Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

A little thing I saw from James Posey

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A little thing I saw from James Posey

    James Posey has been getting a lot of heat around here lately. Personally I can't complain. I found myself in recent years wanting an old school vet who's cool under pressure, plays physical, gritty basketball. So now we have one, so I can't be mad. Posey will usually not look pretty when on the court, but I see something in Posey. Specifically, I saw something in Fridays game that I can't get out my head. James Posey is a "glue guy" on any team he plays for. It's just him.

    Late in the 4th quarter the Pacers needed to inbound the ball up by one, they call timeout. They are expecting the Hornets to foul so the main focus of the time out is get the ball in bounds to the guy who we want to shoot two free throws (which turns out to be Posey but that's not the point). In the waning seconds of the time out the camera shifts over to Posey, JOB, and Collison standing around mid court. Posey was emphatically talking to JOB. He had his arms stretched out and was making a face at JOB that would suggest he disagreed or didn't understand what JOB was asking. Posey wasn't going to let this go. He was not going to do something he felt was wrong. So he replies with what appears to be his ideas on the current strategy. Even Collison steps up and chimes in his two cents, presumably agreeing with Posey. Whats even more interesting is JOB appears to concede to Posey, at least from the TV broadcast. Granted I don't attend games as frequent as many of you (I see the Pacers when they're in Denver) So I don't have the opportunity to see how everyone interacts. My question is when was the last time this team had a vet who seems to have JOB's ear? You can go back and look at the Fox Sports Indiana broadcast and see for yourself. I will admit this could all be a miss-communication, and Posey just didn't know the play for example, but this is what I feel I saw, and I wish I didn't delete the broadcast so I could watch it again before posting this. I think Posey has JOB's attention because of his innate semi-tactful leadership.

    1. Am I over blowing this? Maybe I am, but I have watched as many Pacer games as possible on NBALP, and I don't remember a guy that could discuss strategy with JOB in the way Posey appeared to do.

    2. Have players been vocal with JOB during his tenure? Something tells me JOB doesn't take advice from TJ or Rush.

    3. If so who?

    4. If a player in the past has been vocal with JOB does he appear to listen?

    5. Is this demonstrative leadership style from Posey negative for the young guys going forward?

    I especially love Posey for this because Collison was right behind him, and the PG, if no one else, needs to be able to communicate, and be heard.

    6. Did anyone else see this?

    I understand how some could be down on Posey. I was never a huge fan of his when he played anywhere else, and still don't know too much about him. Maybe he becomes a conduit for player coach communication. Something every team needs. I don't think it matters one bit to Posey what team he's on, who the coach is, or who his teammates are. He is going to speak and be heard, and that's intangible.

  • #2
    Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

    I'm actually watching the telecast right now. I'll have to take a look at this.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

      I still don't want Posey
      @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

        If anything, I think Posey ran the floor better on Friday night. When my cousin and I went to that Orlando game, he looked very out of shape as he chugged it up and down the court. He seemed to have a bit more of a spring in his step against New Orleans.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

          Posey is going to be crap until it matters. When its a big game or postseason he'll hit a couple of threes and get to the line, like he did Friday. Granted, Friday was not a big game. James is a different player than we've seen in recent memory.

          James Posey for a change is a bench player that looks to distribute the ball to the post and play a lot of in and out action. That is a good thing. When the regular season comes around, he will begin to take charges. He may have lost a step or 647.88 in lateral quickness, but he will be nitty gritty when he is up front with his man and he will teach all the players a thing or two about certain players.

          In a weird way, he's an extension of a good coach on the floor. He knows where to get the ball next and he knows perfectly what is a good shot for him and what is a bad shot for him.

          For the downside, he can't shoot off the dribble or fill the lane in a fastbreak for **** because he just can't do that. He also doesn't rebound anymore and he can't stay in front of his man.

          Of course everyone was saying that about Rasheed last year.

