Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

  1. #1
    Mjolnir Diamond Dave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Crawfordsville
    Age
    28
    Posts
    2,175
    Mood

    Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Unhappy Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    Wednesday, January 12, 2005

    By Len Pasquarelli
    ESPN.com
    Barring a miraculous, and unexpected, recovery, the Indianapolis Colts will be without standout situational pass rusher Robert Mathis for Sunday's divisional-round game with the New England Patriots at Gillette Stadium.


    Robert Mathis
    Defensive End
    Indianapolis Colts
    Profile


    2004 SEASON STATISTICS
    Tot Ast Solo FF Sack Int
    23 21 2 6 11 0




    One-half of the NFL's most prolific sack tandem, Mathis suffered a sprained knee ligament very late in last Sunday's wild-card rout of the Denver Broncos, and the second-year veteran is listed as "doubtful" on the NFL's official injury report.


    By definition, that means there is only a 25 percent chance that Mathis will play. In truth, however, the odds may be even slimmer than that, and Indianapolis does not expect him to be available. It is not known whether Mathis could play in the AFC Championship Game on Jan. 23, should Indianapolis win at Foxboro on Sunday.


    "I don't know how long he'll be out," Colts team president Bill Polian said. "He's a fast healer, but he's certainly a force and it's difficult not to have him."


    Mathis, 23, registered 10 sacks during the regular season, the 13th most in the league. With the NFL-best 16 sacks posted by right end Dwight Freeney, the Colts had the top sack duet in the league. Certainly the pair composed an effective upfield tandem that brought considerable pressure from the defensive edges.


    A fifth-round choice in the 2003 draft, Mathis is the kind of undersized but extremely quick lineman that Colts coach Tony Dungy prefers. At only about 240 pounds, he still plays with natural leverage and, in his second season, began to develop techniques that go beyond just his innate physical qualities.


    It should be noted, though, that in his last six games, including the playoff victory over the Broncos, he had just one sack. Mathis has only 2 sacks in his last eight outings.


    The absence of Mathis will force the Colts to shuffle their "nickel" pass rush package. In the third-down front Indianapolis uses most often, Mathis aligns at left end. Starting left end Raheem Brock then moves inside to tackle. Indianapolis might now use Brock outside, or might slide Brad Scioli or recently signed Nick Rogers
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  2. #2
    ImReppinBtown
    Guest

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    That realy sucks, especially since Freeney and Mathis are just about guranteed to put constant presure on Brady. Freeney and the rest of the line will have to step up in Mathis' abscense.

  3. #3
    realtyczar
    Guest

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    Quote Originally Posted by ImReppinBtown
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    That realy sucks, especially since Freeney and Mathis are just about guranteed to put constant presure on Brady. Freeney and the rest of the line will have to step up in Mathis' abscense.

    Think about what you just said, and then think about our Defense!

    With that said, I still feel we can win!

    Go Colts!

  4. #4
    ImReppinBtown
    Guest

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    haha hey theres no doubt in my mind that we're going to win, but with mathis gone that just weakens our chances, go colts!

  5. #5
    Fat, Drunk and Stupid Lord Helmet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Richmond, IN
    Age
    24
    Posts
    15,669

    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    Mathis?Not playing?
    Super Bowl XLI Champions
    2000 Eastern Conference Champions





  6. #6
    canyoufeelit
    Guest

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    you usually have to double-team Seymour, yeah losing mathis sucks, but them losing seymour sucks a lot more for them

  7. #7
    Member indytoad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Age
    30
    Posts
    2,503

    Default Re: Looks like they won't have Seymor, but we won't have Mathis

    I thought Seymour was only 'questionable.'

    Which sounds to me like Belichick trying to screw with everybody.

    IndyToad
    Look fresh

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •