Announcement

Collapse

The Rules of Pacers Digest

Hello everyone,

Whether your are a long standing forum member or whether you have just registered today, it's a good idea to read and review the rules below so that you have a very good idea of what to expect when you come to Pacers Digest.

A quick note to new members: Your posts will not immediately show up when you make them. An administrator has to approve at least your first post before the forum software will later upgrade your account to the status of a fully-registered member. This usually happens within a couple of hours or so after your post(s) is/are approved, so you may need to be a little patient at first.

Why do we do this? So that it's more difficult for spammers (be they human or robot) to post, and so users who are banned cannot immediately re-register and start dousing people with verbal flames.

Below are the rules of Pacers Digest. After you have read them, you will have a very good sense of where we are coming from, what we expect, what we don't want to see, and how we react to things.

Rule #1

Pacers Digest is intended to be a place to discuss basketball without having to deal with the kinds of behaviors or attitudes that distract people from sticking with the discussion of the topics at hand. These unwanted distractions can come in many forms, and admittedly it can sometimes be tricky to pin down each and every kind that can rear its ugly head, but we feel that the following examples and explanations cover at least a good portion of that ground and should at least give people a pretty good idea of the kinds of things we actively discourage:

"Anyone who __________ is a liar / a fool / an idiot / a blind homer / has their head buried in the sand / a blind hater / doesn't know basketball / doesn't watch the games"

"People with intelligence will agree with me when I say that __________"

"Only stupid people think / believe / do ___________"

"I can't wait to hear something from PosterX when he/she sees that **insert a given incident or current event that will have probably upset or disappointed PosterX here**"

"He/she is just delusional"

"This thread is stupid / worthless / embarrassing"

"I'm going to take a moment to point and / laugh at PosterX / GroupOfPeopleY who thought / believed *insert though/belief here*"

"Remember when PosterX said OldCommentY that no longer looks good? "

In general, if a comment goes from purely on topic to something 'ad hominem' (personal jabs, personal shots, attacks, flames, however you want to call it, towards a person, or a group of people, or a given city/state/country of people), those are most likely going to be found intolerable.

We also dissuade passive aggressive behavior. This can be various things, but common examples include statements that are basically meant to imply someone is either stupid or otherwise incapable of holding a rational conversation. This can include (but is not limited to) laughing at someone's conclusions rather than offering an honest rebuttal, asking people what game they were watching, or another common problem is Poster X will say "that player isn't that bad" and then Poster Y will say something akin to "LOL you think that player is good". We're not going to tolerate those kinds of comments out of respect for the community at large and for the sake of trying to just have an honest conversation.

Now, does the above cover absolutely every single kind of distraction that is unwanted? Probably not, but you should by now have a good idea of the general types of things we will be discouraging. The above examples are meant to give you a good feel for / idea of what we're looking for. If something new or different than the above happens to come along and results in the same problem (that being, any other attitude or behavior that ultimately distracts from actually just discussing the topic at hand, or that is otherwise disrespectful to other posters), we can and we will take action to curb this as well, so please don't take this to mean that if you managed to technically avoid saying something exactly like one of the above examples that you are then somehow off the hook.

That all having been said, our goal is to do so in a generally kind and respectful way, and that doesn't mean the moment we see something we don't like that somebody is going to be suspended or banned, either. It just means that at the very least we will probably say something about it, quite possibly snipping out the distracting parts of the post in question while leaving alone the parts that are actually just discussing the topics, and in the event of a repeating or excessive problem, then we will start issuing infractions to try to further discourage further repeat problems, and if it just never seems to improve, then finally suspensions or bans will come into play. We would prefer it never went that far, and most of the time for most of our posters, it won't ever have to.

A slip up every once and a while is pretty normal, but, again, when it becomes repetitive or excessive, something will be done. Something occasional is probably going to be let go (within reason), but when it starts to become habitual or otherwise a pattern, odds are very good that we will step in.

There's always a small minority that like to push people's buttons and/or test their own boundaries with regards to the administrators, and in the case of someone acting like that, please be aware that this is not a court of law, but a private website run by people who are simply trying to do the right thing as they see it. If we feel that you are a special case that needs to be dealt with in an exceptional way because your behavior isn't explicitly mirroring one of our above examples of what we generally discourage, we can and we will take atypical action to prevent this from continuing if you are not cooperative with us.

Also please be aware that you will not be given a pass simply by claiming that you were 'only joking,' because quite honestly, when someone really is just joking, for one thing most people tend to pick up on the joke, including the person or group that is the target of the joke, and for another thing, in the event where an honest joke gets taken seriously and it upsets or angers someone, the person who is truly 'only joking' will quite commonly go out of his / her way to apologize and will try to mend fences. People who are dishonest about their statements being 'jokes' do not do so, and in turn that becomes a clear sign of what is really going on. It's nothing new.

