Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

  1. #1
    Chairman of the Boards 90'sNBARocked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Chicago, but Brooklyn/Naptown Raised!!
    Posts
    7,615

    Default Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

    http://blogs.1070thefan.com/2014/03/...source=twitter

    by Conrad Brunner

    Can we please just fast forward to the Eastern Conference Finals?

    That way, we can skip the rest of this nonsense and get down to the really important business, to the series everyone wants to see:

    Nets vs. Bulls.

    OK, OK, just being snarky there, not entirely serious. We all know what would make for a much more entertaining and compelling matchup:

    Raptors vs. Wizards.

    Seems like a joke but, given neither the Pacers nor the Heat have even loosely resembled championship contenders lately, previously unthinkable alternatives have worked their way onto the landscape.

    Yes, the Pacers have a four-game win streak and are the first in the East to 50 wins. But before you start hanging banners and ordering rings, consider: the streak was built against teams with a combined record of 77-191.

    Their last 11 wins, in fact, have come against sub-.500 teams. The Pacers haven’t beaten a team with a winning record since Portland on Feb. 7, losing all four tries since. This is not the first time I’ve mentioned this particular fact but it now gains increasing relevance, given the remaining schedule.

    Five of their next six games are against teams with winning records. The other, Wednesday in New York, is against a Knicks team that has won six in a row and is riding the wave of Phil Jackson’s return to save his old franchise.

    “This is the point in the season where we put everything aside and man-up,” said Paul George. “We’ve been fortunate to play sub-.500 teams. Now it’s coming around to playing the playoff-bound teams, the upper-echelon teams. We’ve got to man-up at this point.”

    Since the Pacers beat the Trail Blazers in early February, they have put together an 11-7 record. That’s good for sixth in the East in that span, tied with Charlotte.

    Excepting Atlanta, every other playoff contender in the conference has at least as good a record as the Pacers, and all have at least two victories over winning teams in that span.

    Chicago (13-5) has six, in fact, while the Nets (12-5) have five. Though much has been made of Miami’s recent slump to five losses in seven games, the Heat (10-6) has seven victories over winning teams in that span.

    Of the Pacers’ 15 remaining games, nine are on the road, and 10 are against teams currently in playoff position.

    If they are to dispel the popular, and increasingly credible, theory that they peaked in January, it’s time to shake this malaise once and for all.

    The offense has been disjointed, flat and generally painful to watch. This is inevitable when a system built on inside-out ball movement inverts and becomes increasingly dependent on one-on-one plays from its explosive but mistake-prone wings.

    The defense has been sporadic, lax in closing out to shooters, slow in reacting to the pick-and-roll, frequently unable to recover aggressively in transition.


    Though much of the criticism has been directed toward the bench, the reality is the starters have become the problem. In the last seven games, the once-dominant first unit has shot .436 overall, .333 from the 3-point line and been effectively neutralized (outscored by one point).

    In the last eight, the Pacers have been outscored by 48 points in the first quarter.

    Bench scoring has actually been on the rise, to 29.9 in the last seven games. Of course that could change if the MRI on Andrew Bynum’s swollen knee contains bad news.

    “We haven’t come out of the gates as strong but we’re showing resolve and we’re coming back and winning these games,” said Roy Hibbert, who has all-but disappeared offensively. “One of these nights we’re going to come out, do what we’re supposed to do and get a lead early.

    “It’s a grind right now. Everybody’s going through it. Some teams are peaking right now, some teams are getting by, some teams are losing a couple. I’d rather win.”

    The Pacers certainly aren’t peaking, but they are getting by. If they want to avoid losing more than a couple, they need to change their present course. Quickly.
    Thought this was a good article
    Last edited by BillS; 03-18-2014 at 09:14 PM. Reason: add author
    Sittin on top of the world!

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 90'sNBARocked For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Member ilive4sports's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sacramento, CA
    Posts
    6,876

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

    The thing is, the Pacers don't need to be more dependent on our wings to make one on one plays. Thats the problem, we are trying to make so many one on one plays. We need to throw the ball inside to West and Hibbert more. Play inside out again, keep the ball moving. Both Hibbert and West are pretty good at finding the cutter too.

  4. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ilive4sports For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Member CableKC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    San Jose, CA ( 1123, 6536, 5321 )
    Age
    42
    Posts
    25,274

    Sports Logo

    Default Re: Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

    Quote Originally Posted by Conrad Brunner
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    The offense has been disjointed, flat and generally painful to watch. This is inevitable when a system built on inside-out ball movement inverts and becomes increasingly dependent on one-on-one plays from its explosive but mistake-prone wings.

    The defense has been sporadic, lax in closing out to shooters, slow in reacting to the pick-and-roll, frequently unable to recover aggressively in transition.
    Brunner best articulates what many here ( and I myself is beginning to ) believe.

    On the Offensive end.....it's no longer Inside / Out....it's Outside / In ( but only if Hibbert is lucky enough to get the ball passed to them from the Outside ). I'm not suggesting that he doesn't get any touches.....I'm suggesting that I don't think that he is getting anywhere near the # of touches that they should be getting in a game ( I think he should be averaging at least 11 to 12 FGA a game...not the 8 to 9 FGA a game ). Where as the Defense doesn't seem as aggressive as it needs to be for the duration of the entire game.....only when the Team falls behind and/or let's the other Team catch up. The offense that is driven from the Wing Positions....specifically from PG24 and Lance....both of which are turnover prone....costs the Team points, leads and even ( against Playoff bound Teams ) a "Win".

    I admit that I am on the fence now.....leaning towards a concern that this Team is getting complacent and in a "malaise" ( as the OP Title suggests ). I don't like the way that the Team has been playing as of late....not in the sense that we should be blowing out far less talented Teams....but that the Team ( overall as a whole ) makes simple yet damaging but IMHO correctable mistakes.

    I WANT to believe that this Team will be able to find what it's missing now that it had in the beginning of the season.....but I'm not entirely sure that it can. I don't get the sense that we have hit rock bottom....but I'm more concerned that this Team is just too comfortable with the way that they have been playing as of late.....which IMHO is a bad thing.
    Last edited by CableKC; 03-19-2014 at 12:11 AM.
    Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

    This is David West, he is the Honey Badger, West just doesn't give a *****....he's pretty bad *ss cuz he has no regard for any other Player or Team whatsoever.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to CableKC For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    Member PR07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,973

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

    It's just been too much dribbling and iso-ball. As a general rule of thumb, you'd like to see a perimeter player make two dribbles (if he does dribble) and then either pass or drive. Our perimeter guys dribble too much. They hold the ball dribbling and not only does this allow the defense to get set and run down the shotclock (negating the possibility of a more oportunistic shot), but it also doesn't get teammates involved, most notably our big men. Our guys have got to learn to trust one another and make the extra pass, working the ball both inside and out.
    Last edited by PR07; 03-19-2014 at 10:46 AM. Reason: bc

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PR07 For This Useful Post:


  9. #5

    Default Re: Time running out for Pacers to shake malaise

    Quote Originally Posted by PR07 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    It's just been too much dribbling and iso-ball. As a general rule of thumb, you'd like to see a perimeter play make two dribbles (if he does dribble) and then either pass or drive. Our perimeter guys dribble too much. They hold the ball dribbling and not only does this allow the defense to get set and run down the shotclock (negating the possibility of a more oportunistic shot), but it also doesn't get teammates involved, most notably our big men. Our guys have got to learn to trust one another and make the extra pass, working the ball both inside and out.
    You, my friend, hit it squarely on the head.
    Also, Bynum has been a huge bright spot but now looks as if he is going to be out awhile. This is not good.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •