Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

    Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
    Again...not true...the Pacers did pay the luxury tax. A number of years. There for a while we had one of the highest payrolls in the league. And, we were competing. And the arena was full...and we were winning....starting to see a correlation? Herb said back then he didnt like it but would do so if it meant they had a shot to win the championship. Appears that has changed. Which means we got as close as we were gonna get for a while last year.
    Hey man, hopefully this will help you out!

    Renounce Barbosa, Foster, Amundson, Price, Fez

    Granger 13m
    West 10m
    Hibbert 6.5m
    Hill 3.9m
    Hansbrough 3m
    George 2.5m
    Pendergraph 1.5m
    Plumlee 1m
    Stephenson 1m
    Johnson 900K
    Jones 2.9m
    Collison 2.3m

    48.5m + incoming
    Augustin 3.5m
    Green 3.6m
    = 55.6m
    Trade - outgoing
    Collison 2.3
    Jones 2.9
    = 50.4m
    + incoming
    Mahimni 3.8m
    = 54.2m
    Cap is 58m
    = 3.8m in cap space is left if Hill and Hibbert isn't signed yet.

    With Hibbert and Hill signed

    Granger 13m
    West 10m
    Hibbert 14.5m
    Hill 8m
    Hansbrough 3m
    George 2.5m
    Pendergraph 1.5m
    Plumlee 1m
    Stephenson 1m
    Johnson 900k
    Mahinmi 4m
    Green 3.6m
    Augustin 3.5

    66.5 mil in total salary + signing Barbosa to whatever.

    luxury tax is 70.3m
    - 66.5m
    = 3.8m from luxury tax

    Now there was 3.8m under cap before Hibbert and Hill signed
    But there is 3.8m from luxury tax after Hibbert and Hill was signed.

    Again, if you add Barbosa to this, we'll call it 3m for the heck of it. The Pacers are approx. 500k under Luxury Tax. And would have been 500k under the cap.

    So as KP said on 1070 the fan after the press conference "Amnesty wasn't a reality."

    Unless Hansbrough was traded! Of course the FO isn't going to tell you this in the media now are they.

    Also, I do believe that Barbosa might have already been signed cause his cap hold is 11.4m and I have never heard of the Pacers renouncing it. So, in order for the cap hold to disappear, he must have already been signed. Just a hunch!
    Last edited by Pacer Fan; 07-14-2012, 10:26 PM.
    Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

      With the current roster plus the presumed salaries of Plumlee and Johnson (about 875k and 750k respectively), as far as I can tell our team salary sits about about 63.7 million dollars. The luxury tax line is 70.3. That means there's a gap of about 6.6 million left between us and the tax.

      Dahntay Jones was making 2.9m for us. Darren about 3.2m. That's 6.1m right there. Now the gap is down to just 500k, and that's assuming the numbers I have from ShamSports or the ones I've calculated (based on what the new deals of Roy, George, Gerald, and Ian's SHOULD be) are not at all too low. A small error and we're looking at paying the luxury tax if we keep DC and DJones and just sign Ian outright. Combine that with the fact that we likely were okay with giving DC a soft place to land (starting role, great coach/organization, Dirk to play with), as well as the reasonable assumption that if DC were worth a 1st rounder we'd have found that out by now (from a trade having been made to get it), the concept (as seen by how we got Orlando Johnson) that getting a 2nd rounder is reasonably easy to do with cash if you want one, and it becomes clearer why we did this the way that we did. Particularly since being under the tax versus over the tax is the difference between not paying the tax AND GETTING TAX MONEY FROM ALL TAX PAYING TEAMS and paying the tax WHILE GETTING LITTLE OR NONE OF THAT SAME MONEY FROM OTHER TAX PAYERS, which is important to Simon (especially lately; he's taking bad losses this past several years), and it all becomes pretty obvious why this happened.

      Honestly, I'm okay with it. Was it the ONLY WAY to go? No. Is it some God awful, no sense, stupid, terrible decision? HARDLY.

      This may also at least partially help to explain why we didn't try to wait and bid on Brand, by the way. They probably preferred investing on a young athletic center who should at least be an okay backup if he doesn't show any growth rather than a near-retired Elton Brand to backup David West for 15 minutes a game.

