Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuries

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

    I wonder if NBA contracts were not guaranteed how much harder Bender would've or could've tried to play thru the soreness, learned to reinvent his game to compensate for it, and whether he might've decided to be a 'lab rat' afterall?

    -Bball
    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

    ------

    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

    -John Wooden

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

      Bender was a great talent for sure...he had it all. Could have been close to an all-star if not one. However, I never liked his approach to the game. Maybe it was because he was trying to make use of the small amout of minutes that he was able to play, but he would force a lot of things and not play within the team concept. It was very frustrating, for sure, just hanging on and hoping that he could finally get healthy.
      .

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

        Originally posted by Bball View Post
        I wonder if NBA contracts were not guaranteed how much harder Bender would've or could've tried to play thru the soreness, learned to reinvent his game to compensate for it, and whether he might've decided to be a 'lab rat' afterall?

        -Bball
        Soreness? No cartilage means it's bone on bone. I think that's a little more than soreness. The only way he could have reinvented his game was to switch to a wheelchair basketball league.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

          Originally posted by grace View Post
          Soreness? No cartilage means it's bone on bone. I think that's a little more than soreness. The only way he could have reinvented his game was to switch to a wheelchair basketball league.
          If it was so sore how did he manage to play in those 'for fun' games he played in during the summer? It was the organized basketball that seemed to be where he had problems.

          I'll never believe Bender was anything more than a bust waiting to happen. All that was left at the end of the day was for what excuse would be used.

          No, I do not believe his knees were in such bad shape that he couldn't play. I will always believe more motivated players have played thru worse and I don't believe that Bender's knees were as bad as he'd like us (or the team) to believe. The plug would've been pulled long before if they were.

          Here is what I believe:
          He was too raw and picked WAY too high. He was more than satisified by the money he made off the bat (though he apparently wasted a huge portion of his first season's pay (source: the Indy Star interview with Bender offering advice to Oden/Conley)). When he got that second GUARANTEED contract inked, all motivation was gone.

          I do believe his knees bothered him. I also believe he'd always relied on athleticism to play basketball and had no motivation to truly learn the game or find other ways he could help the team without solely relying on jumping out of the gym. So, add up fat wallet, sore knees, lack of motivation and you get one of the worst trades and picks in Pacer history. And that = bust.

          Moreso, even if he would never have had any problems making the transition and had no health issues, where were we going to play him? He sucked as a SG. He was mediocre as a SF. Surely nobody could picture him as a center. I don't suppose JO would've minded coming off the bench behind Bender?

          -Bball
          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

          ------

          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

          -John Wooden

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

            Originally posted by Y2J View Post
            Actually, in brief glimpses he showed the potential to be a dominant scorer. And you'd have to think if he could've played a long stretch without missing games, those brief glimpses would have slowly became a near-every game thing. Who could possibly guard a 7-footer who gets 3-feet in the air on his jumpshot? Not to mention he was going to the line like a madman.

            A healthy Bender would've became, at minimum, a 20 per game scorer with ease.
            Actually, when Bender played he showed the ability to be completely neutralized by a good 6-7 defender. He couldn't handle the ball well enough to get around them and when they crowded him he couldn't shoot.

            If he'd ever developed a post game where he could take the 6-7 guy to 12 feet of the basket and hit the turnaround that would be a different story. But 7-footers who are purely perimeter players get abused by smaller, quicker defenders.

            His only hope to become a big-time player was by developing a post game. That might have happened in time (I doubt it but it's possible) but he was never going to be anything special as a perimeter player - he didn't have the skills.

            And I have no idea what you're talking about on going to the foul line all the time. That just didn't happen - 4 FT's/game (which is about the max you'd have in any season if you balance it to 40 minutes/game) is pretty minimal.
            The poster formerly known as Rimfire

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

              The guy didn't play enough for anyone to gameplan against him and hardly enough for any team to even make a switch to deal with any temporary success he was having. There's nothing wrong with thinking he might have been great, but I don't know how anyone can be "sure" of it.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                Originally posted by Bball
                If it was so sore how did he manage to play in those 'for fun' games he played in during the summer? It was the organized basketball that seemed to be where he had problems.

                I'll never believe Bender was anything more than a bust waiting to happen. All that was left at the end of the day was for what excuse would be used.

                No, I do not believe his knees were in such bad shape that he couldn't play. I will always believe more motivated players have played thru worse and I don't believe that Bender's knees were as bad as he'd like us (or the team) to believe. The plug would've been pulled long before if they were.

                Here is what I believe:
                He was too raw and picked WAY too high. He was more than satisified by the money he made off the bat (though he apparently wasted a huge portion of his first season's pay (source: the Indy Star interview with Bender offering advice to Oden/Conley)). When he got that second GUARANTEED contract inked, all motivation was gone.

                I do believe his knees bothered him. I also believe he'd always relied on athleticism to play basketball and had no motivation to truly learn the game or find other ways he could help the team without solely relying on jumping out of the gym. So, add up fat wallet, sore knees, lack of motivation and you get one of the worst trades and picks in Pacer history. And that = bust.

                Moreso, even if he would never have had any problems making the transition and had no health issues, where were we going to play him? He sucked as a SG. He was mediocre as a SF. Surely nobody could picture him as a center. I don't suppose JO would've minded coming off the bench behind Bender?

                -Bball

                Although I tend to agree that Bender would never be the All-Star, 20 ppg player everybody believed he would be, I definitely don't think he was a bust and to say he was "too soft to play through the pain" is a really ridiculous thing to say.

                BBall seems to be forgetting that Bender did have one Knee surgery during his time with the Pacers and he later suffered a torn calf muscle when he was finally starting to show signs of developing a knack for getting to the FT line and blocking shots. Those are legitimate injuries and as someone who has had knee injuries I can attest to the fact that walking, let alone running and jumping, can be nearly impossible at times.

                I know you had a strong dislike for the guy but Bball, those statements sound really dumb coming from a guy who has never played professional basketball (or any organized ball?) through an injury.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                  Originally posted by naptownmenace View Post

                  I know you had a strong dislike for the guy but Bball, those statements sound really dumb coming from a guy who has never played professional basketball (or any organized ball?) through an injury.
                  I did stay at a Holiday Inn Express last night tho...

                  -Bball
                  Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                  ------

                  "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                  -John Wooden

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                    Just for the record... I don't have any particular hate towards Bender. Bender is what he is (or was...). My problem was (and is) with management so totally missing the boat on the whole situation and compounding it at every turn.

                    -Bball
                    Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                    ------

                    "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                    -John Wooden

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                      I agree with Uncle Buck I think he could have become a All star caliber performer. When I look at Durant I see the player the Pacers thought they were getting in Bender.

                      I agree with BBall with Pacer management totally being clueless about Benders medical problems occuring in highschool.I would think that would be a major red flag.I also wonder all the wieght Bender gained througout his career also compounded his injury problems.

                      He went from being around 180 pounds to be around 230 pounds when we last saw him play.I alway thought he gained that weight way to quick and his body simply couldn't support it.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                        For anyone who is interested in what Bender's game could have become, just take a look at Kevin Durant in few years. Bender may not have developed into an all-star, but he would have been a damn good player using his athleticism and size alone. It sucks, but it is was it is. The sky was the limit..but when your knees are done, it's over. Nothing more devastating to a career in any sport then deteriorating cartilage in the knee. (Well, there are, but it's one of the most devastating injuries you can get)

                        Anyone who is saying that he could have actually played is either bitter or ignorant. You CANNOT play a sport like basketball with no cartilage in your knee. It's simply not going to happen. Way to painful.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                          Originally posted by Moses View Post

                          Anyone who is saying that he could have actually played is either bitter or ignorant. You CANNOT play a sport like basketball with no cartilage in your knee. It's simply not going to happen. Way to painful.
                          The Pacers sure spent a lot of time and money trying to prove otherwise... Unless you happen to believe the diagnosis is overhyped in the first place. And that is what I believe. If there was no cartilage in his knee(s) then what took so long to get to the point they finally arrived at? And why wasn't Bender left unprotected in the last expansion draft? And why wasn't he our amnesty cut?

                          That stuff doesn't make sense to me anyway... let alone if they thought his knee problems were impossible to overcome.

                          -Bball
                          Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                          ------

                          "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                          -John Wooden

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                            Originally posted by Y2J View Post
                            if he could've played a long stretch without missing games, those brief glimpses would have slowly became a near-every game thing...
                            Like in 2001-2002, when he played in 78 games, started 17, and averaging >21 minutes per game.

                            He had one fairly healthy full season. It was extremely unremarkable.

                            http://www.basketball-reference.com/...bendejo01.html

                            He was developing into a decent role player and learning how to not just drift along at the 3-point line. I had high hopes that he would be a decent 6th/7th man on a good team. That's not too bad, but it's a country mile away from all-star caliber.
                            The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                              So much misinformation in this thread.

                              1. Doctors told Bender that if he continued to play he'd spend his retirement in a wheelchair. What would you do? Or is he still just a wuss?

                              2. By the 03-04 season, the "deer-in-the-headlights" look was gone, and he had such a significant post game that he drew double teams every time he was out there. If you don't believe me, go buy them off nba.com and see for yourself. I remember one game in particular against San Antonio where they had no answer for him. Like was said earlier, when he was on, he was completely unguardable. DK, you must not have watched many of his games, because he had a very developed post game the last 2 seasons, and would simply destroy a 6'7" defender in the post.

                              3. The Durant comparison is valid, if you add 3" to Durant's height and give him NBA 3-point range. Durant probably has better BBall IQ, but not enough to make a significant difference in overall performance.

                              4. I will die believing Bender could have been an MVP type player if his knees had been ok.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: I will always believe that Bender would have been a real player if not for injuri

                                Bender is a perfect example of a player whose myth has grown because he rarely saw the court.

                                10 years from now people will be swearing they saw him shooting shots from half-court with dead-eye precision, claim he could dunk over 7'ers with regularity, willed the team to wins even while playing on a bad leg, and was a defensive monster who could scare opposing players into turnovers with just a glare.

                                I will die believing Bender was a bust... and I'll have his career to point to as proof. ...Not some mythical games based on hope and hype and fading memories.

                                -Bball
                                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                                ------

                                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                                -John Wooden

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X