Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Non-Colts thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Non-Colts thread

    [green]I like you again Sollozzo[/green]

    Comment


    • Re: Non-Colts thread

      Seriously, didn't last night play perfectly to the script? That was the most predictable ending ever. Romo had the ball down 3 points with plenty of time left and the opportunity to win the game, but he quickly throws a horrendous pick. Then a stupid Dallas penalty at the very end prevents them from forcing a FG and getting the ball back. So predictable. I mean, was it ever going to end any other way than that?

      Comment


      • Re: Non-Colts thread

        Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
        Seriously, didn't last night play perfectly to the script? That was the most predictable ending ever. Romo had the ball down 3 points with plenty of time left and the opportunity to win the game, but he quickly throws a horrendous pick. Then a stupid Dallas penalty at the very end prevents them from forcing a FG and getting the ball back. So predictable. I mean, was it ever going to end any other way than that?
        With two timeouts (maybe 3?) and the 2 minute warning

        Comment


        • Re: Non-Colts thread

          I think the Redskins won't win more than one game, and I really think RG3's health is a concern in the future, but you're kidding yourself if you don't seem as a strong team. Their running game is ridiculous. The defense has absolutely no clue who is going to run the ball and it's incredibly difficult to try and stop. The offensive line is blocking great for them and you have to honor the run. Until RG3 launches the ball and hits a home run. Dangerous team.

          I'm really looking forward to seeing how Seattle plays defense. Because I feel they are one of the few teams, along with SF, that can make a dent into the Redskins offense.
          Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

          Comment


          • Re: Non-Colts thread

            Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
            I'm done arguing with Colts fans rarely find unbiased ones I just find most of them ridcoulous.
            Right, because there are generally more biased Colts fans than any other team in the league. Give me a break. Go to a Redskins board, a Bears board, a Boston bar, a Houston bar, its the same everywhere. If you want to claim to be impartial, unbiased and all that, you might want to avoid those easy generalizations because that's just foolish.

            Regarding the Skins-Cowboys, RG3 was not 100% but he wasn't playing on just one leg either. He wasn't throwing dimes left and right, he didn't playing amazing- he was 9-18 for 100 yds but still ran for 60+yds. But lets not pretend he was a superhero out there. Romo and the offense played terribly, the defense couldn't stop Morris. And the Skins recognized that RG3 wasn't playing his best game, wasn't 100%, and the Cowboys couldn't stop Morris. So of course they're going to ride him the whole game. And saying this doesnt take anything away from RG3's play this year or the Skins winning 7 in a row. They've earned it.

            Comment


            • Re: Non-Colts thread

              Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
              I'm done arguing with Colts fans rarely find unbiased ones I just find most of them ridcoulous.
              We're ridiculous because we don't agree that a quarterback who threw it a whopping 18 times was "tossing dimes left and right"?

              And hell yeah we're biased, just like every other fan base is. When you cut ties with a HOF QB and have a rookie lead you to an incredible 11-5 season while making many clutch plays in the process, then yeah, you're going to be biased towards that rookie. Of course we are biased towards Luck. We watch him every weak and have an obvious fondness for him. He threw the ball 234 more times than RG3 and was asked to do far more with his arm than RGIII. We give him points for that. He also didn't have a monster running back like Morris on his team. Luck would almost be unstoppable if he had a running threat like that behind him.

              But acting like Colts fans are the only ones with bias is just silly. I think your obvious anti-Colts bias is just as strong as our pro-Colts bias.
              Last edited by Sollozzo; 12-31-2012, 03:08 PM.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                Only one mistake Wilson is playing far beyond expectations. I don't know if anyone though he would start let alone play like an elite QB this year. Also arguing about injuries is lol this is football everyone is hurt. I never complain about injuries and the Bears have them bad every year. But this is a contact sport **** happens. Also saying Wilson and RG won't last is lol. Again this is football tons of HOF QBs careers were derailed due to hits. In football you are one hit from being hurt PM proved that. No matter your build you can get hurt 5 years is a long career in football. I'm done arguing with Colts fans rarely find unbiased ones I just find most of them ridcoulous.
                Good the feeling is mutual then, since I don't care for most of your immature know-it-all posts.

