Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

SI Article on Jermaine O'Neal: What Would You Do?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SI Article on Jermaine O'Neal: What Would You Do?

    Great article.

    http://premium.si.cnn.com/pr/subs/si...131/index.html

    What Would You Do?



    That's what Indiana's Jermaine O'Neal asks those who rip him for his actions during the brawl in Detroit. His detractors would be wise not to judge him too quickly.



    By S.L. Price

    Jermaine O'Neal has a question. He finds himself asking it often these days, because even two months later the brawl remains the defining moment of this NBA season and legal proceedings continue and, well, the question has a way of disarming those inclined to criticize. "What would you do?" the Indiana Pacers' forward says, and anyone inquiring about that night has to stop then and at least pretend to think -- especially after O'Neal is quick to acknowledge that he was wrong for slugging a fan in the face. "I'll take my punishment with open arms," he says. "And I hate that for the rest of my life, when they look back at the worst suspensions ever, my name will come up. I hate that." So, yes, O'Neal feels remorse. But he also asks you to put yourself in his place.

    He knows: It's hard to imagine being on court in The Palace of Auburn Hills on Nov. 19, when a basketball game turned into a riot. Video footage showed everything but what it felt like. Two of O'Neal's teammates, Ron Artest and Stephen Jackson, responded to a hurled beer cup by going into the stands, punching and getting punched, before belligerent Detroit Pistons supporters stormed the court. Artest swung at one, and then O'Neal saw his teammate, Anthony Johnson, on the ground. He ran over and floored someone named Charlie Haddad with a right hand while Haddad's arms were pinned by security guards; at the moment of impact O'Neal slid onto his butt like a newborn colt hitting a patch of ice. Making for the tunnel, he was the target of curses, beer, popcorn and a folding chair.

    "There's 12 of us with Pacers jerseys on, against thousands," says the 26-year-old O'Neal. "If you listen to some of those 911 calls? People were afraid, right along with us. I don't think enough people actually sat back and said, 'What would I do?'"

    By the time he finishes, the question has done its job: You find yourself uncertain and shake your head in better-you-than-me sympathy. It becomes easier to focus on more concrete matters, like the fact that, since returning from his 15-game suspension on Christmas Day, the 6'11" O'Neal has played the best ball of his nine-year career, keeping Indiana in the playoff chase and returning his name to the Most Valuable Player short list. Or the fact that, while his panicky cheap shot is often served up as another reason to dismiss NBA players as thugs, an arbitrator reduced O'Neal's sentence from 25 games because of his record of "character, community involvement and citizenship." Or that, even after suspensions wrecked the Pacers' title hopes, his teammates, coaches and bosses describe O'Neal in terms normally applied to a church deacon. "We're lucky to have him here," says coach Rick Carlisle. "He's one of the kindest, most generous star players I've ever been around."

    Besides, the brawl is only the latest dizzying turn O'Neal's life has taken. His father abandoned the family before Jermaine was born, then showed up to get acquainted when his son became a teenage star in Columbia, S.C. Shortly before his career-making senior year at Eau Claire High, O'Neal had to cope with a dubious statutory rape charge. Two years ago O'Neal walked into his mother's Indianapolis condo and found his stepfather, Abraham Kennedy, lying on a bed after he'd shot himself in the temple.

    O'Neal can smell the gunpowder from that March evening still. He normally didn't like his mother's suitors, but he was close to Kennedy, who'd married Angela Jones three years earlier; O'Neal even got him a job working security at Conseco Fieldhouse. Just moments after dropping Angela at home, O'Neal answered his cellphone, heard his mother's faint voice and the word shot: He U-turned across four lanes and raced back. O'Neal walked into a guest room and found Kennedy's body, twitching. The bullet had torn through his head. "We're talking about blood everywhere, major blood, membranes, his head swollen," O'Neal says. "It was so bad, I walked in and had to turn around and look out the door right away and ask God just to help me."

    O'Neal steeled himself and went back in. There was an open Bible on the bed. He stood next to his stepfather and took his hand. Kennedy couldn't speak. All O'Neal could think was: Keep him awake. "He was breathing real hard and looking at me like he was sorry, like he had made a mistake," O'Neal says. "I told him he was going to be O.K., and every time he closed his eyes and his breathing slowed, I just told him to wake up."

    After 15 minutes the paramedics arrived. At the hospital the doctor told O'Neal and his mother to make funeral plans. Jermaine pressed him for an option, and the doctor described a procedure, highly risky, that could save Kennedy, or kill him, or leave him a vegetable. Angela was too distraught to respond. Suddenly, the decision was on O'Neal.

    He looked at the doctor. "What would you do?" he said.

    "Do you want the chain off?" Jermaine O'Neal asks, preparing to pose. He starts to remove the silver rope, complete with a diamond-studded crucifix the size of a hood ornament, from around his neck.

    "No," says Judy Klipsch, vice chairman of Klipsch Audio Technologies. "I want the chain. Because that's you."

