Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

    Like most Pacers fans, I’ve been following this team’s moves over the summer, particularly their draft picks and the recent 4-team trade (KUDOS TO LARRY BIRD & JIM MORWAY, BTW!), as well as, reading some of the threads that discuss player rotations, etc., and a few things stand out with me that I would like to share with the readers. Keep in mind that my opinions are based on how I see the roster as it currently stands, as well as, how I believe the coaching staff can utilize the roster in order to get the maximum usage at each position based on the overall makeup of the team to date. In doing so, I will also provide a position-by-position breakdown of how I see where each player fits and the pros and cons of each. And with that, here we go...

    Point Guard: The addition of Collison definite has the "potential" of stabilizing the most important position on the roster. Without question, the Point has been a position in flux for the Pacers since the days of Mark Jackson’s departure. Excluding TJ Ford, the Pacers have had at least six different starting PG’s since - Ollie, Anderson, Anthony, Tinsley, Jack and Watson. I won’t dare mention the many backup PG’s who have come and gone. Needless to say, this team needs a PG who can lead, remain healthy, establishes tenure but most importantly takes pride and ownership of this vital position. The obvious hope is that Collison is the future, as well as the present, for this team at PG. However, his acquisition creates some problems. For starters, you have AJ Price waiting in the wings. I’m sure coming into this season he may have had the impression he would at least be the backup-PG, but his injury may push him as far back as the #4 PG. How can this be? Well, TJ Ford is still a Pacer. Thus, the problem is obvious. Unless he is traded or he finds himself benched again by coach O’Brien, I don’t think Price will see as much playing time as he had hoped coming into the season at least not until he fully recovers from his knee surgery and definitely not before the trade deadline. But Price isn’t the only player who’s time and development from this position may become stalled. Stevenson may also find it difficult to see playing time this year even as a combo Guard. I’ll go into more detail later on why I believe this to be so when I discuss the Shooting/Scoring Guard position. For now, the only way I see the rotation improving at this position is to trade TJ Ford. I do believe, however, that in the interim between Price healing and the trade deadline, we will see Collison and Ford running the Point. Who starts is the bigger question. My money is on Collison only because he gives coach O’Brien more of what he wants from a PG - a passer with good court vision, the ability to defend at the point of attack, and the ability to score along the perimeter. Collison’s ability to probe the defense and make quick decisions above all else makes him the more suitable choice as a starting PG. Nonetheless, we’ll have to wait and see if Ford can finally get his act together plays more up to the style coach wants. Regardless of whether or not Ford complies or not, whether he increases or decrease his trade value, management will make every attempt to trade him or buy him out. Until he’s gone, our two younger up and coming PGs will continue to wait and watch from the sideline.

    Shooting Guard: I see this position in as much turmoil as the PG position and here’s why - the acquisition of James Posey. That statement may come as a bit of a surprise for most readers, but there’s a reason why I make this pronouncement. As the roster currently stands, we have Brandon Rush, Paul George, Mike Dunleavy and Lance Stevenson fighting for playing time here. (It should be noted that Dunleavy and Stevenson could see playing time at other positions, SF and PG, respectively. More on the SF position in a moment.) However, as I see the makeup of this roster and based on Brandon Rush’s performance since his acquisition and the overall fluctuations this position has undergone since Reggie Miller retired and Stephen Jackson was traded, I don’t see Brandon Rush as the future SG for this team. My reason for this have been very well documented by the fans and sports analysts alike, as well as coach O’Brien and Bird themselves: Rush hasn’t show the confidence and consistency required of a reliable, starting Shooting Guard. While he does bring a skillset to this position that really haven’t been since in a while, i.e., his ability to drive baseline and get to the rim, his defense, and his ability to play above the rim, he still hasn’t taken ownership of this position. In his defense, I believe a large part of as to why he hasn’t done so is because of how coach O’Brien has "plugged" him into the offense. In my observations, I believe coach wants Rush to become a prototypical catch-n-shoot type of SG. But that’s not exactly Brandon Rush’s game. He’s far more effective if he’s allowed to move with the ball and "react" to what the defense gives him as opposed to relying on designed plays to contribute while on the floor. He can take his man off the dribble and drive the lanes, go base line, step inside for jumpers, or hand outside the arch for the 3, but I think he often times feels he’s been pigeonholed, and that probably makes him feel unsure of his capabilities or perhaps he believes he has more to offer but his abilities are being constrained within this offense. Either way, Brandon Rush hasn’t shown me that "the Rush is on!" And like many Brandon Rush fans, I’ve been waiting to see him break out of his college-confined shell and become an NBA caliber basketball players. The wait continues... As such, I would drastically change the rotation at this position and insert Danny Granger as the starting SG. I know I’ve just received several wide-eyed looks, but there’s a reason for this and once you see my rotation which I will provide later, you will understand why. For now, just know that based on my observation of the players and how the roster currently stands, I believe this shift will have a dramatic improve on team defense and strengthen the team’s ability to attain a 3-pronged offense which is vital to every contending/championship caliber team. Stevenson could also see playing time at SG, but he'd likely fall behind Paul George who is taller, stronger and has performed from this position at a higher collegic level. My assessment as far as the potential for playing time between these two rookies, therefore, is George would see more minutes that Stevenson. But this isn't a knock on Stevenson; it simply means that it's quite possible the coaching staff (O'Brien) may want to hold Stevenson back and see how things shape up at PG and groom either as a Combo Guard. Either way, Stevenson should see more playing time over the next year or two either due to Dunleavy's expiring contract or if a player or two are among the Guards are traded. So, to Stevenson I'd say "be patient; your day will come soon. For now, just soak it all in and learn what you can and work to get better day-by-day."

    SmallForward: If Granger is moved to SG or PF as has been suggested by Bird in his recent press conference concerning the acquisition of Collison and Posey, who will start at this position? James Posey, of course! This is where the improved team defense begins to shape up. As a veteran player, James Posey provides the attributes on both sides of the ball this team desperately needs. He’s a smart and savvy player who is patient with the ball and won’t force shots. He’s not known to be a post-up SF, but he does posses this skill. But one thing he will do unlike why Dahntey Jones was brought here for is relief Granger of this defensive assignment along the Wing. This is important if Granger is to continue being the offensive threat, that "Go-To-Guy" every team needs. This is not to say that Danny should slack off in playing stronger defense regardless of what position he plays, i.e., SF, SG or PF, but in shifting him to SG, Danny will no longer be that player who matches up to the opposing team’s best offensive threat. If Posey is to become this team’s new starting SF, who will back him up? Based on experience, players development, defense and overall talent, I believe that job should befall Mike Dunleavy. Yes, another surprise choice, but again there is a reason for this and it’s based moreso on how Dunleavy would fit with the 2nd Unit as you will see when I present my version of the rotation later. But assuming that Dunleavy remains with this team (as he is one of those expiring contracts Bird mentioned in the press conference), he would fit better as the 6th or 7th man moreso than Dahntey or Brandon.

    PowerForward: The primary reason this position has been in flux since JO was traded is due to the very reason JO’s productivity dropped prior to his departure - player health, i.e., Hansborough, Foster. Anther aspect that has contributed to the instability from this position has been the youth movement that followed, i.e. Soloman Jones, McRoberts. Suffice it to say, no player has been able to take ownership of the PF position any more than one has been able to make PG or SG their own. But I believe that is about to change. Trading Troy Murphy opens the door for either Tyler Hansborough or Josh McRoberts to step through and take control of the 4-spot! Of the two, I believe McRoberts presently is more poised to do so. Moreover, he’s probably a better fit to play alongside Roy Hibbert than Hansborough because of his speed, rebounding ability and ability to spread the floor alittle more than Hansborough. Of course, Hansborough still has the stigma of his vertigo to get over. So, until he can demonstrate that he is over that ailment, my vote would be to give the starting PF job to McRoberts. He’s a much more athletic players than Hansborough, plays above the rim, has quickness, amazing reach, will hustle for loose balls just like Hansborough and Foster, can rebound, has shown shot blocking ability and has this uncanny ability to constantly stay in motion and get in on plays you wouldn’t expect him to be part of. I love McRobert’s "youthful exuberance"! I just hope the young man doesn’t hurt himself. But as they say in football, "those who are afraid to take a hit usually are the one’s who get hurt!" I believe Josh McRoberts will "wear the helmet" and get out there and do the dirty work a player from the PF position needs to do....things Troy Murphy would not do. McRoberts is a natural big man. He’ll bring back that tough-guy persona that has been missing from this position for the Pacers that hasn’t been seen since the days of the Davis Boys.

