Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

    It’s a combination that is dangerous and we are going to have to be on the lookout for it all year long. Teams know who we are; we are getting their best shot each time we step on the floor. That combined with our sometimes utterly perplexing offensive sets leads to games that are probably closer than they should be.

    The altitude in Utah also does play a factor as you could see early on that Paul George wasn’t getting a lot of lift when he jumped. Also mix that in with him not having a particularly good shooting night (West also had a bad shooting night but was saved by hitting some jumpers in the 4th) and for about half of this game it really looked like that trap game might actually have sprung and trapped away. But the sign of a really good team is that it can plow through rough spells and come away with a win.

    Utah has some decent talent on their team and ultimately I think that Trey Burke is going to be one hell of a player and their big men have real potential. I don’t know what their ceiling is but I do think they can be a decent team in a few years.

    Now having said all of that, and remember I have already said that there were reasons why the Pacers did not play as well as they could/should, if we would have played this way against a better team or a team that could hit the mid range with more success than they did in the second half then the end result might look very different.

    First and foremost Viva Scola. This guy has had a couple of games where he wasn’t an impact player but I’m telling you far more nights he is right there giving you a lot of what you need. Sure I would like for him to spread out the points by half a little more but just the fact that the guy usually single handily ensures that your starters don’t come back into a double digit deficit every half is nothing short of outstanding. Think back to last season and then remind yourself how bad that bench was about scoring any points and now think that on a night like tonight how valuable getting 28 points from your was with Luis getting half of those. He also is always in there on the glass as well and was called for one of the most bogus calls I’ve seen this year.

    For those who didn’t view the game I’ll give you a quick recap. The Jazz started off with a ball of energy, hitting shots and getting into the paint. We looked like we had just received anesthesia and was walking in a daze. They took a decent lead. Paul was apparently affected by the altitude so his answer was to shoot and miss a lot of three’s. Luis came in with the second unit and dropped 10 points on them and generally kept the team in the game. Second half looked a little like the first to start off with but then the switch flipped and our defense went from ordinary NBA defense to “you shall not pass” defense and once again the python continued to squeeze tighter and tighter all the while the Jazz kept struggling and struggling thinking they were making progress only to have C.J. Watson drop Fat Man & Little Boy three point shots on them and then they just accepted their fate and were swallowed to provide nourishment to the Pacers Python.

    Let’s drop some grades

    Paul George: B The grade is probably a little harsh but there were times I felt like he was settling. I guess in the post game he said he was really struggling with the altitude so we’ll believe him and move on. Had a huge, soul crushing steal for an easy basket in the 4th that if you looked closely enough you could actually see the souls of the Utah fan base going out of their body’s. Now I am interrupting this normal grading period to bring you a message from the Peck Broadcasting System (PBS). STOP SHOOTING SO MANY DAMNED THREE POINT SHOTS. We now return you to your normal grading period.

    David West: B I guess his game in L.A. took more out of him than we thought it did. Second game in a row that he has zero free throw attempts, to me that is a sign (not always a true sign but a sign nonetheless) that you are just not playing down low in the paint. Now some of this is by design but some of it is not. Obviously both he and Roy can’t be in the post at the same time so David being out top makes sense seeing as how he can hit that shot but also he is a very under rated passer. But there were a few times that he could have put the ball on the floor and gotten in the paint and IMO gotten some contact and drew a foul. But that’s just me. He played decent defense and almost had a double/double himself but in the more rare points and assists for a power forward.

    Roy Hibbert: B+ We really need to make more of an effort to let him get some shots out west as his % is high and it slows the game down which is by far to our advantage. He was 6-9 from the floor tonight and I’m wondering why he only got up 9 shots. Hell Paul George almost took that many three point shots. Did a decent job on the boards but I would like to have seen him get a few more. I am concerned a little that teams now have had time to scout us that they are starting to draw Roy away from his man and work the PnR leaving Roy scrambling on defense, hence fouling out. We will certainly need him in tip top shape if we have any hope at all this weekend.

    Lance Stephenson: A- Very balanced game and a very mature game from him. Other lesser mentally stable player’s coughartestcough would have continued to pursue triple doubles because of all the attention that it garnered both locally and the national media. However to Lance’s credit he came right out went to work and still played very solid defense. However due to his on court antics and frankly his trash talking to opponents he is now the beneficiary of official scrutiny. It could be a combination of things first Lance being Lance but it could also be that this was the Scot Foster crew that gave Lance his last technical. But what he did IMO did not merit a technical, that was a “we are going to control you T” the irony is that Lance actually never usually needs to be controlled other than sometimes he has to be controlled by our own coach. But no Scott Foster just likes doing his Boris Badenov imitation whenever we play them. He’s nowhere near as bad as Crawford but I dislike him in his own unique way.

    George Hill: B I hate saying this but there were times I forgot he was playing. I’m not sure what it was he did or didn’t do that made me overlook him all night but honestly I just don’t remember much of anything he did. He shot no foul shots so that makes me upset that he wasn’t driving, actually I do remember his two drives to the rim after hard cuts (those were nice) but with ball in hand I don’t remember him driving making the defense ever react to him. Like it much better when we attack the rim.

    Luis Scola: A Exactly what you want out of your backup power forward. He is even better at defense than what I even thought he was. Him hitting that face up jumper is just money in the bank a lot of time and it has saved our bacon on more than once occasion this year. When C.J. is going with him our bench can be an asset. Ian has been disappointing on this west coast trip as he has not allowed Roy much of a break at all and when he has been in it usually is the weak spot on the floor. But thankfully Luis has been there to pick up the slack.

    C.J. Watson: B Hit big shots when it counted. In fact he really put a world of hurt on the Jazz with those two big three’s because I am pretty sure he helped stop a run both times by them. Decent defense and I like the fact that he actually has made a point the last couple of games of driving to the rim.

    Orlando Johnson: C I know that he probably deserves more than this but honestly to me this was just a “meh” game from him. I think he is capable of much more particularly when he gets this many min. in a game.

    Ian Mahinmi: C- Hit the gym. I don’t remember him being muscled around as much as he has been the past three games. Again another game in which he has as many fouls as he does points or rebounds. We really need him to step up a little as Roy needs some solid rest as the season goes on.

    Now comes the hell part of our schedule. We haven’t won in San Antonio since before Facebook was invented and our overall winning % against them since 99 is beyond abysmal. Sadly they exploit the one giant weakness we have. They can hit that pull up 15-18’ jumper off of the pick and roll and they have an ultra fast point guard who can burn our interior. All hands will have to be on deck and nobody is going to be able to have a down night.

    In honor of our vanquished foe let us pay tribute by giving them some Jazz…Jeff that it.



    Basketball isn't played with computers, spreadsheets, and simulations. ChicagoJ 4/21/13

  • #2
    Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

    Nine games in 15 days!
    We've lost our legs.

    And now the schedule starts to get tough.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

      Originally posted by Peck View Post
      David West: B I guess his game in L.A. took more out of him than we thought it did. Second game in a row that he has zero free throw attempts, to me that is a sign (not always a true sign but a sign nonetheless) that you are just not playing down low in the paint. Now some of this is by design but some of it is not. Obviously both he and Roy can’t be in the post at the same time so David being out top makes sense seeing as how he can hit that shot but also he is a very under rated passer. But there were a few times that he could have put the ball on the floor and gotten in the paint and IMO gotten some contact and drew a foul. But that’s just me. He played decent defense and almost had a double/double himself but in the more rare points and assists for a power forward.
      Is that you Quinn Buckner?

      Thanks Peck, for being back with your Odd Thoughts..I noticed that one of the first things i thought this morning was to check out PD after breakfast to start the day the well..So yes im expecting it again :P
      Proud owner of 'Dutch Pacers'

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

        C. J.'s important play down the stretch again made me wonder why he didn't play down the stretch against Portland. Allegedly we needed a bigger body to guard Matthews, but maybe GHill could have tried to cover him. Or, let C. J. try and if it doesn't work, then put in OJ. But players who play clutch should be given a shot over untested players.
        "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

          I will not predict we will beat the Spurs, but I will predict we will play one of our best games of the season. Problem is against them it might not be good enough

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

            I really think as Peck pointed out that against some of the more offensively adept teams the Pacers need to slow the pace down, possibly to a crawl.
            {o,o}
            |)__)
            -"-"-

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

              I love when Lance dribbles into the inside, draws attention, and then dishes it out to Scola for a wide open jumper that he nails. It seems like that's happened about 200 times this year. Great chemistry between those two.

              D. West was obviously tired, but he made up for it with some nice passing and hit some big jumpers in the second half.

              I wish Roy would have got more shots too. However, he did get quite a few in Portland, but blew several relatively easy shots after getting great position against Lopez. He did have 16 points in that game, but I felt he should have had even more considering the position he was getting. Regardless, I do wish we could find a way to consistently get him more involved in the offense.

              PG looked tired and reminded me of Kobe when he's forcing things.

              Watson continues to look like a very solid bench addition. Those threes were nice.

              Loved the halftime segment about Lance with the quotes from Bird about his hard work. Lance has a top 5 all time player mentoring him, which is a hell of an opportunity.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                In the first half the pacers looked like they didn't want to expend the energy needed to win the game . I loved the comment by Dan Burke at halftime. They were playing "nice try" defense. Sort of like a pickup game when you tell someone nice try, means to me someone who is half efforting and gambling, taking short cuts. That was the pacers last night in the first half.
                Last edited by Unclebuck; 12-05-2013, 12:50 PM.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                  1) Scola's spot is with a toe on the top of the key. Shots from there are magic.

                  2) Lance reined himself in game-wise but really needs to start keeping his emotions under control. I think he thought he was flinging the ball over his shoulder at the basket when he got that T, but with the way everyone was shooting it's no wonder it went haywire...

                  3) I will be very interested in how DWest does in San Antonio. I felt a little better after his contributions in the 4th quarter, but up to that point he was Zombie David.

                  4) I'd love to see another post play besides the "Roy gets the ball in the low post and PG cuts between him and the baseline before doing anything" play. Defenses are starting to squeeze Roy toward the baseline specifically to cut off that lane, making it useless because if Roy actually gave the ball to a cutting PG it would be an out of bounds turnover.
                  BillS

                  A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                  Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                    Ty Corbin should be fired for not starting the Favors/Kanter front court every game this year. He's been going with Williams/Favors and going small and the only reaosn he went big last night was because Williams was hurt.

                    Favors/Kanter is a fantastic front court on both ends. They will not play that well every night, but they will be BIG every night and they are more talented than just about 3 or 4 front courts in the NBA.


                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                      Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                      Ty Corbin should be fired for not starting the Favors/Kanter front court every game this year. He's been going with Williams/Favors and going small and the only reaosn he went big last night was because Williams was hurt.

                      Favors/Kanter is a fantastic front court on both ends. They will not play that well every night, but they will be BIG every night and they are more talented than just about 3 or 4 front courts in the NBA.
                      The Jazz remind of the JOB-era Pacers. They finally have a nice collection of talent that's being misused, and their coach doesn't get it and never will.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                        Originally posted by imawhat View Post
                        The Jazz remind of the JOB-era Pacers. They finally have a nice collection of talent that's being misused, and their coach doesn't get it and never will.
                        Thank god for Frank Vogel and Jerry Sloan resigning when he did (Corbin was one of the names supposedly on the shortlist when the former head coach of the Pacers was fired).
                        "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

                        "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                          Originally posted by Trader Joe View Post
                          Ty Corbin should be fired for not starting the Favors/Kanter front court every game this year. He's been going with Williams/Favors and going small and the only reaosn he went big last night was because Williams was hurt.

                          Favors/Kanter is a fantastic front court on both ends. They will not play that well every night, but they will be BIG every night and they are more talented than just about 3 or 4 front courts in the NBA.
                          Zach Lowe wrote about this very subject the other day. Here's a short snippet of why they haven't been playing together much recently:

                          The Jazz have scored just 84.2 points per 100 possessions with both Kanter and Derrick Favors on the floor, a mark so unthinkably awful that Tyrone Corbin had to swap Kanter out of the starting lineup in favor of the stretchier Williams.
                          http://www.grantland.com/story/_/id/...leap-greatness

                          It could be that now having Burke in the lineup changes that dynamic so they should probably experiment more with it. I don't think it was necessarily coaching incompetence though, but more of a desperation move for a 1-13 team at the time that had a combination that didn't seem to be working well early.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                            Yeah but as you pointed out, Burke wasn't around for that whole stretch. Coach needs to be aware of how adding a competent PG can help.


                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Odd Thoughts: All that Jazz

                              Jazz will have a nice core when they trade Kanter for a young small forward and draft Randle at #3.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X