                And, incorrect on Wilson. He has had a small faction of people who felt he had big things coming and was underexposed, and I've personallyy said all season that I think whole-heartedly that he and Luck are by far the two best LONG-TERM prospects from this draft.

                Sent from my KFJWI using Tapatalk 2
                There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

                Comment


                • Re: Non-Colts thread

                  Originally posted by vapacersfan View Post
                  Are you freaking serious?

                  D-Hall shut Bryant down, if that is the injury you were talking about. Liek I have said twice already, I guess its a good thing the Redskins had a 100% healthy team

                  In Hawgtown? Thats cute. What did you do, stay up all night thinking that up?
                  4 for 71 is now shutting someone down? Wow! The low expectations of the Redskins have really come through then?

                  If the NFC East wasn't a complete dumpster fire this season then the Redskins don't make the playoffs but to their credit they did. There is nothing wrong with that but as a NFL fan I don't get blinded or fooled by a crappy divison.

                  Celebrate all you want but it doesn't change the fact that RG3 is playing in a system that will get him hurt and long term as a fan of him I would be concerned. Making the playoffs as a fan makes very little difference to me. It doesn't change anything unless a champiionship is won and with RG3 is a step in the right direction but in that system I think they are fools gold.
                  Last edited by Gamble1; 12-31-2012, 03:35 PM.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Non-Colts thread

                    It's pretty pathetic that the Giants couldn't win that division. There's no excuse for that team going 9-7. None. They should have won 11 games. They are maddening.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Non-Colts thread

                      With Dez hell yeah it is!

                      Your lame sarcasm aside, as much as i hate dez he has shown he can be a hall of famer. Is he will or not is another story.

                      You can insult the conference and team all you want, we are still champs.

                      you, and everyone else, can tell us its fools gold and it wont last. Just like all the idiots who said we overpaid for RG3and wouldn't do **** with him

                      Comment


                      • Re: Non-Colts thread

                        And lmfao lol @ playoffs dont matter.

                        Last i checked you play the game to win. To play in the second season. To hopefully win it all

                        last i checked you cant do the latter without the former

                        but thank you for allowing me to celebrate our first nfc championship since 99.

                        Yall enjoy keeping the hate up. Bits kind of entertaining cause yall dont drop the clown act. The only way it would be better would be if we won the SB. Im sure it would just be a "fluke" though

                        Comment


                        • Re: Non-Colts thread

                          Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
                          It's pretty pathetic that the Giants couldn't win that division. There's no excuse for that team going 9-7. None. They should have won 11 games. They are maddening.
                          Karma for Mara screwing Dallas and Washington.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Non-Colts thread

                            Sigh
                            Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Non-Colts thread

                              Originally posted by vapacersfan View Post
                              And lmfao lol @ playoffs dont matter.

                              Last i checked you play the game to win. To play in the second season. To hopefully win it all

                              last i checked you cant do the latter without the former

                              but thank you for allowing me to celebrate our first nfc championship since 99.

                              Yall enjoy keeping the hate up. Bits kind of entertaining cause yall dont drop the clown act. The only way it would be better would be if we won the SB. Im sure it would just be a "fluke" though

                              You certainly deserve to be happy. It was a massive win for your franchise. You were better than every team in your division and deserve to be in the playoffs. You had two big victories against Dallas and that extremely clutch Monday Night win against the Giants. Your team certainly deserves to be playing next weekend. I like how the NFL rewards winning a division.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Non-Colts thread

                                Originally posted by vapacersfan View Post
                                With Dez hell yeah it is!

                                Your lame sarcasm aside, as much as i hate dez he has shown he can be a hall of famer. Is he will or not is another story.

                                You can insult the conference and team all you want, we are still champs.

                                you, and everyone else, can tell us its fools gold and it wont last. Just like all the idiots who said we overpaid for RG3and wouldn't do **** with him
                                Being a champ of a weak divison for a long time I never hung my hate on that... Its about as stupid as it gets IMO as a fan. Does it matter in the long run? Not really and as a fan I know that my team is not likely to win another game which is the same as the redskins. I don't think that is meaningful in the least but if the either the Colts or the Redskins get to the superbowl then I will be shocked and all praise should go to them IMO. Do I expect that to happen this year? No..

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X