    Center: I goes without saying Hibbert owns this position. But don’t confuse him taking ownership of it with him dominate from the paint just yet. He’s still young, growing, learning, developing into the kind of skilled, tough minded Center we’ve commonly seen from most well known Centers throughout the history of the NBA. I was never more thrilled to learn that management had brought in Bill Walton to "tutor" Hibbert. I can’t wait to see how he applies what he has learned on the hardwood. But make no mistake - Roy Hibbert is the present and the future Center for this franchise. His backup should be a healthy Jeff Foster, whom we all have come to know, love and admire. Jeff remains one of the most under rated Center/PFs in the league, but he earned much respect when Tim Duncan spoke candidly about him on this issue, as well as, when announcers began to speak highly of his unique rebounding ability. One should NEVER under estimate the importance of 2nd-change shot opportunities, and the Pacers missed that asset once Foster and Hansborough went out last year. Hopefully, both are able to return and remain contributors for this team. You don’t have a more loyal players dedicated to his craft than Jeff Foster. Yet, his presence posses a threat to Magnum "PI" Rolle’s development should management be able to sign him which I pray they will. Should Bird have no choice but to trade Foster to make room for Rolle, it would be a great lose for this team because as I look down the roster there may be one or two players who could be plugged into the backup Center position, i.e., Solo or McRoberts or even Rolle, but none will fill it like Foster can.

    Okay, now that I’ve addressed each position it’s time to outline who I believe would best fit as starters/reserves on this team:

    PG - Collison/Price/Ford
    SG - Granger/George/Stevenson
    SF - Posey/Dunleavy/Rush
    PF - McRoberts/Hansborough/Solo
    C - Hibbert/Foster/Rolle

    Notice that Dahntey Jones’ isn’t listed. The reason for this is as I’ve said above. When you really look at the various skills and potential make up of the roster and rotations and consider what each player brings and how they may work best with one another, Dahntey just doesn’t fit. You could plug him in behind Posey, but then you lose the ability to bring in a player who can either score from the perimeter, post up his player or drive the lanes. Yes, Dahntey can do these things but he’s not nearly as consistent with them as Dunleavy, and as such he doesn’t pose as big a threat. Even Brandon Rush, as inconsistent as he has been, can be a bigger threat offensively than Danhtey. Moreover, Rush has shown a greater ability to defend his man over Dahntey. Again, this defensive reduction on Dahntey’s part may stem from his attempt to showcase his offense moreso than his defense last year, but based on the statistics, as well as my own observations of these two players, I believe Dunleavy and Rush would make better fits within the rotation at SF over Dahntey.

    Those players in bold are players I believe could be traded by the trade deadline if not sooner. However, I’ve plugged them into the rotation to illustrate how I believe the lineups/rotations should pan out. Of course, this is only this fan’s opinion. Still, if you consider the full range of capabilities each player brings, it’s not difficult to see how man- and team-defense would improve among the starters as listed, as well as how the reserves led by Dunleavy can maintain a high level of continuity particularly on offense, but certainly on defense.

    Those players in italics are players I believe would either move up at their relative positions or be shifted elsewhere depending on how and future trades may shape up, i.e., should Ford be traded Stevenson would move from SG to 3rd PG behind Price and Rush could move to 3rd SG behind George or even ahead of him depending on how George performs or, if coach O’Brien preferred and assuming he shifts Granger to starting SG, he could backup Granger whereby Granger could continue to mentor him. Such a rotation would provide the Pacers with something else they haven’t had in over 10 years - skilled "craftsmen" at their respective positions.

    For far too long, this team has brought in a hodgepodge of "swing players", guys who could play from multiple positions. However, IMO, what this has done is erode professionals at each position, players who have honed their craft to become skilled post defenders, rebounders, pure shooters, penetrators, passers - the fundamental skills each player playing from their respective positions need in order to perfect their skills to the highest degree possible. To put it simply: Michael Jordan didn’t become the Hall of Fame player his is because he was shifted around from PG to SG to SF throughout his legendary career. He became the master of his craft be playing from one position and one position only throughout his career, and by doing so he perfected his craft. Same can be said of all the great Hall of Famers in NBA history! I believe this team needs to get back to that and it can start this year provided the roster pans out close to as I’ve outlined it above.

    Your thoughts are greatly welcomed.
    Last edited by NuffSaid; 08-13-2010, 09:06 PM.

  • #2
    Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

    Originally posted by NuffSaid View Post
    I do believe, however, that in the interim between Price healing and the trade deadline, we will see Collison and Ford running the Point.
    I don't believe we will see Ford play another minute in a Pacer uniform. If he is on the roster he will be in a suit.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

      You took a lot of time putting together this thread, and congrats for doing so.

      James Posey isn't going to be the starting SF. He's over the hill on downward skills. Granger will be the SF, and he will also be playing PF which you didn't mention. I don't envision seeing Granger at the SG position.

      With the acquistion of Collison and what seems to be the feeling in the FO about Ford, I don't see Ford has much future in a Pacers uni. Which makes me believe Stephenson as it stands of now will be b/u to Collison until Price can play and be the b/u whenever that might be.


      The 16th player or odd man out on your roster is Dahntay. You feel he has no place on this roster which says Bird made a mistake signing him to a 4 year contract as a FA. My feeling is he has more to offer at a cheaper salary than Posey. That is if Jimmy will play him.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

        Bird said in the Collison trade interview that AJ was going to be in camp. That he may be ready for game 1.
        "He wanted to get to that money time. Time when the hardware was on the table. That's when Roger was going to show up. So all we needed to do was stay close"
        Darnell Hillman (Speaking of former teammate Roger Brown)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

          Nice read.

          But i disagree with your sight of Granger's role with the team. I think that Granger was the only cornerstone of the franchise and a lock at the SF position, regardless of O'Brien's use of him in recent time. He has the seize, the physique and the necessary skill-set (good touch from midrange and beyond the arc, good drive to the rim, above defensive skills) to play the 3 for almost every NBA team on allstar level. Why would anybody want to change that and shear the team's power?

          So, for me Granger is (and stays) the starting small forward, backed up by Dunleavy if healthy and in good condition and Paul George. For the years to come, george is the obvious backup for Danny.

          Power forward is a tough one due to the uncertainties. Will Hansbrough be healthy enough to stay there for 20+ minutes on a nightly base? Even if that is the case, I personally have a hard time to predict his role with the team and his very impact. I haven't seen enough from him last season due to his concussion, but what I saw seemed promising. He found his way to the rim and to the line and that is something that the Pacers were lacking, a serious threat in the post with above passing skills as well.
          Today I would say he is better preserved as a backup. Maybe behind Posey, with either Rolle or McRoberts picking up the remaining minutes. I wouldn't use Posey more than 25 minutes a game, keeping him fresh for clutch time to defend the opposite team's go-to-guy. I agree with you on that and think he should see some minutes at the 2 or 3 just to lock down scorers.

          Obviously the Pacers have an oversupply at the 2. It is probably Brandon's job to loose and right so. I am not the biggest fan of his and think that a team could use a more traditional SG who shoots the lights out, but at the same time I like what he brings to the table in terms of defense, physique and occasional shot-blocking. This skillset and his cheap contract make D. Jones expendable. Honestly, I was dissappointed with his game in the last season- advertised as a top-notch defender, he barely cared about playing defense, picked up tons of fouls and he took way too many shots (needless to say that they were early in the shot-clock).
          I can see George sliding to the 2-spot occasionally, too.

