Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

    http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...simmons/050302


    Screw the Oscars. Antoine was back.

    No. 88 was standing happily at the free-throw line, putting the finishing touches on a thrilling victory in Phoenix. My father and I were watching on opposite coasts, rehashing our favorite moments on the phone -- Banks' jaw-dropping block on Steven Hunter, Delonte's killer three in OT, Violet Palmer getting inadvertently nailed by a loose ball -- celebrating the most entertaining non-playoff Celtics game in 12 years. And Antoine Walker was the reason. In a last-ditch effort to salvage the season, Danny Ainge swallowed hard and brought back the team's former captain, the same guy he traded 17 months before. It was like someone screwing up a game of "NBA Live," glancing around the room, then hitting the RESET button.


    Now you know -- Antoine was the heart of the Celtics.
    As someone posted on my favorite Celtics message board, the trade invigorated this team like the adrenalin shot from "Pulp Fiction." During the Phoenix game, Dad and I ended up talking five different times -- which hasn't happened since the Reggie Lewis Era -- using the same incredulous, giddy tone that people have at the end of "Pimp My Ride." That's a pretty good comparison, actually. The Celtics took our crappy car (the pre-Antoine team), quickly remodeled it (with the trade), and suddenly we were driving around in a decked-out car with $40,000 worth of stuff in it. Really? This is mine? All for me? Sunday night, we looked like a genuine sleeper in the East, a hybrid of Phoenix and Seattle. Four days earlier in Denver, we looked dead.

    That Antoine was single-handedly responsible for this transformation ... I mean, "ironic" isn't nearly a strong enough word. No local athlete divided Boston fans quite like Employee No. 8. "He just doesn't get it," my father always complained, firmly entrenched in the anti-'Toine camp. He must have muttered those words 35,000 times over the years. When we traded Walker to Dallas, Dad was fine with it. Then we watched Pierce and the gang mope through the following season -- a surly, unlikable group -- as Antoine's competitive spirit was sorely missed. Say what you want about the guy, but he always cared. This year wasn't a complete disaster, not with three promising rookies involved, but Dad (a 31-year season ticket holder) wasn't exactly skipping home from the FleetCenter, either. When I broke the news about the Antoine trade, he was mildly intrigued.

    "Well, he drives me crazy, but at least he plays hard," Dad decided. "Maybe he'll wake Pierce up."

    Not exactly a ringing endorsement. At the end of the Suns game, as Antoine prepared to shoot those aforementioned free throws, FSN showed a graphic saying that 'Toine was a whopping 12-for-32 from the field.

    "Oh my God!" Dad yelped. "Twelve for thirty-two! TWELVE FOR THIRTY-TWO!"

    "We wouldn't have gotten to OT without him," I pointed out.

    "Yeah, I know," he said, still laughing. "I just can't believe we're back here with this guy. It's like climbing back on a rollercoaster."

    Maybe so.

    But have you ever had a bad time on a rollercoaster?

    On Wednesday night against the Lakers, Antoine makes his triumphant return to Boston. The team plans on going all-out for him -- video presentations, posters, even a top-secret surprise -- and why wouldn't they? It's the toughest ticket since Rick Pitino's first game against MJ and the Bulls.

    This isn't about welcoming back a favorite son, because nobody ever liked him that much. It's about 20,000 fans apologizing to someone who never received a fair shake. It's about a guy who learned from his mistakes and longed for a second chance. It's about perception and reality. It's about black and white. It's about 16 championships, and Red and Cooz, and Russell and Bird, and a franchise that used to stand for something. It's about standing and cheering and clapping until your hands ache, about appreciating someone that you never quite understood, about making up for lost time. It's about fans chanting "AN-TWAN WAH-KER" and clapping in rhythm to the syllables.

    It's about No. 8 coming home.

    I attended nearly every home game during Walker's first six seasons; there were times when I honestly wondered if the fans wanted him to fail. With diehards priced out of the premium seats near the court, those spots were filled mostly with businessmen and one-timers, few of them knowing much about the team. These people were always the toughest on Walker, who confirmed every stereotype they had about the league -- in other words, he was an overconfident African-American who seemed a little too pleased with himself, made too much money, talked too much smack and definitely wasn't Larry Bird. So they skewered him. When Walker signed a $71 million extension before the '99 season, then showed up overweight and out of shape, the city never really forgave him. Boston Globe columnist Bob Ryan -- the most respected basketball voice in town -- slammed Walker in a column, called him a "punk" and sealed Walker's fate. Most Boston fans didn't watch Celtics games anymore, so they couldn't come up with their own opinion. Ryan did it for them.

    To be fair, Walker made it impossible to accept him at times, between his hideous shot selection and bombastic personality. There were lots of moments like the Heat game in 1999, when we were winning late and Twan started talking trash to Mourning and Riley, even demanding the ball so he could launch a three in front of Miami's bench. There was the time he told a heckler to "Bite me" in Section One, then grabbed his crotch during a timeout for good measure. There was the time he wouldn't stop arguing with the refs, when Rick Pitino screamed "Stop it!", then whirled around and tabbed someone from the bench, like a frustrated parent sending someone to their room. These things happen when a team hands a 20-year-old kid too much responsibility, when he doesn't have any veterans looking out for him, when he doesn't know right from wrong. He ends up glancing defiantly to his buddies in Section One after baskets, wiggling after meaningless shots, antagonizing officials for no real reason. He ends up digging his own grave.


    After playing with the Hawks, Antoine is more than happy to be back in Boston.
    For the most part, the FleetCenter crowd openly loathed him, treating him like Ashlee Simpson gets treated after her average halftime performance. I remember one game when he sprung for 35 in the first 42 minutes, but they still booed him in crunch time after three straight misses. He couldn't win. Admittedly, I was right there with them -- I gave up on Antoine at least 20 times. For my old website, I wrote more words about him than anyone other than Pedro, every column centering around three themes: "He's finally putting it all together!", "What's going on with him?" and "Maybe we should trade him." Way back in January of 1998, after they retired The Chief's No. 00, I wrote a column with the headline, "Will They Ever Retire No. 8?" (The conclusion? No.) During one eight-day span in 2000, I argued the merits of keeping him, then wrote a column making up more fake trades with him. Re-reading these old columns, you would think I was bipolar.

    And this came back to the "Will he ever get it?" question. Antoine's best quality was also his worst quality -- there wasn't a second when he wasn't entirely convinced that he was the best player on the court. On Opening Night in 1997, when Jordan was still in his prime, Walker capped off an astounding comeback by banking a turnaround in MJ's face and drawing the foul, then doing his exaggerated wiggle and chest-bumping Walter McCarty ... all three feet away from a furious Jordan. There was never any cause-and-effect with 'Toine -- he always riled up the wrong teams, challenged the wrong guys, took that one extra three we didn't need. When he was heckled from the stands, almost always, he sought out the offending voices and stared them down. The guy was a mess. A maddening, talented mess.

    Here was a potential superstar who could play five positions, a gifted offensive rebounder with 3-point range, one of the truly competitive guys in the league ... and he drove everybody batty. I remember hoping that an opposing player would punch him, just to settle him down, and it almost happened with Jerry Stackhouse once. Alas. But when someone is guaranteed $71 million before turning 23, can you really convince him that he's doing something wrong? Many young NBA stars fell short of expectations in the 90's, and only because they made waaaaaaay too much money waaaaaay too soon. Walker almost became one of them, a card-carrying member of the "Hey everybody, look At me!" generation, the same era that nearly destroyed the league. When Pitino made his famous "Larry Bird isn't walking through that door" speech, he didn't realize how poignant it was. Celtics fans didn't just miss the good old days, we pined for them.