In any case, quite frankly, the overall quality and health of the entire forum's community is more important than any one troublesome user will ever be, regardless of exactly how a problem is exhibiting itself, and if it comes down to us having to make a choice between you versus the greater health and happiness of the entire community, the community of this forum will win every time.

Lastly, there are also some posters, who are generally great contributors and do not otherwise cause any problems, who sometimes feel it's their place to provoke or to otherwise 'mess with' that small minority of people described in the last paragraph, and while we possibly might understand why you might feel you WANT to do something like that, the truth is we can't actually tolerate that kind of behavior from you any more than we can tolerate the behavior from them. So if we feel that you are trying to provoke those other posters into doing or saying something that will get themselves into trouble, then we will start to view you as a problem as well, because of the same reason as before: The overall health of the forum comes first, and trying to stir the pot with someone like that doesn't help, it just makes it worse. Some will simply disagree with this philosophy, but if so, then so be it because ultimately we have to do what we think is best so long as it's up to us.

If you see a problem that we haven't addressed, the best and most appropriate course for a forum member to take here is to look over to the left of the post in question. See underneath that poster's name, avatar, and other info, down where there's a little triangle with an exclamation point (!) in it? Click that. That allows you to report the post to the admins so we can definitely notice it and give it a look to see what we feel we should do about it. Beyond that, obviously it's human nature sometimes to want to speak up to the poster in question who has bothered you, but we would ask that you try to refrain from doing so because quite often what happens is two or more posters all start going back and forth about the original offending post, and suddenly the entire thread is off topic or otherwise derailed. So while the urge to police it yourself is understandable, it's best to just report it to us and let us handle it. Thank you!

All of the above is going to be subject to a case by case basis, but generally and broadly speaking, this should give everyone a pretty good idea of how things will typically / most often be handled.

Rule #2

If the actions of an administrator inspire you to make a comment, criticism, or express a concern about it, there is a wrong place and a couple of right places to do so.

The wrong place is to do so in the original thread in which the administrator took action. For example, if a post gets an infraction, or a post gets deleted, or a comment within a larger post gets clipped out, in a thread discussing Paul George, the wrong thing to do is to distract from the discussion of Paul George by adding your off topic thoughts on what the administrator did.

The right places to do so are:

A) Start a thread about the specific incident you want to talk about on the Feedback board. This way you are able to express yourself in an area that doesn't throw another thread off topic, and this way others can add their two cents as well if they wish, and additionally if there's something that needs to be said by the administrators, that is where they will respond to it.

B) Send a private message to the administrators, and they can respond to you that way.

If this is done the wrong way, those comments will be deleted, and if it's a repeating problem then it may also receive an infraction as well.

Rule #3

If a poster is bothering you, and an administrator has not or will not deal with that poster to the extent that you would prefer, you have a powerful tool at your disposal, one that has recently been upgraded and is now better than ever: The ability to ignore a user.

When you ignore a user, you will unfortunately still see some hints of their existence (nothing we can do about that), however, it does the following key things:

A) Any post they make will be completely invisible as you scroll through a thread.

B) The new addition to this feature: If someone QUOTES a user you are ignoring, you do not have to read who it was, or what that poster said, unless you go out of your way to click on a link to find out who it is and what they said.

To utilize this feature, from any page on Pacers Digest, scroll to the top of the page, look to the top right where it says 'Settings' and click that. From the settings page, look to the left side of the page where it says 'My Settings', and look down from there until you see 'Edit Ignore List' and click that. From here, it will say 'Add a Member to Your List...' Beneath that, click in the text box to the right of 'User Name', type in or copy & paste the username of the poster you are ignoring, and once their name is in the box, look over to the far right and click the 'Okay' button. All done!

Rule #4

Regarding infractions, currently they carry a value of one point each, and that point will expire in 31 days. If at any point a poster is carrying three points at the same time, that poster will be suspended until the oldest of the three points expires.

Rule #5

When you share or paste content or articles from another website, you must include the URL/link back to where you found it, who wrote it, and what website it's from. Said content will be removed if this doesn't happen.

An example:

If I copy and paste an article from the Indianapolis Star website, I would post something like this:

http://www.linktothearticlegoeshere.com/article
Title of the Article
Author's Name
Indianapolis Star

Rule #6

We cannot tolerate illegal videos on Pacers Digest. This means do not share any links to them, do not mention any websites that host them or link to them, do not describe how to find them in any way, and do not ask about them. Posts doing anything of the sort will be removed, the offenders will be contacted privately, and if the problem becomes habitual, you will be suspended, and if it still persists, you will probably be banned.

