Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

    Originally posted by xtacy View Post
    you stand pat and guess what? there is an equal if not bigger probablity he won't want to stay.
    There is a huge amount of middle ground between "standing pat" and "blowing it up". That's where I reside.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

      Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
      I think this is the best time to rebuild, like 2011 was for the Colts. We have full flexibility with no pressure, and we have really good assets with Hibbert and West, who are expiring after 2015-2016. I think this is a rare opportunity to shape a team around Paul George without sinking expectations.
      Why would PG want to be a part of a team that's rebuilding? Especially coming off of a bad injury. Football and basketball are much different in terms of a rebuild. But if you want to compare the two; the Colts rebuild looks like a smart idea because they had Andrew Luck in the draft. Luck in the NFL Draft is close to the equivalent of Lebron James in the NBA Draft. There is no Lebron James coming out next year. And even if there was, we have to leave it up to a lottery to determine if we have the chance to get him.

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

        Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
        Why would PG want to be a part of a team that's rebuilding? Especially coming off of a bad injury. Football and basketball are much different in terms of a rebuild. But if you want to compare the two; the Colts rebuild looks like a smart idea because they had Andrew Luck in the draft. Luck in the NFL Draft is close to the equivalent of Lebron James in the NBA Draft. There is no Lebron James coming out next year. And even if there was, we have to leave it up to a lottery to determine if we have the chance to get him.
        We lost Peyton Manning and got Andrew Luck. We are losing Paul George and getting Paul George. It's not rebuilding around the star because we already have that. It's getting guys who are young, cheap, and filling in holes at SG and on the bench by trading guys who contenders would love to have. It's rebuilding if it's long term. If you know you are getting a superstar next year like the Colts did and like the Pacers do, it's reloading.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

          Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
          We lost Peyton Manning and got Andrew Luck. We are losing Paul George and getting Paul George. It's not rebuilding around the star because we already have that. It's getting guys who are young, cheap, and filling in holes at SG and on the bench by trading guys who contenders would love to have. It's rebuilding if it's long term. If you know you are getting a superstar next year like the Colts did and like the Pacers do, it's reloading.
          It's only reloading if you get guys that will be ready to go at the same level of their development as Paul is at his. If you get guys who have to work on their own development while Paul runs in place, it's rebuilding - and if they take too long and we lose Paul, it's blowing up the team.
          BillS

          A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
          Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

            Originally posted by xtacy View Post
            you stand pat and guess what? there is an equal if not bigger probablity he won't want to stay.
            I'm not sure why he would want to leave a championship contender?

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

              Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
              I'm not sure why he would want to leave a championship contender?
              If we are going to stay a championship contender we are going to have to not stay pat at some point because West is done in 2 years essentially, and Hibbert will be a free agent as well. At some point in Paul George's contract the Pacers will have to make moves.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                Check out this list of the 2016 free agents. We will have a ton of cap space that year if we keep West and Hibbert and allow their contracts to expire.

                http://www.sheridanhoops.com/2014/08...-be-best-ever/

                No, we won't get Durant or Lebron, but there are some solid options in there. We'll have a ton of cap space. Maybe we can keep West for cheap. If Hibbert proves his worth, then we will keep him, but at least there are some potential options. The worst thing that we could do is trade Hibbert and West for middling vets with contracts beyond 2016. If we can get a nice young piece for either one of them then you pull the trigger, but don't trade them just for the sake of trading them.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                  Originally posted by PacersHomer
                  We lost Peyton Manning and got Andrew Luck. We are losing Paul George and getting Paul George. It's not rebuilding around the star because we already have that. It's getting guys who are young, cheap, and filling in holes at SG and on the bench by trading guys who contenders would love to have. It's rebuilding if it's long term. If you know you are getting a superstar next year like the Colts did and like the Pacers do, it's reloading.
                  Who do you think Paul George is? What you are proposing is getting rid of everyone good on this team for cheap players who "fill holes" while creating new holes. This is all supposed to make logical sense because Paul George. Paul George isn't that good. He isn't Robertson, MJ, Lebron, Malone, and Russel combined. He is only Paul George. Right now at best he is a top 15 player. That isn't the level of player that you just throw a bunch of random cheap players around and expect to compete for a championship. If you do that you will land in the lottery.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                    Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
                    Who do you think Paul George is? What you are proposing is getting rid of everyone good on this team for cheap players who "fill holes" while creating new holes. This is all supposed to make logical sense because Paul George. Paul George isn't that good. He isn't Robertson, MJ, Lebron, Malone, and Russel combined. He is only Paul George. Right now at best he is a top 15 player. That isn't the level of player that you just throw a bunch of random cheap players around and expect to compete for a championship. If you do that you will land in the lottery.
                    Before injury, he was clearly Top 10.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                      Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
                      We lost Peyton Manning and got Andrew Luck. We are losing Paul George and getting Paul George. It's not rebuilding around the star because we already have that. It's getting guys who are young, cheap, and filling in holes at SG and on the bench by trading guys who contenders would love to have. It's rebuilding if it's long term. If you know you are getting a superstar next year like the Colts did and like the Pacers do, it's reloading.
                      I can see this way of thinking, but we've already been winning with the guys that you're trying to trade. I know a lot of people are down on our roster and our current team, but they've been to two straight ECF. You only make a move if you think that you can flip Roy and/or West for another player that will get us over that hump. If we get a few younger pieces that will need to develop, we are going to be further away from our ultimate goal than we currently are.

                      As things currently stand we will most likely have a top 15 draft pick in next years draft (give or take), AND two huge expiring contracts going into the special 2016 FA class. Why play our cards right now? As you mentioned, we have nothing to lose at this point. Unless you're getting a young stud that you feel you can pair with PG for the next few years moving forward, you may as well see what you have this year. Decide who you can keep and whom you should let go, and go into next season with a few more assets and flexibility.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                        Originally posted by PR07 View Post
                        Before injury, he was clearly Top 10.
                        I disagree. This is what I mean about how people rag on Hill and Hibbert for their second half performances, but give Paul a complete pass. Paul played like a top 10 player in November and December. Januaray through April he was far from a top 10 player. I was being generous by calling him at best a top 15 player. Top 10 players do not shoot 41% or less for two thirds of a season.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                          Originally posted by Eleazar View Post
                          I'm not sure why he would want to leave a championship contender?
                          we are not a championship contender anymore. if this group of players hasn't done enough to convince you by now i don't know what else they can.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                            Originally posted by Ace E.Anderson View Post
                            I can see this way of thinking, but we've already been winning with the guys that you're trying to trade. I know a lot of people are down on our roster and our current team, but they've been to two straight ECF. You only make a move if you think that you can flip Roy and/or West for another player that will get us over that hump. If we get a few younger pieces that will need to develop, we are going to be further away from our ultimate goal than we currently are.

                            As things currently stand we will most likely have a top 15 draft pick in next years draft (give or take), AND two huge expiring contracts going into the special 2016 FA class. Why play our cards right now? As you mentioned, we have nothing to lose at this point. Unless you're getting a young stud that you feel you can pair with PG for the next few years moving forward, you may as well see what you have this year. Decide who you can keep and whom you should let go, and go into next season with a few more assets and flexibility.
                            Who do you have that you don't know about?

                            That is what is going to be the hardest part for me to swallow about this season, we aren't seeing what we have with anybody other than Solomon Hill & maybe Levoy Allen.

                            Doing nothing this year IMO does nothing to help or improve our situation in 2016 When Paul George returns hopefully fully healed and playing at 100%. David West is not going to be a part of whatever happens on that team neither will Luis Scola. Frankly I don't suspect Chris Copeland, C.J. Watson, Rodney Stuckey, C.J. Watson or Ian Mahinmi will either.

                            Also did you just read those names I typed, that is not a wealth of talent.

                            I still believe Mahinmi gives you the most bang for the buck to work with. I think you could get a wing of comparable skills to what Ian is at center for him.

                            But either way to me doing nothing this year is a huge mistake. It makes the inevitable rebuild that is coming going to be that much harder because we won't have any assets to work with and then you will be stuck in middle draft pick purgatory for awhile.


                            Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                              I'm okay with doing what you want to call what I am suggesting below ( rebuilding, retooling, re-whatever ):

                              I would look to keep a the core of:

                              PG24 / GH / Solo / Miles / Rudez

                              and build around this core.

                              I'd evaluate whether to keep:

                              Hibbert / Lavoy / Stuckey / Whittington

                              or not for the long-term over the course of this season while gauging their Trade Value. I am leaning towards including Hibbert in the core of Players due to his age and what he does do very well ( defense ). But if the right offer comes along and/or he continues to play inconsistently, then I may be fine with trading him.

                              As for the rest, i'd have no problem trading:

                              West / Scola / Sloan / Copeland / Watson / Mahinmi

                              for assets that we can keep for the long term and/or assets that won't hurt the Pacers 2016-2017 Cap Space. I want to keep West....but Peck ( and others ) have bought up valid points about not keeping him in the long-term plans of the Pacers. If that is the case...then we might as well see what value West / Scola / Sloan has on the Trade Market.

                              So, call this whatever you want to call it......IMHO...it's retooling over the next year.....then I am fine with it. The key thing to do is to ensure that we preserve whatever 2016-2017 Salary Cap Space that we have.
                              Last edited by CableKC; 08-08-2014, 05:37 PM.
                              Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: Should the Pacers rebuild after Paul George injury?

                                Originally posted by xtacy View Post
                                we are not a championship contender anymore. if this group of players hasn't done enough to convince you by now i don't know what else they can.
                                Be given a chance to see how they respond to having one of the biggest reality checks to ever hit rather than just make the assumption that the worst they've played in 2 years is essentially how they will always play?

                                Look, I understand people around here don't want to get their hopes up. There's quite an element of "it's easier to downplay these guys than to take the chance of being disappointed again." The team as currently staffed (with PG out for the year) is certainly not a contender. But it isn't completely out of line to think that Roy can get his head on straight. It isn't impossible to think that Lavoy and Solo and even Copeland end up being able to strengthen their ability to be solid roleplayers when they come back? Is it that hard a stretch to think that we could get one dependable veteran out of the players available to move? Given those things, why is it impossible for us to be a contender in 2015-2016 without clearing the decks?

                                If the roster on paper was what declared a champion Miami would be getting its fourth ring this fall. Clearly, that's not how it works.
                                BillS

                                A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                                Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X