Page 13 of 20 FirstFirst ... 391011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 325 of 490

Thread: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

  1. #301

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by wtelfair View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    We definitely need Dragic then because he own us last season.
    we "need" Dragic because he'd immediately be the best offensive player on the roster, by a large margin. with or without Lance.

    now go get him, NBA2K it and sprinkle all the Spurs dust on it. good luck.

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Heisenberg For This Useful Post:


  3. #302
    Member larry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Indiana
    Age
    37
    Posts
    834

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    On the bright side I'm not close to being sure this team was ever going to fully recover back into a title contender after the collapse. They "may" have but once something breaks with any product or profession it usually requires a new part or piece to repair it. You can't glue or tape something & have it come out being better or even as good as new likely.

    This Pacer team looked broken to me. The East was weak. San Antonio proved that. Miami proved we were no longer the pre-all star break legit team or even the suprising, scrappy underdogs the year prior. We weren't championship worthy as currently constructed. We got the 1 seed because Miami, while better than us was also not playing well. We could have had hopes to challenge in the East this year due to Miami breaking up, Rose's suspect health, & hopes that our young players improved.

    I still think this team before today was broken. Even if the East sucked next year & guys came back improved individually we were broken. The unknown issue that cropped up was still there with Lance staying.

    I wanted Lance back but felt either Hibbert would need to go or that we needed a pure PG. I liked how we looked with letting our small lineup run & gun style last year. The sample size was beyond small for that though.

    Lance would roam the baselinethis year if he didn't have the rock, so a Rondo type guard would not be an ideal guy to pair with a SG like Lance. The collapse made Lance walking bearable to me. Pre allstar the thought of him leaving was very scary to me.

    At the end of the day I think our offer to Lance was better & the deal he took proves we didn't low ball him or go cheap. He chose to leave. We could have matched the Hornets offer. Cut Scola & it's there. Lance either wants to be the man or there were just hard feelings with people here in Indy.

    I'd bet our chemistry will improve. It dipped this year only after Lance got better & better. Lance was saying he would be willing to be a 6th man behind Granger last offseason. He was happy to just have a major role early. Like him or not the humble Lance was gone by the all star break. He became entitled by season's end.

    Yes, our overall talent will go down, but were the Spurs the most talent loaded team? Probably not. They were loaded for sure, but they just fit well as a team.

    I remember losing Antonio Davis after the ECF in 99. We expected to make the Finals in 99 too. Instead we lost in 6 & that year was a bit disappointing. Antonio was emerging into a border line allstar like Lance. He asked to be moved, was moved, & Austin Croshere came from nowhere to HELP guide us to the Finals in 2000. If you watched every game that year you know Austin was playing awesome & you weren't shocked by his Finals performance. We actually got Jonathan Bender for Davis that year. Bender didn't contribute in 2000, yet we still improved team wise despite losing Davis.

    Yes it's true we already had Dale Davis in front of Antonio Davis & this time we dont have a great guy to just plug in at SG for Lance.

    So in summary we became less talented but probably less broken today. How that translates to team success NOBODY knows.

    In my humble opinion something had to change anyways. A new coach, going smaller, or trading for a new PG.
    Making constant changes to a core would have been an overreaction had the Heat just edged us. I could see keeping our team exactly the same another year if we hadn'tn't imploded. Just remember that the collapse did happen, so standing pat wasn't our answer anyway.
    It will be interesting to see if we get lucky & get to watch a guy from out of nowhere give us a Croshere type boost .

    Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
    1 - 2, Tinsley's coming for you.
    3 - 4, You're not a team no more.
    5 - 6, He's gonna plead the 5th.
    7 - 8, He's gonna stay out late.




  4. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to larry For This Useful Post:


  5. #303

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    you typed all that on a phone?

  6. The Following 19 Users Say Thank You to Heisenberg For This Useful Post:

    + Show/Hide list of the thanked


  7. #304

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by CableKC View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    If we pursued Players that gave us fits.....we'd be going after every other scrub that played against us over the last 2 seasons.
    Well let me see those players that lit us up most of the time:

    Melo
    Lebron & Wade
    Ariza
    Korver Jeff Teague and Paul Milsap
    CJ Miles
    Lowry & Ross
    Rose
    Jennings

    Those are from the east alone. My point is, those are decent players list hence signing Stuckey ain't that bad for me

  8. #305
    Member sportfireman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Louisiana
    Age
    35
    Posts
    1,181
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Seriously people our stubborn coach will be our demise not the players. I guess most of you are ignoring it. Vogel is as stubborn as Obrien, unwilling to play guys to their strengths. He believes this and that's it. We're gonna ball to one and one song only.
    I'm not perfect and neither are you.

    Romans 3:23 For all have sinned,and come short of the glory of God. kjv
    Ephisians 4: 32 And be ye kind one to another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven you. kjv

  9. #306
    Tree People to the Core! indygeezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cumberland
    Posts
    15,265
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Our stubborn coach who is working on a one year contract? The one that hasn't been extended? Hopefully Bird will have a few Come to Heaven talks with him.
    If you get to thinkin’ you’re a person of some influence, try orderin’ somebody else’s dog around..

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to indygeezer For This Useful Post:


  11. #307
    The Doctor's In The House TheDon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Age
    30
    Posts
    4,580

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    reading this post feels like trying to figure out what stages of the kubler-ross everyone is on. kstat is probably laughing his *** off at this thread.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to TheDon For This Useful Post:


  13. #308
    Rebound King Kstat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Age
    32
    Posts
    28,069

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDon View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    reading this post feels like trying to figure out what stages of the kubler-ross everyone is on. kstat is probably laughing his *** off at this thread.
    I'm still wrapping my head around the logic that excuses Rodney for the dysfunctional atmosphere that led to him having 6 head coaches in 7 years, when he's the guy that publicly stabbed four of them in the back and created that dysfunctional atmosphere...

    I mean holy hell, he was far from the most damaging on-court presence the Pistons had in this era (Will Bynum award), but off the court the guy was peerless.

    Look, I get it: hope for the best, worst case he can be released. My worry from the other side of this is another Andrew Bynum effect where he eats away at the team from the inside and by the time he's been dealt with, its too late.
    Last edited by Kstat; 07-17-2014 at 06:51 AM.

    It wasn't about being the team everyone loved, it was about beating the teams everyone else loved.

    Division Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 1989, 1990, 2002, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008
    Conference Champions 1955, 1956, 1988, 2005
    NBA Champions 1989, 1990, 2004

  14. #309
    This must be a bad dream.
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Not really where I want to be.
    Posts
    1,376
    Mood

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey



    Well if nothing else, you can't say that Rodney doesn't have a nice smile

  15. #310
    Member Eamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Age
    26
    Posts
    62

    Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Said to my flatmate about two-three hours before the Stuckey interest was revealed - "Jameer Nelson, Stuckey or a longer shot, Kent Bazemore to replace Stephenson."

    It's the most we could expect to get and I'm not disappointed as it was alongside expectation. Stuckey isn't a bad player from what I've seen, just needs some consistency and a better situation to play in... or he'll be as good as Evan Turner wasn't.
    Pacers fan since April 9th 2004 - New Jersey 80 Indiana 90.

  16. #311
    Member ilive4sports's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    6,858

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Not exactly excited about the signing, but as long as its a cheap deal I really don't mind it.

  17. #312
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brown County, Indiana
    Posts
    3,744

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Trader Joe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    This forum could use a little more pants poopin' to lighten up the mood.
    Where is that K-Mart ad about shipping my pants?

  18. #313
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Brown County, Indiana
    Posts
    3,744

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    that would just bring out the poopy haters.
    I suppose it could be worse. It could be diaper gravy!

  19. #314

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom White View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It could be diaper gravy!
    Sort of like:


  20. #315
    Stay focused SMosley21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Going the distance
    Age
    31
    Posts
    2,534

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Kstat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm still wrapping my head around the logic that excuses Rodney for the dysfunctional atmosphere that led to him having 6 head coaches in 7 years, when he's the guy that publicly stabbed four of them in the back and created that dysfunctional atmosphere...

    I mean holy hell, he was far from the most damaging on-court presence the Pistons had in this era (Will Bynum award), but off the court the guy was peerless.

    Look, I get it: hope for the best, worst case he can be released. My worry from the other side of this is another Andrew Bynum effect where he eats away at the team from the inside and by the time he's been dealt with, its too late.
    I'm pretty curious about his "issues". Could you enlighten us, because I can't seem to find anything other than the insubordination stuff from 2011.
    Grown Man Ball

  21. #316
    RING THE BELL! Sandman21's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Area55
    Posts
    6,336

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    The one reason that this COULD work is that he is basically playing for his career now. He screws this up, he's done for in the NBA.

    Now the question is, does he realize that this could be his last chance?
    "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

    "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "
    Want your own "Just Say No to Kamen" from @mkroeger pic? http://twitpic.com/a3hmca

  22. #317

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Eamer View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Said to my flatmate about two-three hours before the Stuckey interest was revealed - "Jameer Nelson, Stuckey or a longer shot, Kent Bazemore to replace Stephenson."

    It's the most we could expect to get and I'm not disappointed as it was alongside expectation. Stuckey isn't a bad player from what I've seen, just needs some consistency and a better situation to play in... or he'll be as good as Evan Turner wasn't.

    Bazemore signed with Atlanta I think. The only positive from this signing, is many people on real gm seem to see Stuckey as a point guard. And he was used primarily in Detroit as a point guard. This COULD mean.... Stuckey and Miles are coming off the bench. And Watson will be packaged in a trade with someone else for a REAL Lance replacement or a whole new back court altogether.

    http://www.pistonpowered.com/2011/12...best-position/


    ^This article from 2011 suggests that his best position is point guard. And if that's the case, that means we have four point guards on the roster. Hill, Sloan, Stuckey, Watson.

    Vogel isn't the sharpest tool in the shed, so maybe he believes Stuckey can play the two. But I wonder if this addition means a trade is coming.
    Last edited by Grimp; 07-17-2014 at 08:53 AM.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Grimp For This Useful Post:

    sav

  24. #318
    Member naptownmenace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    4,633

    Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Kstat View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm still wrapping my head around the logic that excuses Rodney for the dysfunctional atmosphere that led to him having 6 head coaches in 7 years, when he's the guy that publicly stabbed four of them in the back and created that dysfunctional atmosphere...

    I mean holy hell, he was far from the most damaging on-court presence the Pistons had in this era (Will Bynum award), but off the court the guy was peerless.

    Look, I get it: hope for the best, worst case he can be released. My worry from the other side of this is another Andrew Bynum effect where he eats away at the team from the inside and by the time he's been dealt with, its too late.
    Detroit has been really bad since 2011. If a player is upset about a coach who obviously is over his head and the team is unprepared game in and game out, I don't have a problem with that when he's on a bad team. Guys like Tracey McGrady and Ben Gordan were equally insubordinate (or worse) while with the Pistons. Are the players the reason that the Pistons had 6 coaches in 7 years or should Joe Dumars take the blame? Several coaches and player quit on the Pistons and that points to the front office, IMO.

    I think Stuckey will be a good citizen on a better team with better coaching.
    Quote Originally Posted by vnzla81
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Larry is not coming back, he didn't have a meeting with Orlando for not reason, yeah he is coming back to the NBA but not to the Pacers, the notion that he is a taking a year off and then come back is absurd.
    Quote Originally Posted by Trader Joe View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    GOOD GOD THAT'S LARRY BIRD'S MUSIC!

  25. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to naptownmenace For This Useful Post:


  26. #319
    Member PR07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,960

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Getting Stuckey at a veteran minimum is a great deal, but it's hard for me to say that a team with CJ Miles + Stuckey is better than the one with Lance, unless Lance truly was a blackhole in chemistry and a stat-padder.

    What I think I'll miss the most about Lance is his energy and bulldog mentality, most of our other guys look like they just woke up from a nap some games.

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PR07 For This Useful Post:


  28. #320

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    I'll keep saying to myself that (Miles, Stuckey, Rudez) at least equals (Stephenson, Turner, Bynum) because of the suckiness/irrelevance due to health that was Turner and Bynum.

    That makes my cope. It's how I roll.
    Last edited by Slick Pinkham; 07-17-2014 at 09:21 AM.
    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!)

  29. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slick Pinkham For This Useful Post:


  30. #321

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Slick Pinkham View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'll keep saying to myself that (Miles, Stuckey, Rudez) at least equals (Stephenson, Turner, Bynum) because of the suckiness that was Turner and Bynum.

    That makes my cope. It's how I roll.

    I feel a trade is coming though. This signing to me looks more and more suspect. Stuckey is a point guard. His shooting is worse than Lance. Especially from 3. If the Lance talks broke down in week 1, like most articles suggest? The front office couldn't have just been sitting around waiting on Lance. I think they were lining up a trade. They talked with Stuckey during that time about maybe being backup point guard? That would mean CJ is going somewhere in a package. It makes sense because CJ for what he brings to the table and his contract has value. CJ and Stuckey's contracts are similar in years too. Both are on 1 year deals now. CJ signed with us for two seasons. He's entering his last season now. Stuckey was signed to a 1 year. Why add a replacement for Lance specifically who is smaller, and not as skilled a shooter as he is? And who isn't starting quality?

    And if Miles was gonna start, then that means that we'd need a two guard replacement off the bench..... again. Something doesn't fit here. Not gonna speculate or get peoples hopes up but I suspect at least 45% right now that they've had something cooking for the last few weeks. I just can't see them waiting on Lance, and then choosing Stuckey as a plan B. Because surely, they would've reached out to another two guard on the market and said don't sign with anyone because if Lance leaves, we wanna sign you. That has happened before with teams. They also had time to retain Turner since the Lance talks broke down so quickly. So I think they put together a trade to replace Lance and maybe get a new PG too. Stuckey, could be CJ's replacement. Their deals are similar, except Stuckey is bigger and more physical at the PG spot than CJ is.

  31. The Following User Says Thank You to Grimp For This Useful Post:

    sav

  32. #322
    Can see thru wooden doors dal9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,909

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by Grimp View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I feel a trade is coming though.
    By this you mean you're about to post a real big one?

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to dal9 For This Useful Post:


  34. #323
    Member sav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    North Central Indiana
    Posts
    266

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    I think you are on to something Grimp.

  35. The Following User Says Thank You to sav For This Useful Post:


  36. #324
    Member PR07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,960

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    The only reason I think there will be a trade is because Damjan Rudez and Chris Copeland are redundant. They are the same type of player, and there runs the risk that Vogel won't play either one for defensive purposes.

  37. The Following User Says Thank You to PR07 For This Useful Post:


  38. #325

    Default Re: Pacers sign Rodney Stuckey

    Quote Originally Posted by dal9 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    By this you mean you're about to post a real big one?
    No because I don't want to speculate now with proposals while the board is in this state of mourning over how this whole thing played out. But....... I just don't see this as a sensible move. Nothing adds up here. This move would be a desperation move for a team when a player just pulls out of negotiations on the fly and bolts. Ala Elton Brand being a Clipper that one year? Until Philly swooped in at the very last second with a max deal and he bolted for Philadelphia. But if the Lance talks broke down in week 1? They had to be constructing something to replace him long term and be an upgrade. A front office of Bird and Pritchard I don't see just grabbing a Rodney Stuckey and trotting him out as the replacement for a guy like Lance. I could be wrong, but it doesn't add up. A 1 year deal for a physically smaller player, who's been a backup his whole career? And... who doesn't shoot nearly as well as the last guy? I don't buy it.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •