Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

    Originally posted by CableKC View Post
    I'm not sure who Heisenberg is referring to.....but try to focus on the main point that I think he is trying to convey. In order for the new GM to rebuild the Team into a vision of what he wants his Team to be....he has to clear away all of the garbage that his predecessor had left over.

    Getting rid of all of the overpaid talent is a start. Having Cap Flexibility is always a very good asset to have....it allows a very saavy GM to make a lot of moves and to improve the Team in the long term by acquiring assets. Look at what the Suns GM did and the sheer # of assets they acquired by clearing away Players that have value but no longer fit the teams needs.

    The Raptors traded $37+ mil in Salary and got back one of your favorite Players and Patrick Patterson while saving some 2014-2015 CapSpace. My guess is that Ujiri is now going to start fielding calls for both Vasquez and Patterson to see if they can unload Hayes and Salmon's contracts.
    Thompson (cavs) and Andrew Wiggins come to mind

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

      Clearly a big part of this is the Andrew Wiggins lottery they want him BAD. In their defense how often does a hometown hero look like he is going to be a major superstar? I have to believe getting him would sell a TON of tickets.

      Note to Toronto, you will sell way more Wiggins Jerseys if you switch from Raptors to Dragons just saying.

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

        Masai Ujiri, swung the deal with Sacramento general manager Pete D’Allesandro, who was Ujiri’s assistant in Denver
        Now we know why...those connections, guess he owed him a favor.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

          Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
          Tyler and DJ have been out of the rotation.
          Huh?

          He played barely 2mins against PHO, because he injured his shoulder and left the game, but prior to that game he played 29mins against GSW, 34mins against Den, and 25mins against Miami. He's played in 18 out of their 19 games, with one game under 15mins (against Houston back on 11-11), missing only their last game.
          Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

            Originally posted by CableKC View Post
            Over the last 2 to 3 weeks....Casey has been brilliantly ( and I use that term very sarcastically ) starting Hansbrough ahead of Amir and giving him as many ( if not more ) minutes than Jonas V.....their only true Center. Makes no sense to me.
            I did see Tyler starting a few games. I figured Casey as was tanking or something. He finally came to his senses. I just don't get some of the things he does. He also has a wired wing rotation at times. With that said coaching a bad team has to be hard. I guess he wants to reward guys who work hard?


            Playing Tyler over Amir should be a fire able offense IMO.
            Last edited by pacer4ever; 12-09-2013, 10:03 AM.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

              I agree with Pelton the timing of this trade leads me to believe the Raps are going to try to repackage Grevis and P Patt at the deadline. My grade for the Raps is TBA. I need to see what they do at the trade deadline first.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                Originally posted by Ragnar View Post
                Clearly a big part of this is the Andrew Wiggins lottery they want him BAD. In their defense how often does a hometown hero look like he is going to be a major superstar? I have to believe getting him would sell a TON of tickets.

                Note to Toronto, you will sell way more Wiggins Jerseys if you switch from Raptors to Dragons just saying.
                The funny thing is that despite the ineptitude of Dwayne Casey.....he's was starting Hansbrough over the likes Amir Johnson and playing him more minutes than JonasV over a stretch of games a week back....the Raptors are still winning some games that they shouldn't be winning ( see the Lakers game yesterday ) and are in the same division as the hapless Knicks and Nets. They can't tank...even if they wanted to.
                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                  Originally posted by immortality View Post
                  Now we know why...those connections, guess he owed him a favor.
                  It's a win-win for both Teams. The Kings want to make the Playoffs this year. They have the capspace and need for a Player like Rudy as a Vet and a way better Starting SF than Salmons and the Raptors are looking to dump all their bad luggage.
                  Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                    Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                    I agree with Pelton the timing of this trade leads me to believe the Raps are going to try to repackage Grevis and P Patt at the deadline. My grade for the Raps is TBA. I need to see what they do at the trade deadline first.
                    I totally agree.

                    It's WAY EASIER to trade some combination of ( Vasquez or Patterson ) + ( Salmons, Landry Fields or Hayes ) in smaller deals than it is to trade Rudy Gay's 18+ mil contract. This is one of the reasons why Granger won't likely be traded....it's HARD to match that much Salary.

                    I'm guessing that the Raptors can now get an Expiring Contract+1st round pick for any of the above Players.
                    Last edited by CableKC; 12-09-2013, 02:36 PM.
                    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                      Originally posted by pacer4ever View Post
                      I did see Tyler starting a few games. I figured Casey as was tanking or something. He finally came to his senses. I just don't get some of the things he does. He also has a wired wing rotation at times. With that said coaching a bad team has to be hard. I guess he wants to reward guys who work hard?

                      Playing Tyler over Amir should be a fire able offense IMO.
                      I'm guessing that Ujiri has a similar 3-year plan like Bird did. Spend his 1st year clearing house by getting rid of all the Players that he doesn't fit his vision of the Team, fire Casey during the offseason and then in the 2014-2015 season....get a new Coach that fits his style/vision and go after Players that he wants. He rebuilds the entire Team with a new Coaching Staff in 1 season.

                      Hire on Steve Nash as an assistant Coach or add him to the Front Office after he retires and BAM! Instant Ticket Sales for the Raptors!
                      Last edited by CableKC; 12-09-2013, 02:39 PM.
                      Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                        Originally posted by Dgreenwell3 View Post
                        Thompson (cavs) and Andrew Wiggins come to mind
                        Add in Bennett.

                        The Cavs Frontcourt is chalk full of Canadians.
                        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                          Originally posted by CableKC View Post
                          It's a win-win for both Teams. The Kings want to make the Playoffs this year. They have the capspace and need for a Player like Rudy as a Vet and a way better Starting SF than Salmons and the Raptors are looking to dump all their bad luggage.
                          There is not a snowball's chance in hell the Kings are making the playoffs in the Western Conference this season.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                            Originally posted by cdash View Post
                            There is not a snowball's chance in hell the Kings are making the playoffs in the Western Conference this season.
                            Yeah, they're already 5.5 games back of 8th, played 6 of 18 (will be 19, they have another home game tonight) on the road.
                            "It's just unfortunate that we've been penalized so much this year and nothing has happened to the Pistons, the Palace or the city of Detroit," he said. "It's almost like it's always our fault. The league knows it. They should be ashamed of themselves to let the security be as lax as it is around here."

                            ----------------- Reggie Miller

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                              You guys think DJ gets picked up by an NBA squad?

                              Waived by the Raptors, I'd say he's bound for Europe.
                              This space for rent.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Toronto Trades Rudy Gay to Sacramento

                                Originally posted by cdash View Post
                                There is not a snowball's chance in hell the Kings are making the playoffs in the Western Conference this season.
                                That doesn't mean that they're not going to try. At some point, your Team has to grow up and actually try instead of just trying to tank for another top Lottery pick.
                                Last edited by CableKC; 12-09-2013, 11:55 PM.
                                Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X