Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

    Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
    He probably has more to do with the Pacers being bottom feeders than anyone else on the team.
    Unfortunately for us, Mr. Ray spends less than 1% of his time expalining himself, providing depth or examples, or substance to his posts.

    So let me take this and try to do some justice to it. Because it is time to consider that there may be some hidden substance to this comment.

    Granger may be Clark Kellogg version 3.0 or Shareef Abdur-Rahim version 2.0 (Shareef was Clark Kellogg versoin 2.0.)

    Except that Clark was a perennial "best player on a 20-odd win team" and Danny is the best player on a 36-win team. So that's got to count for something. Chuck and John Long at least took Clark's teammates to the playoffs. Could we swap out Granger and one other player from this roster and be in the playoffs?

    I like Granger. Then again, in 1985 I was trying to defend Kellogg until the 86-87 season made it obvious that the best statistical player on a bad team may be the source of the losing. (Prior to 86-87, I assumed Herb Williams was the biggest part of the problem.)

    Just saying...
    Why do the things that we treasure most, slip away in time
    Till to the music we grow deaf, to God's beauty blind
    Why do the things that connect us slowly pull us apart?
    Till we fall away in our own darkness, a stranger to our own hearts
    And life itself, rushing over me
    Life itself, the wind in black elms,
    Life itself in your heart and in your eyes, I can't make it without you

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

      Originally posted by dcpacersfan View Post
      I'll give credit where credit is due, and Troy was one of our better performers last night. His jumper looked better. He didn't chuck so much and took it to the basket a few times, even if he got a pretty ugly and obvious offensive foul called on him one of the times, I'd rather have him at least try to take it to the basket like that than always shoot the 3.

      If Troy played like that every game, I'd be relatively happy with him. Same goes for T.J.

      I want to embrace Granger as this team's star. But he's been chucking too much, not playing defense as well as he could, and not passing the ball incredibly well. He's settling for so many jumpshots. That's the difference between a good player like Danny and a great player like Lebron. Lebron James averages 9 assists per game! Danny averages 2.8. If Danny were able to average something like 5 apg and get to the line, say, 2 more times per game off of drives, he'd be infinitely better than he is now. That should be realistic for him, but right now it doesn't appear he has that ability to be better than he is (a good second option) to as good as he can be (definitely not Lebron or Kobe, I don't expect that at all, but only one tier below I think is a reasonable expectation).
      Is it too difficult to figure out that Danny is in a funk because the ingredients that gave us the five game streak got pre-empted by politics and favoritism? I'd be depressed too.
      "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....



        Is this why we call Duke Princess?

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

          Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
          I have never praised coach O'Brien. My attempt to show how crazy this Troy bashing has gotten led to my Danny comment. Do I think Danny is the main reason that the Pacers are one of the worst teams in the NBA, no I don't. He is however, contributing to the teams woes as much if not more than Troy. Now if that is trolling, guilty as charged. How can you justify calling me a troll when almost all posters here are guilty of trolling with their incessant Troy bashing? This reminds me of when Jackson was being hammered often without reason. It has become cool to bash Troy and if anyone trys to show how off the charts this bashing has become they are now a troll. Please!
          Saying Danny is contributing to the teams woes more so than Murphy is trying to push the buttons. There is just no way you can justify that. Even as a chucker, he is still doing good on offense and playing much better defense than Troy.

          Not to mention, Danny is the only good offensive player we have, have you seen the way other teams guard him? Its even harder for him this year as Troy hasn't been able to spread the floor like last year so defenses close in on Danny even more.

          I have not been bashing Murphy, but if you look at the games, he and TJ are the main reasons we are losing. To defend those accusations and put more blame on Granger and Hibbert are just insane. For Granger to become that player we all know he can be, he needs a PG who can run an offense, a coach who can run a play, and another player to take some pressure off of him. He has none of those.

          I still like Troy. After Dunleavy's career year, I said we should trade him. After Murphy's, I thought we should keep him. But looking at it now, he and TJ are holding this team back. I don't think your a troll for defending Troy, I agree with you that he is getting far more blame than he should, I'm calling you a troll from the way you are going about it, making comments like it being more so Granger's fault and other comments you have made like that.

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

            Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
            Saying Danny is contributing to the teams woes more so than Murphy is trying to push the buttons. There is just no way you can justify that. Even as a chucker, he is still doing good on offense and playing much better defense than Troy.

