Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

    I'm so confused. Are we supposed to draft Gordon or White? I think we should just compromise and hire Sampson instead.



    While we're at it, we could hire Greenspan as GM. There's a championship move if I've ever seen one.

    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

      I imagine that ATL pick headed to Phoenix could be had too. They
      aren't gonna get much use out of a developmental guy in the
      early teens.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

        Depending on who we pick with the 1st pick would help determine who the 2nd pick that we get....whether it is a 2nd "1st round pick" or our regular 2nd round pick.

        If we drafted Love or some other Big Man...it would make no sense to pick up White unless he was in the 2nd round.
        Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

          I'm in.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

            Originally posted by Kegboy View Post
            I'm so confused. Are we supposed to draft Gordon or White? I think we should just compromise and hire Sampson instead.



            While we're at it, we could hire Greenspan as GM. There's a championship move if I've ever seen one.

            You know, sometimes you're really quite evil.






            I like it.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

              Draft Express has him going with the 16th pick in the second round if I am not mistaken. He should be there for our second round pick.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                I believe Seattle, Memphis and New Jersey have multiple 1st round picks late in the draft. Not sure if Dj will be available late though

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                  Originally posted by GrangerRanger View Post
                  Draft Express has him going with the 16th pick in the second round if I am not mistaken. He should be there for our second round pick.

                  How do you figure? He was the only post presence on a ranked team all year. He put up large numbers in a big conference and he's got a great skill-set to go along with decent size and good athleticism. He shot 60% and was able to effectively handle double and triple teams all year and his 10-15 foot jump shot is money as was seen against Arkansas yesterday. He's got great heart to go along with good stamina, an ability to stay out of foul trouble, and a warriors mentality (not Ron Artest warrior). I honestly don't see where everyone thinks he will slip out of the first round. If Ike Diogu can get picked #9 overall, there's no reason to think DJ should be a 2nd round pick.
                  Last edited by Coop; 03-22-2008, 05:11 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                    DJ White will have to adjust to the NBA game a lot. He's 6'9. He doesn't have amazing height but he does have a lot of good things on the court. At 6'9 (Magic Johnson was that size) he is a raw talent. Thats why I figure to see him going in the second round (as do mutiple other sites).

                    However, that does not mean he will not be a great player in the NBA. Sometimes people here (as they did with Steve Alford and Reggie Miller) over rate players from Indiana. He's great at the college game, and has a chance of being so at the NBA level. But it will take a few years to adjust to the game. He reminds a lot of Marc Jackson for some reason.

                    He has a build for a Small Forward or maybe a powerforward. He's only 230. Vince Carter is 6'5 and 225.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                      He was 230 during his junior year. I thought I remembered articles at the beginning of this year talking about how he had bumped up to 245-250. Regardless, he doesn't have amazing height, but he makes up for it with his 7 foot wingspan and an explosive vertical.

                      I agree he will have to adjust because he won't be able to muscle players around as much on the next level, but thats the case with any big guy in college.

                      I'm going to have to disagree that he is a raw talent. In his 4 years at IU, he has really improved at doing all the little things throughout the game. He has a polished post game and he is a smart player on defense. In 33 mpg he only averaged 2.5 fouls per game. He does all that while being relied on as a shot blocker and aggressive rebounder.

                      I understand where you're coming from about IU fans being biased towards their players, but it just doesn't add up. I've watched every game this year and I have seen nothing that shows me he isn't ready for the next level. Last summer, he played for the US in the PanAm games and was the leading scorer and rebounder while consistently going up against grown men from around the world. If I recall correctly, Hibbert was also on that team and was completely outplayed by White.

                      I'm not trying to say that White is going to come in and be some great NBA player, but if players like Hibbert, and Love can go in the lottery, why is DJ destined to be a 2nd round pick?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                        Oh White is ready for the next level. But not ready to come in and put up great numbers right away. I see him as sort of a Danny Granger type guy in terms of production, evolving every year. The only thing is, for him to be sucessful, I really feel that the Pacers need to draft him. If he gets drafted by a team that doesn't need a back up powerforward atm and he ends up in the D - League I think it's a very bad situation for a player like him to be in. He's better then that.

                        As much as I have said about him, I still am leaning towards us drafting him if none are availible at the picks that he is. The only thing is, would you take Gordon over Dj?

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                          I highly doubt he's there in the second round
                          STARBURY

                          08 and Beyond

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                            i see no way that he goes 16th in the 2nd round. he will be gone in the 1st. he put up good stuff even against the good teams- gordon didn't. i know gordo has a higher projected ceiling but, dj is not a mid 2nd round pick and if he was only 230 then shaq must only go about 280 or so. dj is an easy 250. he is built like a tank.
                            and yes if i could trade ike for dj, i'd do it in a heartbeat.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                              what the heck are we gonna do with DJ White? o yea, pull in some IU fans to watch Pacer games.
                              http://Twitter.com/dRealSource

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: The Official "Bring DJ White to the Pacers!" Bandwagon

                                Originally posted by Shade View Post
                                DJ will likely go in the early-to-mid 20's, so we'll have to make a deal to get a pick around that area.

                                And no PUkes! It took me forever to get used to having Brad Miller on the team.
                                I guess all I could say to that would be potfh. Carl Landry will be twice the player DJ White could ever hope to be. Spoken, quoted.
                                A: "I've got to wait until it gets dark to finish filming. We have one scene shot at night."

                                J: (Drunk) "Come film in my pants man, it's already dark there."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X