Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

    I highlighted Pacer related references.


    Little left in Atlanta
    NBA Columnist Ira Winderman

    Thoughts on the passing of the NBA trading deadline:

    Perhaps the Hawks' incoming owners are being prudent in holding off on their purchase of the franchise. Soon there might not be anything left to buy.

    Two weeks ago, the Hawks had assets in Shareef Abdur-Rahim, Theo Ratliff and Dan Dickau.

    But now, after first trading those three to Portland for Rasheed Wallace, precious little remains.

    After forwarding Wallace to Detroit, all Atlanta has left to show for Abdur-Rahim, Ratliff and Dickau is the sum total of about $20 million in cap space and a mid-first-round pick in this June's draft.

    And for this Hawks Director of Basketball Operations Billy Knight is being lauded?

    The draft pick, which initially belonged to Milwaukee, came courtesy of Detroit. Otherwise, the fallout in Atlanta has been nothing but the expiring contracts of Wesley Person, Bob Sura, Chris Mills and Zeljko Rebraca.

    Considering the failures in recent years on the free-agent market by Chicago and Utah, what exactly does the cap space guarantee?

    Especially in an arena where ushers and vendors make up the majority of the attendance.

    With the likelihood that Kobe Bryant and Kenyon Martin aren't headed to Philips Arena, does adding Quentin Richardson this summer as a free agent make it all worthwhile? It's not as if the free-agent class of '04 gets much better.

    "You want to have flexibility," Knight said. "Some people are saying, `Oh well, they're going after a max-out free agent.' It doesn't necessarily mean that. It just means that it could happen if we wanted to."

    Certainly, the chemistry of Glenn Robinson, Abdur-Rahim and Ratliff was a disaster. But what the Hawks have left themselves with doesn't set up as discernibly better.

    As Detroit moved closer to securing Wallace, the thought was that the Pistons merely were renting a contributor for a playoff run. The priority remained freeing enough salary-cap space to eventually retain forward Mehmet Okur, an impending free agent.

    Now that the Pistons have Rasheed, who also is an impending free agent, that thinking could change.

    Under cap rules, had Detroit not cleared cap space by dumping Chucky Atkins, Sura and Rebraca, it would have been unable to offer Okur more than about $5.1 million for next season.

    Now, those restraints are gone -- but only if the Pistons renounce their offseason rights to Wallace.

    And that's where it gets tricky.

    Under salary-cap rules, the only way the Pistons could retain their rights to extend a market-value contract to Wallace would be to place a salary hold on their cap at about $25 million. That would again limit the maximum they could offer Okur to what is expected to be a league-average $5.1 million salary for next season.

    Ultimately, these final two months of the season could have Wallace and Okur competing for a single payday in Detroit. Then again, if Wallace produces his typical numbers, it could moderate Okur's productivity to where his value would fall into the $5.1 million range.

    One thing is certain: Wallace will not be the one taking the $5.1 million from the Pistons. He could get that same mid-level salary-cap exception from New York, his preferred destination.

    Then there is Danny Ainge and his bizarro world in Boston.

    Yes, by agreeing to be the third wheel in the Atlanta-Detroit Wallace deal, he secured an additional first-round pick. But at the time of the trade, that pick acquired from the Pistons stood at No. 22, a spot that yielded the mighty Zoran Planinic last year.

    To get that pick, Ainge had to take on Atkins' additional two seasons, at $4.2 million next season and $4.5 million the year after.

    In addition, Ainge had to send former Heat guard Mike James to Detroit.

    Pistons President Joe Dumars said James was more than a throw-in.

    "Don't fall asleep on this guy," Dumars said. "We really think he's going to be able to help us."

    THE FALLOUT

    Atlanta made few friends by gifting Wallace to Detroit. In fact, Nets President Rod Thorn tried to preempt the trade by warning the Hawks that they would be getting fleeced. Remember, with a better record, Detroit would get second-round homecourt advantage over New Jersey, even if the Nets emerge as a higher playoff seed by virtue of an Atlantic Division title. ...

    One other issue regarding the Hawks' questionable approach: Why, if they were looking to move Wallace, did they play him Wednesday in New Jersey in what turned into a one-game Atlanta career for the forward? Were his 20 points in a loss so necessary that it was worth risking injury and the loss of the draft pick eventually received in the trade? ...

    Speaking of Wallace, the Elias Sports Bureau could find only two other instances when a player was traded after playing just one game with a team (Robert Archibald with Orlando earlier this season and Cadillac Anderson with New Jersey in 1991).

    ON THE OUTS

    The Jazz wasn't able to lose Greg Ostertag at the trade deadline, but it almost certainly will during this summer's free agency. Eleven total rebounds over a recent three-game span hardly sat well with coach Jerry Sloan. "If you're going to be seven feet tall, you can't play like you're 6-1," Sloan said of the 7-2 sloth. "I don't know what else I have to say or do. I'm not going to beg. I'm not going to kiss his feet to play. I'm not going to go that far. But I will kiss anywhere else he needs kissed if that will help him play." ...

    Magic forward Gordan Giricek, after scoring 15 points in Wednesday's home victory over Utah said, "I hope this game was good enough to stay here. We'll see." It wasn't. He was dealt a day later to the Jazz for guard DeShawn Stevenson. The Magic received interest from seven teams regarding Giricek, including East front-runners New Jersey, Indiana and Detroit. ...

    As a reserve on a seven-year, $51 million deal, Pacers forward Austin Croshere appreciated his chances of being dealt were slim. "I haven't even bothered looking on the internet this year," he said, back home in Indiana at least for the balance of the season.

    BREAK TIME

    While the NBA agreed to extend the All-Star break from four to five days next year, as the final tradeoff for the extension of the first round of the playoffs from best-of-5 to best-of-7, the benefit will be minimal unless the extra day comes after the All-Star Game. This year, with only one day off between Sunday's late game in Los Angeles and the resumption of the schedule Tuesday, Ron Artest, Allen Iverson and Shaquille O'Neal all missed practice the day after their appearances at Staples Center. With two days off after the All-Star Game, it would give participants a travel day as well as a day of practice. ...

    And why was Artest late getting back to Indiana? Because after being pampered with private jets throughout his career, he did not realize he couldn't simply walk to the counter immediately before the flight he wanted, grab a ticket, and head to his seat. He had given up his seat on a Pacers charter to travel with his wife and children. ...

    Omitted from the Rookie Challenge, Darko Milicic apparently had his own All-Star Weekend moment, after all. Yes, that was the Pistons forward you spotted on South Beach in a Bentley, rented for $1,000 a day. Considering the No. 2 overall pick in last June's draft is only 18, we could imagine the cost of the insurance waiver. ...

    Forward Keith Van Horn was at Disney World during the break with friends when he learned of his trade from New York to Milwaukee for Tim Thomas. "It was my daughter's fourth birthday and I was getting ready to take her to a birthday party with Cinderella," he said, his New York slipper suddenly no longer a snug fit. ...

    Thomas also was in the state when the deal went down, enjoying the break in South Florida. In fact, the day before the trade was made official, he ran into Knicks nut Spike Lee. The first thing he asked me was, `Are you ready to come home?'" Thomas, a New Jersey native, said. "I looked at him like he was crazy, and I said, `Of course.' The very next day, I get the call." ...

    The trade for Thomas inflated the Knicks' payroll from $91 million to $94 million. When factoring in the overall payout including the dollar-for-dollar luxury tax, the total charges run close to $135 million.

    TEMPERS FLARE

    That Vince Carter was injured last week while defended by Bruce Bowen hardly was a shock. The Spurs forward had a nifty takedown of the Raptors forward while with the Heat a few years back, and the two were called for dual technicals in first Spurs-Raptors meeting this season. This time, it was a severe ankle sprain for Carter. "The question was, was it an accident or was it on purpose?" Carter said. "It's not very often you see someone put their foot up under you like that." ...

    Whether or not Gary Payton tried to take a bite out of Golden State's Speedy Claxton during Wednesday's dust-up, the Lakers' O'Neal got his shot in, referring to 5-8 Eric Musselman as, "the little midget Warrior coach." ...

    With Kobe Bryant possibly headed elsewhere as a free agent this summer, O'Neal said he's not about to beg his Lakers teammate to stay. "If one wants to be here, then persuasion is not necessary," Shaq said. "I don't need my wife to come home and bring me flowers and be nice to me to get me to stay, because I already want to stay." He added, "Make sure you print that, so she reads that."

    NET-SCAPES

    Why life in the NBA is good, even when you don't ever hit the court: Cut by New Jersey before he ever suited up for a game (but not until after an ugly incident at a New Jersey hotel that had police involved), forward Eddie Griffin received $125,000 of his $371,000 contract as a parting settlement from the Nets. ...

