Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

    That, and the truth is that if they managed to really pin this problem down, the other, more subtle/nuanced issues the die hards can point to are not likely to cause them to lose in the playoffs, so keeping it simple in this case isn't really a bad thing.

    If we control our turnovers pretty well, barring new unforeseen serious issues, we will probably at least make the Finals.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

      Originally posted by Hicks View Post
      If we control our turnovers pretty well, barring new unforeseen serious issues, we will probably at least make the Finals.
      It's a combination of turnovers and executing offensively during crunch time in tight situations. That offensive meltdown in the fourth quarter in Miami last month is something that cannot happen if we are to eliminate them in the playoffs.

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

        Originally posted by Sollozzo View Post
        It's a combination of turnovers and executing offensively during crunch time in tight situations. That offensive meltdown in the fourth quarter in Miami last month is something that cannot happen if we are to eliminate them in the playoffs.
        This too. We actually took care of the ball that Miami game IIRC

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

          I'm more concerned about the offensive rebounding. Our Offensive Rebounding Rate is 20th in the league. We can nullify turnovers by creating extra possessions, but an inability to get offensive rebounds is setting ourselves up for failure. Last year we were 4th in offensive rebounding.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

            Originally posted by Hicks View Post
            It's obvious, sure, because it's clearly a big weakness.
            Sure the stat is obvious. But what isn't obvious is why to do commit turnovers? Our style of play on offense will always keep the Pacers from being at the top of the NBA for fewest turnovers. We try to pass the ball a lot. We try to have all 5 starters capable of initiating some of our offense. We don't have 1 player who dominates the ball.

            Honestly, the total number of tturnovers in and of itself doesn't bother me. What bothers me is what really good pressure defense does to our offense. We don't handle that well. That is IMO our biggest weakness. But of course that is in many ways related to turnovers, but it also causes us to work the shot clock down too far. And it just so happens the Heat when they are motivated play the best pressure defense in the NBA.

            Because in theory we could have a game where we commit 10 turnovers and be totally taken out of our offense and have a poor shooting %, and have to throw up a lot of bad shots with the shot clock winding down. So in other words as a coahc you don't/can't change your offense just to get fewer turnovers, that won't help. Turnovers are a result of type stat in the majority of cases. I mean sure there are careless turnovers, but that is probably 25% of our total
            Last edited by Unclebuck; 01-16-2014, 02:46 PM.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

              Originally posted by PacersHomer View Post
              I'm more concerned about the offensive rebounding. Our Offensive Rebounding Rate is 20th in the league. We can nullify turnovers by creating extra possessions, but an inability to get offensive rebounds is setting ourselves up for failure. Last year we were 4th in offensive rebounding.
              How much that have to do with the Pacers increase in FG%? Last year they had an offensive rebounding rate of 30.3%. This year it's 24.7%. Pacers last year averaged 13 offensive rebounds (12.9) while this year it's 10.4. Surely one or two a game is from hitting the first shot, instead of missing it, rebounding it, then scoring. They bump that up by 1.5 and they're back at 6th-7th.
              Last edited by Since86; 01-16-2014, 02:48 PM.
              Just because you're offended, doesn't mean you're right.” ― Ricky Gervais.

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                I'm alittle sour on Reggie Miller right now. Where was he for the Pacers before our Game 7 in the ECF? There has never been any mention of a Pep talk to the guys. Yet he made a very well known appearance for Mark Jackson's team after they won their first series.
                Just because Reggie didn't do a pep talk doesn't mean he hasn't been involved in playing a role with helping this team:

                http://blogs.pacers.com/2014/01/17/r...ith-new-stage/

                Hall-of-Famer Reggie Miller earned the typical loud cheers and standing ovations that he receives every time he’s back at Bankers Life Fieldhouse, as he was Thursday to serve as an analyst for TNT’s broadcast of the Pacers and New York Knicks.

                What we didn’t know, until postgame, was how much of an impact he’s had on Pacers’ budding superstar Paul George over the last nine months. George and Reggie Miller didn’t have a relationship until the 2012 playoffs, when they first connected.

                David Benner, the team’s director of media relations, reached out to Miller and set it up with the help of then team president, Donnie Walsh. Back when Miller was playing, Benner was known for bringing Miller a drink and then firing him up for each game by trash talking.

                Last season, George had to carry an unexpected burden as Danny Granger was sidelined for all but five games due to a knee injury. He struggled with it at first, as did the team, but then his game took giant leaps en route to being named the NBA’s Most Improved Player.