      I can understand having a different opinion on how to make these moves, but there's just no denying the way they did choose to go was reasonable and understandable.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

        Actually, now that I've done that math, I don't see them bringing Barbosa back, even if he was willing to sign for peanuts and be the 3rd string SG; unless my numbers are too high, there's just not enough room to avoid the tax.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

          Originally posted by Pacer Fan View Post
          Hey man, hopefully this will help you out!

          Renounce Barbosa, Foster, Amundson, Price, Fez

          Granger 13m
          West 10m
          Hibbert 6.5m
          Hill 3.9m
          Hansbrough 3m
          George 2.5m
          Pendergraph 1.5m
          Plumlee 1m
          Stephenson 1m
          Johnson 900K
          Jones 2.9m
          Collison 2.3m

          48.5m + incoming
          Augustin 3.5m
          Green 3.6m
          = 55.6m
          Trade - outgoing
          Collison 2.3
          Jones 2.9
          = 50.4m
          + incoming
          Mahimni 3.8m
          = 54.2m
          Cap is 58m
          = 3.8m in cap space is left if Hill and Hibbert isn't signed yet.

          With Hibbert and Hill signed

          Granger 13m
          West 10m
          Hibbert 14.5m
          Hill 8m
          Hansbrough 3m
          George 2.5m
          Pendergraph 1.5m
          Plumlee 1m
          Stephenson 1m
          Johnson 900k
          Mahinmi 4m
          Green 3.5m
          Augustin 3.5

          66.4 mil in total salary + signing Barbosa to whatever.

          luxury tax is 70.3m
          - 66.4m
          = 3.9m from luxury tax

          Now there was 3.8m under cap before Hibbert and Hill signed
          But there is 3.9m from luxury tax after Hibbert and Hill was signed.

          Again, if you add Barbosa to this, we'll call it 3m for the heck of it. The Pacers are approx. 600k under Luxury Tax. And would have been 500k under the cap.

          So as KP said on 1070 the fan after the press conference "Amnesty wasn't a reality."

          Unless Hansbrough was traded! Of course the FO isn't going to tell you this in the media now are they.

          Also, I do believe that Barbosa might have already been signed cause his cap hold is 11.4m and I have never heard of the Pacers renouncing it. So, in order for the cap hold to disappear, he must have already been signed. Just a hunch!
          A couple of your numbers are likely off a little bit-the starting salaries of the new signees...but youve taken the time to do what I simply refused to do....Scola or Brand couldve been added...as Ive said...when they made the dump with Dallas it set the tone for something big. Now...they did nothing big...they signed Green and Dj and left another 4 or 5 million unused...which was the whole point really...

          I said in a thread somewhere....was this really about saving money to sign Barbosa? REally? who would you rather have...and remember who our backup pf is....and David West, Luis Scola or Barbosa....I know who I would select....
          The Most Common Cause of Stress is Dealing with Idiots

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            Except it wouldnt have necessarily required going into luxury tax world. Getting Brand or Scola wouldnt have mean the luxury tax.
            I'm done with this, it's pretty clear at this point you just want to argue. You've totally changed your argument, you weren't talking about guys like Brand/Scola, you were referring to BIG MOVES, like a starter etc.

            Also, to be clear, I share a little disappointment that we apparently didn't bid on either of those guys. But who knows what the deal was with that.

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            And lets be very, very clear. If youre going to take the attitude youre suggesting Simon is now taking, then you damn sure better be maximizing every single asset you have...and giving assets away for no return is not doing that.
            Actually under the argument I'm making, those assets were in fact not for nothing, they were for CAP SPACE, which directly resulted in us being able to get Augustin and Green, which were the replacements for DC and DJ. The net effect for us was essentially trading DJ and DC for Augustin/Green. How many times do people have to say this before you get it. If you accept that we won't go into the tax, and in fact might want a few mil as a cushion to work with this year/next year for trades or using the MLE or whatever while still avoiding the tax, then this is a perfectly reasonable conclusion to make.

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            When you then are also buying 2nd rounders that would appear to be highly inefficient and borderline inept...
            Are you referring to the 2nd round pick we got before free agency was even close to starting? I guess now the front office is supposed to be psychic too?

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            which is again why i suggested they probably got something in the form of cash in return.
            Like I said, interesting possibility but ok, not much else to say.

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            Because surely if theyre gonna take this tight approach they certainly wouldnt give away assets when its quite clear someting could have been gotten in return.
            WE GET IT. YOUR OPINION. You're not moving the needle with me by just repeating this opinion over and over and over and over and over and over again.

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            And thats not conjecture...It happens all the time. As stated, we gave up a 2nd for Barbosa...then went out and bought a 2nd at the draft...then failed to get one when we should have in this latest travesty of a deal. You think thats conjecture? How so? Please...tell me.
            It's conjecture because you're assuming that in every case you can always get those picks from teams, when in fact you have no direct evidence of that. You have no proof, therefore it's conjecture. I see what you're saying, I'm not saying you aren't using any logic or haven't thought this through, I'm just saying it's still a guess on your part that we absolutely, positively, without a shadow of a doubt could get those picks.

            If your whole argument is that we didn't get 2 second round draft picks, then that's not really much is it?

            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
            Did we or did we not give a 2nd rounder in exchange for Barbosa???? Did we or did we not get zero 2nd rounders for Collison and D. Jones? Did we or did we not pay for a 2nd rounder in the draft? Exactly.
            I think you're missing the part where that automatically, magically means it can be done in each and every circumstance no matter what. Again, show me a specific trade that we could have made, but didn't, where we end up with the players we wanted PLUS these two super-valuable 2nd round picks you're talking about.

            -------------

            I'm going to stop here, because honestly you're just repeating yourself over and over. We know what you think. It's not a totally crazy opinion but I just happen to disagree with it, as apparently several others do too. You've made your case, you're not going to convince anyone you already haven't convinced at this point. Can we move on to other topics now please?
            Last edited by rabid; 07-14-2012, 10:34 PM.

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

              Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
              A couple of your numbers are likely off a little bit-the starting salaries of the new signees...but youve taken the time to do what I simply refused to do....Scola or Brand couldve been added...as Ive said...when they made the dump with Dallas it set the tone for something big. Now...they did nothing big...they signed Green and Dj and left another 4 or 5 million unused...which was the whole point really...

              I said in a thread somewhere....was this really about saving money to sign Barbosa? REally? who would you rather have...and remember who our backup pf is....and David West, Luis Scola or Barbosa....I know who I would select....
              yea, I rounded some numbers up or down, but it is pretty close. I don't know that they have signed Barbosa, but Coach V said he would be back. I would rather have Scola or Brand too, but Barbosa has bird rights and Scola and Brand has to be under the cap. Hibbert and Hill aren't going to wait any more then they did, They are risking 10 of millions for every second that passes by. Accidents can happen and I'd be busting the FO's doors down to get 58 & 40 million signed. Besides it would have been disrespectful to make them wait any longer. And it wasn't the FO's fault that amnesty didn't start earlier. It is what it is. stop trying to lay blame that just isn't there!
              Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
                Again...not true...the Pacers did pay the luxury tax. A number of years. There for a while we had one of the highest payrolls in the league. And, we were competing. And the arena was full...and we were winning....starting to see a correlation? Herb said back then he didnt like it but would do so if it meant they had a shot to win the championship. Appears that has changed. Which means we got as close as we were gonna get for a while last year.
                Disagree, and I'm a critic of Herb's. Nothing's really changed except Herb isn't willing to pay the tax on the present team yet. Thus his 3 year plan. He wants to wait and see if the fans have come back to stay. I think he should have given Bird the green light now, that's where I become the critic, because he's not going to do it in 3 years when every dollar over the tax will cost him 3. Even the Knicks are apparently blinking at that. But like has been said, it is his money.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                  makes more sense to keep jones rather than re-sign barbosa, the way i see it...

