Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

    She's only 19??? Wow. I'd never heard of her until the Pacers broadcast and I thought she was in her mid to late 20s.

    Very hot indeed. And she's only two years younger than me...






    And way out of my league.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

      Originally posted by grace View Post
      I'm assuming Helio's fiancée might have something to do with that.
      Well, on the surface I would agree with that, but the girl from 90210 (Jenny Garth) is married (with two kids) to the guy who played the jerkoff in 'Can't Hardly Wait' and she and her pro dancer have all kindsa chemistry...

      Her husband (Mr. Jenny Garth) is at every single show, so I assume he is being as nice about it as he can....I know I wouldn't be having my wife out there getting tossed around by some professional dancer with 1% body fat, no matter how good looking I was....I'm not saying the guy dancers are hetero, but most of them look to be....

      Of course, Julianne's brother Derek is one of the pro's also...Apparently he is a pretty good dancer in his own right...

      I actually like the show. The dancing is good, the girls are hot, the outfits are skimpy, and the format is entertaining. My wife and I enjoy watching it together. Monday nights are for the new week's routines and Tuesday nights are for the results of the voting by the fans....both shows, of course, LIVE.

      Pretty entertaining watching Marie Osmond faint on live TV...Youtube it and enjoy!



      RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

        Originally posted by Aw Heck View Post
        She's only 19??? Wow. I'd never heard of her until the Pacers broadcast and I thought she was in her mid to late 20s.

        Very hot indeed. And she's only two years younger than me...






        And way out of my league.
        NEVER admit that. EVER. We're all in the same league; you just have to have the balls to realize it and act that way.



        RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

          Originally posted by heywoode View Post
          NEVER admit that. EVER. We're all in the same league; you just have to have the balls to realize it and act that way.
          That's testosterone talking. (grin)

          I disagree with everything you said. For instant, sometimes knowing your not in someone's league drives you to get there. So admitting your not, is important.

          And we're not all in the same league, we're just all human.
          Being in someone's league has a lot to do with compatibility, age, station in life, etc., so no everyone is not in the same league.

          Take a clean cut guy, that works hard, etc, etc. Then take a slovenly, dirty girl, that only wants to sleep all day. Neither is in the others so called league. However, both CAN change leagues.

          Another for instant, Take an 80 year old woman and a 20 year old man. Are they in each other's so called league? No, but if you take a 80 year old man and a 20 year old girl, some time's the man thinks he's in the girl's league. (grin)

          So does that mean I think I'm in Julianne Hough's league? Well . . . let's just say she's not in mine. (snort)

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

            Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
            That's testosterone talking. (grin)

            I disagree with everything you said. For instant, sometimes knowing your not in someone's league drives you to get there. So admitting your not, is important.

            And we're not all in the same league, we're just all human.
            Being in someone's league has a lot to do with compatibility, age, station in life, etc., so no everyone is not in the same league.

            Take a clean cut guy, that works hard, etc, etc. Then take a slovenly, dirty girl, that only wants to sleep all day. Neither is in the others so called league. However, both CAN change leagues.

            Another for instant, Take an 80 year old woman and a 20 year old man. Are they in each other's so called league? No, but if you take a 80 year old man and a 20 year old girl, some time's the man thinks he's in the girl's league. (grin)

            So does that mean I think I'm in Julianne Hough's league? Well . . . let's just say she's not in mine. (snort)
            You're just arguing meaningless semantics. If you think someone is out of your league, exactly how would you put that motivation to "get there" to use? What would you 'need' to get into her league? Plastic surgery? Taking "cool" lessons? Hiring 'Hitch'? Buying a whole new wardrobe and getting in better shape? That last one is remotely possible, but chances are, even if you dressed better, and were in better shape physically, you would still lack the confidence to make a difference. You would still probably not be paying attention to the most important detail about being in someone's league.

            I have always lived my life by the premise that I don't care how hot a woman is, I have a chance if I strike her fancy. Many a stunning woman is lonely and bored because all she gets is gold-chained, slick-hair poseurs who are full of testosterone hitting on them. Women of all types (at least the ones worth being with) are far less concerned with perfect looks/perfect body than we men think. I always approached every woman as though she were exactly that...a woman. Not some unattainable piece of ***. Treat women as though their hotness is secondary to stimulating conversation and personality matching, and you will agree with me.

            I was speaking strictly in the context that was presented. A normal looking guy ( I assume) thinking a very, very attractive female is out of his league. The examples you give are of people who are both humans, but would have nothing in common because of lifestyle/life experience. Many a hot girl that my friends thought was waaaay out of my league turned out to be waiting for someone who put their hotness aside and talked to them like their personalities were what mattered most, which of course it does.

            I can guarantee you that Julianne Hough, or any other woman is in my league, as long as the personalities/beliefs can find common ground.
            Last edited by heywoode; 11-06-2007, 12:24 AM. Reason: correct usage



            RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

              Originally posted by heywoode View Post

              I can guarantee you that Julianne Hough, or any other woman is in my league, as long as the personalities/beliefs can find common ground.
              You just made my point!

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                You just made my point!
                Uncommon personalities/beliefs doesn't mean "out of my league". It means "not compatible". There is a big difference. It should have been obvious what context I was posting about, but you countered with examples that didn't really apply to the statements I made....

                I agree with you that the examples you gave would not be compatible, but those examples are meaningless to the subject I was discussing....That's all I was saying...

                Do you disagree with me, given my further explanation of my statement "nobody is out of my league"?



                RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                  wow, unbelievable...and 19? wow. nice pictures

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                    Originally posted by heywoode View Post
                    Uncommon personalities/beliefs doesn't mean "out of my league". It means "not compatible". There is a big difference. It should have been obvious what context I was posting about, but you countered with examples that didn't really apply to the statements I made....

                    I agree with you that the examples you gave would not be compatible, but those examples are meaningless to the subject I was discussing....That's all I was saying...

                    Do you disagree with me, given my further explanation of my statement "nobody is out of my league"?
                    I think what it boils down to is how a person defines "Out of my league."

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                      Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                      I think what it boils down to is how a person defines "Out of my league."
                      I can't imagine a 20 year old man saying that an 80 year old woman is out of his league. The implication of the statement "out of my league" is that someone is too hot for you. Everyone (I thought) knows that. That was my point. Nobody is too hot to date. You may find out that someone who is really hot is not compatible with you, but you should never balk at approaching someone because they are too hot (and out of your league).



                      RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                        Nice photos. She and Helio really do have good chemistry on the show. I wonder if they will do a segment on the show about the trip to Indy. The soap opera guy's partner is pretty hot too.
                        The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                          Originally posted by ABADays View Post
                          Nice photos. She and Helio really do have good chemistry on the show. I wonder if they will do a segment on the show about the trip to Indy. The soap opera guy's partner is pretty hot too.
                          I think they have decent chemistry, but who wouldn't with that 19 year old award-winning hot-*** dancer?!

                          We watched last night and didn't see anything about it...maybe on the results show tonight??

                          Yes, Edyta is hot too...Almost everyone left aside from Jane Seymour and Marie Osmond is hot...The girl that Mark Cuban was paired with wasn't super pretty in the face, but she was friggin' hot too....That Australian accent was a winner in my book! I was sad to see her go...



                          RESIDENT COUNTING THREAD PHILOSOPHIZER

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                            Originally posted by heywoode View Post
                            I think they have decent chemistry, but who wouldn't with that 19 year old award-winning hot-*** dancer?!

                            We watched last night and didn't see anything about it...maybe on the results show tonight??

                            Yes, Edyta is hot too...Almost everyone left aside from Jane Seymour and Marie Osmond is hot...The girl that Mark Cuban was paired with wasn't super pretty in the face, but she was friggin' hot too....That Australian accent was a winner in my book! I was sad to see her go...
                            I'm going to have you cheat for me here. We don't get the show until a day later. Tell me what happens tonight and if they ran an Indy segment.

                            BTW - for someone in their mid to late 50's Seymour is pretty damn hot.
                            The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                              She's 19?????????

                              Holy CRAP.

                              EDIT: And Helio's 32... Creepy.
                              Last edited by Trader Joe; 11-06-2007, 06:02 PM.


                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: heywoode's Julianne Hough photos thread

                                Originally posted by Indy View Post
                                She's 19?????????

                                Holy CRAP.

                                EDIT: And Helio's 32... Creepy.
                                Speaking of creepy - how about your avatar on Pacers Digest. I feel like I have to hold out my cross or throw holy water on the computer screen every time I look at one of your posts.
                                The best exercise of the human heart is reaching down and picking someone else up.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X