Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

    I thought this was an interesting read (and a neat picture that has already been snapped up as an avatar, I see!). There is a fair amount of info about Frank's background that most of us already know. However, this is the first time I've heard of Frank saying he wants to be with the Pacers for life, and I did not realize he was on pace to pass Bird and Leonard in the win column this season. There are a few other nuggets of interest strewn throughout.

    http://www.nuvo.net/indianapolis/the...1#.UshnGfRDuSp

    The Pacers' Coach Frank Vogel



    The Indiana Pacers' most anticipated season in at least a decade was about to dawn, and Frank Vogel thought he had a gem.

    When he met the media before the Pacers faced Orlando on Oct. 29 in Bankers Life Fieldhouse, Vogel anticipated a question about expectations and was prepared when it came.

    "It's like when you see a great movie and the sequel comes out," he said, "you want to see how it plays out after that."

    After a brief moment of awkward silence, one of the reporters pointed out, more often than not, sequels suck.

    Rather than being put off by the effrontery, as would so many others in his profession, Vogel laughed and launched a discussion about sequels good and bad, deciding he hoped this season was more like Toy Story 2 than Caddyshack II.

    "I'll chalk that up as a bad analogy," he said.

    It was not the type of relaxed dialogue you would expect before a game from a professional head coach, a profession that spawns God complexes capable of humbling an actual deity.

    That type of self-importance simply is not for a guy who laughed the night fans of the movie Old Schoolstarted chanting "Frank the Tank" in his, um, honor.

    Vogel isn't interested in being a legend. He just wants to be a coach.

    Thing is, he's on his way to both.
    Vogel at work,
    Michelle Craig

    In Vogel's third season, the Pacers are in rare air, poised to contend for what would be the franchise's first NBA championship.

    Coach Slick Leonard hung three banners during the ABA years, but lasted just four losing seasons in the NBA. Larry Brown got the team to the Eastern Conference Finals for the first time in 1994 and went back again the next year, but didn't take the next step. After two more years ended on that same precipice, Larry Bird's third season as coach was the breakthrough as the Pacers reached the NBA Finals in 2000, only to lose to the Lakers in six games.

    What happened since has been well-documented and threatened the franchise's future. Just when Rick Carlisle thought he had a team in position to contend, a spectator named John Green lobbed a drink at Ron Artest one November night in The Palace of Auburn Hills, all hell broke loose and the Pacers became pariahs.

    It took patience, discipline and a series of shrewd moves, most orchestrated by Bird after he moved from the bench to the front office, but now the Pacers are all the way back. The team is winning, the headlines are positive and the seats are full.

    Maybe the shrewdest move of all was the most unlikely: Bird's decision to replace seasoned but vitriolic head coach Jim O'Brien with his protégé, an inexperienced but enthusiastic young assistant named Vogel, midway through the 2010-11 season.

    "In this business, when things go bad you start getting calls from agents representing coaches, and they say, 'I hope it doesn't happen, but if it does, my client would be interested,'" Bird said, reflecting on the move. "I had a number of those guys and there were some pretty good ones.

    "I asked Jimmy O'Brien and he said 'For the long run, Frank's going to be an excellent coach, but obviously he has no experience yet.' So I called Herb [Simon, the franchise owner] up and said 'I'm going to hire this kid. I'm going to give him a chance.' Nobody gets chances in this league, but they should."

    At the time, Vogel appeared to be the most interim of coaches. Now, at only 40 years old and still the third youngest coach in the NBA, he is on the verge of not only joining the Pacers coaching legends who have preceded him, but surpassing them. He is on course to move beyond Leonard (142 NBA wins) and Bird (147) on the Pacers' franchise list this season. If he follows up with one more successful season, Vogel could pass Carlisle (181) and Brown (190) to become the winningest coach in the franchise's NBA history.


    Michelle Craig

    With the Pacers in the midst of winning their first nine games, by far the best start in franchise history, they prepared to play host to the Chicago Bulls, one of their chief rivals in the battle to dethrone the mighty Miami Heat. Mike Dunleavy, now a member of the Bulls but a former Pacers player from the O'Brien era, was asked by a reporter from The Chicago Tribune about Vogel and referred to him as "one of the premier coaches in the league."

    When told of this comment, Vogel was genuinely flummoxed. His face flushed as he searched for a response.

    "I'm an aspiring young coach," he said.

    Always has been.

    Growing up in Wildwood Crest, N.J., a small vacation town on the Jersey Shore, real life was far different than that portrayed on the MTV series. His father published a local real-estate guide, his mom worked the reception desk at Wildwood High during the school year and waited tables at one of the tourist joints in the summer.

    "It was a complete working-class background," Vogel said. "We had enough to be happy but not a lot in excess."

    Frank played soccer and basketball but was not even close to a star athlete. His chief moment of celebrity came in 1986 when, as a 13-year-old, he appeared on the "Stupid Human Tricks" segment of David Letterman's show. His talent was spinning a basketball on one end of a toothbrush while brushing his teeth with the other.

    Fifteen minutes of fame? More like 30 seconds.

    "I was the least recruited of the starting five on our basketball team," he said. "I was never the man, the guy. I was just always a humble part of it, just part of the team, but I was a point guard, a captain, a leader, a lead-by-example type of guy, make sure you're touching all the other guys, keeping everybody else working as hard as you're working."

    He wound up at Juniata Collage, a Division III (non-scholarship) program in Huntingdon, Pa., starting at point guard for the Eagles. He was like hundreds of other guys, playing out the string at the lowest level of the game, majoring in biology, looking at a future as a high school teacher and coach.

    And then he met Rick Pitino, and everything changed.

    After his freshman season at Juniata, Vogel attended the Five-Star basketball camp and took the opportunity to introduce himself to Pitino, then the head coach at the University of Kentucky. After a brief conversation, Pitino gave Vogel the standard brushoff line, "Gimme a call if there's anything I can do for you."

    Vogel took it literally. He packed his bags, left Juniata and drove to Lexington, Ky., with no promise – or even prospect – of a job. In fact, he had been told in no uncertain terms he wouldn't even qualify as a student manager because the Wildcats preferred in-state applicants.
    They told him he could hang around the gym if he wanted, and so he did. Constantly.

    "My whole approach with them wasn't asking for something but showing that I can give them something," he said. "And I believed that I could."

    After a couple of weeks of constant presence and no movement on the job front, Vogel
    turned to Pitino's top assistant. Jim O'Brien — yes, that Jim O'Brien —- decided he could use some help and got Pitino's approval for a two-week trial period for Vogel.

    "That's all I needed," Vogel said.

    After finishing out his senior season as a student manager, Vogel became Kentucky's video coordinator. When Pitino left to become head coach of the Celtics, he took Vogel along in that same role. When O'Brien succeeded Pitino in Boston, he made Vogel an assistant coach.

    The happy kid with the basketball, the toothbrush and the dream was on his way.
    The Pacers had just played one of those games where they seemed to sleepwalk through the first half, only to come out and utterly dominate the second, this time against Toronto. It has become their modus operandi, a difficult trend for Vogel to explain. This time, when the subject arises in the postgame media briefing, he smiles and says, "I give great halftime speeches that make them want to run through walls."

    After the chuckles subside, he delves into his usual explanation, that the best players spend more time together on the floor when the game is in the balance, so naturally the team performs at a higher level.

    In Vogel's world, it always is about the players. It is the bedrock of what makes him an unassumingly brilliant coach.

    Do not be deceived, though. He is not a man without ego; quite the contrary. Nor is he a man without temper. The thing about Vogel is he understands both and has them firmly in control.
    Vogel with Paul George,
    Michelle Craig

    "I don't think he's an anomaly from the standpoint of not having an ego," said Mark Boyle, who in his 25 years as the radio voice of the Pacers team has worked with every significant coach in the franchise's history. "I think he might be an anomaly from the standpoint of managing it and disguising it better than other guys. You can't succeed without it and he's succeeding, so he must have it, but he doesn't demonstrate it, at least not typically."

    He idolizes Pitino and reveres O'Brien, yet Vogel could not be more different. He has not aspired to be like them, but rather to take facets of their personalities and synthesize them into his own.

    "They were good for me from the standpoint they're not like me," Vogel said. "I learned a lot of their style and what was necessary to have command in your voice and command of your team. But I would be remiss if I tried to do this outside of my own personality. I took a lot of what made them great and added it to what I do and came in here to be myself."

    Consider the very genesis of his career as a head coach. Here he was, stepping in for his mentor, a coaching father figure.

    The first decision Vogel made was to basically throw out everything O'Brien had installed and do it his way. On the fly, during the season.

    A team built around up-tempo offense and 3-point shooting would suddenly shift its focus inside. Center Roy Hibbert, a player who wilted under O'Brien's tough-love approach, would become the focal point of both the offense and the defense.

    Vogel introduced a new term to the team: smash-mouth basketball.

    He also changed the culture, emphasizing positive reinforcement. Instead of dictating to the players what they were expected to do and berating them if they fell short, he told them what he thought they could do and encouraged them to strive.

    It was so crazy, it worked. Ten games under .500 when he stepped in, the Pacers wound up making the playoffs in 2011, losing to the Bulls in a lively first-round series. The following year they won their first playoff series in nearly a decade but were overmatched by the Heat in the second round. The steady progression continued last year when they advanced to the conference finals and played Miami on nearly even terms before falling agonizingly short in Game 7.

    There aren't many rungs left on the ladder for this happy team and its smiling coach. If they continue the climb this year, they may reach the pinnacle.

    "You can be positive, but when players mess up they've got to know it's not right. They've got to be held accountable," said Bird. "You can be very positive in a lot of situations, but when it comes time to get down on a guy, you've got to tell him, you've got to do it in front of the guys, you've got to be consistent and players react to that.

    "I like positivity. It makes you feel better. I like to go to practice and not hear the screaming. But when he needs to do it, he does it. The thing about Frank, he doesn't linger on the bad. He gets right to the positives and how he wants it done and he expects results. It's a good feeling. It really is."
    Michelle Craig

    Behind closed doors, however, another side of his personality sometimes emerges. He isn't all smiles, pats on the back and slaps on the butt.

    "He'll get mad and cuss," said veteran power forward David West. "He'll go Andrew Dice Clay on you, man."

    Seriously?

    Turns out there are teeth behind that smile.

    "It's like sitting in second-grade math class at a Catholic school and all of a sudden the nuns are dropping f-bombs," said assistant coach Dan Burke, who has worked with all kinds in his 17 years with the Pacers. "There are a lot of guys in the league with the middle name 'f-bomb.'

    "When he gets going, it's good stuff. Most of the time it's pregame or halftime when he's amped up. He comes in highly charged and the guys feed off it."

    When Bird is asked about this side of Vogel, he couldn't help but smile.

    "They always say when you're a head coach you get three times a year when you can go crazy. Any more than that, the players just laugh at you," he said. "I think Frank knows when the right time is and it's not staged. He really gets mad and the players sense that."

    They know, even when out of character, Vogel isn't playing games.

    The head coach's office is an assemblage of the things that make Vogel atypical for his world. Where you would expect to see trophies draped with cut-down nets, instead you see a huge photo collage of his wife and daughters. The big whiteboard on the wall, the place coaches normally fill with play diagrams and strategic bullet points, instead has doodles of small animals.

    They are the work of daughters Alexa and Arianna, who visit dad after home games.
    He also has a framed photo of his first Pacers team and a couple of motivational images, including one of former Pacer Jeff Foster appearing to decapitate an opposing guard above the caption, "No layups!"

    Somewhere in a drawer there are bound to be volumes of statistics, cases filled with DVDs of game and individual player breakdowns, books authored by great coaches and, quite possibly, great generals.

    Aren't there?

    Maybe so, but Vogel does not see himself as some Patton-like figure, destined for greatness, fulfilling some mythic destiny. You know the type.

    He still sees himself as the player none of the big schools wanted, the kid who had to pester his way into Pitino's inner circle, the man who seems driven every single day to prove he belongs.

    "I was always hungry because I never was the guy at any point — manager at Kentucky, video guy, assistant coach, fifth-best player on your high school team," Vogel said. "Here I am, still just a piece."

    More like a piece of work, as they might say back in Wildwood Crest.

    Vogel is the right man at the right time with the right team. His style might not translate as well with a group of more veteran, more jaded players, but with this group, it fits perfectly.
    He knows basketball almost as well as he knows himself. And therein lies the true secret to Frank Vogel's success. He isn't trying to be anyone other than Frank Vogel. He doesn't want to coach any other team than the Indiana Pacers.

    "I love the game, I love to compete and I want to be great at what I do," he said. "Besides my family, coaching is what I'm most passionate about. I don't want just to be a coach. I want to be the Pacers' coach forever."

    After a moment, a well-timed pause, he flashes those pearly whites one more time.

    "Billy Joel has a line: I won't be here in another year if I don't stay on the charts," Vogel said. "Gotta keep winning."

    Now there's an analogy that works.

    Last edited by gummy; 01-04-2014, 03:13 PM.
    "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

    "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

    "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

  • #2
    Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

    Lots of really good things have happened to our Pacers over the past few seasons, it's not just one thing for sure.

    But if I had to pick the single most significant thing about turning our franchise around I would choose the day that Frank Vogel became our head coach.

    He is the perfect mixture of personality, knowledge, passion, planning and tactics all rolled into a humble person who understands today's players.

    Other coach's could have gotten probably similar results but I'm going to go forward and say that no coach could have gotten better results.

    He literally is the perfect coach for our team.


    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

      He's a young Popovich and that bodes well for our future. I hope he has the same tenure. We are likely to be very good for a very long time.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

        I hate motivational posters with an unmotivated passion, but if they all had pictures of Jeff Foster on them, I might have to reconsider.
        You Got The Tony!!!!!!

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

          I love Frank's pre-game video even while he's assistant coach. One thing I really noticed was his emphasis on defense way back then. Glad he's currently doing it "his way", not Jim's way

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

            Originally posted by Peck View Post
            Lots of really good things have happened to our Pacers over the past few seasons, it's not just one thing for sure.

            But if I had to pick the single most significant thing about turning our franchise around I would choose the day that Frank Vogel became our head coach.

            He is the perfect mixture of personality, knowledge, passion, planning and tactics all rolled into a humble person who understands today's players.

            Other coach's could have gotten probably similar results but I'm going to go forward and say that no coach could have gotten better results.

            He literally is the perfect coach for our team.

            2011 was just a fantastic year for the Pacers. We got rid of O'Brien, made Vogel the coach, and added two outstanding veteran play makers in West and Hill.

            I think that Vogel will be one of those rare NBA coaches who stays with the same team for a long time. I mean he has already been the coach for three years now. He could definitely hit 10+ years with the way things are going. It's just one of those matches made in heaven.

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

              I think Vogel could go if our luck takes a sour turn (with health, free agents, etc.) and in turn the team struggles, but even then I'm not convinced he would be fired or quit, either. He could be a long-time guy.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

                Originally posted by Hicks View Post
                I think Vogel could go if our luck takes a sour turn (with health, free agents, etc.) and in turn the team struggles, but even then I'm not convinced he would be fired or quit, either. He could be a long-time guy.
                If he's given as much rope as Jim O'Brien, Vogel might be here until he retires. They might even bury the man at half court.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Conrad Brunner Piece on Frank Vogel

                  Originally posted by AesopRockOn View Post
                  I hate motivational posters with an unmotivated passion, but if they all had pictures of Jeff Foster on them, I might have to reconsider.
                  Or Dale Davis.
                  "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                  "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X