Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

    I'm beginning to agree with Seth....I think that with all the hype around his "potential" growing.....Thabeet won't be on the board after the 6th pick.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    Comment


    • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

      There was a defensive raw specialist at Wake Forest. He was a sophomore and he was exciting to watch. His progression was rapid and people knew who he was by the end of his junior year. Duncan had that something special. Thabeet still looks lost of defense. He is constantly out of position for rebounds because his determination to get after the block. I really do not see Thabeet more than a Ratliff. Maybe a Ratliff that remains healthy. I don't think he will get a offensive nit-ch to his game. He and Hibbert will most likely be solid contributors, but nothing to TANK over. Unless Thabeet has a great tourney I don't see him cracking the top 8. I would not be surprised if Hibbert has a better tourney because of his experience. That is why I we would see a team like the New Jersey or Miami (if they play slightly better) pick him over Thabeet.

      Love impressed me against Oregon. He may not have had an ideal game, but he was productive. He is the type of player that makes players around him better. A Sabonis factor so to speak.

      Comment


      • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

        Originally posted by CableKC View Post
        I'm beginning to agree with Seth....I think that with all the hype around his "potential" growing.....Thabeet won't be on the board after the 6th pick.
        I've been thinking the same thing for a while. A guy with his size, athleticism, youth, and defensive abilities is a combination too promising to pass up on. With how a guy like Andrew Bynum was slept on, I could see a team not wanting to make the same mistake twice and end up taking him as high as the top-5.

        Comment


        • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

          Originally posted by intridcold View Post
          There was a defensive raw specialist at Wake Forest. He was a sophomore and he was exciting to watch. His progression was rapid and people knew who he was by the end of his junior year. Duncan had that something special. Thabeet still looks lost of defense. He is constantly out of position for rebounds because his determination to get after the block. I really do not see Thabeet more than a Ratliff. Maybe a Ratliff that remains healthy. I don't think he will get a offensive nit-ch to his game. He and Hibbert will most likely be solid contributors, but nothing to TANK over. Unless Thabeet has a great tourney I don't see him cracking the top 8. I would not be surprised if Hibbert has a better tourney because of his experience. That is why I we would see a team like the New Jersey or Miami (if they play slightly better) pick him over Thabeet.

          Love impressed me against Oregon. He may not have had an ideal game, but he was productive. He is the type of player that makes players around him better. A Sabonis factor so to speak.
          You have to consider the huge size differential. Theo is 6'10" 235, Hasheem is 7'3" 260, with room to grow. That makes a world of difference. If you take Theo's ability and put it in that huge of a frame, you could be looking at another Dikembe Mutombo. Maybe not an elite center, but a guy one notch below it. I'm not saying Thabeet will reach that level, he's a gamble like every other young player, but the possibility sure is enticing.

          Comment


          • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

            Here's Thabeet's sophomore production (top) compared to Ratliff's sophomore production...



            Thabeet is better pretty much across the board. And Thabeet is doing it in the tough as nails Big East, whereas Ratliff played at Wyoming, in the then Western Athletic Conference (WAC) with teams like BYU, San Diego State, Air Force etc. And of course, the huge size differential which mentioned earlier.

            Comment


            • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

              In case you hadn't trusted my comments on Bill Walker and his attitude, they mentioned it in during the game last night. You know the game, the one where Walker went 0-14 and K St lost a critical home game to Texas.

              In other news, bring in Augustin (still), looks to at least be a Ford type of PG.


              Croz, as I mentioned before, the Big 12 and Big East appear more competive than the ACC. I agree that perhaps Collison is overrated even though he's in perhaps the best conference of all, but it's still a huge risk to chase Singletary with some of these other PGs on the board. Heck, if Chalmers comes out and is on the board you take him before Singletary too.

              We won't even get to see Singletary in the tourney because despite a semi-weak ACC VA is well under .500.

              Love impressed me against Oregon. He may not have had an ideal game, but he was productive. He is the type of player that makes players around him better. A Sabonis factor so to speak.
              That's a big factor with him. This is what I like about both him and Brandon Rush. You can see them read the court away from the ball. High IQ guys that get the most out of their talent and have enough to impact the game. Love isn't going to lead the team to the title but he's going to make both your offensive and defensive system run like a top.

              Love has hinted that he would strongly consider staying another season at UCLA. I kinda wish he would so the Pacers could get a top PG/SG this year and then get him next year perhaps.


              Thabeet probably is about Ratliff or so. That's fine with me if you get him at 8-10. That's a guy that impacts the game at an NBA level in two areas (shot block, rebound).
              Last edited by Naptown_Seth; 02-26-2008, 09:23 AM.

              Comment


              • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                Thabeet's upside if far higher than Theo Ratliff. We're talking undersized 6'10" 235 lb center vs enormous 7'3" 265 lb center. I'd also wager Thabeet's offense will end up superior to Ratliff's.

                Best Case: Dikembe Mutombo
                Worst Case: Desagana Diop
                Median: Samuel Dalembert

                Comment


                • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                  Originally posted by Kofi View Post
                  Thabeet's upside if far higher than Theo Ratliff. We're talking undersized 6'10" 235 lb center vs enormous 7'3" 265 lb center. I'd also wager Thabeet's offense will end up superior to Ratliff's.