    This went a little deeper, of course. Thanks to relentless self-promoting and trash-talking, unflattering stories about posses and illegitimate kids, tattoos and crotch-grabbing, spiralling salaries and everything else, as we headed towards the millennium, it became tougher and tougher for paying customers (mostly white) to identify with the players (mostly black). Because of Walker's infamous wiggle, as well as his penchant for trash-talking and baiting referees, Boston fans naturally associated him with every other problem child. Sure, he was bad, but he wasn't that bad. Behind the scenes, he was practically a prince -- adored by everyone in the organization, the kind of guy who remembered everyone's names, bought birthday presents, took care of ball boys and paid for employee's vacations. Nobody knew about this, and nobody really cared.

    That was one of the many dichotomies with 'Toine. A superb offensive rebounder, he spent most of his time 25 feet from the basket. A surprisingly creative passer, he still managed to make the dumbest pass possible at the worst possible time. Nobody cared about winning more than him, yet he never got himself into phenomenal shape until last summer (a contract year, of course). Considered to be a terrific teammate, he struggled adjusting to "second banana" status as Pierce evolved into a franchise player. He was never quite what we wanted him to be. And we excoriated him for it.

    Pitino didn't help matters by floating Walker's name in about 100 different trade rumors, then leaking an unflattering story about Walker after his resignation -- something about 'Toine griping about not getting enough shots in the huddle of a tie game, which was allegedly when Pitino had the epiphany that he needed to resign. (Actually, he needed to resign because he was a terrible NBA coach and an even worse evaluator of talent. But we won't split hairs.) Now Walker's name was sullied for good -- he wasn't just a bad guy, he was a coach-killer. With the team unable to trade him because of his contract, we were stuck with him. Almost like VD.

    When the team improbably turned things around during the Jim O'Brien Era, making it all the way to the Eastern Finals in 2002, the fans fell head over heels for Pierce. Walker was an afterthought, belittled for shooting so many 3s, even though his coach was imploring him to do so. With two quality players and 10 average ones, O'Brien decided that the best way to compete was by playing Walker and Pierce big minutes, slowing things down and revolving the offense around an unconscionable numbers of 3s. For whatever reason, Antoine was blamed for this style of play, a curious outcome for the undisputed heart and soul of the team, an admitted work-in-progress, someone who played 40-plus minutes a night and never missed a game, someone who spent summers in Chicago with Jordan and absorbed as many lessons as he could. Most fans would love a guy like that. We tolerated him.

    When he was finally traded, the prevailing attitude seemed to be, "Good riddance." Even I felt that way, although I hated what they got in return. It was time for him to go. They needed to hand over the team to Pierce, once and for all. Antoine was in the way.

    Or so we thought.

    So why are we excited to have him back? Because he gave a crap about being a Celtic, that's why. Walker came to the franchise in 1996, four years removed from Bird, three years removed from McHale and Reggie, two years removed from Parish. He played with Dee Brown and Rick Fox, both of whom played with the Big Three and understood how the franchise resonated with the city. For all his faults as a player, Walker always understood that it meant something to wear the Celtics green, knew the names on the rafters, valued Red Auerbach's advice, listened to Tommy Heinsohn's tips on the team charter. When the team traded him, he was devastated -- not because they gave up on him, but because he never wanted to play anywhere else.

    And there's something to be said for that. The NBA has evolved into a league where everyone goes to the highest bidder, save for a precious few like Tim Duncan. When Kobe became a free agent, you never heard him say the words, "There's no way I'm leaving the Lakers." He explored his options for most of the summer, even using the Clippers to jack up his price before re-signing. This happens all the time. In Cleveland right now, an entire city holds its breath with LeBron, hoping he won't be leaving in three years. In this league, you never know.