          And I'll check the whole coach/DC/Posey thing out in the morning.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

            Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
            I still don't want Posey
            But you want Collison, and Posey was the price of obtaining him. I would rather have Posey than Murphy this year. Posey has been part of championship teams, but yet the Pacers have no use for him? I like the idea of Posey being around the young guys. I understand that some don't want him which is why I never asked if people wanted him in the thread. I wanted some clarification on the questions I asked. If I wanted to know who wanted Posey or not I would of made a poll do you want Posey YES/NO. I believe basketball is highly psychological sport. Posey definitely has a mentality I think we haven't had the pleasure to have in quite sometime.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

              Originally posted by BringJackBack View Post
              Posey is going to be crap until it matters. When its a big game or postseason he'll hit a couple of threes and get to the line, like he did Friday. Granted, Friday was not a big game. James is a different player than we've seen in recent memory.

              James Posey for a change is a bench player that looks to distribute the ball to the post and play a lot of in and out action. That is a good thing. When the regular season comes around, he will begin to take charges. He may have lost a step or 647.88 in lateral quickness, but he will be nitty gritty when he is up front with his man and he will teach all the players a thing or two about certain players.

              In a weird way, he's an extension of a good coach on the floor. He knows where to get the ball next and he knows perfectly what is a good shot for him and what is a bad shot for him.

              For the downside, he can't shoot off the dribble or fill the lane in a fastbreak for **** because he just can't do that. He also doesn't rebound anymore and he can't stay in front of his man.

              Of course everyone was saying that about Rasheed last year.

              And I'll check the whole coach/DC/Posey thing out in the morning.
              Some great stuff in your post. I should of mentioned this in the OP. I don't want to get too much into Posey the player as opposed to Posey's mentality.

              You do seem to know a lot about evaluating players though, and your remark about him being an extension of the coach on the floor is exactly where I'm heading. He's a savvy vet, and he is not scared of the moment. On top of all this he seems to be able to communicate during live action with JOB. Which is something I can't name anyone who could.
              Last edited by focused444; 10-17-2010, 12:52 AM.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                Originally posted by focused444 View Post
                Some great stuff in your post. I should of mentioned this in the OP. I don't want to get too much into Posey the player as opposed to Posey's mentality.

                You do seem to know a lot about evaluating players though, and your remark about him being an extension of the coach on the floor is exactly where I'm heading. He's a savvy vet, and he is not scared of the moment. On top of all this he seem to be able to communicate during live action with JOB.
                I mean, he's not an extension of the coach like Steve Nash or Rajon Rondo is. Rajon and Steve are your typical extensions of the coach that you will hear on TV alot or whatever.

                But guys like Shane Battier, Grant Hill, and our very own James Posey are what I would call perfect role players. They know what they can and can't do and they don't force anything or they don't try to make difficult passes to get a top 10 sports center highlight. They are happy with the championship when its all said and done. They are extensions of the coach as they are going to get the ball to the best players and they are going to play by percentages and know when it is their time to step up.

                James is vocal on the floor and he isn't backing down to anyone like Ron doesn't on the court. He's been through it all and he knows that at a home game vs. Minnesota there is no need for him to put in all of this effort if it is going to bring him down for the next three games before a couple days rest. But if we play Lakers on the road, he is going to play hard and he is going to try to do what players like him do.

                It's amazing how he's turned himself into a journeyman into one of the 10 or so uber glue guys in the league. He's not really that as a player anymore, at all, but he'll have flashes during big games.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                  Originally posted by BringJackBack View Post
                  I mean, he's not an extension of the coach like Steve Nash or Rajon Rondo is. Rajon and Steve are your typical extensions of the coach that you will hear on TV alot or whatever.

                  But guys like Shane Battier, Grant Hill, and our very own James Posey are what I would call perfect role players. They know what they can and can't do and they don't force anything or they don't try to make difficult passes to get a top 10 sports center highlight. They are happy with the championship when its all said and done. They are extensions of the coach as they are going to get the ball to the best players and they are going to play by percentages and know when it is their time to step up.