          The point is played by Collison, no doubts about that. I would like to see Stephenson picking up big minutes behind Collison and then sliding over to the 2-spot once Price is ready to go. Depending how Stephenson played in that role, it will be a battle between the latter two with the winner backing up Collison. Btw, I am pretty sure there will be some setbacks for him in the course of the season where it might be necessary, even essential to back him up, to support him and to trust him (and NOT to bench him). I assume that O'Brien would bench him (as he did with Hibbert and Rush) just to play it old-school and show authority or whatever. I have a hard time believing that this might be the appropriate approach to deal with young, apsiring players, but that is not up to me.

          Center is an easy one - Hibbert, backed up by Foster. I doubt that S. Jones is still here on opening night.

          Just my opinion.

          Starting Lineup

          PG
          Collison
          Rush
          Granger
          Posey
          Hibbert
          Last edited by pathil275; 08-13-2010, 03:16 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

            Who is going to guard Tim Duncan on opening night???? My guess is if no moves are made to add a power forward old reliable Jeff Foster will be the starter on opening night at pf.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

              Originally posted by diamonddave00 View Post
              Who is going to guard Tim Duncan on opening night???? My guess is if no moves are made to add a power forward old reliable Jeff Foster will be the starter on opening night at pf.
              Hibbert.

              Duncan is a Center. He calls himself a power forward, but he plays in the post and never strays too far from the basket.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                Originally posted by count55 View Post
                Hibbert.

                Duncan is a Center. He calls himself a power forward, but he plays in the post and never strays too far from the basket.
                Then who guards the other San Antonio big man, presumably DeJuan Blair but perhaps Antonio McDyess or Tiago Splitter? It is hard to imagine anyone but Jeff has size/strength/bulk to contend with any of them.
                The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!).

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                  Originally posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
                  Then who guards the other San Antonio big man, presumably DeJuan Blair but perhaps Antonio McDyess or Tiago Splitter? It is hard to imagine anyone but Jeff has size/strength/bulk to contend with any of them.
                  Danny, Posey, McBob (6'10" 240lbs), Hansbrough (has the strength)

                  I don't think you have to worry a lot about McDyess past his jump shooting these days. Blair....you have to hope our height advantage is enough to outdo his strength. Splitter....we'll find out.
                  "man, PG has been really good."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                    Originally posted by count55 View Post
                    Hibbert.

                    Duncan is a Center. He calls himself a power forward, but he plays in the post and never strays too far from the basket.
                    Didn't Hibbert play really well against Duncan last year? Seems like I remember being impressed with that.

                    Hmm... found this on Youtube. Hibs doesn't look good in the beginning but had some good plays late in the game, including getting the bucket that put Indy ahead late and a nice block on Duncan (that ended up not mattering).

                    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v9eJd8V4zzQ

                    Wow, I'll be so glad to not watch Ford any more. And that was on a good shooting night.
                    Last edited by Anthem; 08-13-2010, 04:29 PM.
                    This space for rent.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                      Originally posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
                      Then who guards the other San Antonio big man, presumably DeJuan Blair but perhaps Antonio McDyess or Tiago Splitter? It is hard to imagine anyone but Jeff has size/strength/bulk to contend with any of them.
                      Originally posted by Ozwalt72 View Post
                      Danny, Posey, McBob (6'10" 240lbs), Hansbrough (has the strength)

                      I don't think you have to worry a lot about McDyess past his jump shooting these days. Blair....you have to hope our height advantage is enough to outdo his strength. Splitter....we'll find out.
                      Basically what he says.

                      I don't see Blair sharing the floor with Duncan very much. Of his almost 1,500 minutes last regular season, only about a 26% of it was with Duncan on the floor - and he didn't share the court with Duncan for one single second in the playoffs. Pop doesn't like to play them together because - wait for it - it ****s up the spacing in the offense.

                      I suspect you'll see Danny out there at the opening tip in San Antonio as the nominal 4, and I'm hopeful that McRobert or Hansbrough can emerge enough to get some minutes, and we'll go from there.

                      As Oz says, the only guy I can see torturing us offensively is possibly Splitter - and I just don't know what to expect from him. Blair, you just have to keep off the boards, and McDyess you just have to get a hand in his face on his jumper.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                        I've always been of the opinion that if you try playing the "match-up game" before the game even begins, you've affectively lost the game long before tip-off. Instead, you take stock of those threats you must contend with and make your player adjustments throughout the game.

                        Example:

                        Pacers -vs- Spurs. You know you have to contend with Duncan, Parker, Ginobli and perhaps one or two others. You tip your hand by changing your lineup to contend with them. Instead, you game plan from the locker room, stay with your starting-five but rotate players sooner than normal even if it means you go smaller or put forth a strong front-court. Either way, you don't pull Hibbert, for example, just because he's a rookie. Instead, you play him but sub him out sooner for Foster, or you start off w/Hibbert and McRoberts but rotate Hansborough for McRoberts sooner.

                        But you don't tip your hand before the game is played. IMO, that's always been a huge mistake by both coach Carlisle and O'Brien.

                        Path,

                        Your lineup would work, but you'd also kill any chance of McRoberts or Hansborough seeing significant playing time. Moreover, you negatively affect the off/def "balance" I believe is essential for any team moving forward.

                        Team chemistry is very important, and part of that chemistry is finding the right balance between a prolific offense and a strong defense. Such balance can't be part of your starting unit only. It must also be made an important part of your 2nd-Unit. Those teams that are able to bring in their reserves and still maintain a decent offensive and defensive presence are the teams that have found that balance among both their starters and reserves. It is for this reason that I did not place Granger at either Forward position based on the makeup of the roster currently. I think the Pacers can acheive a more balanced team overall by starting Posey at SF and Granger at SG.

                        I don't expect Posey to be a scoring threat. That's not his role. His is to defend at the highest level possible against the opposing team's best player. In doing this, you free Granger to become the consistent offensive threat he has continued to be. The only problem with having Granger at the 2-spot is you take away his ability to post-players up. But you can regain that skill any time you need to by moving him back to SF during rotations. The one thing you don't want to do is kill any confidence you may have gained in McRobert's development over the summer. Believe me, there was a reason coach O'Brien wanted him to be part of Summer League play. He's being groomed to play alot more minutes at PF.

                        Of course, you could go w/the lineup you've outlined, but how do you maintain a balanced offense while also retaining a strong defense now that you're left with George, Dunleavy, McRoberts and Hansborough to choose from? Do you rotate McRoberts or Hansborough in for Granger? Dunleavy is a better choice to sub in for Rush since he followed him at various times near the end of last season, but now you've lost the opportunity to get your #10 draft pick on the floor more often throughout the season.

                        Balance...that's the #1 theme of the rotation I've proposed.
                        Last edited by NuffSaid; 08-13-2010, 05:00 PM.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                          Our rotation this season is a "happy" problem.....but I'm looking more to next season.

                          Below is our likely future core:

                          PG - DC/AJ
                          SG - BRush/Lance/Posey
                          SF - Granger/George
                          PF - ??? / Hansbrough / Rolle
                          C - Hibbert / McRoberts

                          That's the beauty of the trade....we will likely have our future 10-11 man rotation already set and this doesn't even include the 2011-2012 1st round pick. The only thing we need to do now is to get a Starting Quality PF....which we can get with copius amounts of $$$.
                          Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                            Lots of good info/thoughts here ....................... BUT ........... If McRoberst is the starting PF, we're in trouble. Nice bench guy - starter - I simply don't see it.

                            Carry on ................

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Pacers: A Beautiful Mess to Have!

                              Originally posted by PacerDude View Post
                              Lots of good info/thoughts here ....................... BUT ........... If McRoberst is the starting PF, we're in trouble. Nice bench guy - starter - I simply don't see it.

                              Carry on ................
                              The few times he's had starters minutes he's produced starters results. It's pretty early to write him off.
                              "I had to take her down like Chris Brown."

                              -Lance Stephenson

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X