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                    Originally posted by rabidpacersfan View Post
                    I'm done with this, it's pretty clear at this point you just want to argue. You've totally changed your argument, you weren't talking about guys like Brand/Scola, you were referring to BIG MOVES, like a starter etc.
                    yes...and instead...we didnt go that direction...we signed a couple small deals instead....instead of making a big move...like i said...we are all sitting around here talking about the pizazze of hopefully some marginal improvements in the bench...

                    Also, to be clear, I share a little disappointment that we apparently didn't bid on either of those guys. But who knows what the deal was with that.
                    Who knows? exactly the point...no real plausible answer....to a very legitimate question...I mean if we are looking to upgrade the bench...did we talk about Tyler being a weak link more than many other backup slots last season???? But hey, lets just glance right over that one...



                    Actually under the argument I'm making, those assets were in fact not for nothing, they were for CAP SPACE, which directly resulted in us being able to get Augustin and Green, which were the replacements for DC and DJ. The net effect for us was essentially trading DJ and DC for Augustin/Green. How many times do people have to say this before you get it. If you accept that we won't go into the tax, and in fact might want a few mil as a cushion to work with this year/next year for trades or using the MLE or whatever while still avoiding the tax, then this is a perfectly reasonable conclusion to make.
                    capspace? yes...capspace needed to get dj and green? no...and that capspace effectively disappeared when Hibbert and Hill re-signed...again..you wanna talk about the luxury tax...but this is July...not the end of the season that the tax is based on...and its not conjecture to think that a borderline starting pg making 2 million a year on an expiring could be gotten rid of sometime between now and the deadline...but the point is you have a long time before u have to resort to give him away...but hey...if thats a reach, then i find it ironic im the one that just wants to argue...



                    Are you referring to the 2nd round pick we got before free agency was even close to starting? I guess now the front office is supposed to be psychic too?
                    You totally missed the concept...Has nothing to do with the player. If the front office is gonna give up 2nd rounders for players like Barbosa...then buy 2nd rounders come draft time....then give away players like Collison and Jones instead of getting 2nd rounders...well...the front office is inept...which is again why I started this thread saying that i dont believe theyre inept, I think they got some cash considerations and chose to keep it quiet for their own reasons...



                    Like I said, interesting possibility but ok, not much else to say.



                    WE GET IT. YOUR OPINION. You're not moving the needle with me by just repeating this opinion over and over and over and over and over and over again.
                    Oh, the irony....



                    It's conjecture because you're assuming that in every case you can always get those picks from teams, when in fact you have no direct evidence of that. You have no proof, therefore it's conjecture. I see what you're saying, I'm not saying you aren't using any logic or haven't thought this through, I'm just saying it's still a guess on your part that we absolutely, positively, without a shadow of a doubt could get those picks.
                    Not every case...just these cases...again...borderline starting pg on an expiring 2 million dollar deal....rotation player defensive specialist on an expiring 3 million dollar deal...we picked up something similar and it happens quite often. Now like I said, if we are gonna pay a 2nd rounder when we buy but give away when we sell....that hardly seems like a competent front office..which again leads me to believe they got something...

                    If your whole argument is that we didn't get 2 second round draft picks, then that's not really much is it?
                    Well...guess whatever we paid this last draft for that second rounder doesnt count....i cant tell...does the money only count when its going out and not when its coming in? Im sure Simon would have an interesting take on that....



                    I think you're missing the part where that automatically, magically means it can be done in each and every circumstance no matter what. Again, show me a specific trade that we could have made, but didn't, where we end up with the players we wanted PLUS these two super-valuable 2nd round picks you're talking about.
                    again...not at all...but this case is a prime case....not a stretch by any stretch of anyones imagination...hence why there were outcrys everywhere and many pundits cried what are the pacers doing...but hey...its all conjecture...i get it...

                    -------------

                    I'm going to stop here, because honestly you're just repeating yourself over and over. We know what you think. It's not a totally crazy opinion but I just happen to disagree with it, as apparently several others do too. You've made your case, you're not going to convince anyone you already haven't convinced at this point. Can we move on to other topics now please?
                    Feel free I can agree to disagree...no problem....I know what the facts are...Im good with that...cant help it if Im not a fan of Koolaid
                    The Most Common Cause of Stress is Dealing with Idiots

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                      Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                      With the current roster plus the presumed salaries of Plumlee and Johnson (about 875k and 750k respectively), as far as I can tell our team salary sits about about 63.7 million dollars. The luxury tax line is 70.3. That means there's a gap of about 6.6 million left between us and the tax.