    The photographer lines up the shot. Klipsch flits about, trying to keep things loose. It's not necessary: O'Neal is nothing if not cooperative. He can smile on command or twist his baby face into a menacing scowl that, along with his braided hair and inked-up arms, would work for the cover of a rap album. O'Neal is aware of the power of that menacing image; just a few days before he had sat in front of his locker and said that the outcry after the brawl was largely due to the predominance of African-Americans in the NBA. "I hear people saying our league is too hip-hoppish,'" O'Neal said. "That doesn't sit well. Tell me what that means. I have plenty of tattoos, but I love my family. I believe in living my life the right way because I have a daughter and she looks up to me, and I have fans who look up to me.

    "The baseball player breaking a lady's nose with a chair because [her husband] was talking -- they didn't talk about that for weeks, did they? Every day for six weeks, you'd see something on TV about us -- but they didn't talk about the hockey player trying to kill his agent. Kill his agent. But these are people who are not black. It's totally unfair for this league to be judged off this one incident. I saw some tapes in court, hockey players flattening people [in the stands], but you don't hear, 'This guy listens to heavy metal music, or rock and roll music; he's a bad guy.'"

    This afternoon, though, O'Neal doesn't have to worry. When Klipsch Audio, a company based in heartland Indianapolis, signed up O'Neal last summer to serve as a national spokesman, it wasn't interested in a buttoned-down shill. "We're trying to get away from that old stereotype," says marketing coordinator Tom Meyer-Klipsch, who wanted to reach the under-30 crowd, white, black and every other color under the sun, and saw O'Neal's edgy persona as a plus. "Now that we're out in Best Buy and mass- merchant retail, Jermaine's face is the one we want out there." After the brawl Klipsch never made a sound about backing away from O'Neal. Part of their resolve was based on the old saw about any publicity being good publicity. But it didn't hurt that Judy lives across the street from O'Neal, and that Tom and Jermaine spent New Year's together. It took time, but they got to know O'Neal.

    "I've seen a lot of maturity in Jermaine in the last year and a half," says Larry Bird, who took over as head of basketball operations in July 2003. "He got engaged. He's family oriented. He's done everything we've asked him to do. What people saw on TV that one night? That's not Jermaine O'Neal. He's totally different."

    Bird isn't just talking about O'Neal's longstanding devotion to fiancée Lamesha Roper and to their five-year-old daughter, Asjia. He's talking about how, since guard Reggie Miller began telling him three years ago that the Pacers would go only as far as he would lead them, O'Neal has shouldered more and more responsibility, assuming blame for losses, thanking his teammates for wins -- and, in the locker room, blistering them for poor effort. O'Neal was the one who confronted Artest after his early-season request for time off to promote a CD threatened to disrupt the team. He also served as the players' point man in discussing Artest's behavior with management just days before the brawl.

    "It's my team," O'Neal says. "If I've got something to say, I'm going to say it. Ronnie knows that last year I was his personal p.r. guy pushing him for the All-Star Game, for defensive player of the year. When people work hard, come to the gym and do what they're supposed to do, I'm there for them. But as soon as you start stepping toward the fine line you shouldn't cross, I'm going to say something every single time."

    The idea of O'Neal as sheriff has its ironies. He had spent two months in the fall of 1995 dangling while the Columbia district attorney's office mulled whether to prosecute a rape case against him after O'Neal, then 17, was discovered in bed with his 15-year- old girlfriend. The girl insisted it was consensual, but her father pressed charges; in South Carolina it was a felony for anyone 16 or older to have sex with someone younger than 16. If convicted, O'Neal faced up to 20 years in prison. After a whirl of negative, statewide publicity and calls from some parents for his suspension from the basketball team, the D.A. finally declined to prosecute, instead referring him to a program that would allow him to expunge the charge from his record.

    The situation humiliated him, but he never hid from it. When the story broke in Columbia, O'Neal had been set to run a race for his school's cross-country team. His basketball coach and mentor, George Glymph, told him to skip it; he could avoid the cameras and questions by not showing up. "I'm going," O'Neal told Glymph. "If I don't go, they're going to be all over you. You've been with me, I'll be with you."

    The Portland Trail Blazers drafted O'Neal 17th out of high school. Back in Columbia after his rookie year, O'Neal verbally clashed with a mall security guard, was charged with disorderly conduct and missed an appearance before a magistrate. Sentenced to 100 hours of community service, he found himself picking up garbage and digging ditches under the July sun. But when his bosses suggested letting him go after he'd served only half his time, O'Neal insisted on finishing up. "They shouldn't have arrested me," he says. "They were totally wrong, but that's [the sentence I got], and I was going to serve it. I had to deal with it. I've always got to be able to deal with it."

