Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

    Originally posted by greyhound80 View Post
    Poor play for the last month is a LITTLE THING? Not trying to be a smart *** but what exactly is the big picture?
    Playoffs. Peaking at the right time. Losses like this can be good for a team. It might light a fire. They showed when they are locked in, that 5 man groupe can play soul crushing defense. That effort at the end of the game--that's what you will see in the playoffs.

    Comment


    • #92
      Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

      I was at the game. Tough loss, we should have gone for two for one with 30 seconds left. However, having Larry Bird sign my ticket made my night.

      Click image for larger version

Name:	1800432_10151953091454249_761444021_n.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	16.3 KB
ID:	3241242

      Comment


      • #93
        Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

        Originally posted by Heisenberg View Post
        Turner's going to **** me off a lot in his few months here
        I'm realizing that I still harbor some left-over resentment from his OSU days.

        Comment


        • #94
          Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

          I just don't see the offense for this team. I don't see what Frank gets them into except David West being better than his defensive matchup, and Paul George hero ball. This team will have to win on defense. That's nothing new. But if that's the case, then they'd better get back to playing it at a championship level. Mentally, they're not doing it. Too much cheating toward non-threats and abandoning the perimeter, too much inconsistent play from Hibbert protecting the rim of late. Make them beat you with long 2s. That's it. That's all there is.

          Comment


          • #95
            Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

            I just think they've misused Scola all year. Those pick and pop shots that he gets are a hair out of his range. I don't understand why we don't get him the ball deeper in the post and let him use his arsenal of old-man moves to score around the basket. When he gets the ball too far away from the hoop, he either shoots a jumper out of his ideal range or he tries to dribble by the defender, which usually ends up a turnover. Move Ian a little further away from the basket because let's face it: He isn't much of an offensive threat in the paint or from the mid-range (although I think his shot has good form and he can knock them down from the elbow on occasion).

            Comment


            • #96
              Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

              Originally posted by cdash View Post
              I just think they've misused Scola all year. Those pick and pop shots that he gets are a hair out of his range. I don't understand why we don't get him the ball deeper in the post and let him use his arsenal of old-man moves to score around the basket. When he gets the ball too far away from the hoop, he either shoots a jumper out of his ideal range or he tries to dribble by the defender, which usually ends up a turnover. Move Ian a little further away from the basket because let's face it: He isn't much of an offensive threat in the paint or from the mid-range (although I think his shot has good form and he can knock them down from the elbow on occasion).

              I feel like Luis isn't our only player that is misused. George Hill might even be a more prominent example.
              There is no NBA player named Monte Ellis.

              Comment


              • #97
                Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                I believe that fans get upset about losses because we all know that if recent trends, not microcosms or little things, continue, this team will end up with the #2 seed. AND this team probably cannot get to the Finals as the #2 seed. The Pacers are having a fantastic season. Still have the best record in the league. However, the starters have to play nearly perfectly in order to beat a good team. The bench has just been dismal. The defense has not been as focused since mid January. The offense gets away from its strengths WHICH IS PLAYING THROUGH DAVID! These are trends. This has been going on for too long for a team that aspires to be #1. It's OK for a team that wants to be really good. It isn't OK for a team that wants home court.

                Comment


                • #98
                  Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                  Originally posted by cdash View Post
                  Playoffs. Peaking at the right time. Losses like this can be good for a team. It might light a fire. They showed when they are locked in, that 5 man groupe can play soul crushing defense. That effort at the end of the game--that's what you will see in the playoffs.
                  I agree with you but if they don't get that fire, they're going to get caught. Miami has the best player in the world. Also, one of the top 10 players when healthy AND they have more shooters. The margin of error is small.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                    Originally posted by greyhound80 View Post
                    I believe that fans get upset about losses because we all know that if recent trends, not microcosms or little things, continue, this team will end up with the #2 seed. AND this team probably cannot get to the Finals as the #2 seed. The Pacers are having a fantastic season. Still have the best record in the league. However, the starters have to play nearly perfectly in order to beat a good team. The bench has just been dismal. The defense has not been as focused since mid January. The offense gets away from its strengths WHICH IS PLAYING THROUGH DAVID! These are trends. This has been going on for too long for a team that aspires to be #1. It's OK for a team that wants to be really good. It isn't OK for a team that wants home court.
                    I think that's where the difference in opinions about the team is, too. The majority of us who are not ridiculously upset over a loss like this don't believe we need the #1 seed to beat the Heat. It would definitely be beneficial, but we took Miami to 7 games last year with a team that was not as talented or mature as the one we have. The gains that both Lance Stephenson and Paul George have made are huge, and the added experience this team has of going 7 games against Miami certainly helps. While our bench has been inconsistent with their play, they are clearly an upgrade over what we brought to the playoffs last season. Scola, Turner and Watson are all capable of scoring in double figures on any given night. I felt that was something we completely lacked last year except for the occasional game by Hansbrough and maybe Augustin if he hit a few 3 point shots. I could type for a while about more reasons, but I think this team is clearly in a better position to beat Miami and they do not need the #1 seed to do it. I feel that the media has blown out of proportion our goal at the beginning of the year and it has given fans a false idea of what is necessary to have any chance at beating Miami. #1 seed or not, I feel very strongly we can beat Miami in a 7 game series with this group of players and coaches.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                      Originally posted by BenR1990 View Post
                      I think that's where the difference in opinions about the team is, too. The majority of us who are not ridiculously upset over a loss like this don't believe we need the #1 seed to beat the Heat. It would definitely be beneficial, but we took Miami to 7 games last year with a team that was not as talented or mature as the one we have. The gains that both Lance Stephenson and Paul George have made are huge, and the added experience this team has of going 7 games against Miami certainly helps. While our bench has been inconsistent with their play, they are clearly an upgrade over what we brought to the playoffs last season. Scola, Turner and Watson are all capable of scoring in double figures on any given night. I felt that was something we completely lacked last year except for the occasional game by Hansbrough and maybe Augustin if he hit a few 3 point shots. I could type for a while about more reasons, but I think this team is clearly in a better position to beat Miami and they do not need the #1 seed to do it. I feel that the media has blown out of proportion our goal at the beginning of the year and it has given fans a false idea of what is necessary to have any chance at beating Miami. #1 seed or not, I feel very strongly we can beat Miami in a 7 game series with this group of players and coaches.
                      Do you honestly see us taking 2 in Miami? Or winning all 3 at home. I don't see either of those happening.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                        Originally posted by Mad-Mad-Mario View Post
                        Do you honestly see us taking 2 in Miami? Or winning all 3 at home. I don't see either of those happening.
                        I'm very confident we could do either.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                          Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                          George Hill needs more opportunities to get some quality shots off. I'd play him with the bench more. Vogel is not utilizting his skill sets very well. Play him with Turner so that Turner then has somebody to kick it back out to for a 3pter.
                          I feel this is the one of the biggest issues with our offense right now. We are basically playing ISO ball (between Lance, PG, or West on the post) and utilizing Hill as a spot up 3pt shooter only. Hill should be running more pick & rolls/pops, etc.

                          I know there's only one ball to go around, but Vogel needs to get Hill more FGA.

                          Comment


                          • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                            Originally posted by BenR1990 View Post
                            I think that's where the difference in opinions about the team is, too. The majority of us who are not ridiculously upset over a loss like this don't believe we need the #1 seed to beat the Heat. It would definitely be beneficial, but we took Miami to 7 games last year with a team that was not as talented or mature as the one we have. The gains that both Lance Stephenson and Paul George have made are huge, and the added experience this team has of going 7 games against Miami certainly helps. While our bench has been inconsistent with their play, they are clearly an upgrade over what we brought to the playoffs last season. Scola, Turner and Watson are all capable of scoring in double figures on any given night. I felt that was something we completely lacked last year except for the occasional game by Hansbrough and maybe Augustin if he hit a few 3 point shots. I could type for a while about more reasons, but I think this team is clearly in a better position to beat Miami and they do not need the #1 seed to do it. I feel that the media has blown out of proportion our goal at the beginning of the year and it has given fans a false idea of what is necessary to have any chance at beating Miami. #1 seed or not, I feel very strongly we can beat Miami in a 7 game series with this group of players and coaches.
                            The team last year actually had a plan on offense. They played inside out. They controlled the tempo and forced teams to play at their pace. This year its let PG or Lance dribble around and force something, and all Vogel does is stand in the corner and talk about championship level passing.
                            Last edited by graphic-er; 03-05-2014, 12:55 AM.
                            You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                              Originally posted by BenR1990 View Post
                              I'm very confident we could do either.
                              And what exactly are you basing this on? Miami is a very good road team. In two playoffs series they have beaten us in Indiana 3 out of 6 games. And we have only won 2 out of 7 in Miami.

                              And this team is not significantly better than that team that played Miami last year in the playoffs.

                              Comment


                              • Re: Pacers / Warriors Post Game Thread - 3/4

                                Originally posted by Mad-Mad-Mario View Post
                                And what exactly are you basing this on? Miami is a very good road team. In two playoffs series they have beaten us in Indiana 3 out of 6 games. And we have only won 2 out of 7 in Miami.

                                And this team is not significantly better than that team that played Miami last year in the playoffs.
                                First, I couldn't care less what happened last year because it's completely irrelevant to what's happening now. Rosters have changed, players have progressed and developed, etc.

                                I also totally disagree with your notion that this year's team is not better than last year's team. I think that statement is ridiculously flawed in so many ways.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X