Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

    Would I trade Foster - no- unless we get a boni-fide NBA starting point guard who is still young. No Earl Watson, No Ridnour, no Mike Bibby. I want a young Boni-fide starting point guard. Someone who would be the pacers starter and finisher at that position for the next 6 to 8 seasons - no questions asked. I'd trade Jeff and jamaal for someone like that - throw in DH or Baston also.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      Would I trade Foster - no- unless we get a boni-fide NBA starting point guard who is still young. No Earl Watson, No Ridnour, no Mike Bibby. I want a young Boni-fide starting point guard. Someone who would be the pacers starter and finisher at that position for the next 6 to 8 seasons - no questions asked. I'd trade Jeff and jamaal for someone like that - throw in DH or Baston also.
      Interesting thought there.....just for fun....any reasonable trade scenarios that you can come up with where you would part with Foster?

      I will throw out one of my own.

      Damon Stoudamire+Mike Miller

      for

      Tinsley+Foster

      We make ( at best ) a lateral move at the PG spot...but get a starting quality SG that can hit the 3pt shot and shoot the ball. I'm recluctant to give up what Foster gives us...but I will live with having Baston do his best imitation of Foster while giving Ike more minutes but getting back a bonafide shooter in Mike Miller. The only flaw that I see is whether getting Foster back in return for taking on Tinsley's contract is incentive enough for the Grizzlies to bite.

      Remember...this is just for fun.....so no need to start any response with "Are you EFFIN kidding me?"

      EDIT - although I would wish the Grizzlies would do this...I doubt that they would like Tinsley's contract.
      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

        Originally posted by Jay@Section19 View Post
        Troy "should" be making Jeff expendable, with similar rebounding (including, unlike Jeff, getting tough rebounds in traffic), better shooting and no noticeable dropoff on defense.
        .
        I think there is a very real dropoff on defense. Jeff does a very good job on mobile big guys, he moves quite a bit better than Troy does.

        I like Jeff on the team a LOT. But I also think we gotta play Ike and Harrison. And we gotta get guard help. If he can bring something decent in, he's on the table with almost everyone else.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

          Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
          Would I trade Foster - no- unless we get a boni-fide NBA starting point guard who is still young. No Earl Watson, No Ridnour, no Mike Bibby. I want a young Boni-fide starting point guard. Someone who would be the pacers starter and finisher at that position for the next 6 to 8 seasons - no questions asked. I'd trade Jeff and jamaal for someone like that - throw in DH or Baston also.
          Nobodies giving you that guy for Jamaal and Jeff.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
            Would I trade Foster - no- unless we get a boni-fide NBA starting point guard who is still young. No Earl Watson, No Ridnour, no Mike Bibby. I want a young Boni-fide starting point guard. Someone who would be the pacers starter and finisher at that position for the next 6 to 8 seasons - no questions asked. I'd trade Jeff and jamaal for someone like that - throw in DH or Baston also.
            There aren't many of those guys in the league, so the teams with them will obviously not be foolish enough to deal them. Bibby looks to be our best chance at "upgrading" the PG spot. I do like that deal with the Grizz because of the fact that Mike Miller is involved, but I don't see the Logo agreeing to it.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

              I kind of like Jameer Nelson down in Orlando. He's played great in the past but is having a lousy season, maybe Orlando's to the point they'd consider moving him? He's young, quick, and can shoot.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                Originally posted by PacersFan83 View Post
                If he's not now, he soon will be. Like I said, our front court is fanastic and it'd be nice to keep the great depth, but if we can move one of our big men (most likely Jeff) for backcourt help, we can't turn it down.
                What I was saying in my previous post was that the two can not be reasonably compared, because they bring two completely different facets to the game. One is specialized in offensive moves and brings decent rebounding and scoring, the other one is specialized more in defensive moves and brings rebounding, solid D and hustle to the team.

                We need all those facets to be succesfull, especially if Ike can hardly guard a chair the need for a defensive presence in our frontcourt, when JO is on the bench or injured and Ike is playing, is vital.

                We just can't afford to lose Foster (yet). IF Ike "gets it" a lot better then he is currently, defensively, then we should indeed start considering moving Jeff.

                Regards,

                Mourning
                2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

                2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                  Originally posted by bnd45 View Post
                  Bibby looks to be our best chance at "upgrading" the PG spot. I do like that deal with the Grizz because of the fact that Mike Miller is involved, but I don't see the Logo agreeing to it.
                  Statistically speaking ( cuz I love to compare Stats )......for the 2006-2007 season alone....Bibby's shooting percentage has dropped significantly compared to his previous years. In fact.....his shooting stats compared to Tinsley ( for this year ) is somewhat comprable...if not a little worse. As to why there is a drop in performance in Bibby's performance this year...compared to last...I'm wondering if it has anything to do with playing under Eric Musselmen's offense as opposed to Rick Adelman's more free-flowing offense .

                  2006-2007 Season Only

                  Games Played:
                  Bibby : 47 games played
                  Tinsley : 48 games played


                  Minutes Per Game
                  Bibby : 36.1 MPG
                  Tinsley : 31.3 MPG


                  Points Per Game
                  ***Bibby : 17.3 PPG
                  Tinsley : 13.7 PPG


                  FGM - FGA / FG%
                  Bibby : 5.8 - 14.8 / 39%
                  ***Tinsley : 4.9 - 12.5 / 40%


                  FTM - FTA / FT%
                  ***Bibby : 4.1 - 4.9 / 83%
                  Tinsley : 2.9 - 4.1 / 71%


                  3ptA - 3ptM
                  Bibby : 1.7 - 5.5 / 31%
                  ***Tinsley : .9 - 2.8 / 32%


                  Turnovers Per Game
                  ***Bibby : 2.4 ToPG
                  Tinsley : 2.8 ToPG


                  Assists Per Game
                  Bibby : 5.4 MPG
                  ***Tinsley : 6.5 APG


                  However, if you compare the stats over the last 3 full seasons and this one ( since the 2003-2004 season ), on average...Bibby scoring and overall shooting is somewhat better compared to this season and even better then Tinsley's averages.