The legal means of watching or listening to NBA games are NBA League Pass Broadband (for US, or for International; both cost money) and NBA Audio League Pass (which is free). Look for them on NBA.com.

Rule #7

Provocative statements in a signature, or as an avatar, or as the 'tagline' beneath a poster's username (where it says 'Member' or 'Administrator' by default, if it is not altered) are an unwanted distraction that will more than likely be removed on sight. There can be shades of gray to this, but in general this could be something political or religious that is likely going to provoke or upset people, or otherwise something that is mean-spirited at the expense of a poster, a group of people, or a population.

It may or may not go without saying, but this goes for threads and posts as well, particularly when it's not made on the off-topic board (Market Square).

We do make exceptions if we feel the content is both innocuous and unlikely to cause social problems on the forum (such as wishing someone a Merry Christmas or a Happy Easter), and we also also make exceptions if such topics come up with regards to a sports figure (such as the Lance Stephenson situation bringing up discussions of domestic abuse and the law, or when Jason Collins came out as gay and how that lead to some discussion about gay rights).

However, once the discussion seems to be more/mostly about the political issues instead of the sports figure or his specific situation, the thread is usually closed.

Rule #8

We prefer self-restraint and/or modesty when making jokes or off topic comments in a sports discussion thread. They can be fun, but sometimes they derail or distract from a topic, and we don't want to see that happen. If we feel it is a problem, we will either delete or move those posts from the thread.

Rule #9

Generally speaking, we try to be a "PG-13" rated board, and we don't want to see sexual content or similarly suggestive content. Vulgarity is a more muddled issue, though again we prefer things to lean more towards "PG-13" than "R". If we feel things have gone too far, we will step in.

Rule #10

We like small signatures, not big signatures. The bigger the signature, the more likely it is an annoying or distracting signature.

Rule #11

Do not advertise anything without talking about it with the administrators first. This includes advertising with your signature, with your avatar, through private messaging, and/or by making a thread or post.
See more
See less

Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

    http://www.cbssports.com/nba/writer/...s-another-shot

    NDIANAPOLIS -- Larry Bird sits quietly in the stands watching practice, peering down through basketball eyes that have seen so much. Sometimes, he stands and leans on a railing, stretching his chronically achy back. His eyes, though -- squinty, a little droopy -- never avert their Hall of Fame gaze from the action on the court below.

    Bird is back in his element, back running the only team he wanted to run. A year off has rejuvenated him, has reminded him of a fact he probably should've already known.

    "If you're a lifer, you're a lifer," Bird told CBSSports.com in a quiet moment after practice last week.

    Bird is a lifer, all right; a private man who knows there is no use fighting the awkward bond between his small-town roots and his life's work in the public eye. He has returned after a year off to reclaim his perch as president of the Indiana Pacers, an outcome he truly didn't foresee when he left.

    "I never dreamed I'd be back, especially so quick," Bird said. "But I thought that's the best thing that I've done in a long time -- get away from it, refresh, watch the team play."

    He is watching the team play in person now, watching his offseason handiwork take shape. So far, even the instinctively diffident Bird has to admit he likes what he sees.

    "Of course, any time you've got a better team, it makes it a lot easier," Bird said. "But not only that, we've got good guys. These guys are so good to be around. It's like you never left."

    In the summer of 2012, after winning the NBA's executive of the year award, Bird had to step away from the game that has been in his blood since he first lofted a basketball toward a hoop in his native French Lick, Ind. He was burned out, in constant agony from the back problems that brought his Hall of Fame playing career to an end. There were other challenges that Bird, ever the introvert, describes only as "health issues."

    "It wasn't hard," Bird said in a rare moment of reflection about his decision to leave the Pacers. "I knew we had a good team, that the team was pretty well set."

    Bird, 56, spent time in Florida and at his beloved southern Indiana ranch. He watched almost every Pacers game last season, filing some mental notes into his encyclopedic basketball mind.

    After a while, teams started calling Pacers owner Herb Simon. What's going on with Larry? Can we talk to him? One such team was the Sacramento Kings, and after a brief but serious flirtation, Bird and Simon began the dialogue that ultimately led him back to Indiana, where he belonged.

    "I guess when the other owners started calling my owner up and started asking questions, that's when he called me and said, ‘Look, I want you back here,'" Bird said. "'I'd rather you be here than anywhere else.'"

    In the end, nothing that Bird tried during his year hiatus -- personal appearances, a little corporate work -- could replace his burning obsession with the game, his need for the competition. The final push for a reunion with the Pacers came from Frank Vogel, the unproven, 30-something assistant Bird had promoted to head coach after firing Jim O'Brien late in the 2010-11 season.

    On his first day back at work following a brief vacation, on the heels of Indiana's Game 7 loss to Miami in the Eastern Conference finals, Vogel traveled to Bird's ranch and made his pitch.

    "I went down and spent some time with him hoping I could nudge him a little bit to understand what we're building here and get him to want to be a part of it," said Vogel, now 40. "He affects what we do here in so many ways."

    Donnie Walsh, who had returned to the Pacers a year earlier after a three-year stint running the Knicks, agreed to stay on in an advisory role when Bird returned as president. Suddenly, the pieces were coming back together for another run at the Heat.

    Bird and Walsh, possessing a sizeable percentage of the Hoosier state's collective basketball knowledge between them, would be Vogel's two-sided sounding board -- a kettle drum of information that Vogel could tap any time. The skilled Kevin Pritchard would execute the vision as the GM, along with rising front-office stars Peter Dinwiddie and Ryan Carr.

    "Things haven't really changed much," Bird said.

    The core pieces Bird had assembled -- a blossoming star in Paul George through the draft, George Hill and Roy Hibbert through trades and David West via a rare foray into high-level free agency -- have remained. The Pacers retained West this past summer with a three-year, $36 million deal. With little fanfare, George committed to a five-year extension that could be worth as much as $90 million.

    After falling to Miami in six games in the 2012 conference semifinals, the team Bird left behind had succumbed to the Heat again -- one round and one game closer to the Finals. Bird watched it all unfold from afar and knew that the core he'd assembled needed help.

    "When I was sitting there last year I was saying, 'Man, they need a stronger bench, a more consistent bench,'" Bird said. "Soon as I got back, I started pinpointing guys I wanted to go after."

    The first name on the list was C.J. Watson, a backup point guard capable of maintaining order when Hill went to the bench. Bird's initial inquiries were that the price for Knicks free agent Chris Copeland would be too high -- until Copeland's agent called and said he wanted to be in Indiana.

    "The price went down within a range that I could afford," Bird said.

    Bird has never been one to trade draft picks; in the small-market reality in which he lives, they're too valuable. But with the Pacers so close to title contention, Bird deviated from his playbook and sent a first-round pick to Phoenix as part of a deal for Luis Scola.

    "I've always liked Scola, always been after Scola," Bird said. "I made some calls knowing the price might be steep, but still feel like we got a good deal out of it."


    Far from Bird's small-market comfort zone, the Nets loaded up with luxuries few teams, if any, can afford -- a star-studded roster with a luxury tax bill that will exceed most teams' entire payrolls this season. The Knicks doubled down on the prolific but thus far title-less talents of Carmelo Anthony, casting off a first-round pick for Andrea Bargnani. A team like the Pacers would have to demand a pick in return just to absorb such a contract.

    "Every collective bargaining agreement, they try and do whatever they can to make it a level playing field," Bird said. "But it's never going to be that way. You've got major markets that can go out and spend a lot of money on one player, and if he doesn't pan out, they just sit there and go get another one. We can't do that. But I knew coming in here what we were up against. ... I chose to be here, I know our limitations and I know what we can do and can't do."

    Bird has never been a win-the-trade-on-paper executive; he trusts his eyes and his gut over analytics. In that respect, so much changed in the GM ranks in the year that Bird was away. Young, advanced stats-minded executives have been installed all over the league as teams try to copy the blueprint set forth by Daryl Morey in Houston and Sam Presti in Oklahoma City. Former players running teams -- Bird, Joe Dumars, Pat Riley -- are being squeezed out by number crunchers and former agents.

    "I came from the group of Jerry West, Rod Thorn and all those guys," Bird said. "Even when I first took over when Donnie left, I could call those guys up and ask their opinion -- not really on players, but different things. We shared information. But now with so many new guys, you really don't know ‘em. You know who they are, but you really don't know 'em.

    "And I don't know if they get nervous, but they don't talk a lot, ya know?" Bird said. "Some of these guys I never heard of because they come from different backgrounds."

    One thing about Bird's job has not changed, and it's a fact of pro basketball that has endured since his playing days: The contenders load up and take their shots at the team that's on top. You build your roster and your culture with the goal of getting past the team that's in your way. When Bird played with the Celtics, it was the Sixers, Pistons, Lakers and others. For Bird the executive, it's the Heat.

    "First of all, they've got the best player in the world," Bird said. "But they're a tax team. They'll spend a little bit more to get the players they want and they've got players that want to go there and play -- pretty good players for a lot less money. That makes it tough, but that's just part of the game. I've always said, the favorite is going to be the team that has the best player. ... They deserve to be No. 1 until somebody takes 'em off that spot."

    In the end, that's why Larry Bird is back. Refreshed and invigorated, Bird has brought his full arsenal of basketball instincts and guile to bear on the problem at hand -- the team that's in his way. Just like the old days.

    If you're a lifer, you know, you're a lifer.
    "Nobody wants to play against Tyler Hansbrough NO BODY!" ~ Frank Vogel

    "And David put his hand in the bag and took out a stone and slung it. And it struck the Philistine on the head and he fell to the ground. Amen. "

  • #2
    Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

    Ken Berger is one of my favorite writers. Nice article.

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

      Originally posted by Unclebuck View Post
      Ken Berger is one of my favorite writers. Nice article.
      So a free agent did take less to come to Indiana then...
      Nothing in life worth having comes easy.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

        If Frank is ever out of an NBA job, I need to invent something that man can go out and sell...
        "Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better." - Albert Camus

        "Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well." - Voltaire

        "Everyone's values are defined by what they will tolerate when it is done to others." - William Greider

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

          "And I don't know if they get nervous, but they don't talk a lot, ya know?" Bird said.
          This is interesting. I never think of Bird as the chatty type, but he's complaining that the new GMs can't have a casual conversation.
          "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

            he trusts his eyes and his gut over analytics.
            Intuition over integers!
            "Look, it's up to me to put a team around ... Lance right now." —Kevin Pritchard press conference

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

              Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
              This is interesting. I never think of Bird as the chatty type, but he's complaining that the new GMs can't have a casual conversation.
              At least not without their analytics charts in front of them. I agree with Bird's way. Trust your eyes and your gut, not what some spreadsheet tells you.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                Originally posted by McKeyFan View Post
                This is interesting. I never think of Bird as the chatty type, but he's complaining that the new GMs can't have a casual conversation.
                I took that to mean that the new GMs aren't part of the old boys' club of former players that Bird easily relates to.

                Funny thing, back when Walsh and Bird were doing the 2-headed monster thing, didn't we hear reports that the older GMs would still call Walsh while the younger ones preferred to deal with Bird? Or am I misremembering it?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                  Bird and Walsh, possessing a sizeable percentage of the Hoosier state's collective basketball knowledge between them, would be Vogel's two-sided sounding board -

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                    "I never dreamed I'd be back, especially so quick"
                    So not even Bird thought he was coming back, interesting that I got trashed by some people here for thinking the same thing
                    @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                      Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                      So not even Bird thought he was coming back, interesting that I got trashed by some people here for thinking the same thing
                      lol.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                        Originally posted by vnzla81 View Post
                        So not even Bird thought he was coming back, interesting that I got trashed by some people here for thinking the same thing
                        Well, no, you didn't think he wasn't coming back, you were absolutely certain he wasn't coming back, to the point that anyone who thought he was coming back was a fool for thinking so.

                        See the difference there?
                        BillS

                        A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
                        Or throw in a first-round pick and flip it for a max-level point guard...

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                          Originally posted by BillS View Post
                          Well, no, you didn't think he wasn't coming back, you were absolutely certain he wasn't coming back, to the point that anyone who thought he was coming back was a fool for thinking so.

                          See the difference there?
                          No difference at all.
                          @WhatTheFFacts: Studies show that sarcasm enhances the ability of the human mind to solve complex problems!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                            Originally posted by BillS View Post
                            Well, no, you didn't think he wasn't coming back, you were absolutely certain he wasn't coming back, to the point that anyone who thought he was coming back was a fool for thinking so.

                            See the difference there?
                            I don't understand why posters such as yourself get on vnzla's case about this. He was right before he became wrong. This is indisputable! In fact, if Bird hadn't come back, he'd still be right. That's on Larry Bird, not vnzla. If you're going to try to use logic and common sense, choose another target.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Ken Berger: Larry Bird back in the game, gives Pacers another shot

                              Originally posted by LoneGranger33 View Post
                              I don't understand why posters such as yourself get on vnzla's case about this. He was right before he became wrong. This is indisputable! In fact, if Bird hadn't come back, he'd still be right. That's on Larry Bird, not vnzla. If you're going to try to use logic and common sense, choose another target.
                              How was he right before he was wrong? They said he was taking a year hiatus and he did. Not much room for interpretation there.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X