    The Celtics didn't know how much they needed Antoine until he was gone.
    Antoine? He loved playing for the Celtics, setting him apart from everyone on this current team. Even as recently as last week, GP looked exasperated, Pierce exhausted, Blount catatonic. Ricky Davis always looked happy enough, but the guy could have a good time picking up elephant poop. The rookies started out wide-eyed and giddy before the season ground them down; during last week's Lakers game, mild-mannered teenager Al Jefferson even chewed out Jiri Welsch for missing him on a fast break. Heading into the trading deadline, this was a sullen group content with going through the motions, a rudderless ship, the kind of team that could give up 15 straight or score 15 straight at any time.

    Then Danny bit the bullet and brought Antoine back.

    Suddenly guys were huddling before free throws, helping each other up, cheering teammates from the bench. In about 3.2 minutes, 'Toine transformed them into Hickory High. Finally -- finally! -- he had harnessed the misplaced emotion from his previous stint in Boston, figured out how he could use it constructively. Maybe the time away helped -- a humbling up-and-down stint in Dallas, followed by four eye-opening months in Atlanta (the least talented team in the worst possible city) -- but the fact remained, he looked like a different player. THIS was the guy we always wanted: Well-conditioned, focused, passionate, always in control, the ultimate teammate. His influence on Pierce was worth that 2006 first-rounder alone; almost instantaneously, Pierce started playing hard again, feeding off Antoine's intensity, just like he did back in the day. It was like getting two All-Stars in the same trade.

    And honestly? As a basketball fan, that Phoenix game was one of the most satisfying nights I can remember. From 1996 to 2003, I had invested in Antoine Walker. Cared about him. Defended him. *****ed about him. Cheered him on. Worried about him. Wondered about him. It was an all-encompassing experience, almost like being a relationship, with the same peaks and valleys and the same ambiguous ending. When he was shipped to Dallas, it resembled a bitter romantic breakup, and I was guilty of the same emotions we feel in those situations -- I wanted him to fail, wanted him to make an *** out of himself. When he was exiled to Atlanta last summer, I remember taking a perverse amount of joy in his plight. And then, when I heard word that he might be headed back to Boston, I wanted him to come home, without even a hesitation. Maybe I just wanted someone on the team who actually cared about being a Celtic.

    And sure, over the next few months, you can count on 'Toine launching some terrible shots, arguing with a few referees, maybe even losing a game or two with an ill-advised 3. That's part of the Antoine Package, for better or worse. You can also count on his getting teammates involved, making an infinite number of big plays, going to battle night after night, teaching the rookies about being a Celtic, wearing his heart on his sleeve. For once, the pluses outweigh the minuses. I never thought I would say that about Antoine Walker.

    "Hey, maybe he gets it now," my father said this week. "Stranger things have happened."

    Well, not really. But that's the NBA for you. For better or worse, we watch talented kids mature into adults on the biggest stage imaginable. We hand them millions and millions, treat them like kings and expect them to handle it. When they can't handle it, we ridicule them, gripe about them constantly, wonder if they'll ever "get it." And because of the salaries and ticket prices, an underlying level of jealousy overshadows our relationship with them, maybe more than we want to admit. In retrospect, Boston fans weren't booing Antoine because he was a bad guy; we booed him because he made a ton of money, because we weren't patient enough with him, because he wasn't Bird or McHale. Was it unfair? Absolutely.

    Starting tonight, we have a chance to atone. After nine grueling years, Antoine Walker will finally have the FleetCenter in the palm of his hand.

    And yes, I wish I could be there. More than you know.
    sigpic
    "It's a league game, Smokey"

  • #2
    Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

    Thanks Abington. I've been looking for a good read on this subject. The Antoine trade is quite an intriguing story.
    "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

      The moral of the story, Walker's play looks alot better in an up tempo system and Pierce cant lead his way out of a paper bag. Nicely written article tho...

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

        Originally posted by abington
        And sure, over the next few months, you can count on 'Toine launching some terrible shots, arguing with a few referees, maybe even losing a game or two with an ill-advised 3. That's part of the Antoine Package, for better or worse. You can also count on his getting teammates involved, making an infinite number of big plays, going to battle night after night, teaching the rookies about being a Celtic, wearing his heart on his sleeve. For once, the pluses outweigh the minuses. I never thought I would say that about Antoine Walker.

        "Hey, maybe he gets it now," my father said this week. "Stranger things have happened."

        Well, not really. But that's the NBA for you. For better or worse, we watch talented kids mature into adults on the biggest stage imaginable. We hand them millions and millions, treat them like kings and expect them to handle it. When they can't handle it, we ridicule them, gripe about them constantly, wonder if they'll ever "get it." And because of the salaries and ticket prices, an underlying level of jealousy overshadows our relationship with them, maybe more than we want to admit.
        I know it's the PacerDigest version of Gowin's Law, but you know who this reminded me of?

        Yeah. You do.
        This space for rent.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

          I could not help but think of Artest when I read this article

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

            I love Simmons, but this story's overcooked. I think he's waaayyyyy to excited and optimistic about Walker's return. But that's what he does with the Celtics. Before the season he picked them to make the EC Finals, so that should tell you something. And I can't believe he doesn't criticize Ainge. Instead, Ainge is actually credited with "biting the bullet."

            It will strike Simmons soon enough that this Celtic team is only capable of so much; maybe -- MAYBE -- the second round.

            Antoine Walker deserves all the criticism he gets. He's a selfish, lazy player. But ultimately, I'm glad he's back in Boston, too. Watching him lose as a Celtic is much more fulfilling.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

              What if the Celtics finsh ahead of the Sixers.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

                Originally posted by Unclebuck
                What if the Celtics finsh ahead of the Sixers.

                Then they'll play Chicago, Orlando or you guys in the playoffs. It will go 6 or 7 games and they might even pull through. Then they will lose to Miami or Detroit in 5, maybe 6 games.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

                  Originally posted by BabbleOn
                  I love Simmons, but this story's overcooked. I think he's waaayyyyy to excited and optimistic about Walker's return. But that's what he does with the Celtics.
                  Well, I do have to agree that Antoine's return has revitalized the local interest here in Boston on the Celtics. Admittedly, it would have been hard for interest to sink much lower than it had. I always maintain that the priority of interest for sports fans in the Boston area for the last few years has been:

                  Red Sox > Patriots >>>> Bruins >> Candlepin bowling > Local College teams > Celtics

                  A quick barometer of what's on the minds of local sports fans here is to listen to the hot topics on the sports radio stations in town. Prior to the Walker trade, you could count the number of times the Celtics would be mentioned on a monthly basis on the fingers of one hand. Now post-Walker trade, every other topic by callers to the sports stations has been about the Celtics. Amazing.
                  Your horse is dead, get off it already...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

                    BC, where does Charlie Moore the Mad Fisherman rank on that list?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

                      Originally posted by MSA2CF
                      BC, where does Charlie Moore the Mad Fisherman rank on that list?
                      Dunno - somewhere below the Celts but likely way, way above NASCAR
                      Your horse is dead, get off it already...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: A great NBA read: T'oine and the Celtics by Bill Simmons/sportsguy

                        Originally posted by BostonConnection
                        Well, I do have to agree that Antoine's return has revitalized the local interest here in Boston on the Celtics. Admittedly, it would have been hard for interest to sink much lower than it had. I always maintain that the priority of interest for sports fans in the Boston area for the last few years has been:

                        Red Sox > Patriots >>>> Bruins >> Candlepin bowling > Local College teams > Celtics

                        A quick barometer of the what's on the minds of local sports fans here is to listen to the hot topics on the sports radio stations in town. Prior to the Walker trade, you could count the number of times the Celtics would be mentioned on a monthly basis on the fingers of one hand. Now post-Walker trade, every other topic by callers to the sports stations has been about the Celtics. Amazing.
                        I guess that makes Simmons a "real" fan or something...the guy obviously loves his Celtics 24/7.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X