Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

    Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
    Well, I think we are missing some ingredients still. Here are my thoughts:

    1. We need a tougher minded, better defending, more vocal, better point guard, someone who is a better leader and player at that position than we have now. This player doesnt need to be a superstar, but he needs to be a "winning" player, preferably even someone with a championship pedigree if someone like that existed. Closest I can think of.......someone we draft in the next year or 2, or Kirk Hinrich or someone like him.


    We need leadership, vision and a passion for winning from the PG position.
    "I'll always be a part of Donnie Walsh."
    -Ron Artest, Denver Post, 12.28.05

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

      Originally posted by able View Post
      SvG

      Add SvG and subtract Tinsley. (yes!!)


      Well, it's a start. I'm not certain we can win with a team built solely around JO but I'll give him this, he's stepped up his game.
      Ever notice how friendly folks are at a shootin' range??.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

        Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
        5. More than anything, we need the patience and vision to have a long term plan and stick with it. We need a visoion of what type team and organization we want to be, and we need the persistance and toughness and self assurdness to stick with a plan no matter what short term things are happening. If you surround yourself with good people, by and large you'll be successful.....we need to try and build this team the right way, because in the NBA, a single mistake can cost you for years and years.

        Just my opinion of course....

        tbird
        All good points, but this one is major. TPTB have ideas, but they continue to be new ones. That is a sign of a lack of vision. The type of poor decision-making you see with lesser franchises. My guess is that this is a Bird issue.

        Now backing out of decisions is OK, but it should not be necessary so often. Whether you want to point to Saras and Jack a couple years ago...or Al just last year...they were all mistakes to acquire....or the new style of play we largely abandoned...or James White being cut. Keep in mind these are only a few criticisms in the "back out of a decision" category.

        I consider this a pattern now. JMO

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

          An elite perimeter player who's better than JO. Make it an option 1A and 1B type scenario

          edit: oops, you said realistically. In that case, a lot of luck.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

            Realistically.......given the unliklihood of making trades to acquire the type of player that we need ( since...from a contract point of view....Tinsley, Dunleavy and Murphy are close to impossible to move )....the only realistic moves that we can make is the "all or ( close to ) nothing" type moves.

            We tear down the whole thing and start from scratch ( trade JONeal with Tinsley and build off of a different younger core of players...like Granger/Shawne/Marquis/Ike/Dunleavy/Murphy/Foster )...or we make minor moves for cheapie role players ( like another SG that can shoot ) and continue down our current path.

            Since we no longer have any realistic pieces to trade that another team will take.....I really doubt that we make any other moves this season....unless we start to include Foster, Granger and Shawne in the trade "grab-bag".
            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

              We need Granger and either Diogu and/or Williams to become impact players. We also could use an upgrade in the backcourt. I think eventually Foster will have to be moved to allow more consistent playing time for Diogu. Maybe he could be one of the pieces to help us get the backcourt upgrade.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                This is a great thread. Thanks for starting it. Speculating about how to 'fix' the Pacers is about all that we have left this season -- I don't consider finishing 7th or 8th in the East much of an accomplishment. So, here's a three-step program for redemption of a once-solid franchise --

                1. The first thing is to replace the front office. We don't have competent people making decisions about player personnel. I don't have any idea what's happened to Walsh. He was a master for many years but outside of drafting Granger, he hasn't made a good decision since he traded Dale for Jermaine. I can't even talk about the dumb things that his side-kick from Boston has done. Larry Legend must go. He wouldn't know talent if it fell on his golf bag.
                2. We need a new coach. I've lost a lot of respect for Carlise. He's personally decent and I admire the fact that he resists temptations to manage players via the press. This no small thing, but by itself, it's not nearly enough. In a nutshell, he can't coach. He plays favorites with playing time and so let's people rot on the bench for not discernable reason (Maceo!). What risk would he have taken last night, for example, in letting Maceo play? Rick doesn't know anything about X's and O's. The team plays the same lame offense, game after game, even though the rest of the league long ago figured out how to defend it. We have no defense. Players don't get better (other than DG which I honestly can't explain), even from one season to the next -- let alone from one game to the next! We rarely score at the end of a quarter because Rick's brain-trust can't design a play that gets a reasonable shot from a 40% shooter. The bottom line, he can't adjust his game plan to the talent that he has. My guess? The players respect Rick as a man, but he doesn't inspire them. That's why they play flat so often. We will never go anywhere with any group of players until we have a different coach. Note: do you think Dungy knows anything about b-ball?
                3. Player-wise, we need two things. A center that can play tough defense, rebound and score when he's wide open. And, we need a point guard. Even if you like JT (and, I don't), we don't have anyone to come off the bench and give Jamal 15 minutes of rest per game. That's not too much to ask as most every team in the league has a PG backup younger than 38. As for shooting guard, I'm happy with Quis -- assuming he's not our new Bender/Harrison.

                In summary, like most businesses, it's hard to have a winner until you have excellent leadership. That's really the core of the problem with the Pacers. The front office and the coach have to be replaced.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                  a) Wrong Van Gundy. We need Jeff, not Steve.

                  b) I'm totally convinced that if we acquired a pass-first PG that Rick would try to change them, too. What many of us want from the PG is not the same as what the coach wants, and the frustration with Tinsley, though completely merited, is misguided.

                  Let's be honest here, Tinsley is playing more and more like AJ (style-wise) with each passing game.

                  Since neither Rick nor Tinsley ever really comment on the PG play, I don't know why anyone would expect a different style of play from another PG if Tinsley were traded.

                  So we might as well get a PG that is good at playing in the style Rick wants. Or, better yet, replace Rick as soon as JVG is available.