                  2003-2007 Season Only ( 3 full seasons and half the 2006-2007 season )

                  Games Played:
                  ***Bibby : 291 games played
                  Tinsley : 182 games played


                  Minutes Per Game
                  Bibby : 37.6 MPG
                  Tinsley : 29 MPG


                  Points Per Game
                  ***Bibby : 19.3 PPG
                  Tinsley : 11.5 PPG


                  FGM - FGA / FG%
                  ***Bibby : 6.7 - 15.5 / 43%
                  Tinsley : 4.2 - 10.3 / 41%


                  FTM - FTA / FT%
                  ***Bibby : 4.0 - 4.9 / 82%
                  Tinsley : 2.0 - 2.8 / 71%


                  3ptA - 3ptM
                  ***Bibby : 1.9 - 5.1 / 37%
                  Tinsley : 1.1 - 3.1 / 35%


                  Turnovers Per Game
                  ***Bibby : 2.4 ToPG
                  Tinsley : 2.7 ToPG


                  Assists Per Game
                  Bibby : 5.8 MPG
                  ***Tinsley : 5.9 APG


                  If we want to somewhat upgrade our "shoot first / pass second" PG....Bibby would fit that bill. Given that both Tinsley and Bibby's defense are equally bad.....if I were to simply look at the stats over the last couple of years and we were to trade for Bibby for Tinsley/Foster, we would likely be getting a somewhat better starting PG that can be more solid 2nd/3rd scoring option ( at least compared to Tinsley ) that is more durable, a somewhat more reliable 3pt shot that is much better at making it to the FT line that is a little less turnover prone.

                  The only concerns that I have is if its a good idea to continue to stick with a "shoot first / pass second" Starting PG....or if it would be better to get a "pass first / shoot second" Starting PG. In addition....would Bibby's "shoot first / pass second" PG mentality fit in well with Carlisle's offense? Bibby seemed to flourish under Rick Adelman's offense compared to Musselman's offense that is likely more restrictive.

                  The problem is that the cost to get him would be Foster. Assuming that Baston could pick up some of the slack if Foster is traded and Ike's likely increase in minutes pans out.....I could probably get used to seeing Bibby run the point over Tinsley.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                    If we continue to play like the way that we have been playing.....I wouldn't be surprised if Foster is moved for some backcourt help...with or without Tinsley.
                    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                      Cable KC really good post/stats on Bibby vs. Tinsley. Last night on TNT they were talking about a wrist injury really affecting his shooting numbers early in the season. He's slowly starting to come around. As for the 2 systems, I don't what to make of that becasue I don't watch many Kings games. Obviously they don't run as much as they used to, but he can still get his own shot. He would thrive here because he wouldn't be expected to carry the team like he was in Sac when everyone left.

                      Bibby, Dunleavy, Granger, JO, and Murphy is a good 5. (Since we're talking about the future, maybe even a helahty Marquis Daniels as the 6th man)Defensively they don't lose anything and offensively they improve because Bibby is a better scorer and doesn't have the bad habit of pounding the ball for the first 18 seconds of the shot clock. I already mentioned this, but the p&r become even better with Bibby and JO or Murphy running it.

                      Back to Foster- Here's more reasons for why he has to be the sacraficial lamb that gets packaged if Tinsley goes: The only legit PGs we could get in a 1-1 swap would be E. Watson, B. Knight and M. James. I can't see Charlotte taking him so that leaves us 2 options before other guys have to be included.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                        Originally posted by bnd45 View Post
                        Back to Foster- Here's more reasons for why he has to be the sacraficial lamb that gets packaged if Tinsley goes: The only legit PGs we could get in a 1-1 swap would be E. Watson, B. Knight and M. James. I can't see Charlotte taking him so that leaves us 2 options before other guys have to be included.
                        I've brought this up before ....but I add Marko Jaric from the TWolves for a straight-up swap. He may not be a pure PG...but he has some PG skills...and actually plays some defense. I know its not much of a lateral move...but I would do it simply for his defense and a change.

                        I don't think that we have a chance with Watson or Mike James.....there is no real incentive for the Sonics or the TWolves to take on Tinsley's contract.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                          If I had my choice of Minny PGs I'd go for James.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                            Originally posted by bnd45 View Post
                            If I had my choice of Minny PGs I'd go for James.
                            Yeah...I guess I would to....but I would think that if the TWolves had a choice between the 2...they would give up Jaric.
                            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                              Mike James is having a lousy season and could be had for cheap. He's signed to the MLE.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Its Time To Move Jeff Foster

                                I'm against lateral movement of the point guard for the sake of moving him. I'd prefer to keep Foster and seek trading guys like Harrison. I would hope that our brass will listen to reasonable offers, and make any move that would significantly help us. I consider no one on the roster untouchable, but obviously the price would have to be right.

                                Manufacturing a trade for a point guard of equal or lesser value than Jamaal seems foolish. If we can pry a better point guard away from someone, using bigger chips makes sense.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X