Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

    Sorry about the formating.

    http://proxy.espn.go.com/nba/columns...had&id=1976521

    Trading Artest: Risk and Reward
    By Chad Ford
    ESPN Insider
    Chat with Chad Ford at 1 p.m. ET today!
    The Pacers’ expectations at the start of the season were pretty straightforward.
    Win an NBA Championship. ... or bust.
    “The Pistons are the champs and you respect what they have accomplished,” Pacers GM Larry Bird told Insider in October. “But we can compete with them. In fact, we can compete with them better than we did last year. To be the champs, you have to beat the champs. I think we’ve got as good a shot as anyone.”
    That feeling only swelled when the Pacers traveled to Detroit on November 19 and destroyed the Pistons on their own home floor.
    “When we played Detroit up there, we beat them easily,” team president Donnie Walsh told Insider. “We did it without two of our starters (Reggie Miller and Jeff Foster). I think it was at that point that we felt like we were serious, serious contenders.”
    But minutes before the final buzzer sounded, disaster struck both team’s seasons. The brawl in Auburn Hills, Mich. will go down as one of the ugliest incidents in the history of the NBA. The Pacers suffered the brunt of the aftershocks, losing Jermaine O’Neal for 15 games, Stephen Jackson for 30 games and Ron Artest for the season.
    After seeing their team decimated by huge suspensions in the wake of the incident, the goals of the franchise changed dramatically. Championship aspirations were shelved. The Pacers simply wanted to survive. “We had this incident, it was terrible for us and the league, and we got the suspensions,” Walsh told Insider this week. “Our immediate goal was to survive this and win as many games as we can. We felt if we could stay around .500, we’d really have a shot once guys started coming back.” Mission accomplished. On Wednesday in Boston, Jackson returned to the fold with the Pacers clinging to a 20-19 record and an eighth Eastern Conference playoff seed. After the loss to the Celtics, they’re just three games behind the Pistons in the Central Division standings and 4½ games away from a No. 2 seed in the playoffs.
    On Thursday night, the Pacers play host to the Pistons for their third meeting of the season. Now that O’Neal and Jackson are back, do the Pacers have enough firepower, sans Artest, to still win it all?
    If the answer is no, will Walsh and Bird succumb to the urge to trade Artest for a player who might make the difference between an early playoff exit and the NBA Finals?
    Still contenders?
    Despite the loss of Artest, the Pacers still have a number of reasons to believe that they’re still as good as the Pistons and Heat this season. To begin, one of the Pacers starters blossomed with O’Neal, Jackson and Artest in street clothes.
    Point guard Jamaal Tinsley has evolved from a good basketball player into an all-star caliber point guard this season. The Pacers signed Tinsley to a sixyear, $40 million extension this summer that is beginning to look like a year, $40 million extension this summer that is beginning to look like a serious steal.
    Tinsley remains one of the best floor
    generals in the NBA, but he is no longer
    just a pass-only point guard. He’s
    dramatically improved his outside
    jumper over the course of the past few
    years and is no longer afraid to use it.
    Teams can no longer sag on him on the
    offensive end. His 17.3 ppg average this
    season is dramatically better than his
    career-high of 9.6 ppg during his rookie
    year. His scoring output should decline now that O’Neal and Jackson are
    back, but he should remain an effective weapon in the Pacers’ offensive
    attack.
    Tinsley has also evolved into one of the best defensive point guards in the league. He uses his strength,
    quick hands and great instincts to shut down opposing point guards. This season, he ranks third in the
    league in steals. But that’s not the total story. As stats guru John Hollinger pointed out in this year’s Pro
    Basketball Forecast, Tinsley’s impact goes beyond steals. According to a complicated set of formulas
    Hollinger has assembled tracking individual defensive matchups, Tinsley led all NBA point guards in
    defensive efficiency last season. Judging from what we’ve seen this year, he’s doing it again.
    “Jamaal has really kept us together during all of this,” said Walsh. “He’s really grown as a player. He really
    makes our team run smoothly. I think people really have under rated just how good he really is.”
    Second, the Pacers have, arguably, the best bench in the East. That’s partly why they were able to survive
    without O’Neal, Jackson and Artest for so long.
    “We have a lot of depth,” Bird said. “Over the course of an 82-game season, that gets more important to
    you. Injuries are going to happen. Sometimes it’s just a matter of outlasting your opponent.”
    Their bench has improved. Seldom used prior to the Motown Melee, reserves Fred Jones, Austin Croshere,
    James Jones and rookie David Harrison were thrust into prime- time roles after the suspensions and
    responded with impressive numbers.
    Now that they’re back in supporting roles, they have more experience to step up when called upon.
    “I think those guys have really grown as basketball players because of this,” Walsh said. “In the past,
    we’ve always believed we had a deep bench but they weren’t really tested. Now that they’ve been out
    there, and won games for us, I think Rick [Carlisle] knows that he can lean on them now.”
    Third, the Pacers might be the most motivated team in the league right now. Jackson and O’Neal are on fire about what happened and can’t wait to take it out on their opponents. ... on the court.
    “I’m so happy I’m back I want to scream,” Jackson said on Tuesday. “We’ve got a sense of urgency right now. We want to get some momentum going now, and then be rolling when we come out of the All-Star break.”
    Jackson says he has a lot of emotions he’s ready to
    release after sitting at home and watching his team
    struggle without him.
    could have made one play to help determine the outcome, or at least pat somebody on the butt, that really
    destroyed me.”
    Jackson is now vowing to not only lift the offense, but also to take over Artest’s role as the team’s
    defensive leader.
    “If anybody has to play on both ends of the court, it’s me,” he said. “Not having our defensive stopper in
    Ron, I’m willing to take on that challenge. I did it in San Antonio and I did it in Atlanta. I’m willing to do it
    here. I’m going to try to do everything on the court.”
