Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

    I got my answer. This team sucks at passing the ball.

    Let me state it one more time. We rank 23rd in the league in A/T ratio
    http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/te...tTurnoverRatio

    Im no John Wooden but with the talent this team has on its roster this stat does not bode well for our chances at raising a Banner.


    not gonna walk around w my head up backside pretending this team is fine on the offensive side of the equation.

    23rd overall in assists to turnovers... yupp this team is A OK alright.

    Comment


    • #47
      Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

      Originally posted by PacersPride View Post
      I got my answer. This team sucks at passing the ball.

      Let me state it one more time. We rank 23rd in the league in A/T ratio
      http://espn.go.com/nba/statistics/te...tTurnoverRatio

      Im no John Wooden but with the talent this team has on its roster this stat does not bode well for our chances at raising a Banner.


      not gonna walk around w my head up backside pretending this team is fine on the offensive side of the equation.

      23rd overall in assists to turnovers... yupp this team is A OK alright.
      Well, it can't be that bad considering we are 39-10....

      Comment


      • #48
        Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

        Originally posted by BlueCollarColts View Post
        Well, it can't be that bad considering we are 39-10....
        Colts dominated the regular season for years. How many SuperBowls did that translate into. No one is saying the sky is falling.. made that abundantly clear in my OP. Was simply asking what the root of the issue is in regards to our offense at times stalling out.

        Unlike most stats, I find A/T ratio to be one of the very few to actually have some merit. Bird called the team out on the turnovers as well so its not like im pulling this crap outta left field or anytying.


        23rd in the nba at A/T. tied w OKC which is basically a one man iso team speaks volumes.

        Comment


        • #49
          Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

          Originally posted by PacersPride View Post
          No one is saying the sky is falling.. made that abundantly clear in my OP.
          If that is the case, I would highly recommend not using an expletive (or placeholder for one) and abstain from using all capitals on words in the thread title. I believe that is automatically going to rub people the wrong way before they even read the first post.

          Comment


          • #50
            Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

            As for the starters...

            Other then Paul throwing up bricks, offense looks the same to me.

            Really hasn't changed much from the last two years. Lance at a more consistent, higher level of play. DWest legs looking better. Overall chemistry is a little better.
            Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

            Comment


            • #51
              Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

              Originally posted by BenR1990 View Post
              If that is the case, I would highly recommend not using an expletive (or placeholder for one) and abstain from using all capitals on words in the thread title. I believe that is automatically going to rub people the wrong way before they even read the first post.
              well u shouldn't judge a book by its cover then.

              I love the f****** BnG. not gonna sugarcoat it and pretend the offense doesn't have issues it needs to improve on.

              Again, im not John Wooden but passing is about as fundamental as it gets. I find it hard to believe its the system when Coach Vogel emphatically emphasizes sharing the basketball.


              ** fyi - despite the Colts regular season dominance it was only when the defense (teams Achilles for years) got right did the team capitalize on its talent and win the Lombardi.
              Last edited by PacersPride; 02-09-2014, 03:28 PM.

              Comment


              • #52
                Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                Originally posted by PacersPride View Post
                well u shouldn't judge a book by its cover then.
                Like I said, it was just a suggestion. You can take it or leave it. I just believe that if you were looking to have a legitimate conversation about our offense, choosing a different title may have been helpful in achieving your goal.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                  Question: How many points does it take to win a basketball game ?

                  Answer: One more than the opponent.


                  Enough said.
                  I would rather be the hammer than the nail

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                    Seems like one of the main issues that could hold us back from winning a title should be okay to discuss. What's the problem?

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                      Originally posted by CJ Jones View Post
                      Seems like one of the main issues that could hold us back from winning a title should be okay to discuss. What's the problem?

                      Honestly, kinda beating a dead horse at this point. Yes?
                      Garbage players get 1st round picks, (WTF)! All of the NBA must hate the Pacers! LOL

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                        Originally posted by Cousy47 View Post
                        I don't believe we run plays the way the Coach designs them. This team is built to move the ball. We have speed in the back court, really good hands(except Ian) in the front court and pretty good passers at all positions. However our 2 main ball handlers, Lance and Paul spend too much time dribbling and then try to force the ball to the paint when they run out of time. IMO, we need to pass the ball a lot more than we dribble and we need to get into our plays much earlier in the clock. Especially when we are feeding Roy in the post, we should know that he has problems establishing and keeping position in the paint, making him wait and try to hold his position takes away too much of his scoring opportunities. Move the ball, move the defense, get open shots. Fixed.
                        Can I offer an alternative explanation? The players are running the plays that are called. But Frank is experimenting with the choices he has offensively to find out what things are most likely to work best come playoff time. The Pacers have 8 [or 9 counting Bynum] guys that can be a primary offensive option. But picking and choosing which of those options work best is taking some trial and error.

                        Both Paul and Lance are young. And as you correctly noted, they have a tendency to 'dance' with the ball instead of making the quick decisions that guys like David and Hill make. That, I'm assuming, is a factor of their age and experience. So they are getting a chance to run the offense thru them, with the stagnation that happens sometimes. But with this experience, their ability to run the offense during the playoffs will be improved. Their tendency to make stupid turnovers will go down with more experience. Or, if they do not get better at the things you posted about, their chances to run the offense during the playoffs will be reduced.

                        Danny, David, Hill, Roy, CJ, Andrew and Luis are basically finished products. Frank knows what they do and what they don't do. There is some learning curve with CJ and Luis because they are new guys, but still, there are not any real surprises about their games. They can be integrated into a playoff offense pretty much any time. But Lance and Paul are still blank slates for the most part. Both of them are carrying increased responsibilities offensively this year and Frank needs to let them play and see what they can do and what they cannot do.

                        Which leads me to Danny and now Bynum. Both coming off injuries. Both very skilled two way players. Both used to be capable of being the primary scoring option. Both transitioning to secondary roles, at least for now. The Pacers need to determine how healthy they are and what they are still able to do. That is going to take some experimenting also. The truth about their ability to contribute will be determined late in the season. To be a little hyperbolic, they could be either your best players or worst players in the rotation, depending on how their knee injuries heal or not. But the only way to find that out is to let them get some minutes and see what happens.

                        JMO, but I think the OP'ers point is more than anything else. The Pacers are a team trying to integrate two young guys, two new rotation guys and a couple of injured guys into a new offense. They are trying to find out what works best and what doesn't work that well. That takes some time. I expect as the season wears down, you will see less giving the ball to Lance or Paul and having them create and more PNR with West and Hill. Sometime having too many good players is in finding out what works best.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                          Originally posted by AesopRockOn View Post
                          I think you need to clarify this UB. We are in the bottom 37th percentile for offensive efficiency (because of those deficiencies) but there is nothing wrong with the offense? PP, you really should have made this a poll, because it would be eye-opening to see how many think we actually have a good offense.

                          And yes, we are not a good passing team overall, nor are our individual players good passers (excluding a select few for select stretches).

                          Lastly, for those who aren't worried (and also have high expectations), here is a list of NBA champions and their corresponding rank in offensive efficiency: Miami (1st) in 2013; Miami (6th) in 2012; Dallas (8th) in 2011; Lakers (11th) in 2010; Lakers (3rd) in 2009; Boston (5th) in 2008; San Antonio (5th) in 2007; Miami (7th) in 2006; San Antonio (8th) in 2005; Detroit (19th) in 2004; and San Antonio (11th) in 2003. Maybe we're the Pistons setting another historical precedent, but I don't know how many would take that bet.


                          Our offensive talent isn't the best. But I think we maximize what we have

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                            Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                            Our offensive talent isn't the best. But I think we maximize what we have
                            4 all star level players and George Hill... 3 former all star level players on the bench and its a talent issue we cannot pass the ball?

                            I get that Coach may be experimenting but the turnover issue has been present for two seasons + Bulls first round series exit.


                            Its slighty amusing some seem to believe 23 rd in the league assists to turnover is the best this team is capable of offensively. has nothing to do with fg attempts in a game or slow tempo offense. were not a very good passing team.


                            its a concensus theme from those who contributed more than 2c.


                            Got what I was looking for from the thread. Go Pacers!

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                              We can pass the ball just fine. It just comes down to execution.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Re: what the BLEEP is wrong with our OFFENSE?!?

                                Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
                                Our offensive talent isn't the best. But I think we maximize what we have
                                This is an interesting position that I'm not sure many have. I am with Hicks that I don't know what to do about it at this point. But if your idea UB is that the turnovers are built into the talent, I'm mostly in agreement though not sure the overall outcome is something that cannot be adjusted for. Considering our standing as the best defensive team, it seems like you are at peace with everything and just waiting for the chips to fall as they may. Very zen position that I am not quite at yet.
                                You Got The Tony!!!!!!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X