Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Spurs to be punished for resting players

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

    Absolutely. Anyone else think it was fishy how the Lakers got their one b2b2b done in the first three games last year?
    "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

    "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

    Comment


    • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

      Originally posted by kent beckley View Post
      I see in these posts that the overwhelming majority of people on this board are in favor of Pop's authority to sit these players. If this was a game on a wednesday night, on two regional cable stations, I would have an easier time agreeing. But this was 'THE' game of the week. Until ABC starts showing games on Sundays, the early TNT game is the most watched NBA game.
      Why should that change the rules?

      Are we going to start saying that on the Thursday night TNT game players get 6 fouls plus one additional foul for every time they were voted into an all-star game? Are we going to start saying that the team with the most fan votes gets a 10 point head start? Are we going to pause a game every time the referees make a call and open the text voting lines so viewers can vote to overturn the call? Are we going to give a player extra free throws if he has a high selling jersey?

      If your answer is "of course not", then why should which players are on the floor matter based on which televised (or non-televised) game it is?

      It's a sporting event, and needs to be treated as such. The "risk" - like showing a Heat game is any kind of ratings risk whatsoever - is that players might not be on the floor OR might not perform up to the hype.

      You want to "punish" the Spurs, don't pick them for the Thursday night national TV game next year. That's about the only "punishment" this deserves.
      BillS

      A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
      Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

      Comment


      • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

        I really can understand where both sides are on this one.

        But ultimately there is nothing the league can do unless there is a pre-establish rule against resting your players. And Stern knows it.

        Comment


        • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

          Originally posted by BillS View Post
          I'd thank this a bazillion times and thank Wojnarowski a million for writing it in the first place.
          Best NBA related article I've ever read.

          Comment


          • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

            Originally posted by BillS View Post
            I really couldn't disagree more.
            That's because you're looking at it from Popovich's vantage point and I'm not. I'm looking at it from a commissioner and fan of the Pacers POV. As a commissioner, Stern has the right to say - "Don't try to work the schedule".

            All-in-all, this really isn't a big help for the Spurs anyway. I doubt this will help the Spurs win the championship or even help them stay healthier or rested for the playoffs.



            I also like Woj's article. He's my new favorite writer this season. Last year it was Sheridan but ever since the playoffs of last year and the offseason, Woj has really stepped his game up.

            Comment


            • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

              Originally posted by BillS View Post
              Why should that change the rules?

              It's a sporting event, and needs to be treated as such. The "risk" - like showing a Heat game is any kind of ratings risk whatsoever - is that players might not be on the floor OR might not perform up to the hype.
              This is an extremely naive statement. Of course the NBA is a sporting event. But it is also, and more importantly from a financial standpoint, a 'show'. It is entertainment. The average fan, not you and me who are currently in a discussion on a small-market team web-forum, pays money to see the stars. They are who pay the bills. If they go away, you have hockey. You have a small niche sport that the general public doesn't give two craps about.

              Why is 'The Office' in their final season? Why is nobody watching it? The show's star is no longer on the show. Therefore people stopped watching it.

              Comment


              • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                How could this have been avoided? The old three could have sat on Wednesday Night.

                Comment


                • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                  Originally posted by kent beckley View Post
                  This is an extremely naive statement. Of course the NBA is a sporting event. But it is also, and more importantly from a financial standpoint, a 'show'. It is entertainment. The average fan, not you and me who are currently in a discussion on a small-market team web-forum, pays money to see the stars. They are who pay the bills. If they go away, you have hockey. You have a small niche sport that the general public doesn't give two craps about.
                  Of course there has to be entertainment value of some kind. But the more that entertainment value diverges from your core product, the more you change from a sports match to a "sports entertainment show" like the WWE. When the entertainment decisions are placed above sports decisions, it isn't a sports match any more.

                  If it is to be a sport, then what is on the floor has got to be handled like a sport and not like a Vegas Show. Otherwise, when does it become acceptable to give even greater advantages to the stars the "fans" pay to see? Is there a line any more?
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                    Originally posted by kent beckley View Post
                    How could this have been avoided? The old three could have sat on Wednesday Night.
                    Even if the coach thought having his stars on Wednesday night made more of a difference than on Thursday night? Or should every coach be required to call the League Office before every game and ask permission to sit players?
                    BillS

                    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                    Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                    Comment


                    • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                      An NBA coach should be allowed to decide what is in the best interest of his team. If that means resting players or sending them home to be ready for a division game, so be it.... They should be trying to win their division or make the playoffs....

                      Comment


                      • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                        Originally posted by BillS View Post
                        Even if the coach thought having his stars on Wednesday night made more of a difference than on Thursday night? Or should every coach be required to call the League Office before every game and ask permission to sit players?
                        You don't think Pop knows when he is on national TV?

                        I understand your point. My point is that Stern is in the position to make sure all teams are doing what is in the common interest of the league, not just the San Antonio Spurs. The league would have been better off if the Spurs starters played their normal minutes last night. I don't see how anyone could argue with that.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                          Originally posted by kent beckley View Post
                          You don't think Pop knows when he is on national TV?

                          I understand your point. My point is that Stern is in the position to make sure all teams are doing what is in the common interest of the league, not just the San Antonio Spurs. The league would have been better off if the Spurs starters played their normal minutes last night. I don't see how anyone could argue with that.
                          Could you expand on why the League ( as a whole ) would have been better if the Spurs Starters played their normal minutes?
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                            Well Stern stuck it to them $250,000 fine thats bull

                            Comment


                            • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                              Originally posted by diamonddave00 View Post
                              Well Stern stuck it to them $250,000 fine thats bull
                              I don't get how can Owners be okay with this.

                              So, the rule of thumb is that you can't rest your Starters during a game on National TV. If a Coaches wants to rest their Starters.....then dress them....have them play for a minute and then rest them for 47 minutes . Are Coaches allowed to do that without getting fined?

                              Also...is Pop fined $250k or are the Spurs Owners fined?
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Spurs to be punished for resting players

                                http://www.nba.com/2012/news/11/30/s...ent/index.html

                                Originally posted by NBA
                                San Antonio Spurs fined by league

                                Offiicial Release
                                Posted Nov 30, 2012 6:05 PM

                                The NBA announced Friday that the San Antonio Spurs organization has been fined $250,000 for its decision to send four players home prior to the Spurs' Nov. 29 game in Miami. The Spurs' actions were in violation of a league policy, reviewed with the NBA Board of Governors in April 2010, against resting players in a manner contrary to the best interests of the NBA.

                                NBA Commissioner David Stern stated: "The result here is dictated by the totality of the facts in this case. The Spurs decided to make four of their top players unavailable for an early-season game that was the team's only regular-season visit to Miami. The team also did this without informing the Heat, the media, or the league office in a timely way. Under these circumstances, I have concluded that the Spurs did a disservice to the league and our fans."
                                :shakehead
                                Last edited by Pingu; 11-30-2012, 07:56 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X