    His mother worked two jobs when he was young, and they lived in Section 8 housing. His older brother, Clifford, worked a night job in high school and would give Jermaine the paycheck and tell him to buy the sneakers he wanted so bad. Since he was 18, O'Neal has been supporting his family. He bought his mother and grandmother houses, an aunt a car; he gave Clifford $1 million a few years ago. He's never seen it as a burden. "What I go through is only temporary," O'Neal says. "For every bad day, there's going to be three good days. My mother always said that, and I truly believe it. I've taken my bumps and bruises, but you've got to be willing to get knocked down and pick yourself up. You can't get discouraged. You can't lose sight of what your goals are. I know I'm a good person. I know I can play basketball."

    O'Neal is not bitter, he says, about the brawl, the arrest, his lack of playing time during four seasons in Portland. He will readily criticize the judge or commissioner David Stern for the penalties they imposed, and he will say that he cares what people think of him, but he does so with an odd lightness, as if nothing anyone says can touch his sense of himself. "I'm not a killer," O'Neal says. "I'm not a beastly guy. Everybody goes through situations where they got to say, 'Man, I wish that didn't happen.' But does that make you a bad person?"

    Abraham Kennedy lived. O'Neal gave the go-ahead for surgery; Kennedy went under the knife. The good news ends there. The bullet took part of Kennedy's brain and all memory of the day. He can't say why he tried to kill himself; sometimes he doesn't believe it happened. Afterward, Angela collapsed and lost 20 pounds within a week, and the marriage crumbled. Within a year the two were divorced.

    After Kennedy's surgery, O'Neal spent the first night sleepless, scared his stepfather would die, scared his mother would die, too. She seemed better the next day, but Indiana management made it clear that O'Neal should take as much time off as he needed. The Pacers boarded a plane for a four-game road trip to the West Coast. They were in their seats when O'Neal came walking across the tarmac, carrying his bag. "My teammates need me," he told one coach when he arrived. He could feel their eyes on him. He would lift his head, and everyone would look away. "I just felt ... obligated," O'Neal says. "I'm obligated to my team, I'm obligated to my family, and it's something I can't ever turn my back on. No matter what."

    O'Neal played his first game at Golden State, washing away tears with the sweat: He couldn't stop thinking about all he'd seen. In the months that followed, his appetite all but disappeared. Each night he'd wake every few hours with a start. Each morning his sheets were soaked with sweat. It didn't matter. That April he was the Eastern Conference's player of the month.

    So, really, it's no shock to hear that, during his recent suspension, O'Neal would call Carlisle during halftime to suggest adjustments or to have him instruct certain players to drink more water. It's no shock to see O'Neal, who finished third in the MVP balloting last year, come back from this season's suspension looking to shoulder even more responsibility. With Artest, Indiana's leading scorer, suspended for the season and Jackson banned for a 30-game stretch that ends this Wednesday, O'Neal knew he'd have to produce even more. He poured in 55 points against the Milwaukee Bucks, the most in the league this season. He scored 35 and buried the winning free throws in the Pacers' first-ever win in Memphis. At week's end he had averaged 29.0 points and 9.4 rebounds in the 14 games since his return. "He's been unbelievable," Miller says.

    "Running, dunking, making defensive plays -- he's the real deal," says Orlando Magic forward Grant Hill. "As long as he's out there, they have a chance to beat anybody."

    But the Pacers can lose to anybody, too. They may have beaten the Heat in Miami and the Rockets in Houston earlier this month, but they also lost to the lowly New Orleans Hornets. The night after O'Neal's monster game against the high-flying Phoenix Suns -- 29 points, 12 rebounds and six blocks -- Indiana spent the whole game chasing the very beatable Magic at home. O'Neal finished with 38 points and 15 boards but had already missed five free throws when, with 58 seconds left and the Pacers down by three, he stood doubled over between the key and midcourt, waiting to take two more. Come on, he urged himself. Big players make big shots. He went to the line and missed again. Indiana lost by one.

    In the crowd, a fan wore a FREE RON ARTEST T-shirt, but O'Neal didn't complain about the Pacers being shorthanded. Because no matter how tough things get, no matter how painful his troubles, O'Neal is sure that it only makes him stronger.

    "It's hard," he says. "But I can never say it's too much, because back when I was in Portland I didn't have enough. And I know that when I walk away from the game, people are going to say, 'He was one of the best.' Right now there's not a whole lot teams can do to slow me down; you've got to hope I'm hurt or having a bad shooting night. If I keep learning on the run like I'm learning now, it's going to be impossible to stop me."

    Issue date: January 31, 2005

  • #2
    Re: SI Article on Jermaine O'Neal: What Would You Do?

    That is good. Hard to believe he's been here so long and I didn't know about that stuff from high school.

    OT, for you college kids looking at stereo systems, I highly recommend Klipsch speakers. When you grow up and have real money and more refined tastes, there are better ways to go. But if you care about loud speakers with range that will impress people but not cost an arm and a leg, they're definitely the ticket.
    Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: SI Article on Jermaine O'Neal: What Would You Do?

      Wow, that is a great article. I had no idea about the rape thing.

      Bumping this because it's a great article.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: SI Article on Jermaine O'Neal: What Would You Do?

        Great article
        Super Bowl XLI Champions
        2000 Eastern Conference Champions




        Comment

        Working...
        X