying that many players would view living in LA as a big upgrade over Indianapolis.

    Just my opinion of course.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

      DD, Odom will eventually report to the Pacers thats a given Odom has a history of being unhappy when hes traded.

      he wants to win in LA but he failed thats on him. Bird will settle him down.
      "To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan, but also believe." - Anatole France

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

        Originally posted by Smashed_Potato View Post
        DD, Odom will eventually report to the Pacers thats a given Odom has a history of being unhappy when hes traded.

        he wants to win in LA but he failed thats on him. Bird will settle him down.
        It would be smart not to tell your new team's fans that you don't want to be there if you have any expectations of ever adjusting to new surroundings. Sorry but Odom is probably not going to be happy and Pacer fans will not appreciate that he doesn't want to be here. We already have at least one player who doesn't want to be here. For $27M he could see the bright side.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

          Speakout hes not upset because he doesn't wanna be there hes upset because he was expected to have a new role with the Lakers next year.

          More aggressive scoring/ valuable 2nd option etc. that was Phil's statement after the exit meetings. you can't blame him for being upset about something he thought won't happen atleast not this summer can you?

          he will get over it.. just like he did when he left Miami.
          "To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan, but also believe." - Anatole France

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

            I wouldn't want my employer to trade me to a lesser city that puts out a lesser product. That'd suck.

            Of course basketball's a little different, but there's plenty of room for me to understand Lamar's apprehension.
            Last edited by Kraft; 06-05-2007, 09:22 PM.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

              Originally posted by indygeezer View Post
              Chill Jerm, you always take everything I say so personally when all I'm really trying to do is see where you are coming from. I've been negative about this team alot longer than you and I was trying to determine if you were actually that negative or being sarcastic. Oh, and I was only after you before because of your undying affection for JO. I'm ok with that now since I've come to realize it is no different than my being a big fan of Kevin Costner or Sandra Bullock. But if it makes you happy, I'll never again respond to one of your posts or threads, how's that?
              I have no problem with you replying to my posts. What I have a problem with is you taking constant shots at me in your posts. Its either the fan boy crap or now the negativity crap, or who is really a Pacers fan crap.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                Originally posted by Kraft View Post
                I wouldn't want my employer to trade me to a lesser city that puts out a lesser product. That'd suck.

                Of course basketball's a little different, but there's plenty of room for me to under Lamar's apprehension.
                Obviously you would have been unhappy in Cleveland last year
                The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                  Originally posted by ABADays View Post
                  You are getting EXTREMELY tiring.
                  Put me on ignore then. No body is making you read what I say. I didnt insult no poster in this thread. And not being optimistic is not a rule you can get banned for on PD I believe.

                  I see what you are trying to do though. You go out of your way to make everything I say into a problem so somehow Hicks will get ****ed and ban me because of it.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                    Yo...come on guys. Forums are places where people can come and post their opinions and ideas. We shouldn't bash on people just because we don't agree with them. And lets please try to stop all this fighting crap, it's really taking away from the actually threads. I'm not trying to step on anyone's toes and I know that me (being fairly new) shouldn't really be posting this but, can't we all just get along? Let's try to refrain from this stupid name-calling, etc.
                    I think KP is a Captain Planet fan. He believes that the collective will of five decent starters can outweigh the power of top-level talent. Too bad Herb won't cut the check for their Planeteer rings.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                      Originally posted by Smashed_Potato View Post
                      More aggressive scoring/ valuable 2nd option etc.
                      Hasn't he been just that these past few years? Being negative every time he changes teams is not the way to start off. We deserve better

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                        I think jermainiac is hillarious...why dont you guys enjoy em for his entertaining posts? LOL
                        "GIMMIE DAT!"-DANGER

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                          Originally posted by speakout4 View Post
                          Being negative every time he changes teams is not the way to start off. We deserve better
                          Why would Indiana Pacer fans deserve anything from a guy from New York who went to college in RI and has lived in LA and Miami since then?

                          Not sure why you think you'd deserve somethinf from a guy who's life/family's future/career is currently being played out in a newspaper.
                          Read my Pacers blog:
                          8points9seconds.com

                          Follow my twitter:

                          @8pts9secs

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                            JayRedd.. i think i know were speakout is coming from but if he did not show any excitement coming to LA from Miami why would he show excitement now? Odom is one of those people who needs someone to talk to so he can settle down.
                            "To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan, but also believe." - Anatole France

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                              Originally posted by Smashed_Potato View Post
                              JayRedd.. i think i know were speakout is coming from but if he did not show any excitement coming to LA from Miami why would he show excitement now? Odom is one of those people who needs someone to talk to so he can settle down.
                              Maybe he's just a negative person.

                              And especially now, I think we owe him the right to be pessimistic about uprooting himself and having to start all over on a team and possibly a location he doesn't want to play for/be in.
                              Read my Pacers blog:
                              8points9seconds.com

                              Follow my twitter:

                              @8pts9secs

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: ESPN - Stein's notebook: Odom unhappy about possible Pacers trade

                                Originally posted by JayRedd
                                Maybe he's just a negative person.

                                And especially now, I think we owe him the right to be pessimistic about uprooting himself and having to start all over on a team and possibly a location he doesn't want to play for/be in.
                                Not negative, just emotional. he hated being in LA when he was with the Clippers he did not show any excitement coming here as a Laker. the only time he showed excitement was going to Miami but that was when he wanted to leave.

                                this has nothing to do with the place/team it has something to do with being spoiled in something you think won't happen but it did.
                                "To accomplish great things, we must not only act, but also dream; not only plan, but also believe." - Anatole France

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X