                  EDIT - madison, that's a great post. Except I'd disagree with you on Rick's x's and o's. I think he IS good at the x's and o's, even though most pundits on here think that style of play is "boring". (and they're right, it is boring, but it is also the most effective way to use the players on this team.)
                  Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                  Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                  Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                  Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                  And life itself, rushing over me
                  Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                  Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                    nothing wrong with Stan Jay, except perhaps his looks
                    So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

                    If you've done 6 impossible things today?
                    Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                      He's not in Jeff's league, though.
                      Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
                      Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
                      Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
                      Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
                      And life itself, rushing over me
                      Life itself, the wind in black elms,
                      Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                        I think that it is hard to see what this team needs at this point in time.

                        You really can not make that judgement until the playoffs. This is a brand new group of guys, what we really need is unknown.

                        Although if I had to say, I think that our perminter defense is weak right now. I don't see Tinsley and Dunleavy as good defenders on the outside. Although Tinsley can get some steals and Dunleavy seems to try and play smart it really might not be enough unless this team really gels and really plays well together which I am doubting this team gets that type of chemistry so soon.

                        I would also say that this team needs some outside shooting help. Dunleavy isn't consistant, neither is Tinsley. Granger can hit it but not really a guy who you want to have shooting the 3 ball a lot. Daniels is not a shooter from long range. Armstrong can hit it though.

                        I think that this team could use a second scoring opition from the backcourt, however with Murphy being able to chip in 10-15 points, Dunleavy and Tinsley capable of double figures, we could get by with Danny Granger. However I don't know that he is ready for it night in and night out and I can't say that I want to rely on him to get us 15-20 points night in and night out at this point in his career.

                        It will take probably 3-4 years to build a team into a championship team. We really didn't start over until last years trade deadline when we dealt Ron Artest, and even now you could say we had to start over again.

                        So even with the East wide open you could say that we have a shot at the East, and I think we do although I like the Pistons a little more than us right now, we really are so far away from competing with Dallas and Phoenix.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                          Originally posted by thunderbird1245 View Post
                          Well, I think we are missing some ingredients still. Here are my thoughts:

                          1. We need a tougher minded, better defending, more vocal, better point guard, someone who is a better leader and player at that position than we have now. This player doesnt need to be a superstar, but he needs to be a "winning" player, preferably even someone with a championship pedigree if someone like that existed. Closest I can think of.......someone we draft in the next year or 2, or Kirk Hinrich or someone like him.

                          Agreed. I'd wet myself every day for a year if we somehow ended up with Hinrich. He'd be my #1 choice. Equally good at both ends of the floor. But I'd settle for a Haywood Workman that can shoot.

                          2. We need a premier defensive player at a position we don't have one currently. This is the simplest way to become a championship team in my opinion....have a premier defender somewhere on the floor. Here Im thinking someone like Ben Wallace in his prime, or Bruce Bowen in his prime, Derrick McKey in his prime, Ron Artest without the drama and bad attitude, someone similar to that. We dont need an entire team of them, we just need 1 at one position.

                          At this point, our interior defense is much better than our perimeter defense. For that reason, I'd really like to get a top notch perimeter defender. That would also help our big men by preventing our opponent's best perimeter scorer from penetrating into the lane.

                          3. One more really good player, preferably someone who is either at or above the same level as Jermaine, preferably at a position and with a style of play that compliments him. I have no idea who that might be, it might have to be someone we draft or find in Europe even. Trading for this guy is tough, but someone on the level of a Ray Allen, Joe Johnson, or someone similar.

                          With #1 and #2 above being fulfilled, preferably at the two guard positions, I really think that the player specified in #3 just needs to be a very consistent role player. Give me a player that gives me an efficient 10 and 8 every game that does not hurt me defensively. Even with a long-term vision, not that it's impossible, but acquiring the likes of the specified players, at the dollars one would command, is not likely (while JO is on the team).
                          tbird
                          I'm about as wishy-washy as they come when it comes to Carlisle. On the one hand, I like to see a free-flowing game where players have the liberty to pursue options and to take advantage of things that open up. But that requires players that are very disciplined and who are able to play within their capabilities. Specifically, a player knows his own game well enough to know which shots he should be taking in a variety of situations. If you have players who don't seem to have that internal integrity to limit their games to what they are capable of doing best, then you may as well have a coach who calls the plays. As far as I'm concerned, it's better for all players to be 'pist' off at the coach than to be 'pist' off at each other for percieved selfish play.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                            To make the Indiana Pacers champions, I'm 100% ready to scrap it all--almost.

                            Hang onto Danny, Ike, and Shawne at all costs. I like Jeff, Army, Rawle, and certainly JO, but if we can move them, go for it (though there's no reason to move Army). Rick should go. If we brought in SvG or JvG, I would be thrilled, tho I think I'd prefer SvG. Tinsley is the first one out, IMO. If we could get a big man coach for Hulk, I'd do it in a heartbeat.

                            My next best solution is to drug Mark Cuban and talk him into trading our roster for theirs.
                            It's a new day for Pacers Basketball.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                              O'Neal has a players opt in 07-08, so he can opt out then right?

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: What would it (realisitcally) take to make this a championship team?

                                Honestly I am not a wiz but take a look at these numbers

                                http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/by..._2006&sort=243

                                http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/stats/by..._2006&sort=229

                                we have to shoot better and not turn over the ball. Most of you add that we need a new backcourt, maybe an elite guard. Can we be apart of a three team deal between Chicago and Memphis. Landing either Miller or Gordon while sending two players (Williams and Daniels/Foster). LAC is struggling. How long are they gonna hold onto Maggette? Tins is the teams PG we really need solid jump shooters/slashers that can alevate his alter ego from showing up

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X