Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

    Originally posted by Ragnar

    Of course after that it will be far far better because these guys will have college playing time and we will be better able to evaluate them.
    Exactly! That's the benefit of a rule like this. The future drafts will actually be stronger because everyone coming out will have played at least a couple of years in college.

    While I'm not sure it's the right thing to do, from a constitutional sense, I like what it will most likely accomplish: Fewer HS'ers mucking up the NBA (and salary cap space) based on their potential.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

      Originally posted by A-Train
      Fewer HS'ers mucking up the NBA (and salary cap space) based on their potential.
      What do you MEAN?? There aren't any HSers mucking up the NBA...I mean, look at Bender! What a STUD!!!
      Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

        I totally agree with this move. There are so many players coming out now that don't amount to anything in the NBA. For every Lebron James, there are 20 Jon Bender's. Many of them don't get drafted, or are cut after their rookie contract run out. What are these guys supposed to do once they don't play ball anymore? They don't have a college degree to fall back on.
        Sorry, I didn't know advertising was illegal here. Someone call the cops!

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

          Originally posted by PacersRule05
          Keep dreaming man, he is all IU's .
          *cough*SEANMAY*cough*

          Oh, excuse me. *cough**cough*
          Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

            I would like to see it like the NFL rule.

            3 years out of high school, not an age limit.

            Hell, I just turned 17 when I graduated high school.

            But, I hope there is some kind of rule in place soon.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

              Originally posted by Suaveness
              What do you MEAN?? There are many HSers mucking up the NBA...I mean, look at Bender! What a DUD!!!
              Fixed.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                Can they make it retro-active? We can give Bender back to Toronto for their next draft pick.

                Or hell... just give him back for some popcorn. We'll still get the better end of the deal. Bender sitting on the bench and once again providing a distraction vs a tasty treat of popcorn for the guys after practice!


                -Bball
                Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

                ------

                "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

                -John Wooden

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                  Originally posted by Shade
                  Fixed.
                  Shade, what exactly is Reggie trying to do to Dale from the rear in that picture?
                  Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                    Originally posted by vapacersfan
                    So now just because it is posted on a internet message board it must be true..........................
                    Exactly. Just like my account of the meeting between Ron and the commish is totally true.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                      Originally posted by Kegboy
                      *cough*SEANMAY*cough*

                      Oh, excuse me. *cough**cough*

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                        Originally posted by TruWarier
                        I totally agree with this move. There are so many players coming out now that don't amount to anything in the NBA. For every Lebron James, there are 20 Jon Bender's. Many of them don't get drafted, or are cut after their rookie contract run out. What are these guys supposed to do once they don't play ball anymore? They don't have a college degree to fall back on.
                        Them not being able to go to college is an NCAA rule, so take that fight where it belongs. Baseball players make the same choices and noone cries a river for them. No one makes the GM's pick these guys anyway. If the league doesn't want to be saddled with young players that might be good some day then don't draft them.

                        Every player has the choice to go to school or not. If they choose to go into the draft and don't make it, then go to the financial aid office and go to school like everyone else does. If they were stupid enough to think that b-ball was going to be thier ticket in life after high school, then thay get to sleep in the bed they made.

                        With the more stringent accountablility rules coming into effect in the NBA, schools may shy away from one or two year wonders if they wil hurt them long term.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                          Can someone clear something up for me.

                          If I'm reading this right it says players under 20 can't play in the NBA.

                          Does that mean they can be drafted when they are 18 or 19, play Euro or minor league ball here in the states & then join the team that drafted them when they turn 20?

                          Or are they going to write the rule so that a player needs to have his 20th birthday before a certain date before he can enter the draft?

                          Why not say that the player needs 2 years of basketball experience following his classes highschool graduation date. Those 2 years could be college, US minor league or Euro ball?

                          Is that even legal?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                            Originally posted by Jose Slaughter

                            Or are they going to write the rule so that a player needs to have his 20th birthday before a certain date before he can enter the draft?
                            They probably won't be allowed to enter the draft unless they turn 20 before a certain date.

                            Originally posted by Jose Slaughter
                            Is that even legal?
                            I think it is okay as long as it is agreed on in collective bargaining otherwise it would be illegal. I think the NFL has a rule and Maurice Clarett challenged it recently in court and was denied because it was agreed on with collective bargaining between the union and the league. I don't know all the particulars of that case but I think that is how it went down. The leagues can't impose the rule unilaterally but if it's in conjunction with the union it is legal.

                            I don't like 18 year olds in the NBA because to me it hurts the product but I don't agree with the restriction. If the kid is good enough and a team is willing to take the chance the kid should be allowed to play IMO. Larry Hughes left college at 19 because he had a younger brother with a life threatening illness and he needed the $$ for medical care so there are always exceptions and I imagine we'll see someone challenge it.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                              I am opposed to an age limit.

                              I have zero interest in College basketball so I could care less if they get better or worse. In fact I am really opposed to major college programs anyway because of the old student athlete concept, which rarely used to apply to star players.

                              A real functioning minor league is the way to go. People like Bender could still be drafted but you could put them in Ft. Wayne (or someplace) & see if they could ever really play in the NBA.

                              I'd much rather a kid who had zero interest in going to school go to the NBDL & let that money go to a kid who wanted to go to school.


                              Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: NBA to have age limit as soon as next year (20 yrs. old)

                                As I said I am completely for the age limit. Kids should not be going out into the NBA at such a young age, because they miss out on the important things in life, including getting an education. I don't care how good you are, you always need an education to function well in life. It certainly never hurts, and you do need something to do after you are finished with your NBA career. You cannot just loaf around at home. Not to mention that if you are good enough to enter the NBA, you are more than likely able to get a basketball scholarship so you wouldn't have to pay for your own education. People should take advantage of something like that.

                                Not only that, but there is the chance to improve your basketball skills when you go to college. It isn't a complete waste of time, and I know that people who come out of college are much more polished than those who aren't. Of course, there are exceptions, case in point Lebron. But there are so many more better people who play the game fundamentally sound, like Duncan. He does all the little things, and he rarely ever makes a mistake. You look at someone like Bender, who could have been much better had he gone through college. He has absolutely no basketball sense, and I have no doubt he could have learned it had he gone.

                                In my opinion you have everything to gain if you go to college, and 20 is certainly reasonable. This will make the college game a whole lot more fun to watch, and the quality of the future drafts will be much better.
                                Don't ask Marvin Harrison what he did during the bye week. "Batman never told where the Bat Cave is," he explained.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X