            Not to mention, Danny is the only good offensive player we have, have you seen the way other teams guard him? Its even harder for him this year as Troy hasn't been able to spread the floor like last year so defenses close in on Danny even more.

            I have not been bashing Murphy, but if you look at the games, he and TJ are the main reasons we are losing. To defend those accusations and put more blame on Granger and Hibbert are just insane. For Granger to become that player we all know he can be, he needs a PG who can run an offense, a coach who can run a play, and another player to take some pressure off of him. He has none of those.

            I still like Troy. After Dunleavy's career year, I said we should trade him. After Murphy's, I thought we should keep him. But looking at it now, he and TJ are holding this team back. I don't think your a troll for defending Troy, I agree with you that he is getting far more blame than he should, I'm calling you a troll from the way you are going about it, making comments like it being more so Granger's fault and other comments you have made like that.
            Fine, I can live with that viewpoint.

            I am glad that Danny is a Pacer, period. I am disappointed in they way he is now playing. He reminds me of the way Rick Mount used to operate back in the day. I think that Danny by shooting so early in the clock disrupts any offensive plan the team may have. How can posters here justify their clamor for more playing time for Roy if Danny shoots the ball at half court three seconds into the shot clock? Does Roy even make it to half court before Danny fires away? Yeah that is stretching it a little, but you get my point.
            Last edited by GuffeyRay; 12-05-2009, 07:26 PM.

            Comment


            • #66
              Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

              Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
              Fine, I can live with that viewpoint.

              I am glad that Danny is a Pacer, period. I am disappointed in they way he is now playing. He reminds me of the way Rick Mount used to operate back in the day. I think that Danny by shooting so early in the clock disrupts any offensive plan the team may have. How can posters hear justify their clamor for more playing time for Roy if Danny shoots the ball at half court three seconds into the shout clock? Does Roy even make it to half court before Danny fires away? Yeah that is stretching it a little, but you get my point.
              I'm not entirely sure that isn't the offensive plan...assuming we have one.

              Comment


              • #67
                Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                Originally posted by rexnom View Post
                Can you please defend Troy? I would like to see a well-crafted defense for why he should be playing the second-most minutes on this team.
                I'll give you a promisory note on that- perhaps after final exams..?
                Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
                I call you a troll because your not trying to look at both sides of the coin, your trying to push buttons.

                I never said Granger hasn't become a chucker, he has. However, your saying he is the main reason we are one of the worst teams in the NBA - hence you being a troll. You praise coach O'Brien but criticize Granger's shot selection, when O'Brien is the one encouraging Granger to shoot like that.

                Also, "You don't want the truth, you can't handle the truth." are you being serious right now? I hope so, because the fact that you would say something that cheesy while being serious is hilarious.

                I have no problem with you, I really don't - but I believe your a troll. Every board has them, people who come to post just to push peoples buttons. It is what it is, I'm just calling it like I see it.
                Pot meet Kettle.

                Comment


                • #68
                  Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                  Originally posted by ChicagoJ View Post
                  Unfortunately for us, Mr. Ray spends less than 1% of his time expalining himself, providing depth or examples, or substance to his posts.

                  So let me take this and try to do some justice to it. Because it is time to consider that there may be some hidden substance to this comment.

                  Granger may be Clark Kellogg version 3.0 or Shareef Abdur-Rahim version 2.0 (Shareef was Clark Kellogg versoin 2.0.)

                  Except that Clark was a perennial "best player on a 20-odd win team" and Danny is the best player on a 36-win team. So that's got to count for something. Chuck and John Long at least took Clark's teammates to the playoffs. Could we swap out Granger and one other player from this roster and be in the playoffs?

                  I like Granger. Then again, in 1985 I was trying to defend Kellogg until the 86-87 season made it obvious that the best statistical player on a bad team may be the source of the losing. (Prior to 86-87, I assumed Herb Williams was the biggest part of the problem.)

                  Just saying...
                  You are treading on holy ground whispering blasphemy here...

                  But, of course, it is something to be considered. I think the Pacers always have to keep the options open to improve the team. Danny is at the highest value he will ever be at probably, he is in the prime of his career.

                  For one thing, Trading Danny is risky business though, he is the face of the franchise, the only person on the roster the casual fan even knows about. So there is the risk of alienating the fans, but then again, that begs the question... What Fans?! It really can't get much worse, so pandering to fans is a horrible strategy for roster changes.

                  Secondly, what type of players do we want in return? Personally, I want Dwilliams and Al Horford I'd be happy with that swap. Any deal including Danny would have to include Murph for me to be happy as well.

                  Anyway it is all speculation, but I don't think we or TPTB should be scared to speculate about trading Danny. I don't think Larry has the guts to do it though. Unless Danny requests a trade, he will be here until he is old and worn down.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                    In theory, PR should never be taken into account when making a trade. But because NBA teams have to worry about immediate bottom lines, it has to be in some circumstances.

                    The only situations where any players from Indiana sports teams have had guys that really could not have been traded are the present day situation of Peyton Manning, and Reggie. Both of these guys earned the endearment of the city. Reggie was a pure LA personality and basked in the spotlight here. Peyton seems more reticent but it is really unavoidable in his case as he is the Lebron of the NFL.

                    Danny Granger isn't to that level. He shies away from the spotlight, and he is well-liked but he is far, far away from the popularity level of Peyton or Reggie, as he doesn't sell out Conseco, ever. He is not an untradeable player. You don't give him up easily, but you consider offers and if a great one comes in you take it. Saying we should never trade trade Danny at this point is like saying Chuck Person was an untradable guy for the Pacers.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                      Originally posted by duke dynamite View Post
                      Watching Danny drive through the lane is painful. Once you think he's got a clear drive, boom! The lane is clogged with defenders and he can't finish.
                      He's not shooting well this year, and the rest of the team isn't either. I think the problem is OB is concentrating on defense and thus the offense is off. Last year we could score with anyone and it kept us in games, this year the defense is 4 points better, but the offense is 7 points worse.

                      What else isn't helping is bringing in six and seven players a year, but that's understandable when you are trying to improve your roster while still staying under the tax.

                      Back to Danny. OB took him out early yesterday against Utah after he hosted 4 threes in the first five minutes. When OB put him back in he immediately started driving the ball. The thing is he has to recognize when they are cutting his drive off and either pass it or shoot the floater.

                      What the Pacers need more than anything is a reliable scorer who can take the pressure off of Danny. Hopefully Dun will be able to do that when he is cleared to play regular minutes.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                        Originally posted by Burtrem Redneck View Post


                        Unless Danny requests a trade, he will be here until he is old and worn down.

                        If this season keeps going the way it has, 1-8 in the last 9 games, and Danny's attitude doesn't change, I could see Granger requesting a trade. He wouldn't be the 1st to do it.

                        I will give Murph credit in I haven't seen him with a sour attitude, with all the heat fans are giving him, like I constantly see with Granger.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                          Originally posted by GuffeyRay View Post
                          Fine, I can live with that viewpoint.

                          I am glad that Danny is a Pacer, period. I am disappointed in they way he is now playing. He reminds me of the way Rick Mount used to operate back in the day. I think that Danny by shooting so early in the clock disrupts any offensive plan the team may have. How can posters here justify their clamor for more playing time for Roy if Danny shoots the ball at half court three seconds into the shot clock? Does Roy even make it to half court before Danny fires away? Yeah that is stretching it a little, but you get my point.
                          And right here I think you have figured out one of the main points of the JOB defensive scheme...If they chuck up a quick 3 before Roy (and most of the team) get across the mid court line, then they have time to get back and pack the lane for the fast break that's sure to follow because there sure as hell won't be anyone under the basket to rebound
                          http://www.grantland.com/blog/the-tr...nce-stephenson
                          "But, first, let us now praise famous moments, because something happened Tuesday night in Indianapolis that you can watch a lifetime’s worth of professional basketball and never see again. There was a brief, and very decisive, and altogether unprecedented, outburst of genuine officiating, and it was directed at the best player in the world, and that, my dear young person, simply is not done."

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                            Originally posted by flox View Post
                            Pot meet Kettle.
                            Says the guy who left realgm because he was so disliked. 0_0

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....

                              Originally posted by Dr. Awesome View Post
                              Says the guy who left realgm because he was so disliked. 0_0
                              Who the hell are you, why do you slander me, and that still doesn't change the fact that you are as bad of a troll as Guffey.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Re: Odd Thoughts while thanking God that the Bobcats laid down tonight....



                                Now, Scooter, he ain't hurtin' nobody.
                                Last edited by duke dynamite; 12-05-2009, 11:11 PM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X