Results 1 to 25 of 112

Thread: Bill Nye totally crushes Phil Ham in creationism debate

Threaded View

  1. #1

    Default Bill Nye totally crushes Phil Ham in creationism debate

    It seemed to be a bad idea to even try, and it did raise a lot of money through ticket sales for the Fred Flintstone-really-rode-dinosuars Museum, but...

    even a creationist web site has a poll up as to who won the debate, and the latest results are


    92% Nye
    8% Ham

    http://www.christiantoday.com/articl...time/35688.htm

    debate summary & analysis links, some with video of the event:

    http://www.businessinsider.com/bill-nye-wins-creation-debate-against-ken-ham-2014-2


    http://www.newrepublic.com/article/1...n-science-wins

    http://www.nbcnews.com/science/scien...faceoff-n22076

    http://guardianlv.com/2014/02/bill-n...s-and-who-won/

    http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/...ye-and-ken-ham


    Ham's odd assertion that science has to be "observational" rather than " historical science based on belief" was hilarious. His claim: You can't tell how old the Earth is, 'cause we weren't there when it formed. You can't tell how fossils appeared in Grand Canyon rocks, 'cause we weren't there...


    Of course, science based on historical reconstruction, when done properly, is just as valid as science based on direct, real-time observation. As Nye pointed out, just looking up into the sky is a historical reconstruction.


    Everyone firmly believes many things that happened in the past that they didn't have a chance to observe. I'd ask Ken Ham "How do you know that Abraham Lincoln was President? After all, you never met him?" How do we know anything about Greek civilization, or that there were Ice Ages?"

    Of course Ham had no answers for the existence of ice cores with records of 680,000 winters (rather than 6,000) and the billions of stars that are over 6,000 light years away.

    Overall it was a good night for reason over superstition, for both non-believers and believers alike (the overwhelming majority of followers of every major religion worldwide, including Christianity, accepts the fundamental principles of evolution as established science)
    The poster "pacertom" since this forum began (and before!). I changed my name here to "Slick Pinkham" in honor of the imaginary player That Bobby "Slick" Leonard picked late in the 1971 ABA draft (true story!)

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slick Pinkham For This Useful Post:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •