Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

    Good read. I hope he gets into the HOF.

    http://www.indystar.com/story/sports...ction/4912209/

    Former Colts WR Marvin Harrison opens up on eve of Hall of Fame election

    By Mike Chappell, mike.chappell@indystar.com 9:19 a.m. EST January 26, 2014

    PHILADELPHIA – A winter storm was slowing the North Philadelphia neighborhood — Marvin Harrison's neighborhood — to a crawl with mounting snow, gusting winds and plunging temperatures.

    Parked cars on a side street leading to Girard Avenue already were buried under a heavy white blanket on this treacherous Tuesday. Traffic was sporadic and perilous.

    But FedEx was on the job.

    After leading a pair of mid-morning visitors in to the warmth of one of his business properties, Harrison walked over to the front door and picked up a special delivery package that had been slipped into the mail slot.

    It was from the Pro Football Hall of Fame, reconfirming his selection as one of the 15 modern-day candidates for the Class of 2014. The Indianapolis Colts' all-time leading receiver finds out Saturday whether his bust will be added in Canton, Ohio.

    Harrison occasionally nodded as he glanced at the letter.

    "I'm not going to lose any sleep over it, but it would be a great honor after everything you did on the field, everything you worked for," he said in an exclusive interview with The Star.

    Harrison paused. His eyes widened and he rubbed his hands together as he recalled one of many casual encounters with then-Colts president Bill Polian at the team's Northwestside complex.

    "Polian would pass me in the hall and say, 'Hey, what's going on Hall of Famer?' " Harrison said. "I was like, 'What's he talking about?' I'd keep on walking, shaking my head. It was after my eighth, ninth or 10th year and I didn't know what the Hall of Fame was all about.

    "He kept saying it. Then you start hearing about (the Hall of Fame) all the time and you start thinking maybe it can be a reality.

    "But it's not something I ever set out to do."

    Shown the way

    Harrison, 41, looks as if he could shed his red sweatshirt and jeans, pull on the pads and run circles around a defensive back even though he hasn't played since the 23-17 overtime loss to the San Diego Chargers in the 2008 postseason.

    He appears fit, close to his usual playing weight of about 180 pounds.

    Post-NFL agrees with him. The greatest aspect of retirement, he said, is "I don't have to be nowhere."

    Harrison spends time dabbling in one of his many business ventures — cars, real estate — and doting over 11-year old son Marvin Jr. He's helped coach his son's Little League teams.

    "They're trying and they're having fun, win or lose. Fun all the time," he said. "They listen to everything I say. I'm always joking with them. I'm kind of the coach (Tony) Dungy of the Little League."

    His aunt owns and operates Deborah's Kitchen, a block away on Girard Avenue, so there's always good food within reach. His grandmother, Lue Anna, retired after working more than three decades as a cook in the Philadelphia school system but helps out at the restaurant. His mother, Linda, worked two jobs to support her family. She also can be found at Deborah's Kitchen.

    "They all work," Harrison said. "They're all doing what they love to do: cook."

    Those close to Harrison work because they want to, not out of necessity after he earned approximately $70 million for 13 years of service with the Colts. He shrugged off the notion of buying a multi-million-dollar home or other luxuries athletes have purchased.

    "You can't over-live your means," he said. "The big house for $7 million? Nah. Don't need one. My grandmother has a nice home. My mom has a nice home, my two aunts. Everybody has a nice place to live.

    "That's what's important."

    Got it done, quietly

    Only Peyton Manning put up numbers as outlandish as Harrison in Indianapolis Colts history: 1,102 receptions, 14,580 yards, 128 touchdowns. All rank among the top-7 in NFL history. He's the only player in NFL history with eight consecutive seasons with at least 1,000 receiving yards and 10 touchdowns. He averaged 5.8 catches per game. Jerry Rice averaged 5.2.

    Yet no one seemed to go about his business on a quieter stage. For much of his career, Harrison focused on his craft. He only rarely opened up about his game or himself with the media.

    In a 2008 interview with the Philadelphia Inquirer, Dungy said he respected Harrison's privacy "because that's the way he wants it."

    "He was not a real out-going person," added long-time Colts offensive coordinator Tom Moore. "But I'll tell you this — he came to work every morning, brought his lunch pail and worked his tail off. When practices were over and the day was done, he went home."

    Aaron Moorehead, a Colts receiver from 2003-07 and currently the receivers coach at Virginia Tech, was Harrison's roommate for several summers at training camp in Terre Haute.

    Moorehead considers himself outgoing, but nearly met his match when paired with Harrison.

    "I didn't want to be a roommate with somebody for three weeks and having nothing to sit there and talk about. That's boring," Moorehead said. "I was one of those, 'Hey, how you doin' and how's your kid doin'?' guys. After a while, Marv would open up to me.

    "I loved that about him. He kept his personal life to himself as much as he could. That was just who he was."

    Teammate Edgerrin James occasionally tried to change who Harrison was. The Colts' career rushing leader was impressed with Harrison's elite skills, and urged his teammate to shout about it.

    "In practice he'd tell me, 'Man, if I were you I'd talk so much they'd all hate me,' " Harrison said, laughing.

    Harrison wrinkled his brow when asked about his sporadic interaction with the media, particularly late in his career.

    "I wouldn't call it private," he said. "Some people have big mouths, some people go about their lives quietly."

    That's still true. Not surprisingly, Harrison doesn't have Twitter or Facebook accounts.

    "Nothing. Nothing," he said. "I don't see the point in it. Call me and we can discuss whatever you want to discuss."

    One issue Harrison declined to discuss was an April 2008 shooting incident in the vicinity of his North Philly bar, Playmakers. One individual was shot in the hand and an infant injured by shattered glass. Although a gun owned by Harrison was used in the shooting and he was questioned, Harrison wasn't charged. The man who was shot was later gunned down but Harrison wasn't questioned about that shooting.

    Pursuit of perfection

    Harrison chased the impossible, first as a two-sport star at Philadelphia's Roman Catholic High School, then at Syracuse University, finally after the Colts selected him with the 19th overall pick in the 1996 draft.

    Gotta be perfect. Nothing less.

    "No one's ever perfect, but you've got to strive for it," he said.

    That was the foundation of Harrison's meticulous approach to practice.

    "Never, never, never missed practice," Manning said of his long-time pitch-and-catch partner. "He treated practice like a game: full speed."

    When it came time for offense vs. defense drills, Harrison insisted on running routes against a starting cornerback, not a backup or practice-squad player.

    "He didn't feel like he could improve by going against the practice squad ... thought it would be a waste of time," Manning said.

    Manning recalled delivering an incomplete pass during a Week 12 practice one season. Harrison stopped, stunned as the football skipped to the ground. He later informed Manning it was the first incompletion in one-on-one work since Week 2.

    "The fact he was keeping tabs on that, to me, was impressive," Manning said. "He did not want the ball to hit the ground. Ever."

    Practice was when Harrison honed his craft, lifted it to Hall of Fame-caliber status. That's when he became an exquisite route runner who routinely bedazzled cornerbacks.

    "When you ran a (specific) route, it had to be 15 yards," he said. "Not 16 and not 14. When I watched film, I might have been good, but I knew I could be better.

    "I knew how things were supposed to be. Perfect."

    Harrison recalled a practice-related conversation with Dungy.

    "I told coach Dungy in a joking way that, 'I'm the highest-paid practice player in the league. You pay me to practice. The games are on me,' " he said. "That was my motto. Who wouldn't want to play on Sunday?"

    A collector

    Safely stowed in a room at Harrison's Philadelphia home are some 130 footballs from his 190-game career with the Colts that serve as a timeline for his Hall of Fame candidacy. He has his first NFL touchdown catch from Manning — Sept. 6, 1998 against Miami —and the last, Dec. 7, 2008 against Cincinnati.

    At some point, the balls will be ripped apart and made into a sofa.

    "Haven't gotten around to it yet," Harrison said, smiling.

    Back at his business, another of Harrison's collections sits in an adjoining garage. Limited-edition pace cars from the Indianapolis 500 and Daytona 500 are neatly situated. There's a 1990 IROC-Z Camaro, the final year it was manufactured.

    "I've always been into cars. Always. You didn't know that?" he asked, running his hand along the shiny front quarter panel of a Corvette. "Everybody needs a hobby. Cars are my hobby."

    Harrison's eyes lit up as he pointed to a pair of limited-edition Buick Grand Nationals.

    "That one up there is a GNX. Now that car is the ultimate," he said. "They only made 471 on those."

    Harrison purchased the GNX from a collector in North Carolina, who had bought it from someone in Indianapolis. As it turned out, this particular Grand National was No. 88 off the assembly line. That was Harrison's jersey number.

