Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

    Originally posted by Pacerized View Post
    As simple as not getting him the ball when he was open. You can quote % all you want but if you want a scorer to have an impact off the bench you get him the shot attempts. Teaming Granger with Lance most of the time was a bad combination. Lance simply wouldn't pass him the ball. If we play Lance with Turner in the same manner, I expect the same results from Turner. We'll see in the next 10 games or so if it's the player or the system, or there is a thin chance that Vogel might change his rotations.
    I disagree that Granger's poor play as of late was a direct result of Lance not passing the ball. There's been numerous times that Danny would have the ball in his hands and make bad/missed shots and poor decisions. It's been pointed out before that he was hardly ever a good finisher at the rim, so you really can't rely on that faucet of his game; but now his shot has regressed. And I'm not sure what you're expecting, but I'm willing to bet that even if most of the plays were called for "give it to Danny", he'd only make himself look worse in our eyes.

    And I agree that Lance can be too selfish at times, but then I think about what he's working with on the floor with him. Granger and Scola have been horrible for the last month or so...Ian acts like he has concrete mittens on...and Watson is too inconsistant lately.

    Comment


    • #92
      Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

      Originally posted by pogi View Post
      I disagree that Granger's poor play as of late was a direct result of Lance not passing the ball. There's been numerous times that Danny would have the ball in his hands and make bad/missed shots and poor decisions. It's been pointed out before that he was hardly ever a good finisher at the rim, so you really can't rely on that faucet of his game; but now his shot has regressed. And I'm not sure what you're expecting, but I'm willing to bet that even if most of the plays were called for "give it to Danny", he'd only make himself look worse in our eyes.

      And I agree that Lance can be too selfish at times, but then I think about what he's working with on the floor with him. Granger and Scola have been horrible for the last month or so...Ian acts like he has concrete mittens on...and Watson is too inconsistant lately.
      We just disagree on what Granger is capable of. He's a scorer and needs shot attempts to do that. Yes there were times he didn't execute but far more times when he was wide open but Lance looked like he just refused to pass him the ball.
      Lance is a bad #1 option with the second unit which is why I'd like to see change in the rotation that keeps him away from the second unit as much as possible. It could be that Scola, Danny, and CJ were all the issue but let's see what happens when Turner comes in. I don't expect him to be any more successful unless Vogel changes the rotation and it sound like he plans to.
      Why do teams tank? Ask a Spurs fan.

      Comment


      • #93
        Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

        Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
        If it has suites it is new style to me. You youngsters get on my nerves. Have you ever been to Market Square Arena? Sometimes I forget how old I am.

        (Just joking around)
        Let's try talking about State Fairgrounds Coliseum !! Yes, I am old like Indygeezer only I think he is older.
        I would rather be the hammer than the nail

        Comment


        • #94
          Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

          Originally posted by Alabama-Redneck View Post
          Let's try talking about State Fairgrounds Coliseum !! Yes, I am old like Indygeezer only I think he is older.
          I saw the Pacers play at the Coliseum!





          It was a preseason game a few seasons ago, but still........
          PSN: MRat731 XBL: MRat0731

          Comment


          • #95
            Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

            Originally posted by Pacerized View Post
            We just disagree on what Granger is capable of. He's a scorer and needs shot attempts to do that. Yes there were times he didn't execute but far more times when he was wide open but Lance looked like he just refused to pass him the ball.
            Lance is a bad #1 option with the second unit which is why I'd like to see change in the rotation that keeps him away from the second unit as much as possible. It could be that Scola, Danny, and CJ were all the issue but let's see what happens when Turner comes in. I don't expect him to be any more successful unless Vogel changes the rotation and it sound like he plans to.
            Everybody has a right to their opinion. My opinion is that Granger was at his best with Lance feeding him. The numbers seem to show this. Lance is not selfish and has actually had to be pushed to look for his own shot the past year or two rather than look to pass first to his teammates.
            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

            Comment


            • #96
              Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

              Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
              I've now been to the bradley center twice. It is the worst sporting venue I've ever been in by a large margin. What a piece of crap.

              However, as I said before, they do have a ridiculously large courtside club. I wish the best locker room at BLF was the same size.

              Saw Bill Bradly briefly as we were walking out he was sitting down low a couple sections over, didn't get a chance to say hi. I was pretty inebriated through the whole game, some crazy *** 3 year old in a Lance Stephenson jersey spilled ice cream on my shoe. This kid was the embodiment of Lance, never calmed down the whole game and was constantly jumping around and screaming in his brother's face. One brother had on a PG jersey and the third had a brand new Danny Granger jersey, they were not from Indy and the kid pulls out his brand new DG 33 Home uni and a marker, broke my ****ing heart. I think he had just gotten it.

              I caught a little **** from Bucks fans, but not too much. Reminded me of when I saw the Colts in STL a few years back. We were just so much better and even their fans knew it. Most fans who spoke to me had a "Please don't hurt us too bad tonight" vibe. I got way more **** two years ago when I went up and MIL was a little more competitive, probably because I was on Larry Sanders the whole game last time. So much so that Roy gave me a thumbs up and said good job after that game.

              I still like MIL as a city, easy to navigate and generally cool people work in the establishments. I went to the Mo's before and after and was waited on by a waitress my age who was an IU grad going to Marquette for law school so that was cool. There's also a brand new Marriott in downtown that is really affordable and nice. A 10 minute walk from the Bradley Center. I recommend it if you go up there and are looking for a place to stay.

              I picked up courtside seats for 100 bucks. Gotta love having a team that crappy in driving distance.

              Also Herb kohl was there I think in a suit and a Bucks hat looking older than god. I also hate these owners that go half way on the fan thing. Either go all in, like a Cuban, or be like Simon and wear your suit and go full on professional, but you just look like a complete idiot wearing a suit and rocking a baseball hat.
              Yes that place is a complete **** hole. I sat next to John Hammonds when I went to a game there. I was making comments just to miss him off. It was one of the funniest things. I had two options say hey and try to talk him up or act like I didn't know who he was and make snarky comments about Drew Good and John Salmons all game. Of course I went with plan B. The looks he gave me were priceless.

              Comment


              • #97
                Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

                Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                I don't think I can consider an arena built in the 80s as a new style arena anymore UB LOL
                Obviously, theres a completely different situation with ownership and how the buildings were and are funded (otherwise KStat might kill me ), but I'd consider the Palace of Auburn Hills a new style arena without hesitation, despite the fact that it was built roughly the same time as the Bradley Center. The Pistons have done an outstanding job on keeping their building modernized as times have changed.
                "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                Comment


                • #98
                  Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

                  I guess Pacer fans really helped out the Bradley Center as that game had the largest attendance for the season.
                  You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

                    Originally posted by Sandman21 View Post
                    Obviously, theres a completely different situation with ownership and how the buildings were and are funded (otherwise KStat might kill me ), but I'd consider the Palace of Auburn Hills a new style arena without hesitation, despite the fact that it was built roughly the same time as the Bradley Center. The Pistons have done an outstanding job on keeping their building modernized as times have changed.

                    The Palace was really the first modern building. It actually might not have been the very first one but it was the one which all others were judged for many years. And going there about 10 years ago, I must say it is still really nice.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

                      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                      The Palace was really the first modern building. It actually might not have been the very first one but it was the one which all others were judged for many years. And going there about 10 years ago, I must say it is still really nice.
                      It was still really nice a year ago.

                      Originally posted by RWB View Post
                      I guess Pacer fans really helped out the Bradley Center as that game had the largest attendance for the season.
                      I'm honestly surprised about that, but its true. They could only draw 15k for the Bulls. We (and Coolio) brought in 17,165. Miami only plays there once this year.
                      Last edited by Sandman21; 02-25-2014, 03:44 PM.
                      "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                      "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                      Comment


                      • Re: Post-Game Thread: Pacers beat Bucks

                        The thing that's never made any sense to me about the BC in MIL is that they designed it more focused on Hockey for whatever reason. It leaves some really crappy seats. The thing I hate the most though is how low the concrete ceilings are in the concourse. You feel like you're in a prison.


                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X