    Ah, the humor of kid-coach Lawrence Frank of the Nets. The diminutive 33-year-old spent the All-Star break in Puerto Rico, growing a beard, of sorts. "I was trying to get into R-rated movies," he said.

    Ira Winderman can be reached at iwinderman@sun-sentinel.com. He can be heard this week on WQAM's Hank Goldberg Show at 5 p.m. Tuesday.

  • #2
    Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

    I liked the fact that Ron flew back home with his family.

    Him missing a practice isn't a big deal to me because he's likes to practice, so he doesn't miss them on purpose.

    Ron Artest is a basketball junkie to the extreme, but even before basketball he's a family man. Winderman could have brought that out with this blurb. Instead he called him pampered which I think is a cheap shot!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

      cheap shot for certain, the least "pampered" player i can think of with his background, just a wanna be writer trying to be a wanna be witty person, failing at all his attempts, there's a word for people that fail at everything they do


      :P


      So Long And Thanks For All The Fish.

      If you've done 6 impossible things today?
      Then why not have Breakfast at Milliways!

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

        sorry

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

          Typical writer painting with a broad stroke. I don't think Ronnie is pampered at all. He might be naive or he may not think things through as well as he should, but then saying that does not make a good article.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

            Typical writer painting with a broad stroke. I don't think Ronnie is pampered at all. He might be naive aor he may not think things through as well as he should, but then saying that does not make a good article.
            EVERY NBA player is pampered. Let's not kid ourselves here.

            With that said, I don't view this as a big insult. I think the writer was trying to make it out to be, but the fact is NBA players are spoiled and it's probably reasonable to assume most would forget you can't just walk up get a ticket and get to your seat on a normal flight like you do a personal plane.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

              Ron should not have been punished by the Pacers. Having to fly back with the wife and kids was punishment enough for missing the shoot-a-round. Glad I wasn't on that plane.

              Just kidding, I admire Ron for traveling with the family. Though I'd imagine the wife ordered it.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

                Ira = mediot
                This space for rent.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

                  Ira = mediot
                  I actually wrote the writer about his Artest comment. He replied. Here's what he had to say:

                  "No, I wrote about a single moment and responsibility. I have written
                  glowing pieces about Ron in the past -- from my work at this newspaper, to
                  contributions for Sporting News and Sports Illustrated".

                  Actually, I comment to these writers when I disagree with them. I almost always get nice responses. The only time I remember not getting an at least cordial response was Stephen A. Smith (not that I would expect anything else from him). Darren Rovell from ESPN.com was very, very nice-he wrote an article about Bob Knight that I gave him some insight and a source to go to for future Knight articles-again, very nice man.

                  I wrote to Smith about his condemning the Eastern Conference and he replied with this:

                  "You're not making sense. Consider the question that was asked.
                  Just because I feel the East is weak and nothing they do means anything at the end of it all, it doesn't take away from what has transpired already in the IMMEDIATE scope of things.

                  I don't see the difficulty in understanding that."

                  Basically he was saying the East was a waste of time but he's always talking about the East-and I was sticking up for the Eastern Conference (obviously a weaker conference but getting stronger all the time). I thought his tone or how I took the tone that he wrote was unprofessional-plus I don't like the guy anyway.
                  Two=the number 2
                  Too=means "also"
                  To=many definitions-also known as the one to use when the other 2 (two, too) do not apply.

                  Their=shows ownership-'it is their house'
                  They're=they are
                  There=many definitions-also known as the one to use when the other 2 (their, they're) do not apply

                  Sorry but it bugs me when these are used incorrectly when I read posts on PacersDigest.com.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

                    Ira = mediot
                    I actually wrote the writer about his Artest comment. He replied. Here's what he had to say:

                    "No, I wrote about a single moment and responsibility. I have written
                    glowing pieces about Ron in the past -- from my work at this newspaper, to
                    contributions for Sporting News and Sports Illustrated".
                    Glowing pieces about his game, maybe. But calling Ron Artest "pampered" seems rather uninformed to me. Two words: Best Buy.
                    This space for rent.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: NBA Columnist Ira Winderman takes cheapshot at Artest

                      i didn't read that paragraph as very critical of artest. more like pointing out that these nba guys could be so naive. different people read different things, i guess.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X