    "Guess it was meant to be," he said.

    The routine seldom changes. After Harrison adds another car to his collection — he's hoping a Stingray leads this year's Indy 500 — he drives it for perhaps a week and 120 miles.

    "Then I park 'em," he said.

    At some point, the collection will be handed down to Marvin Jr.

    "He gets everything," Harrison said. "He just can't drive 'em."

    Perfect ending

    Harrison's NFL career ended Feb. 24, 2009 when the Colts, unable to convince him to accept a pay cut, terminated the final three years of his contract. Six weeks earlier, Dungy had retired.

    "It was time," Harrison said. "I had the perfect owner (Jim Irsay), the perfect team, one team my whole career, Dungy leaving, I played my one year in the new stadium (Lucas Oil) ...''

    He remains moved by his relationship with the fans in Indianapolis.

    "I don't think I was ever booed one time. I'm serious," he said. "I'm proud I was able to represent the city of Indianapolis and we won some games."

    Although he declined to identify them, a few teams showed an interest in signing him. Harrison was confident he still could be productive, but never gave extending his career serious consideration.

    "I didn't want to go cross-country and play again. I didn't want to go anywhere else," he said. "Some people don't know how to call it quits. They keep on going and going.

    "I was totally healthy. It was a perfect ending."

    Again, Harrison paused. His eyes brightened and he considered his collection of cars in the back room.

    "Had a great time and I was gone," he said, waving his right hand. "Got in my Corvette and went down the road."

    Call Star reporter Mike Chappell at (317) 444-6830. You can follow him on Twitter at @mchappell51.

  • #2
    Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

    I was wondering why Mike Chappell was in Philadelphia the other day since no Indiana team was in the area. Now I know why.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

      Marvin opening up for this interview tells me the HOF would really mean a lot to him.
      Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

      ------

      "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

      -John Wooden

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

        Originally posted by Bball View Post
        Marvin opening up for this interview tells me the HOF would really mean a lot to him.

        I agree. It would be a tremendous honor to be a first ballot Hall of Famer.

        I love how the Colts have had a great relationship with Harrison since he left. He seemed genuinely moved by his Ring of Honor ceremony back in 2011. Then he introduced the Fleener pick for us in 2012. Also, him and Edge were sitting in a team suite during the Broncos game this year.

        But yeah, it's a big deal that Chap went up there and scored this big interview with him. I've never seen him open up like that.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

          I love Marvin as a receiver... no question.

          What cracks me up is the contradictory nature of this interview. He's indicating that he wouldn't lose sleep over this, but he's opening up in an interview at the exact same time, when he's been notoriously anti-media all of his career.

          Also, the notion that he didn't know what the HOF was about. Come on, man, you knew what the HOF was about.
          There are two types of quarterbacks in the league: Those whom over time, the league figures out ... and those who figure out the league.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

            Originally posted by Kid Minneapolis View Post
            I love Marvin as a receiver... no question.

            What cracks me up is the contradictory nature of this interview. He's indicating that he wouldn't lose sleep over this, but he's opening up in an interview at the exact same time, when he's been notoriously anti-media all of his career.

            Also, the notion that he didn't know what the HOF was about. Come on, man, you knew what the HOF was about.
            Yeah, at times he seems to be trying to hard to create this image that he has created. The idea he did not know about it is just laughable.

            He was such a fantastic receiver for us and I hope he gets in, but there definitely is a different side to Marvin that he does not want to let people into that is for sure.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Marvin Harrison Indy Star interview

              I've probably told this story before so to those who've heard it I apologize but it is a glimpse how different Harrison is.

              It was the final day for a particular camp and there were several semis lined up around the facility to pick up weights, helmets, even the fridges that hold the gatorade. Of note, one out of place Jeep Cherokee was mucking/blocking the entire situation so people couldn't load. Happened to be Marvin's Jeep as he decided as soon as practice was over he was gone, gone, gone, and this was the closest exit from the building. Everyone else (coaches and players) would simply leave their vehicles at the halls or if really in the mood to get out of Dodge maybe closer to a parking lot near the Center. Shoot, if he could have parked inside the building next to the showers he probably would have tried.
              Last edited by RWB; 01-30-2014, 11:17 AM.
              You know how hippos are made out to be sweet and silly, like big cows, but are actually extremely dangerous and can kill you with stunning brutality? The Pacers are the NBA's hippos....Matt Moore CBS Sports....

              Comment

              Working...
              X