                  Best Case: Dikembe Mutombo
                  Worst Case: Desagana Diop
                  Median: Samuel Dalembert


                  That is exactly what this team needs. Some interior shot blocking and toughness that will make people think twice about coming into the lane..

                  Comment


                  • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                    Anyone like Erica Maynor?

                    Comment


                    • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                      Sene anyone? Petro? I just don't want to throw this pick on just potential. I can see him becoming a Dalembert, but he could end up like a Lauderdale (the Shaq stopper). Size is not the only thing. And we all know that atheleticism can waver (JO is 29 right?). Look I see his upside, but what I see now is a player that is still green even in his most touted area of expertise.

                      I am with you Seth, IQ can mask other deficiencies (sp). Dunleavy might even be out of the league if it weren't for his know-how. If I want raw I want Ibaka late in the first and get a proven guard with our pick.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                        Originally posted by intridcold View Post
                        Sene anyone? Petro? I just don't want to throw this pick on just potential. I can see him becoming a Dalembert, but he could end up like a Lauderdale (the Shaq stopper). Size is not the only thing. And we all know that atheleticism can waver (JO is 29 right?). Look I see his upside, but what I see now is a player that is still green even in his most touted area of expertise.

                        I am with you Seth, IQ can mask other deficiencies (sp). Dunleavy might even be out of the league if it weren't for his know-how. If I want raw I want Ibaka late in the first and get a proven guard with our pick.
                        I don't mind high Basketball IQ......but can't something be said for having a high Basketball IQ player that is limited by his physical skills and ability?

                        It's good that Dunleavy and ( to a certain extent ) Murphy can understand how JO'Bs defensive system because of their high basketball IQ.....but that high basketball IQ isn't going to help them when he is guarding a far quicker, more skilled and athletic player.

                        If a player like Love is the best Big Man if not player that we can choose at whatever spot we are drafting...then I have no problem with drafting him. But if there was some player that could really help us in one of the many areas of help that we need ( like some "both ends of the court" PG or SG )....I would much rather choose the player that can help us at both ends of the court then Love ( assuming that this player isn't the dumbest player on the court ).

                        I'm not saying that we should choose super athletic, skilled players that is as dumb as a rock over high basketball IQ players....but I don't think it's a good idea to place a higher premium on players with high basketball IQ that aren't as athletic ( or quick ) over a player that has the necessary skills that we need to fill a clear weakness in our overall game. To me....there is a reason why Dunleavy isn't our best long-term option as the Starting SG...it's because he gets burned by far quicker and more athletic SGs.

                        I understand that having a high basketball IQ for a player can help any player better fit into JO'Bs system.....but if the player doesn't have the necessary skills nor physical attribute to properly implement that system....what good is that?
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                          Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                          Love has hinted that he would strongly consider staying another season at UCLA. I kinda wish he would so the Pacers could get a top PG/SG this year and then get him next year perhaps.
                          I think he'll stay at least one more season. I highly doubt money's an issue for him, which is the main reason most young guys come out early. I bet he stays at least 2 seasons, maybe even more.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                            My perfect draft would be to pick up three great defensive players.

                            First Pick: Thabeet
                            Trade into the Late Lottery: Darren Collison
                            Second Round: Marcus Dove

                            Comment


                            • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                              Yeah, Love basically said that didn't he..."the family has money, I don't need to go chase a contract, I can play here if it's what I'm enjoying". Ironically all the more reason you'd like him to come out and get drafted by Indy.

                              We'll see, some kids like this do stay, others have a change of heart. Hibbert, Noah, Duncan are all guys that came back another year as examples.

                              Cable, if you haven't seen Love play much I think you need to take a look. He's not just smart as in structure, he's smart as in reading the floor on the fly. It's not so much about learning systems, it's about seeing what to do before everyone else when it gets crazy.

                              On top of that he's crafty. He's not a lug that gets by running the system. To me that seems more like Hansbrough.


                              Dove - good kid, pretty solid, but seems redundant with this roster. And while he's the man with his team, he's struggled to stay out of foul trouble in some pretty big games. Someone will get him in round 2 and he just might surprise people a bit ala Carl Landry, but I think the Pacers can do better with a high 2nd round pick.


                              You know if Indy ends up slotted around 10 some of these choices will be made for them, but it's still going to be a really tough spot to make a choice. They probably are going to have to make a guard/big choice where either has the chance to impact the team.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Official 2008 NBA Draft recruiting center...

                                Originally posted by Naptown_Seth View Post
                                Dove - good kid, pretty solid, but seems redundant with this roster. And while he's the man with his team, he's struggled to stay out of foul trouble in some pretty big games. Someone will get him in round 2 and he just might surprise people a bit ala Carl Landry, but I think the Pacers can do better with a high 2nd round pick.

                                Dove would be there for shut down perimeter defense not because we need another sf. This kid has the physical tools to be an elite defender at the next level- he has been one of the best defenders, if not THE best defender in the country for the past 2-3 years. If we get three solid defenders in this draft we'll be in great position. Pair Ike or Murphy next to Thabeet and suddendly their defense doesn't look so bad. Thabeet takes up so much space that we could play a 4 out 1 in style that JOB likes to run. Collison would complement what Diener brings and we could use Dove to guard the McGradys, James, and Wades of the league.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X