    Jackson’s debut in Boston Wednesday night was a mixed bag. He scored 17 points but shot just 6-for-18
    from the field in a loss to the Celtics. Jackson’s legs gave out in the third quarter, and he missed 12 of his
    last 15 shots. Obviously, it’s going to take a while for him to get his wind back, but in the long run, his
    return will mean a lot to Indiana.
    Finally, the Pacers’ stiffest competition, the Pistons and Heat, have their fair share of weaknesses.
    The Pistons have not been playing with the competitive fire that they did last year. They’ve been in some
    sort of malaise all season. They seem to be as snakebit as the Pacers were about the whole brawl. Over
    the past few weeks, head coach Larry Brown has been complaining about the team’s effort and just this
    weekend, Ben Wallace, the poster child for effort in the league, shot back at Brown, telling him to lay off.
    weekend, Ben Wallace, the poster child for effort in the league, shot back at Brown, telling him to lay off.
    While the addition of Carlos Arroyo should bolster the Pistons’ backcourt, the team still has enough depth
    issues to make them vulnerable. If they catch lightning in a bottle again this spring, they probably will be
    too tough for the Pacers to beat. But if the Pistons continue to tread water, the Pacers can take them even
    without Artest.
    The Heat got off to a fantastic start but have had their own fair share of problems lately. While Shaquille
    O’Neal and Dwyane Wade might be more dominant than any player on either the Pistons’ or Pacers’ roster,
    the rest of the team has serious issues.
    After a great start, Damon Jones has hit a serious wall. Eddie Jones has been up and down all season.
    Udonis Haslem has played well, but he’s a role player. The fact that the Heat signed Qyntel Woods on
    Wednesday shows you how desperate they are. The bottom line is that in a seven-game series, the Heat
    probably need to add a player or two, and stay injury-free, if they’re going to the Finals.
    With all of that said, the Pacers remain realistic about the speed bumps they now face if they’re going to
    win a title.
    “The suspension changed everything,” Walsh said. “We’ll be a good team. Ronnie is a very good player.
    You can’t say we’re as good without him as with him.”
    “Still, we’ll be competitive. Real competitive.”
    Pistons president Joe Dumars agrees.
    “I still think the Pacers are a force to be reckoned with,” Dumars told Insider. “Stephen Jackson and
    Jermaine O’Neal give them enough power to compete with anyone in the league.”
    Trade Artest?
    While the Pacers still are clearly in the playoff hunt, there are as many questions as there are answers.
    Without Artest going out and shutting down their
    opponents’ best player, can the team be as good
    defensively as they need to be?
    Artest was also their second-most important offensive player. Can Jackson, Tinsley and their bench players pick up the slack?
    Can the Pacers come together in the middle of the
    season? Despite the passion, it’s not as easy as it
    seems.
    Do those question marks ever tempt the Pacers into
    trading Artest for a player who could come in and
    immediately improve the Pacers chances of winning a title this season?
    “We’re not going to do it,” Walsh said. “Not at the trade deadline, anyway.”
    “We’re not going to panic. If you look toward where this team will go, ...sooner or later all of our players
    are coming back including Ronnie. The average age of our team is 25 years old and all of our key players
    are on long-term contracts. We have to keep that in mind.”
    The Pacers are certainly inclined to be patient. But the truth is, the lack of quality offers for Artest has
    made that stance an easy one to adopt.
    Walsh’s position on the topic softens a bit when the question is posed a different way. What if someone
    offered the Pacers a really good player for Artest?
    “If we got offered a very, very good player, maybe that would be different,” Walsh said. “A team would
    have to offer us a top 10 to 15 player for us to trade Ron. We’re not getting those type of offers.”
    The Pacers probably won’t. Most of the teams that were interested in Artest wanted him on the cheap, or
    wanted to stick the Pacers with a big contract in return.
    But are the Pacers demands unrealistic? No one disputes Artest’s talent. But he’s proven – on multiple
    occasions – that he lacks judgment. His inability to control himself threw a serious monkey wrench into the
    Pacers’ season. Can they really trust Artest to come back next season and be a different person?
    To put it more succinctly, aren’t the Pacers worried that Artest could burn them again?
    “You can’t say ‘no’ to that question,” Walsh told Insider. “Ronnie’s had some incidents. I believe he’s made
    improvements. He’s really tried to stay out of trouble the last year. He knows now that he can’t do
    anything more or it’s over.
    “At the same time, we all have to acknowledge that he’s going to be looked at and baited, so we have to look at it.” If that sounds like a lukewarm endorsement of Artest, it isn’t meant to be. Everyone in the organization seems to have a genuine affection for him.
    But the Pacers know that there are serious risks involved with keeping Artest. They also know that letting him leave without proper compensation might alter dramatically the team’s chances to win a title. Balancing the two competing concerns might be the most difficult task that Walsh and Bird endure. One Western Conference executive, who didn’t want to be named, empathizes.
    “I’m not sure what I’d do in their situation. I don’t think there is a team in the league that doesn’t want
    what Artest brings to the basketball court,” the executive said. “I also don’t think there is a team in the
    league that wouldn’t be frightened by all of the other stuff that Artest brings to the table. The Pacers are
    really damned if they do, damned if they don’t.”
    The Pacers’ window is pretty large. They’re young and their players keep getting better. But the East is
    getting better, too.
    Miami is better. The Cavaliers are getting a lot better. The Magic and Wizards are improved. Generally, this
    season is a down year in the East. Soon, though, top-to-bottom competition is going to get much tougher.
    Do you risk it all, right now, for a better chance to win it all? Or are you patient, and trust that Artest
    finally has learned his lesson?
    The Pacers have until February 24, the trading deadline, to make up their minds. Given the stellar track
    record of that Pacers front office, it will be tough to second-guess them no matter what they decide.
    Chad Ford covers the NBA for ESPN Insider.

  • #2
    Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

    “We’re not going to do it,” Walsh said. “Not at the trade deadline, anyway.”

    Very interesting statement.
    You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
    All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

    - Jimmy Buffett

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

      Also, I really agree with this:

      The Pacers are really damned if they do, damned if they don’t.”
      You're caught up in the Internet / you think it's such a great asset / but you're wrong, wrong, wrong
      All that fiber optic gear / still cannot take away the fear / like an island song

      - Jimmy Buffett

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

        Pretty good article by Ford in my opinion. His last statement sort of sums it up for me.

        (Given the stellar track record of that Pacers front office, it will be tough to second-guess them no matter what they decide.)

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

          I don't think the Pacers should trade Artest. This year's team never got a chance because of the brawl. It's unfortunate, because IMO if there's no brawl they're right there with San Antonio. I think Walsh is right when he says to be patient (it's his history anyway). The Pacers need to compete as best they can this season (and they're still very dangerous), and then next year go with a 9 man rotation of Tinsley, Jackson, Artest, Jermaine, Foster starting with Johnson, Fred Jones, Croshere, and Harrison off the bench. That brings up some questions:

          1. Reggie. He should play a Chris Mullin circa 2000 role. If he can accept that, fine. If he can't, retire and move to the front office. That may be a little blunt.

          2. Backup PG. The biggest weakness. Maybe try to package Bender for a point guard, or sign someone like Damon Stoudamire. But it's good when that's your biggest weakness.

          3. The others. I wouldn't count on Bender at all. I'd shop him, but treat him like the Magic treated Grant Hill if he's still with the Pacers. Anything you get is a plus. Keep Pollard because of the Shaq factor and the extra big man factor. I think James Jones will sign somewhere else where he can play consistently.

          4. Artest. He's always a question mark. It's been repeated ad nauseam around here.

          But I don't think you do something drastic if you're the Pacers. This year's team never got a chance. But they will next season, and they'll be a favorite.

          But that's just an outsider's opinion.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

            I think that is a great article. The quote by the "western conf GM was interesting.

            Don't want to take this thread in this direction, becaue there are more important things to discuss, but I still don't think Tinsley is that good of a one-on-one defender. Yes he has great hands, and is very strong. Tinsley is good in off the ball and if he gets near a loose ball he always comes up with it.


            back on topic. Anyone, from Bob Kravitz to the most ardent Artest supporter who thinks it is an easy decision to trade Ron or not to trade Ron is either not being truthful or are just plain wrong. Even I know there is a huge risk in keeping Ron. Trading Ron is a safer move, but making a bad trade will harm the franchise for the next 10 years.

            When you trade a player as good as Ron and make a bad trade the franchise often does not recover for 10 years. League history bears this out

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

              Tinsley led all NBA point guards in
              defensive efficiency last season.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                Good points, UB.

                The part about Jamaal having such a defensive impact last year is bull. That's Rick's system. Jamaal is never gonna be a lock down guy. He's got good hands and gets the steals, but it's now looking like he's more likely to outscore his opponent than hold him down.
                Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                  Originally posted by Unclebuck

                  When you trade a player as good as Ron and make a bad trade the franchise often does not recover for 10 years. League history bears this out
                  (Paraphrasing) Walsh said the Pacer's aren't going to trade Artest by the trade deadline this year, so if it happens it will only happen in the summer.

                  Artest is hard to trade anyway. He's a top ten player making 5-6 million a year. Trading him even up for another top player is almost impossible.

                  What might happen this summer is they trade him for a player and a high draft pick. Otherwise I think he will be here next year.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                    Originally posted by Kegboy
                    . . . it's now looking like he's more likely to outscore his opponent than hold him down.
                    Good point! He neutralized Wade when we player Miami. They both scored 30 points.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                      Originally posted by Unclebuck
                      I think that is a great article. The quote by the "western conf GM was interesting.

                      Don't want to take this thread in this direction, becaue there are more important things to discuss, but I still don't think Tinsley is that good of a one-on-one defender. Yes he has great hands, and is very strong. Tinsley is good in off the ball and if he gets near a loose ball he always comes up with it.


                      back on topic. Anyone, from Bob Kravitz to the most ardent Artest supporter who thinks it is an easy decision to trade Ron or not to trade Ron is either not being truthful or are just plain wrong. Even I know there is a huge risk in keeping Ron. Trading Ron is a safer move, but making a bad trade will harm the franchise for the next 10 years.

                      When you trade a player as good as Ron and make a bad trade the franchise often does not recover for 10 years. League history bears this out
                      I too think this is a fabulous article. It speaks to many of the questions that we've posed as to what management thinks about the situation.
                      There's just no easy answer, though I agree that the lack of quality offers has made it much easier to consider keeping him on.
                      The emergence of Jamaal and getting Jackson, Harrisons potential, AND having an another MVP in Jermaine LIKELY make our situation trading Artest less risky than most teams trading a top 15 player. NOt to mention that we would trading him for non-basketball reasons, not because we WANT to.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                        Where was all this Chad Ford love when Mark Cuban was calling him an "idiot" like yesterday?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                          Originally posted by Fool
                          Where was all this Chad Ford love when Mark Cuban was calling him an "idiot" like yesterday?

                          What's the saying, "Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn once in a while."

                          Ford is pretty good . . . when he checks his facts.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                            DO NOT TRADE RON!!!

                            Next year's starting line-up:

                            C - Harrison
                            PF - JO
                            SF - Ronnie
                            SG - SJax
                            PG - Tins

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Trading Artest: Risk and Reward Chad Ford Insider ESPN.com

                              Originally posted by btownpacer
                              Notice how Ford actually has a real life conversation with an NBA GM in this one?

                              I wonder if he read Cuban's rant..........
                              Or if Cuban ever actually reads article like this.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X