                  James is vocal on the floor and he isn't backing down to anyone like Ron doesn't on the court. He's been through it all and he knows that at a home game vs. Minnesota there is no need for him to put in all of this effort if it is going to bring him down for the next three games before a couple days rest. But if we play Lakers on the road, he is going to play hard and he is going to try to do what players like him do.

                  It's amazing how he's turned himself into a journeyman into one of the 10 or so uber glue guys in the league. He's not really that as a player anymore, at all, but he'll have flashes during big games.
                  Exactly! He's not a Nash type of extension, his skill set doesn't allow it, but if Collison/George/Lance or any Pacer even Granger is out of place (physically or mentally) he will direct them, or at least try. He's been in a lot of huge games, and he will show up in big moments. JOB already had him as the guy to take the two free throws. I think that's because of him not feeling pressure, not his skill. It's similar to when Ron took Danny under his wing. IMO every team needs a guy like this to speak up and direct the show even if the can't physically run it. I have complained about Rush's passive demeanor, and Posey is exactly the opposite, he's intense from a mental aspect.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                    Stupid question on my end.....when people say that a Player is a good "glue-guy", what does that mean?

                    Can someone provide me some examples of who is a good "glue-guy" and how that translates into action on the court?
                    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                      Everybody will have their own personal definition, but I will give you what I think it means. A "glue-guy" is another term for a person with great intangibles. Things like after a loss everybody is down, but not Posey. From what I've seen he probably rallies the troops, saying whatever he needs to say to rectify any situation.The aspect that makes these type of players special is it doesn't seem like pretentious leadership to the other players, they trust him. Lets say Collison is running a play wrong Posey will tell him right there on the court with the clock running where to go, and probably later too. Next time they will be better for it. It's a mentality of a guy who will do everything in his power to improve the totality of team. These things are immeasurable because you never know how much impact they're having. It's very much behind the scenes stuff. I don't think it's a coincidence Posey has been on championship teams. It's basically another way to say good locker room guy. I think Posey is more than that though because he has the respect of JOB in a different manner than I've seen previously.
                      Last edited by focused444; 10-17-2010, 01:44 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                        I noticed this as well, but I wasn't sure what the context was.

                        I also agree about Posey being a "glue-guy." Two seasons ago, I thought that was Jarrett Jack.
                        2015, 2016, 2019 IKL Fantasy Basketball Champions - DC Dreamers

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                          Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                          I still don't want Posey
                          me2

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                            Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                            me2
                            I am not implying Posey is a great addition on the court at this stage in career, but if Posey is getting minutes you will see him being effective at times. He is by no means un-tradeable from our stand point. If some team thinks they need him and the right deal is there I fully expect Larry to move him. I give you that. My point though was never about on the court issues much anyway. I think you're overlooking what he can provide as far as leadership. I could easily see a scenario where Lance, Paul, or any other Pacer needs guidance from Posey. I think it's extra beneficial for the young guys to be exposed to him at this point in their careers. I wouldn't be surprised if a couple season from now the Pacers (especially younger) players will acknowledge learning from him.

                            Do you not see it?

                            or

                            Do you not care?

                            Do me a favor, ask Lance what Posey means to the team as far as leadership when you see him again. I would love to hear his response.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: A little thing I saw from James Posey

                              I like Posey he might be out of shape but he can fix this problem. He's a much needed veteran for our team who is willing to help the young players. The fact he tries to get the ball in the post more often is great because this was the Pacers eigther get Hibbert to work down low and score or Roy will pass the ball out to a guy waiting on the perimeter to shoot. I like the way he stays calm, while last year many guys on our team just took stupid shot after 5 seconds of ball-possesion. Im look forward to see how much of an impact he can make as a mentoring veteran and great locker room guy. It's great to see Posey disagrees with O'Brien on plays or tactics, seems like he doesn't like the "take the first shot you get" tactics. Don't hate on Posey I think he's a cool guy.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X