                Come playoff time, where he averaged just 9.7 points during the 2012 postseason, the Pacers needed George to reach even higher even further. Yes, togetherness is the team’s motto and any player can step up at any time, but championship-caliber teams also need a go-to guy.

                And that’s when Miller, who played every one of his 18 NBA seasons with the Pacers, began being of assistance to George. They exchanged a lot of text messages, and occasionally talked on the phone.

                “It was a new stage for me,” George said. “Going and being a star on the rise and handling the media pressure and just handling stepping on to another stage. He helped me with understanding and learning, and he taught me how to handle myself going through that situation.”

                That, and more, is why George went out of his way to walk across the court after the Pacers suffocated the New York Knicks, 117-89.

                “Reggie’s the man,” George said with a big smile. “You don’t let Reggie walk out of here without getting a hug from him. Reggie’s the one I’ve got the most respect for, someone I look up to.

                “It was good to thank him for that and let him know I’m behind him as much as he’s behind us.”


                Miller wasn’t made available to comment.

                Lance Stephenson, who posted a career-best 28 points against his hometown team, was the first to dash over to Miller following his postgame television interview.

                “You know I got to say what’s up,” said Stephenson. “He’s the man. I just said, ‘What’s up, how you doing.’ That was my first time actually meeting him in person. He just said he’s happy that I’m playing well right now.”

                George already has already topped Miller in some franchise records, like the most made 3-pointers in a game (9). Just 23-years-old, and an understanding that he’s going to be with this organization for the foreseeable future after signing a five-year extension in late September, George has other personal goals in mind.

                “I don’t want you guys to take this out of context, but he’s somebody that I look at and at the end of the day, I want to say I was the best Pacer to play here,” said George. “He set the bar high, he set the limits high and that’s just out of respect.

                “I feel like if I get to that point and the next up-and-coming guy is ready to take that, I’ll be all for it. I just want to challenge him for it and it’s another bar that I can set, and be happy to accomplish.”

                With George’s defensive play, which has coach Frank Vogel proclaiming him the best wing defender in the game, George finishing his career as the best player in franchise history is a real possibility. Look out, because when George sets out for something, he typically accomplishes it.
                "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                  Thanks for sharing that, Sandman. It should almost be in it's own thread.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                    When Bird speaks, you listen

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                      Originally posted by Sandman21 View Post
                      Just because Reggie didn't do a pep talk doesn't mean he hasn't been involved in playing a role with helping this team:

                      http://blogs.pacers.com/2014/01/17/r...ith-new-stage/
                      Biggest stage of their careers, a Game 7 ECF on the road, and the greatest Pacer of all time was in the arena. Don't you think it would have been a welcome visit by one of the great clutch performers in the history of the sport? Thats all I'm sayin.. Maybe they dont' come out and throw up on themselves that game and make it very competitive or even win? They were a deer in headlights.

                      To me it says more that guys like Lance Stephenson haven't met Reggie Miller before last night. Maybe thats on the young players for not reaching out until now. But in big time playoff game they aren't reaching out and asking for a Reggie Miller pep talk. Reggie Miller needed to show up and deliver one for them.
                      You can't get champagne from a garden hose.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                        Originally posted by BlueCollarColts View Post
                        When Bird speaks, you listen
                        I guess we listened pretty well last night
                        Forever struggling to convince myself "In Larry we trust"
                        Writer at NoseBleedSectionSports.com

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                          Originally posted by graphic-er View Post
                          Biggest stage of their careers, a Game 7 ECF on the road, and the greatest Pacer of all time was in the arena. Don't you think it would have been a welcome visit by one of the great clutch performers in the history of the sport? Thats all I'm sayin.. Maybe they dont' come out and throw up on themselves that game and make it very competitive or even win? They were a deer in headlights.

                          To me it says more that guys like Lance Stephenson haven't met Reggie Miller before last night. Maybe thats on the young players for not reaching out until now. But in big time playoff game they aren't reaching out and asking for a Reggie Miller pep talk. Reggie Miller needed to show up and deliver one for them.
                          Yeah, thats totally not awkward for the guy who will be on the broadcast crew for that particular game. If Reggie wasn't working the game that night, then I think he'd have done it if asked. Hell, how do we know that he didn't anyway?
                          "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                          "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Bird Warns Pacers about Turnovers

                            Can Bird make this "Turnovers will kill us" comment before the start of every game?
                            Ash from Army of Darkness: Good...Bad...I'm the guy with the gun.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X