                      Dahntay Jones was making 2.9m for us. Darren about 3.2m. That's 6.1m right there. Now the gap is down to just 500k, and that's assuming the numbers I have from ShamSports or the ones I've calculated (based on what the new deals of Roy, George, Gerald, and Ian's SHOULD be) are not at all too low. A small error and we're looking at paying the luxury tax if we keep DC and DJones and just sign Ian outright. Combine that with the fact that we likely were okay with giving DC a soft place to land (starting role, great coach/organization, Dirk to play with), as well as the reasonable assumption that if DC were worth a 1st rounder we'd have found that out by now (from a trade having been made to get it), the concept (as seen by how we got Orlando Johnson) that getting a 2nd rounder is reasonably easy to do with cash if you want one, and it becomes clearer why we did this the way that we did. Particularly since being under the tax versus over the tax is the difference between not paying the tax AND GETTING TAX MONEY FROM ALL TAX PAYING TEAMS and paying the tax WHILE GETTING LITTLE OR NONE OF THAT SAME MONEY FROM OTHER TAX PAYERS, which is important to Simon (especially lately; he's taking bad losses this past several years), and it all becomes pretty obvious why this happened.

                      Honestly, I'm okay with it. Was it the ONLY WAY to go? No. Is it some God awful, no sense, stupid, terrible decision? HARDLY.

                      This may also at least partially help to explain why we didn't try to wait and bid on Brand, by the way. They probably preferred investing on a young athletic center who should at least be an okay backup if he doesn't show any growth rather than a near-retired Elton Brand to backup David West for 15 minutes a game.

                      I can understand having a different opinion on how to make these moves, but there's just no denying the way they did choose to go was reasonable and understandable.
                      quoting this so it doesn't get lost on the previous page. very good post Hicks, confirms what i thought.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                        Originally posted by Will Galen View Post
                        Disagree, and I'm a critic of Herb's. Nothing's really changed except Herb isn't willing to pay the tax on the present team yet. Thus his 3 year plan. He wants to wait and see if the fans have come back to stay. I think he should have given Bird the green light now, that's where I become the critic, because he's not going to do it in 3 years when every dollar over the tax will cost him 3. Even the Knicks are apparently blinking at that. But like has been said, it is his money.
                        Now was the time Will...it was kinda like now or never...because after Hibbert and HIll signed we forever lost the flexibility and capspace...therefore the options will be much more limited...
                        The Most Common Cause of Stress is Dealing with Idiots

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                          I'm honestly cool with seeing how this starting 5 does over 82 games, as well as how the face-lifted bench fits in and helps or doesn't help. We still have several assets; if TPTB ever decide this isn't the way to go, theoretically we could still turn 3-4 of these guys into a very good player or two. In theory.

                          I mean if they just decided to really blow it up, I could see how a package starting with Roy and Paul George could lure a big piece. In theory.

                          For now, I'm cool with seeing how these 5 do. Especially if Paul or Roy or Hill (or a combination) shows any improvement.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                            Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
                            Now was the time Will...it was kinda like now or never...because after Hibbert and HIll signed we forever lost the flexibility and capspace...therefore the options will be much more limited...
                            bull ****. the los angeles lakers prove you are wrong. Kobe will be getting paid close to what Hibbert and Hill make combined.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                              By the way, West's deal is over in a year and Danny's in two, so if we want to reload, there's a way to do it.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Cash Considerations kept quiet in the Mahinmi/Dallas deal??

                                Originally posted by cinotimz View Post
                                cant help it if Im not a fan of Koolaid
                                I have bent over backwards to be civil in this conversation with you, even though we disagree, I would hope you'd extend the same courtesy.

                                Accusing someone with an opposing viewpoint as being a Kool-Aid drinker is a tactic of the weak.
                                Last edited by rabid; 07-14-2012, 11:14 PM. Reason: not going to sink to that level

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X