Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

    http://www.indystar.com/articles/8/025639-4458-116.html

    Mark Montieth: Pacers Q&A
    Indianapolis Star sports reporter Mark Montieth answers your questions about the Pacers.

    January 25, 2005

    Question: As a Pacers fan it's been hard to watch some of the games this season. The Wizards game jumps to mind, maybe because it was the most recent. It's obvious to me that we miss Ron Artest's D the most. I think in the long run getting all these players playing time is good, but a lot of people were all over Derrick McKey for not scoring, but in Game 6 against the Bulls who did we put on Michael Jordan? We don't have a defender that can turn his man into Casper the Ghost and it's killing us.

    I hope all the people that want Artest gone notice this. Stephen Jackson coming back will be great, but (and this is my question to you) do you think the Pacers can win a championship without Ron Artest? (Keith from New Palestine, Ind.)

    Answer: I agree with your point. Defenders are always overlooked until a team starts losing, and then their value becomes obvious. The Pacers miss Artest greatly on both ends. Jackson can pick up the offensive slack and part of the defensive slack, but he's not the defender Artest is. I believe the Pacers can reach the conference finals if they are otherwise healthy this season, and perhaps reach the Finals with a few breaks. But I can't see them winning a championship without Artest.



    Question: Question 1: When I watched the game against Washington and Jamison Brewer got the last shot, during the replay it was clear that there should have been more time on the clock, .9 seconds in my estimation. Why wasn't this pursued by the Pacers staff on the floor?

    There was no way Jermaine O'Neal should have come down with the ball on that last-(.4) second shot that was blocked. It should have been a catch and shoot (Derrick Fisher like!)

    Question 2: Now that Ron Artest has been cleared to practice, what precautions are in place to ensure he doesn't get injured. This would be very bad considering he can't really help the Pacers (other than training). (Andy from Chattanooga, Tenn.)

    Answer: You probably had a better view of the situation regarding the clock than anyone at the game. I don't know what the television replays indicated, but there was no way to know for those at courtside how much time was left. I didn't sense there should have been more time on the clock, either.

    I agree, however, that O'Neal had no chance of getting off a shot by coming down with the ball. I expected them to throw the ball at the rim and try to get a tip of some kind.

    I don't think the Pacers will take any precautions regarding Artest. He'll just have to play and hope for the best. Actually, he can withstand an injury more than the other players since he's not playing. Players rarely seem to suffer serious injuries in practice, since they're not as intense as the games.



    Question: I was wondering if you would highlight all the moments between Reggie Miller and Spike Lee. I know from reading Reggie's book (I Love Being the Enemy) that he and Spike are friends. What do you know about the two and why Reggie enjoys knocking down threes in his face whenever he sits courtside? (Aleks from Bloomington, Ind.)

    Answer: Their friendship grew from Miller's playoff moments at Madison Square Garden. I believe it all began with his 25-point fourth quarter in the 1994 playoffs against the Knicks. Lee was heckling from his courtside seat, which only fueled Miller. He responded with the choke sign while looking over at Lee, which was caught on camera and replayed around the world.

    Miller scored eight points in the final 8.9 seconds of a game there the following year right in front of Lee, and hit a 3-pointer to force overtime in a game there in 1998 while scoring 38 points. He also scored 34 points in leading the Game 6 win in New York that clinched the trip to the Finals in 2000. And, he scored 31 points there last season in a November game.

    Miller gets excited playing in any big game, and games in the Garden tend to be bigger. Spike Lee has added to the atmosphere, and their trash-talking in 1994 sparked a relationship that has carried through. So when Lee was sitting courtside for the game in Miami on Saturday and Miller hit those two 3-pointers in the overtime session, it no doubt brought back memories.

    Miller is a superstitious person by nature, so he's no doubt come to like having Lee sit there courtside. Perhaps the Pacers should buy Lee a seat at Conseco Fieldhouse and fly him in for all the games.



    Question: With the trade deadline looming, do you see the Pacers making any moves? (Sergeant from Ofallon, Ill.)

    Answer: I think it's unlikely. It's always unlikely for them, because they prefer to make their deals in the off-season. Donnie Walsh has rarely made deals in February, and the ones he has made all came in losing seasons. Some people believe they should so something to try to fill the void Artest leaves behind, but they aren't likely to do that under these circumstances.

    Like always, they'll do a deal if they think it helps the team. But they seem even more reluctant to do a deal now than usual because they haven't had a chance to reasonably evaluate their needs given all the injuries and suspensions.



    Question: Are there plans for the Pacers to have new uniforms? Also, how many ex-Pacers are coaches in the NBA? (D.C. from Indianapolis)

    Answer: The Pacers will have new uniforms next season, but the design won't be announced until later this season, or perhaps in the off-season. I'm told it hasn't been finalized yet.

    I wrote a story on the ex-Pacers who are coaching two seasons ago and they had more than any other team in the league. I don't know if that's still the case or not, but there are several out there. Among the head coaches are Byron Scott, Sam Mitchell, Herb Williams, Johnny Davis and Scott Skiles. The assistants include Jerry Sichting, Randy Wittman, Alex English, Lester Conner, Sidney Lowe, Adrian Dantley, Kenny Natt and Tony Brown.

    Then there are guys who fall into the category of "special assistants" who don't sit on the bench during games. Chuck Person works with the current Pacers as a special instructor. Duane Ferrell has had a similar job in Washington in recent seasons.



    Question: What do you think Reggie Miller will do at the end of the season? Do you think the brawl will have an effect on his decision? (Gary from Orange Park, Fla.)

    Answer: I don't think the brawl will have an impact on his decision to retire. I think he'll make that decision after the season and base it on how he feels and how he regards the team's future. He told me a few years ago that he didn't want to play past 40 and he turns 40 in August. But there must have been some reason he signed a three-year contract that takes him through next season. I have to believe he wants to leave his options open.

    If he's feeling good and the prospects are bright, I wouldn't be surprised if he returns. It would seem cruel for him if he played 18 years and then retired the year before they won a championship. He's proven this season he can still contribute when given a major role in the offense.



    Question: After watching the past few games it looks like Anthony Johnson is really struggling with his shot and with setting up the offense. Have the Pacers shown any interest in acquiring another backup point guard or in giving Eddie Gill another shot? (Michele from Denver, Colo.)

    Answer: Johnson has been struggling. He's shooting less than 35 percent, which is a little puzzling because he works hard on his shot. In fact, he did the same shooting and workout regimen that Reggie Miller did when both were out with broken hands. Johnson is recovered from his broken shooting hand, but perhaps the injury has affected his psyche.

    I haven't heard that the Pacers are pursuing another point guard, but that has been a weak spot lately. They probably would have to give up one to get another one in a trade, which means another team has to want what they have. Or it could be part of a larger deal. They had interest in Mike James in the off-season, but he was able to command more in the marketplace than they were able to play.



    Question: What is going on with David Harrison? The last time I saw him was the game where he sustained the concussion (I think it was the Memphis game). Is he doing OK? When does the team expect him back in the lineup? (Patrick from Indianapolis)

    Answer: I wrote about this in Sunday's notebook. They are saying he might return for the game against Detroit on Thursday. He's on the injured list and still hasn't rejoined the team in practice. He watched Saturday's game against Washington on the bench in street clothes but I didn't get a chance to talk to him.



    Question: I am completely confused. I read a report that Ron Artest is allowed to practice with the team but is ineligible to play this year or participate in the playoffs. But the report from Sports Illustrated indicates that the Pacers are still hopeful that he will still be able to play this year. How can that be overturned? Are they hoping David Stern will have a change of heart? The arbitrator upheld the decision on Artest and Stephen Jackson. What other avenue can the Pacers take? (Blake from Chandler, Ariz.)

    Answer: As my story in Saturday's paper said, the Pacers are hopeful Artest's suspension will be reduced, but have been given no indication it will happen. They are at the mercy of David Stern on this one, as there appear to be no more legal recourses.



    Question: In the Pacers' 90-87 loss at New Orleans, Jermaine O'Neal tipped in a basket for New Orleans. Does this basket count in the stats (i.e. is it counted in the FG, FGA and PTS columns of the box score)? (Todd from Indianapolis)

    Answer: That basket was credited to Rodney Rogers, who was behind O'Neal along the foul lane and also swatted at the ball.

  • #2
    Re: Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

    "I haven't heard that the Pacers are pursuing another point guard, but that has been a weak spot lately. They probably would have to give up one to get another one in a trade, which means another team has to want what they have. Or it could be part of a larger deal. They had interest in Mike James in the off-season, but he was able to command more in the marketplace than they were able to play."

    Shame, he would have been a decent addition IMO.

    Regards,

    Mourning
    2012 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2011 PD ABA Fantasy Keeper League Champion, sports.ws

    2006 PD ABA Fantasy League runner up, sports.ws

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

      Originally posted by btownpacer
      Where's the bunny? The catchy title?

      You failed me, Will Galen. You failed me.

      But you still had me at "hello".....

      And if Mark takes offence at being called Bunny and takes action against this site?

      Even mild mannered people get up on the wrong side of the bed sometimes. And yes some people would take offence even at being called Bunny.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

        I'd think would kinda like being
        What's wrong with ?
        It's that damn pancake I bet!

        -Bball
        Nuntius was right for a while. I was wrong for a while. But ultimately I was right and Frank Vogel has been let go.

        ------

        "A player who makes a team great is more valuable than a great player. Losing yourself in the group, for the good of the group, that’s teamwork."

        -John Wooden

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Latest Q&A with Mark Montieth. 1-25-05

          Originally posted by Bball
          I'd think would kinda like being
          What's wrong with ?
          It's that damn pancake I bet!

          -Bball
          Okay, can someone explain to me why is ? Is it just the fact he looks like one, or is this another riddle wrapped in an enigma like ?
          Come to the Dark Side -- There's cookies!

          Comment

          Working...
          X